ML20090E499

Certifies Svc of Testimony on Contentions 16E & 18 & El Jordan 840709,RW Krimm 840711 & SW Speck 840712 Memos Re FEMA Review of Rev 4 to Util Transition Plan on 840716. Related Correspondence

ML20090E499
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	07/16/1984
From:	Glass S Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
References
OL-3, NUDOCS 8407190490
Download: ML20090E499 (11)

Text

. _ _ _ .

l . .

(.y . . .. s wv' m J DE.NCE

- e.

1 ,

tNITED SEATES OF #4FRICA

NUCLEAR REGULATORY cot 41SSION l 0?NQED BEFORE THE A'I0MIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD

'9:59 In the Matter of )

) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 IDNG ISIAND LIGRIING C04PANY ) (Bnergency Planning)

)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC_E I hereby certify that copies of the Federal Bnergency Managenent Agency's Testimony on Contentions 16E and 18 and three memoranduns* relating to the NRC request of a FEMA Review of Revision 4 of the LIIG Transition Plan have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first i

class, this 16th day of July 1984:

• Memorandun dated July 9,1984 from Edward L. Jordan to Richard W. Krimn,

Subject:

FEMA Review of the LIlm Transition Plan for Shorehan in Support of NRC Licensing; Memorandun dated July 11, 1984 from Richard W. KrLmm to Edward L. Jordan,

Subject:

FEMA Review of the LIIm Transition Plan for Shoreham in Support of the NRC Licensing; Memorandun dated July 12, 1984 from Samuel W. Speck to Frank P. Petrone,

Subject:

Review of Revision IV of the LILOO Transition Plan.

James A. Laurenson, Esq. Howard L. Blau, Esq.

Administrative Judge, Chainnan 217 Newbridge Road Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Hicksville, NY 11801 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission W. Taylor Reveley III, Esq.*

East-West Tower, Rm. 402A 4350 East-West Hwy. Hunton & Williams Bethesda, MD 20814 707 East Main Street Richnond, VA 23212 Dr. Jerry R. Kline Administrative Judge Cherif Sedkey, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Johnson '

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission & Hutchison

East-West Tower, Rm. 427 1500 Oliver Building 4350 East-West Hwy. Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Bethesda, MD 20814 Stephen B. Iatham, Esq.

Mr. Frederick J. Shon Jolm F. Shea, III, Esq.

Administrative Judge Twomey, Iatham & Shea j

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Attorneys at law

, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission P.O. Box 398 East-West Tower, Rm. 430 33 West Second Street l Riverhead, NY 11901 4350 Fast-West Hwy.

Bethesda, MD 20814

's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission D i

Washinaton. D.C. 20555 840719049 h hgh l , $" ^ * "0 84071A0000$ __

l

• 1 ji Atomic Safety and Licensing Stewart M. Glass, Esq.

Appeal Board Panel Regional Comsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Federal Bnergency Managenent Agency Washington, D.C. 20555 26 Federal Plaza, an.1349 New York, New York 10278 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary Secretary of the Comnission U.S. Nuclear Ragulatory Connission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C. 20555 Comnission Washington, D.C. 20555

- Spence Perry, Esq.

Associate General Comsel Federal Bnergency Managenent Agency Bernard M. Bordenich, Esq.*

Room 840 Oreste Russ Pirfo 500 C. Street, S.W. Edwin J. Reis, Esq.

Washington, D.C. 20472 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission Herbert H. Brown, Esq.* 7735 Old Georgetown Road Lawrence Coe Impher, Esq. -(to mailroom)

Karla J. Istsche, Esq. Bethesda, MD 20814 Kirkpatrick, lockhart, Hill Christopher & Phillips' Fabian G.' Palomino, Esq.

1900 M Street, N.W. Richard J. Zahnleute, Esq.

8th Floor Special Comsel to the Governor Washington, D.C. 20036 Executive Chanber State Capitol Eleanor L. Frucci, Esq.* Albany, New York 12224 Attorney Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Be Wiles, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Assistant Counsel to the Governor Bethesda, MD 20814 Executive Chamber State Capitol Gerald C. Crotty, Esq. Albany, New York 12224 Comsel to the Governor Executive Chanber Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

State Capitol Staff Counsel l Albany, New York 12224 New York State Department of 1 Public Service Janes B. DotqNdj, Esq. 3 Bnpire State Plaza

' 3045 Pbrter Street,-N.W. Albany, New York 12223 Washington, D.C. 20006 k.

Stewart M. Glass j Regional Counsel for Federal Bnergenc.y Managenent Agency

?

)

~*

COURrESY COPY LIST Edward M. Barrett, Esq. Mr. Brain R. McCaffrey General Co msel long Island Lighting Company Iong Island Lighting Company Shorehan Nuclear Power Station 250 Old Com:y Road P.O. Box 618 Mineola, NY 11501 tbrth Country Road Wading River, NY 11792 tiarc W. Goldacith Energy Research Group, Inc. IEB Technical Associates 400-1 Totten Pbnd Road 1723 Hamilton Avenue Walthm, MA 02154 Suite K San Jose, CA 95125 Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Suffolk County Attorney Ibn. Peter Cohalan H. Ime Dennision Bldg. Suffolk County hecutive Veteran's Memorial Highway County Executive /imgislative Bldg.

Hauppauge,tW 11788 Veteran's Manorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Ken Robinson, Esq.

N.Y. State Dept. of Law Mr. Jay Dunkleberger 2 World Trade Center New York State Energy Office Room 4615 Agency Ikzilding 2 -

New York, NY 10047 ,

En) ire State Plaza

, Aluny, NY 12223 Ms. Ibra Bredes Shoreham opponents Coalition 195 East Main Street Snichtown, NY 11787

Imon Friednan, Esq.

Costigai, Hym e & Hym e 1301 Franklin Avenue Garden City, New York 11530 4%

T

'- P.03

( - .

JUL.12 '84 17:47 FEMA WASH FED CTR 3 I  ! UNITED STATE 8 l 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

j WASHINGTON. o. C.20see

~

\***** g, 9 984 ,,

MDIORANDUM FOR: Richard W. Krim. Assistant Associate Director  !

Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Federal Emergency Management Agency FROM: , Edward L. Jordan. Director ..

Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response -

2 '

Office of Inspection and Enforcement e ,.

SUBJECT:

FEMA REVIEW OF THE LILC0 TRANSITION PLAN FOR SHOREHAM IN SUPPORT OF HRC LICENSING

~

In accordance with the NRC/ FEMA Memorandum of Understanding dated November 1980, we request that FEMA review Revision 4 to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan (i.e., the Transition Plan) which was submitted to the NRC by LILCO on June 29,1984. As noted in the sub- '

mittal cover letter. Revision 4 responds to coments in the FEMA report da'ted .

March 15. 1984, which were developed by the Regional Assistance Connittee (RAC) as a result of a review of Revision 3 of the LILCO Transition Plan. In the June 29. 1984 letter. L1LCO states that copies of Revision 4 'have been fotwarded under separate cover directly to members of the RAC. Additional clarifying infor-mation regarding Revision 4 is contained in a letter to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board from the LILCO counsel dated July 2.1984. copies of which were also sent to the RAC. . For your information, copies of the above-referenced letters .

are enclosed. , ,,

We request that Revision 4 of the LILC0 Transition Plan be given the same priority attention by FEMA and the RAC as in previous reviews of the plan. We have expressed our sense of urgency in discussions with sembers of your staff on July 3 and

• 1984.'re ording the need for the plan review to be com

- .to the conc 1[ision of tka current hearing on emergency preparedness. pleted prior we request that FEMA infom us by July 15. 1984, of the date by which FEMA findings on Revision 4 of the LILC0 plan can be provided. 9 di' , c. v : .

.7 s . .

[ .Jha. Director '

Divis n of Ems ncy Preparedness an gineeri Response Offic of Inspec ion and Inforcement

Enclosures:

l 1. Ltr. fm. LILCO to Denton p ,7, g 0$ggf. M h

, dtd. 6/29/84 .

2. Ltr. fm. LILCO counsel to ASL8 dtd. 7/2/84 ,

l cc: See Attached CONTACT: F. Xantor. It

^

4 . . ;. ..

t. .

. . . s

' - Richard W. Krim - . JUL 8 584 ,

l 1

cc: S. A. Schwartz, IE .

C. R. Van Niel IE = i J.N. Grace.IE .

F. Kantor. IE D. B. Matthews. IE ^

d. R. Sears.1E -

E. 5. Christentiury ELD

' E. Reis. ELD ' '

-  ; R. R. Bellany, R! '

. J. A. Van' V1.tet. NRR

-y - _

s *A -

. . ]..

. a 4

a'

./

. . , , . . ~. .

i .

.. ^ c.- -

. ...;;E ' .

$ g - -4 : ' ,

j -# .

,(g*

t . 3. t .

4 PO'd E M3 03J HStti tM3J GP84i PO, 21"Y1f

, . _ . - . - - _ . . . . _ _ . _ . , _ _ _ _ . . _ __e.. - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - -

'b $6 P.05 l

• JUL.12 '8417:48 FEr1A WASH FEC.CTR 3 Federal Emergency Management Agency -

~

Washington, D.C. 20472 JUL i i 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan

. Director. Division of Emergency

. Preparedness and ' Engineering Response 0ffice of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g L_JhJJd'.. _

RT dr'd'Td.TmrF -

FROM: i Assistant Associate Director s Office of' Natural and Technological e Hazards Programs .-

SUBJECT:

Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA)Reviewofthe LongIslandLightingCompany(LILCO)(TransitionPlanfor Shoreham In Support of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Licensing

, This is in response to your memorandum of July 9,1984, invoking the terms of the November 1980 NRC/ FEMA Memorandum of Understanding and v requesting that FEMA conduct *a full Regional Assistance Committee (RACf ~

review of Revision IV of the LILCO Teansition Plan. Revision IV responds to the FEMA finding transmitted to NRC on March 15, 1984. ,q FEMA intends to give the review of Revision IV of the Transition Plarr'the same priority treatment that has been accorded to previous reviews.of the plan. However, we do not believe we can furnish the finding before November 15. 1984 Among the reasons for the required review time are ~

other Shoreham-related obligations, set by NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ASLB),whichwillplacedemandsonthetimeofFEMA Region 11 staff including the RAC Chairman) who would be involved in the review of Re ision IV. FEMA witnesses are scheduled to testify on August 6,1984 on,' contentions relating to public education and training.

Before that date, extensive preparation must be done. Depositions may -

also occur on this material. , ,

In addition'to demands connected with Shoreham testimony. FEMA Region !!

has a substantial workload associated with operating nuclear. reactors, notably Indian Point. Before the Fall 1984 exercise, the Rockland County j Plan must be reviewed by the full RAC for the first time. Plan revisions for the other 3 counties must also be reviewed. Also, careful attention

. must be given to the review of the exercise scenario and objectives.

it is the I ThisIndianPointexerciseisespeciallyimportantbecause(1) first full-scale exercise since the ASLB issued its report in October 1983; I not to shut down the pla)nt; and (3) it is the first full-scale exercise (2) it is th in which Rockland County will fully participate. It has already been delayed

• a few months to allow Rockland County to fully integrate itself into the planning

~

and preparedness process. It c&nnot be delayed further. The same RAC members involved in this important effort are those who would have to work on the review of Revision IV of the LILCO Transition Plan.

,7 In October 1984, a full-scale exercise will take place at the Salem site.

The RAC work for this exercise has just begun. In addition, RAC plan

" reviews are in progress for the Oyster Creek, Salem, and Ginna sites.

These are critical to Region II subm.ittals relating to plan approvals under 44 CFR 350.

Finally, the RAC members have other comitments within their own agencies and could not devote 100% of their time to Shoreham, even if they did not ~

have these l imp,ortant duties associated with the operating nuclear reactors.

sq As you know, work on RegioIt 11 sites has already been delayed in the past, -

due to the time-intensive demands stemming from both the Indian Point and Shoreham cases. Any further compression of the review timetable for the LILCO Plan, Revision IV, would cause additional delays which would seriously impact the public health and safety in the vicinity of the Region II operating nuclear reactors. We do not feel that a transfer of FEMA regional staff is a viable solution to this problem. Temporarily transferring staff from other FEMA Regions would only transfer the impact to other operating reactors. It would also be of little benefit unless the other RAC members could receive similar relief from their agencies. For these reasons, we believe that we cannot furnish a finding on Revision IV of ' . f '

the LILCO Transition Plan earlier than November 15, 1984.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ,-

J

• N j $

4

• 1 .

~

! l i

4 90*d E HD 03J HSOM tM3J 6P t41 PG, 21* Tit g

Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 ,

. 12 Jul.1984 MD.ORANDUM FOR: Frank Petrone -

. Regional Dirgtor .

FENA tonq q (NewYork)

FROM: S el , ,

i tor

- 1 Programs s rt

SUBJECT:

Raview of Revision IV of the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) Transition Plan (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station)

~

The p'urpose of this memorandum is to request that your. office perform a full RAC review of Revision IV of the LILCO Transition Plan utilizing the Regional AssistanceCommittee(RAC).

As you are aware, the Nuclear P.agulatory Commission (NRC) invoked SectionJII.4 of the Novenbu'r 1, 1980, NRC/ Federal Energency Management Agency (FEMA) Memorandum

> of Unn rstanding (MOU) on June 1, 1983 ,by requesting FEMA to provide findings and det'arminationa by June 17, 1983, for five different plans prepared by LILCO.

, This request was later modified to pertain to the LILCO Transition Plan'and its three . revisions. On June 10, 1984, FEMA received a request from NRC, go,py attached, to conduct a full RAC review of Revision IV of the LILCO Transition Plan. Revision IV reponds to the FEMA finding transmitted to NRC on ~ March 15, 1984 It ic our understanding, based on information from your staff, that copies of -

Revision 1/ have already been delivered to the FEMA Region II Office and' RAC members.

Based en recent conversations between Mr. Robert 5. Wilkerson of g staff and

~

.Mr. Fhilip McIntire'of your staff, we will inform NRC that FEMA can provide a finding by November' 15, 1984 In ordor that we may comply with this delivery

. date, it is also our understanding that TEMA Region !! will furnish Headquarters with the results of the RAC review oy October 16, 1984 3

• !f you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Attachment '

As Stated /

4 20'd E HD 03J HSUN tM3J 9Pt41 F0, 21*Tif

SN' .

s ON11lNf1516 Q.17A 16.E-Ibes the LILCO public education brochure adequately discuss the health effects of radiation exposure that the public might recein in the ewne of a severe accident at the SNPS?

A. The public information brochure does contain educational infor-mation on radiation as required by NUREU-06%, Planning Standard, G.I. Howewr, this brochure does rot address the magnitude of doses that the public might receiw during a sewre accident ed the health consequences related to such releases. Although, as stated above, there is no NUREU-%% i requirment for this type of information, its inclusion would be informatiw to the reader. .

A review of the Spring 1984 issue of LIILO's newsletter, " Keep-ing Current", rewaled that information on health effects re-laced to potential doses resulting from a sewre accident are discussed.

It should be noted that in the process of reviewing the pulic education brochure, the FDR witness panel identified other concerns which are not part of this contention.

- 8a -

l

', e .. .

w 00NITNTION 18 Q17B. t8-Has the FEMA witness panel reviewed the LIILO public infonna-tion posters, telephone book inserts and Emergency Broadcast Systen (EBS) messages?

A. The only infonnation available for review is the EBS messages.

Q17C. 18-Ib the EBS messages contain a description of the energency planning zones and the recommended evacuation routes for each zone?

A. The EBS messages contained in Procedures OPIP 3.8.2 provide for the insertion of narrative descriptions of each zone that may be affected by an evacuation (see attachnent 4 of Procedure OPIP 3.8.2). The EBS messages do not contain provisions for the insertion of narrative descriptions of the evacuation routes -

described in the public infonnation brochure. However, the text of the messages state:

To evacaute follow blue and white evacuation route signs posted on every major road. You will be directed along evacuation routes by trained traffic guides who'know which way you should go.

Q17D. 18-Are there provisions in the EBS messages to accomodate persons who may be visiting an emergency planning zone within the 10-mile EFZ in which they do not reside, and are there provisions to infonn such individuals of the -proper evacuation rcutes?

- 8b -

b 1

A. As stated above in the answer to Question 17C, both EBS messages that deal with evacuation recomendations contain instructions l

for evacuees to follow blue and white evacuation route signs and ,

I the direction of trained evacuation guides. In addition, these l EBS messages contain the following instructions for parents of echool children:

Parents should not drive to sc5ml to meet their children since children are being safely transported outside the zone to re-location centers. Parents should not go to relocation centers until advised to do so.

4 m

I l

{

I l

_ - _. .