ML20141F702
| ML20141F702 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 04/09/1986 |
| From: | Tam P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-62942, NUDOCS 8604230132 | |
| Download: ML20141F702 (6) | |
Text
'
April 9,1986 Docket No. 50-412 Distribution:
Dockit~Ilor50-412 local ~PDR" ~ ~ '"'C ACRS (10)
Tech. Branch NRC PDR L. Rubenstein
' PAD #2 R/F Gray Files Mr. J. J. Carey T. Novak V. Benaraya Vice President, Nuclear Group OELD S. Brown Duquesne Light Company E. Jordan P. O. Box 4 B. Grimes Shippingport, PA 15077 J. Partlow P. Tam
Dear Mr. Carey:
D. Miller
Subject:
Beaver Valley Unit 2, Request for Additional Information (RAI) on Technical Specification Review Enclosed please find the RAI relating to the Beaver Valley Unit 2 draft Technical Specifications submitted on December 20, 1985.
To maintain a workable review schedule, your response to these requests should be submitted within 45 days of your receipt of this letter.
Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed request, please contact me.
This information request affects fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Sincerely, Is/
Peter S. Tam, Project Manager PWR Pro.iect Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensinq-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page L
P BC. 08-R-A PM: PAD #2$f D: PAD #2 D.
ler V.
aroya D. Tam;bg
\\
L. Rubenstein 4/j/86 4/ /
4/f /86 4q /86 8604230132 860409 PDR ADOCK 050004 2 A
2m
Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 Power Station cc:
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Mr. R. E. Martin, Manager Jay E. Silberg, Esq.
Regulatory Affairs Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Duquesne Light Company 1800 M Street, N.W.
Beaver Valley Two Project Washington, DC 20036 P. O. Box 328 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. C. W. Ewing, Quality Assurance Zori Ferkin Manager Assistant Counsel Quality Assurance Department Governor Energy Council Duquesne Light Company 1625 N. Front Street P. O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA 15105 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Room B-151 Transportation & Safety Buf1 ding Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. T. J. Lex Mr. Thomas Gerusky Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bureau of Radiation Protection Power Systems PA Department of Environmental P. O. Box 355 Resources Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 P. O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. P. RaySircar Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation BVPS-2 Records Management Supervisor P. O. Box 2325 Duquesne Light Company Boston, Massachusetts 02107 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. W. Troskoski U. S. NRC John A. Lee, Esq.
P. O. 181 Duquesne Light Company Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 1 0xford Centre 301 Grant Street Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Admin.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15279 U. S. NRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 15229
ENCLOSURE BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1.
As stated in Chapter 16 of the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-1057), the staff will use the then-current versibn' of the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Technical Specifications as the basis for.the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
For the draft Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications submitted by Duquesne Light on December 20, 1985, please identify which of the following categories is applicable for j
each individual technical specification, The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specification and associated a.
basis is exactly like the Beaver Valley Unit 1 technical specifi-cation and basis, b.
The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specification and associated basis is exactly like the Beaver Valley Unit I technical speciff-cation and basis except for some minor difference (s) (e.g., a plant-specific setpoint or plant-specific valve number).
c.
The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specifica:.fon contains significantly different wording and/or basis from the correspond-ing Beaver Valley Unit I technical specification in one or more subsections.
For every technical specification identified as Category c, please an explanation and justification for the significant difference (s). provide 2.
Please provide a schedule for when the following items marked as "later" in the draft Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications subnitted in December 20, 1985, will be provided by Duquesne Light:
2.2.1, Table 2.?-1 3/4.3.2, Table 3.3-4 3/4.3.2, Table 3.3-5 3/4.3.3.1, Table 3.3-6 3/4.5.1 1
l 6.2, Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 l
3.
During its review of the Beaver Valley Unit 2 application, the staff l
identified certain issues that must be included in the Technical Specifi-cations as a condition of staff acceptance.
These issues are ide tified in various sections of the SER. Most of the issues that the staf' has identified as being required to be included in the Technical Specificaticns are already addressed in the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Technical Specificatiors.
Those issues that are not included in the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Technical Specifications will be added to the Technical Specifications being prepared for Beaver Valley Unit 2.
Please identify any statements in the SER which address additional criteria to be added to the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Tech-nical Specifications with which Duquesne Light does not agree so that these concerns can be resolved in a timely manner.
4.
Please provide any other information which would expedite the review of the non-standard Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
r April 9,1986 Docket No. 50-412 st ib ti 42 ACRS (10)
Local POR Tech. Branch NRC PDR L. Rubenstein PAD #2 R/F Gray Files Mr. J. J. Carey T. Novak V. Benaroya Vice President, Nuclear Group OELD S. Brown Duquesre Light Company E. Jordan P. O. Box 4 B. Grimes Shippingport, PA 15077 J. Partlow P. Tam
Dear Mr. Carey:
D. Miller
Subject:
Beaver Valley Unit 2, Request for Additional Information (RAI) on Technical Specification Review Enclosed please find the RAI relating to the Beaver Valley Unit 2 draft Technical Speqifications submitted on December 20, 1985. To maintain a workable review schedule, your rrsponse to these requests should be submitted within 45 days of your receipt ot this letter.
Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed request, please contact me.
This information request affects fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Sincerely, Is/
Peter S. Tam, Project Manager PWR Pro.iect Directorate #P Division of PWR Licensinq-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page L
?
BC. 08-R-A PM: PAD #2 D: PAD #2 D.'
ler V.
aroya P.
am;bg L. Rubenstein 4/j/86 4/ /
4/ /86 4q/86 i
r
\\
Y Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 Power Statinn l
cc:
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Mr. R. E. Martin, Manager Jay E. Silberg, Esq.
Regulatory Affairs Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Duquesne Light Comparfy 1800 M Street, N.W.
Beaver Valley Two Project Washington, DC 20036 P. O. Box 328 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. C. W. Ewing, Quality Assurance Zori Ferkin Manager Assistant Counsel Quality Assurance Department Governor Energy Council Duquesne Light Company 1625 N. Front Street P. O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA 15105 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Room B-151 Transportation & Safety Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. T. J. Lex Mr. Thomas Gerusky Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bureau of Radiation Protection Power Systems PA Department of Environmental P. O. Box 355 Resources Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 P. O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. P. RaySircar Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation BVPS-2 Records Management Supervisor P. O. Box 2325 Duquesne Light Company Boston, Massachusetts 02107 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. W. Troskoski U. S. NRC John A. Lee, Esq.
P. O. 181 Duquesne Light Company shippingpert, Pennsylvania 15077 1 0xford Centre 301 Grant Street Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Admin.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15279 U. S. NRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 15229
r ENCLOSURE g
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1.
As stated in Chapter 16 of the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-1057), the staff will use the then-current verstbn' of the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Technical Specifications as the basis for.-the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications. For the draft Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications submitted by Duquesne Light on December 20, 1985, please identify which of the following categories is applicable for each individual technical specification, a.
The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specification and associated basis is exactly like the Beaver Valley Unit I technical speciff-cation and basis, b.
The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specification and associated basis is exactly like the Beaver Valley Unit I technical specifi-cation and basis except for some minor difference (s) (e.g., a plant-specific setpoint or plant-specific valve number).
c.
The Beaver Valley Unit 2 technical specification contains significantly different wording and/or basis from the correspond-ing Beaver Valley Unit I technical specification in one or more subsections.
For every technical specification identified as Category c, please an explanation and justification for the sign'ficant difference (s). provide 2.
Please provide a schedule for when the following items marked as "later" in the draft Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications submitted in December 20, 1985, will be provided by Duquesne Light:
2.2.1. Table 2.?-1 3/4.3.2, Table 3.3-4 t
3/4.3.2, Table 3.3-5 3/4.3.3.1. Table 3.3-6 3/4.5.1 6.2, Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 3.
During its review of the Beaver Valley Unit 2 applicatian, the star' identified certain issues that must be included in the Technical Spec 11!-
cations as a condition of staff acceptance. These issues are identified in various sections of the SER. Most of the issues that the staff has identified as being required to be included in the Technical Specifications are already addressed in the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Technical Specifications.
Those issues that are not included in the Beaver Valley Unit 1' Technical Specifications will be added to the Technical Specifications being prepared for Beaver Valley Unit 2.
Please identify any statements in the SER which address additional criteria tn be added to the Beaver Valley Unit 2 Tech-nical Specifications with which Duquesne Light does not agree so that these concerns can be resolved in a timely manner.
4.
Please provide any other information which would expedite the review of the non-standard Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
- -. ~..
-