ML20199G116

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Results of Review of Allegation Items 17,2 & 9,per 850503 Request.No Action Required by Technical Review Team
ML20199G116
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 06/11/1986
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250079
Download: ML20199G116 (2)


Text

(

n.

A

  • 7 UNITED STATES T-8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

r, wasMincrow. o. c.20ssa

[

\\..... )g MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan Director Comanche Peak Project I

FROM:.

Herbert H. Livennore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS I

j' As requested in your letter of May '3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These l

three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

?

I Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on i

each hanger inspection."

This testimony was not related to the TRT, but involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor Smith and Gilbert).

No TRT action required.

Item No. 2:

"ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

Root."

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months but was not rejected.,The TRT had already looked

.{

at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

]

No TRT action required.

j Item No. 9:

"NRC was not finding the problem."

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."

"NRC was not monitoring construction."

khetestimonyindicatesthatthesubjectwas i

Region IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT.

No TRT action reqtired.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, and the other one has already been addressed.

8606250079 860611 W

  1. L h _.

PDR FOIA Herbert H. Livermore ARDE85-59 PDR QA/QC Group Leader 2

cc:

C. Poslusny

<-....n.+mm.-m.,,,-__

,..,,m

.,., - - ~.-,--v, y, _..-

m-m-

':.=

'/

UNITED STATES i

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

l g

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i

\\,...../

t a

MEMORAh0VM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:.

' Herbert H. Livermore h

QA/QC Group Leader 1

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS l

i I

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three~ items were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These i

three items (Nos.17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

l l

Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on j

each hanger inspection."

)

i This testimony was not related to the TRT, but i

involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor, Smith and Gilbert).

3 No TRT action required.

j Item No. 2:

"ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

l Rcot."

1 1

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months

?

but was not rejected..The TRT had already looked j

at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQS).

{

~

{.

IfoTRTactionrequired.

j Item No. 9:

"NRC was not finding the problem."

j "NRC was not investigating all allegations."

"NRC was not monitoring construction."

i The testimony indicates that the subject was Region IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT.

)

No TRT action required.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, j

and the other one has already been addressed.

Wf

<4u< c% _

i Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader 1

cc:

C. Poslusny 4

=

_ _ _