ML20093H615

Motion to File Supplemental Testimony in Response to Eddleman Contentions 9G Re Type Test Reporting & 116 Re Fire Protection.Related Correspondence

ML20093H615
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	10/11/1984
From:	Swiger M CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20093H602	List: ML20093H601 ML20093H615 ML20093H626
References
OL, NUDOCS 8410160327
Download: ML20093H615 (4)

Text

_

~s:

• IEELp* *t:n . ,

Jg r.

a '. ,GlCeycg .

.J ,

); .

i Octobeblf0T M84N0:52-

' ~

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - ' .-

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )

)

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-400 OL and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN )

MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY ) ,

)

(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power )

Plant) )

APPLICANTS' MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO EDDLEMAN ,

CONTENTIONS 9G (TYPE TEST REPORTING)

AND 116 (FIRE PROTECTION) ,

On August 9, 1984, Applicants filed their testimony and ,

exhibits in response to Eddleman Contention 116, concerning fire protection. On August 31, 1984, Applicants filed their testimony and exhibit in response to Eddleman Contention 9, concerning environmental qualification of electrical equipment.

The testimony and exhibits will be offered into evidence at the hearings on safety contentions scheduled to begin on October 16, 1984.

Pursuant to the continuing obligation of Applicants and their counsel to keep the Licensing Board and the other parties

informed of new information relevant and material to the gOgfoh

! T' i

.. - - , . -., , - - . ~ , . - , _ , , , - , _ , , - ,-,,-..--,,.,,,..-n.,.-.,n,,, .,,.---,_n,r,--,,r.--

. . . - . . = - . - .-. .- -- - -

a ,

4 4

matters being adjudicated in this proceeding,l/ Applicants move

.for leave to file the following supplemental testimony:

.- 1. " Applicants' Supplemental Testimony ~of Robert W. Prunty, Richard M. Bucci, Edwin J. Pagan and Kumar V. Hate in Response to l Eddleman Contention 9G (Type Test Re- l porting)."

2.- " Applicants' Supplemental Testimony of Margareta A. Serbanescu in Response to Eddleman Contention 116 (Fire Protection)."

These two pieces of supplemental testimony are attached to this i motion.

q The supplemental testimony in response to Eddleman 9G re-l 1

4 flects a change in the method by which Applicants will demon-

! strate the environmental qualification of Class lE coaxial and 5 triaxial Rockbestos cable to be installed in the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant ("SHNPP"). The supplemental testimony also t

! identifies two additional types of Class lE Rockbestos cable ,

used at the SHNPP, and describes how Applicants will demon-strate environmental qualification of these cables.

4 5 The supplemental testimony in response to Eddleman 116 re-

flects certain changes to Applicants' Fire Hazards Analysis which have been made since August 9, 1984. These changes are the result of the availability of more specific information on ,

i' i

h j 1/ E.g., Tennessee Valley Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3), ALAB-677, 15 N.R.C. 1387 (1982); Duke Power Company (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2),

ALAB-355, 4 N.R.C. 397, 406 n. 26 (1976); Duke Power Company (William B. McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-143, 6 l'

A.E.C. 623, 625-26 (1973). >

f

. . , - , - - - ~ . _ - . . . - , ..-.,,-.,-.,r.-. ,--__.--,.-,__.-,.e--,.--..,-~,------.-._-.w---.-_-,._.-_.-.-..--,,r,..c-.--,

b. .

the calorific values of the cable installation used in the SHNPP, as well as plant design changes related to cable tray loading and smoke removal. By letter dated October 10, 1984 from S. R. Zimmerman,~ Manager, Nuclear Licensing Section, Carolina Power & Light Company, to Har~old R. Denton, Director, NRR, copies of which were served on the Licensing Board and the Intervenors, Applicants provided a draft of revised pages of the SHNPP Final Safety Analysis Report ("FSAR") Section 9.5.1 and Appendix 9.5A which contains handwritten revisions to ta-bles and to discussions concerning combustible. loading rnd smoke removal. (See Enclosure 3 to the letter.) A retyped version of FSAR Section 9.5.1 and Appendix 9.5A containing these revisions will be offered into evidence at the hearing.

6 e .

4 i

. i For all of the above reasons, Applicants respectfully re- j quest that their motion for leave to file the attached pieces l of supplemental testimony in response to Eddleman Contentions 9G and 116 be granted.

Respectfully submitted, By: 77)/e(M k,ddI W Thomas A. Baxter, P.C. F John H. O'Neill, Jr., P.C.

Michael A. Swiger SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE 1800 M Street, N.W. .

Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 822-1000 Richard E. Joner Samantha Francis Flynn CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Post Office Box 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 836-7707 Counsel for Applicants Dated: October 11, 1984

']

_ _ _ - _ ._ _ __ __ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ .