|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20245L4191989-05-0404 May 1989 Graterford Inmates First Set of Interrogatories for Commonwealth of PA Dept of Corrections & Production of Documents Request.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20245L4941989-05-0404 May 1989 Graterford Inmates First Set of Interrogatories for Commonwealth of PA Emergency Mgt Agency & Production of Documents Request.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20238D1101987-12-29029 December 1987 Licensee Response to Request for Production of Documents by Air & Water Pollution Patrol Dtd 871207.* List of Available Requested Documents Provided.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20238D0771987-12-29029 December 1987 Licensee Objections to Request for Production of Documents by Air & Water Pollution Patrol & Motion for Protective Order.* Request Re Records of False Activation of Monitor Alarms Requires Extensive Research.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096E4661984-08-31031 August 1984 Supplemental Response to Applicant 840625 Discovery Request & Interrogatories Re Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20096B4071984-08-30030 August 1984 Answer to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094C3131984-08-0303 August 1984 Revised Answer to Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions ML20094A6791984-08-0101 August 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to City of Philadelphia Re Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions City-18 & City-19.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094C2121984-07-31031 July 1984 Answer to Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions (Discovery 35). Certificate of Svc Encl ML20094E5921984-07-23023 July 1984 Amended Answers to Util First Set of Interrogatories Re Offsite Emergency Planning Contention Lea/Foe 24.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090D9621984-07-16016 July 1984 Response to Limerick Ecology Action Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Related Correspondence ML20093D4071984-07-11011 July 1984 Response to Limerick Ecology Action First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090A7091984-07-10010 July 1984 Objections to Limerick Ecology Action First & Second Sets of Interrogatories on Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions. Related Correspondence ML20090A7211984-07-0909 July 1984 Answer to First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Util & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20092P7691984-07-0303 July 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to State of PA Emergency Mgt Agency on Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Related Correspondence ML20151K0601984-06-25025 June 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents to Limerick Ecology Action & Friends of the Earth Re Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20092P7761984-06-25025 June 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20092K7191984-06-22022 June 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20092J7561984-06-21021 June 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Limerick Ecology Action Admitted Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Notice of Appearance for M Mulligan & Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence ML20091K1841984-06-0101 June 1984 Answer Opposing Friends of the Earth 840518 Motion for Admission of New Late Contentions Re Applicant 840509 Motion for Expedited Partial Initial Decision & Issuance of Low Power License.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20091K1771984-06-0101 June 1984 Answer Opposing Del-Aware 840517 Proposed Late Contentions Re Applicant 840509 Motion for Expedited Partial Initial Decision & Issuance of Low Power License.Contentions Should Be Denied & Action Taken Against Del-Aware ML20084D9241984-04-27027 April 1984 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Severe Accidents.Related Correspondence ML20088A4251984-04-0909 April 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Limerick Ecology Action Re Severe Accident Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20088A4231984-04-0909 April 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to City of Philadelphia Re Severe Accident Contentions.Related Correspondence ML20087F2071984-03-12012 March 1984 Responses to Util Interrogatories on Contention I-42. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20086U0501984-03-0202 March 1984 Response Opposing Air & Water Pollution Patrol 840221 Request for Extension of Discovery Period for Contention VI-1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20086U3431984-03-0202 March 1984 Response to Air & Water Pollution Patrol Motion to Compel Discovery.Applicant Denies That Answer to Interrogatory Evasive.Related Correspondence ML20080T9501984-02-27027 February 1984 Answers City of Philadelphia Interrogatories on Sys Interaction Contention.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20080R9931984-02-21021 February 1984 Answers to City of Philadelphia Interrogatories (Discovery 27).Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080N7201984-02-10010 February 1984 Motion to Compel Answers to Listed Interrogatories ML20080E8571984-02-0606 February 1984 Responds to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories Re Contention I-42.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20080E8031984-02-0606 February 1984 Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents of City of Piladelphia to Util Re Sys Interaction.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20080C5911984-02-0303 February 1984 Interrogatories 14-21 Re Environ Qualification ML20080C5961984-02-0303 February 1984 Interrogatories 22-30 Re Environ Qualification ML20080B8761984-02-0303 February 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention I-41.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080B8301984-02-0303 February 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention I-41 ML20080B8201984-02-0303 February 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention I-42 ML20080B8081984-02-0303 February 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention I-42 ML20080A4501984-02-0202 February 1984 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Limerick Ecology Action Onsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080B9231984-02-0101 February 1984 Answers to Twelfth Set of Interrogatories on Qa/Welding Contention (Discovery 24).Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080B9121984-02-0101 February 1984 Answers to Eleventh Set of Interrogatories on Qa/Welding Contention (Discovery 23) ML20080B8911984-02-0101 February 1984 Answers to Tenth Set of Interrogatories on Qa/Welding Contention (Discovery 25) ML20080A6251984-02-0101 February 1984 Answer to Applicant Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention VI-1.Related Correspondence ML20079S2721984-01-25025 January 1984 Answer to Sixth Set of Interrogatories on Qa/Welding Contention ML20079S2901984-01-25025 January 1984 Answer to Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Qa/Welding Contention.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079S2851984-01-25025 January 1984 Answer to Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Qa/Welding Contention ML20079J4541984-01-20020 January 1984 Preliminary Set of Initial Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Onsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20086J9981984-01-14014 January 1984 Twelfth Interrogatory Re Contention VI-1 (Qa/Qc).Documents, Logs & Repts on All safety-related Welds Requested ML20086J9921984-01-14014 January 1984 Eleventh Interrogatory Re Contention VI-1 (Qa/Qc).Details Pertinent to safety-related Pipe Failures Due to Freeze Induced Bursts Requested ML20079F2101984-01-13013 January 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents on Contention VI-1.Certificate of Svc Encl 1989-05-04
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20247L8591998-05-19019 May 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying Licenses Effective Immediately Re Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Sys ML20203A1701998-01-30030 January 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 for Limerick Generating Station,Unit 1 ML20151L3671997-08-0505 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That SA Blacklock Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order ML20151L5181997-08-0505 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) Re SL Nevin Deliberately Falsifying Records of RECW Sample Documentation on 960207 ML20203H6891997-06-0202 June 1997 Transcript of 970602 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa ML20083N3971995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20081B3811995-03-0101 March 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20080D8351994-12-22022 December 1994 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App J Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water Cooled Power Reactors Allowing Continuation of Plant Operation within 24 Month Cycle ML20078K1441994-11-0909 November 1994 Exemtion Granted from Requirements of 10CFR73.55(d)(5) Re Returning of Picture Badges Upon Exit from Protected Area Such That Individuals Authorized Unescorted Access Into Protected Area Can Take Badges Offsite ML20058K7381993-12-0303 December 1993 Memorandum & Order CLI-93-25.* Commission Denies State of Nj Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Adjudicatory Hearing Filed on 931008.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931203 ML20059B0301993-10-22022 October 1993 NRC Staff Response to Commission Questions Posed W/Respect to State of New Jersey Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.* Denies Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing.W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20059B1111993-10-20020 October 1993 Philadelphia Electric Co Response to NRC 931014 Order.* State Failed to Demonstrate Entitlement to Hearing to Challenge Util Amend to Permit Util to Receive Shoreham Fuel ML20059A4581993-10-14014 October 1993 Order Requesting Answers to Two Questions Re State of Nj Request for Immediate Action by NRC or Alternatively, Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing. Operations Plans for Marine Transportation Withheld ML20057G2141993-10-14014 October 1993 Order.* Requests for Simultaneous Responses,Not to Exceed 10 Pages to Be Filed by State,Peco & Lipa & Served on Other Specified Responders by 931020.NRC May File by 931022. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931014 ML20059B1291993-09-14014 September 1993 Affidavit of Jh Freeman.* Discusses Transfer of Slightly Used Nuclear Fuel from Shoreham Nuclear Power Station to Limerick Generating Station.W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20045D8121993-06-14014 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54 Re FSAR Update Submittals ML20126F2721992-12-21021 December 1992 Comment Endorsing Positions & Comments of NUMARC & BWROG Re Draft GL, Augmented Inservice Insp Requirments for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys ML20062C6561990-10-22022 October 1990 Affidavit Requesting Withholding of Summary Rept on Evaluation of Recirculation Nozzle to Safe End Weld Indication & Proposed Disposition to Permit Unit 1 Cycle 4 Operation, from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20006D3821990-02-0606 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Policy & Procedures for Enforcement Actions;Policy Statement.Util Uncertain as to Whether Changes Necessary ML20246J4521989-08-30030 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Terminates Proceeding Per Settlement Agreement Between Limerick Ecology Action,Inc & Licensee.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890831 ML20246F1011989-08-25025 August 1989 Joint Motion for Termination of Proceedings.* Board Moved to Accept Encl Settlement Agreement,Dismiss Limerick Ecology Action,Inc (Lea) Contention W/Prejudice,Dismiss Lea as Party to Proceeding & Terminate Proceeding ML20246F0121989-08-25025 August 1989 Memorandum & Order CLI-89-17.* Staff Authorizes Issuance of Full Power License to Licensee to Operate Unit 2 After Requisite Safety Findings Under 10CFR50.57 Completed. W/Certificate of Svc ML20246F1471989-08-25025 August 1989 Settlement Agreement.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20246E8351989-08-24024 August 1989 Second Supplemental Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission & Memorandum & Order of 890807.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20246E3431989-08-22022 August 1989 Opposition of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Motion by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Set Schedule for Discovery & Hearing.* Requests That Schedule Be Replaced W/More Reasonable Schedule,As Proposed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246C0271989-08-18018 August 1989 Notice of Appointment of Adjudicatory Employee.* Informs That D Nash Appointed as Commission Adjudicatory Employee to Advise Commission on Issues in Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890818 ML20246B7721989-08-17017 August 1989 Correction of Memorandum & Order of 890815.* Advises That Refs to 49CFR2.730(c) on Page 1 & 49CFR2.710 & 49CFR2.711 on Page 2 Should Be Corrected to Read as 10CFR2.730(c),2.710 & 2.711,respectively.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890818 ML20246D7411989-08-17017 August 1989 Transcript of 890817 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Discussion of Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-58.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20246B7751989-08-16016 August 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Rl Anthony 890623 Request for Hearing for Intervention in Remand Proceeding & for Stay of Low Power Authorization.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816 ML20246B7571989-08-16016 August 1989 Order Responding to Limerick Ecology Action Motion for Reconsideration.* Denies Motion to Reconsider,Stay,Suspend or Revoke 890707 Order on Basis That Order Appropriate.W/ Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816.Re-served on 890818 ML20246B7931989-08-15015 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Request for Expedited Answer).* Denies Licensee 890811 Request for Expedited Answer from NRC & Limerick Ecology Action on Basis That Request Lacks Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816 ML20245H8491989-08-14014 August 1989 Notice of Change of Address.* Advises of Council Change of Address for Svc of Documents ML20245H8061989-08-14014 August 1989 Supplemental Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action, Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission & to Memorandum & Order of 890807.* Requests Further Extension of Time in Which to Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20245H5991989-08-11011 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Dismisses Graterford Inmates Contention Re Adequacy of Training for Drivers Responsible for Evacuating Graterford & Terminates Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890814 ML20245H7341989-08-10010 August 1989 Motion by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Set Schedule for Discovery & Hearing & Request for Expedited Answer to This Motion.* Divergence in Positions of Respective Parties Emphasizes Need to Conclude Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245F7161989-08-0909 August 1989 Reply by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission Dtd 890726.* Environ Benefits for Operating Unit 2 Outweigh Small Risk of Severe Accident ML20245F7511989-08-0909 August 1989 Reply by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to NRC Staff Response to Commission Questions.* Commission Should Rely on Licensee Cost Analysis in Response to Question 5 & Rc Williams Affidavit.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245F7341989-08-0909 August 1989 NRC Staff Response to Commission Memorandum & Order of 890807.* Advises That NRC Will Provide Comments on Limerick Ecology Action 890814 Filing Prior to Commission Meeting Scheduled for 890817.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245F7291989-08-0808 August 1989 Affidavit.* Discusses Costs Incurred While Plant Inoperable. Allowance for Funds Used During Const,Security,Maint & Operational Costs Considered Proper for Calculating Costs for Delay ML20248D9241989-08-0707 August 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Extends Limerick Ecology Action Response Deadline to 890814 to Respond to Five Questions Re Severe Accident Mitigation Design Alternatives.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890807 ML20248D7871989-08-0303 August 1989 Correction for NRC Staff Response to Commission Questions.* Forwards Corrected Page 5 to NRC Response to Questions Filed on 890802,deleting Phrase by Nearly Factor 2.5 in Next to Last Line.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248D5671989-08-0202 August 1989 Affidavit of SE Feld.* Advises That Author Prepared Response to Question 5.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248D5981989-08-0202 August 1989 Response by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Commission Request for Comments by Memorandum & Order Dtd 890726.* Licensee Requests Commission Issue Full Power OL for Unit 2 Conditioned Upon Outcome of Pending Litigation ML20248D7111989-08-0202 August 1989 Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission Dtd 890726.* Commission Order Fails to Provide Intervenor Adequate Time for Response & Should Therefore Be Revoked.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248D5391989-08-0202 August 1989 Affidavit of MT Masnik.* Advises That Author Prepared Response to Question 3 ML20248D5311989-08-0202 August 1989 Affidavit of Rj Barrett.* Advises That Author Prepared Response to Question 2 ML20248D4971989-08-0202 August 1989 Joint Affidavit of Gy Suh & CS Hinson.* Advises That Authors Prepared Responses to Questions 1 & 4 ML20248D4721989-08-0202 August 1989 NRC Staff Response to Commission Questions.* Provides Info for Use in Commission Effectiveness Review of Plant Full Power Operation,Per Commission 890726 Memorandum & Order. Supporting Affidavits Encl ML20248D6451989-08-0202 August 1989 Affidavit.* Advises That Author Read Responses to Request for Comments by NRC & Knows Contents.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245J1321989-07-27027 July 1989 Transcript of 890727 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Facility Severe Accident Mitigation Issues.Pp 1-130.Supporting Info Encl 1998-05-19
[Table view] |
Text
',
REUTED cc'"'=&UNDElly LS %
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOW ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD I?M BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE JLDGES g
' ' l.
V Lawrence Brenner, Chairman
.,,a Dr. Richard F. Cole
~
Dr. Peter A. Morris In the Matter of Docket Nos.~50-352-OL 50-353-OL PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2)
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S RESPONSES TO PECO'S I-42 INTERROGATORIES 1.
State whether the City intends to present any expert witnesses on the subjectmatteratissueinContentionI-42,asstatedknLimerickEcology Action's letter dated July 11, 1983 and admitted by the Licensing Board in its Memorandum and Order dated October 28, 1983 (slip op, at 2).
If so, identify each expert witness and state (1) his professional qualifications; (b) the l
subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify; (c) the substance of I
the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; (d) the grounds for each opinion.
Identify by court, agency or other body, each proceeding in which such individual rendered testimony on this subject.
A.
At this time the City has no intent to present any expert witnesses on the subject matter at issue in Contention I-42.
t k
O
0 4
2.
State whether the City intends to present ary factual witnesses on the subject matter at issue in Contention I-42.
If so, identify each such factual witness and further state (a) his professional qualifications; (b) the subject matter on which the witness is expected to testify; (c) the substance of the facts to which the witness is expected to testify.
Identify by court, agency, or other body, each proceeding,in which such individual rendered testimony on this subject (s).
A.
No.
3.
Identify by title, author, publisher and date of issuance or puolication, all documents that the City relies upon as a basis for contentions or that the City intends to use (by way of reference or evidentiary proffer) in presenting its direct case in cross-examining other witnesses on Contion I-42 and all documents to which the City intends to refer in conducting cross-examination of other witaesses who may testify in connection with any such contention.
A.
The City did not draft the contention and therefore relied upon no document for the basis for the contention.
Material used in cross-examination by an attorney is privileged.
The material that is currently in the possession of the City that touches on the subject of the adequacy of PECO's environmental qualification of equipment is as follows:
10 CFR 50, January 21, 1983, 48 Fed. Reg. 2729.
Amendment 51 to Licensing Application, May 24, 1983 and October Supplement.
Limerick FSAR. ~
v u
EQRR Reference List.
Responses to Request for Additional Information of December 19, 1983.
J Philadelphia Electric Company Q*5 Component Classification P agram Rules.
Discovery 27, February 21, 1984.
Board Notification of January 18, 1984,
Subject:
NRC Use of the Terms, "Important to Safety" and " Safety Related" (Board Notification 84-011).
Board Notification of January 12, 1984,
Subject:
Environmental Qualification:
Commission Meeting with Sandia and NRC Staff on January 6, 1984 (Board Notification 87-007).
Board Notification of January 5,1984,
Subject:
Environmental Qualification Briefing of Chairman by Sandia (Board Notification 84-004).
Board Notification of February 13, 1984,
Subject:
Additional Information on Environmental Qualification (Board Notification 84-032).
4 To the extent that your answer to any interrogatory is based upon one or more documents, (a) identify each such document on which your answer is based; (b) identify the specific informar. ion in such doucment upon which you rely; (c) explain how the information provides a basis for your answer.
A.
The information requested is, contained in the analysis, studies and principal documents referrnced in answer to Interrogatory 3.
5.
To the extent that your answer is based upou any study, calculation, r2 search or analysis, (a) describe the nature of the study, calculation, raccarch or analysis and identify any documents which discuss or describe the study, calculation, research or analysis; (b) identify the person (s) or antity(ies) who performed the study, calculation, research or analy. sis; (c) d2 scribe in detail the infcrmation which was the subject of the study, calculation, research or analysis; (d) describe the results of such study, calculation, research or analysis provides a basis for your answer.
A.
The information requested is contained in the analyses, studies and
' principal documents referenced in answer to Interrogatory 3.
.6.
To the extent that your answer is based upon conversations, consultations or correspondence or other communications with one or more individuals or entities, plesse identify each such individual or entity; (b) state the educational and professional background of each such individual,- including occupation and institutional affiliations; (c) describe the nature of each communication, including time and contest, and describe the information received from each such~ individual or entity; (e) explain how such information provides a basis for your answer.
A.
The information requested is contained in the analyses, studies and principal documents referenced in the answer to Interrogatory 3.
~
'^
g
=
7.
To the extent that the City possesses information or documents expressing facts or opinions which are relevant to the specific interrogatories below, but which do not support intervenor's position or which have not otherwise been fully provided in the answers thereto, please provide such information and documents.
A.
The City possesses no such information or documents.
8.
Specify each system, component or party of the Limerick Generating Station which the City asserts is "important to safety" within the meaning of 10 C.F.R.
550.49(b) which has not been included in Appendix B of the Environmental Qualification Report ("EQR") for' Limerick. Your response to this and subsequent interrogatories should consider the revisions made to that documen transmitted to the NRC (Mr. A. Schwencer) by Philadelphia Electric Company (John S. Kemper) on January 16, 1984, including the revised Appendix B.
As to each such component or part, (a) describe in detail the component or parts and their exact location at the Limerick Generating Station; (b) identify the manufacturer, if known; (c) identify whether the component or paft is asserted to be within tre category "important to safety" because of its inclusion in detail the reason for classification in one or more of these categories; (d) describe in detail the alleged "important to. safety" function which the component or part will perict.n; (e) state the basis which the City used in concluding that another system, component or part, or combination thereof, which is being qualified or which is not within a harsh environment' cannot perfor:n the function instead of the subject part or component; (f) state the basis, if any, upon which the City 0
asserts that environmental qualification of such component or part will not or could not be ' performed prior to fuel loading for Limerick Unit 1 or 2, as appropriate; (d) the exact event or events for which the City asserts that the equipment must be qualified, the time or times after the initiation of the most critical event during which the part or component is asserted to be necessary to
^
operate, and the exact environmental conditions which the component or part would experience.
A.
The City has not done an environmental qualification review for Limerick.
. The burden is upon the applicant for an operating license to do such a review, and, since January 31, 1983, there has been a burden upon such applicants to undertake a review of equipment that is not safety-related but that is' important-to-safety to consider its inclusion in an environmental qualification program. As far as the City can tell, no syste matic review specifically for the purpose of identyfing structures, systems and components important to safety but not safety-related has been done'by PECO.
See Discovery 27, Nos. 14 and 15 Rules.
9.
Identify any and all components or parts listed in Appendix B of the EQR, as updated, which the City asserts will not be environmentally qualified by the time of fuel loading for each unit, giving the basis for such conclusion and stating when the City believes such part or equipment will be qualified, giving the basis for such conclusion or estimate.
A.
At this time the City is aware of no '.uch specific components or parts.
However, see response to No. 8..
e
a 4
10.
With regard to each of the following parts, components, or systems which intervenor LEA alleges should be included in the equipment qualification Program, (1) feedwater control; (2) emergency lighting and communications sy tems; (3) plant procese computer system; (4) computer software, to the extent the City agrees with LEA that such equipment must be included in the environmental qualification program; (1) identify the exact systems, part or component involved, with reference to the description contained in the FSAR or P&I.D. 's, if possible; (b) identify the location or locations of the systems, parts or components at the Limerick Generating Station; (c) identify the conditions, e.g., LOCA or HELB, which the City asserts require that these systems be qualified; (d) identify the operations that such equipment would have to perform for such conditions and the time frame in which these actions are required; (e) identify the harsh environment that such equipment, part or component would experience; (f) state the City's understanding of systems, equipmeng, parts or components which can perform functions equivalent to those identified above and which are either being qualified or are not located in a harsh environment and state why this other system, equipment, part or component is not sufficient to perform the intended function.
A.
This City takes no position on this issue at this time.
11.
As to ecch " human interaction problem" which the City asserts should be addressed by Applicant in its Environmental Qualification Report for, Limerick, if any: (a) specify what is meant by the term " human interaction problem"; (b) identify the exact location of such component or part; (c) specify each.
M~
s component or part which the City alleges should be the subject of such a " human i
interaction review"; (d) identify the manufacturer of the part or component, if known; (e) specify the "important to safety" frtnction which requires analysis of human interaction with regard to the particular part or component; (f) state the specific basis in NRC regulations or regulatory guidance for performing such a review, including goals, methodology, experimental work, studies, data analysis techniques and basis for evaluating the results which the City asserts is necessary.
A.
The City takes no position on this issue at this time.
12.
As to each component or part for Vhich the City asserts that an Equipment Qualification Review Record ("EQRR") has not been provided in Applicant's Environmental Qualification Report for Limerick, (a) specify each part or component allegedly omitted; (b) identify the exact location of such component or part; (c) identify the manufacturer, if known, (d) state the basis upon which intervenor relies to assert that such part or component should have been included in an EQRR.
A.
The City has not developed a list of components or parts for which an Equipment Qualification Review Record should be made.
13.
As to eacn part or component for which the City asserts that the EQRR specifies a qualified life of less than 40 year, (a) specify the part or,
3 e.
4 component; (b) identify the manufacturer, if known; (c) the corrective action which the intervenor asserta should be taken by Applicant to correct the alleged deficiency, the basis upon which the means for identification of such items by Applicant as discussed on page 6.2 of the Environmental Qualification Report is insufficient to meet NRC requirements.
A.
The City has not made an environmentsl qualification review for Limerick or a review of qualified equipment that does not eg2al the 40 year plant life, but believes that equipment that is qualified and that has a life less than 40 years should be adentified so that replacements can be made at the end of the equipment is qualified life.
I y
14.
State the City's basis, if any, for the assertion that the key switch in the control roen for the standby liquid control system is in harsh environment and thus subject to qualification pursuant to NRC requirements.
A.
The City has made no such assertion.
The City believes this equipment has
~
an importance to safety that must be evaluated to determine whether it should be qualified.
15.
State what electrical equipment in the PASS system, if any, the City asserts must be qualified; specify how failure in such electrical equipment could mislead the operator.
.g_
e W
A.
The City has made no such assertion.
However, the PASS System will be used to assess accidental conditions.
Therefore electrical equipment used to control and monitor its operations should be reviewed to determine whether it should be included'in the equipment qualif'ication. program.
16.
Identify each and every way which the document, Philadelphia Electric Company Q*5 Component Classification Program Rules fails"to provide a methodology for assuring that equipment, parts or. components falling in the definition of 10 C.F.R. 55049(b) are not properly identified.
The response to this interrogatory may contain proprietary material; if so, it should be sent only to Applicant's counsel in Washingt6n, D.C.
A.
Provided to Applicant's counsel and LEA's counsel.
b \\
u
...m g.uu._...... _._ e.
y y,2 y m....
=5
. ::.~:s limit its reveiw to Class 1-E
.g::-
.=
. a.=u:.
n afety related e..=. ' ::=.a:
Page 9-1 of this document appears toThese are s
).
2-16.
'352 crfim..
electrical components.
s.
but important-to-safety component
?O
- r:,-
1.9h:2 m==
. ?4Md.un44
^
..y
- =..:.==4
.. ~. ~ '..
zu- -
.....g....
~
..?
i:muww a bmm.u..ut
- z.u
- ...~""
.UTIstTGuiT.'? "-"
u:wuwua uz.
.iT&lT.i.EE".T:E -
gu -
...u.
Sub:t' uu.im.:.
uwuwwwu
.f/jf
'""N.tl.'...'.f'
.u.u G"" " " ::::
2.2..:.'.".".'"?.'"-~'.....,.....
.uuu.uw -
- w=.:.s
^"".:.= w ::.
u w.=w::.uu=-.
.h_
u:ust.:
..L.u:.::
'5?r.*".**.~.**' 7:"'5
'"'=
._w:u=:
1
.uu -
u a..
uu
"::-2suu6 =u =......
~
Z..'. ':;
s
.)
W:
s
,g
-Og/
Y.
N s
~
~
..... ~......
...,.4.0 7 -,
g togw. j o,w 4
s s.........
gg a
g
y
_.-.-. n -...
- a--
y.
...;. ~
/
r*\\
/*i.
.c
.. v.
yg......._
g j
....,. >.......%..7...
.u.
s w
'Y
.,,.M.O.).%..
$....M...j.
w'*
Og g
e4 9.M
.a W
a 4.
4 y
me e e u
.ma.
.'J y *. g-
- 9. t.
qu..4.h
.e.
8*
.e. wp.g.. g w.v.
....g..
.g
.a.
e.
.s.
.D
.=
...g e.
.g e
a
.m.........4
..m 6"
M W6
..4
&hh..
..U.
.,g
..e..h.4.,
g..
g.q.....
=.. * *..
gd g
w..
.D.
.d e
b.m.
e, m
-8
.4
.w g
a.
.g
. a g
.g..
g e..
e g
g
.g
,.. o
..,. '.. 2....
.g... e.
.e.. ;.. 2 2.,. 2...
..e..
_.. *.... ".. - 'h..
.2
. 2
. 4..
2_
.: =.
s
. +.......
=
.2,..
6m
. e pg.
g A
mg
.e.
7..
l l
e
S e
c
. /
.a e
3. s;...a 3,j. 2.
. a.
.. a. s...
.+
2.
.1..*=*=*.
.* 1
..... 3.
g.
.e
.,3
.,a.
,e,
.g
...a.
3,.
.%. e.. a. 3 m
.2,.. o ya 6.e........J.....
b.4==.
. )
g o.
t' * * *
..e....
g
)
.---a....n..
-d %.4 4. d.b
.*~.
g..
. g.* e 8*
. *. g.
s
..i 4
e--
9
....m
.*ag...
g *
.. J., 'Z.
- 7. '
g.. *
.g
~ <
g,p....
d Ab......
= " *
.r..s.
2...4.
b.
age 2 J..'
,9~..e.....e.
J...
.... =.. *.
1.
.=3..
...a 4 a..g. a. *,
..e....1
... ;.. 2...
.g,.
4.
e.
.t..+..
.....4
. 3....
... 3
...... a..,...
.y..
- s. W
. w
...s e
e... e p,
p g.
.e..........=.
.-.e..
. =....
A eg.
4.........
..-4....
.,.a g.
4..
u.s
.a.
.g
.g 4
e...,..
.=.6.
.g.
.F g
..me b
t
.J.
ee a
., e
.e O
1/
ev e
e 4
e O
e
. a.-..
=.
e ie -
p..ee
.6av,..... e d =* '.ea..se
. e
... d. e..r.m *. J '
- a. **. a..emw o w 'e a e.
en.*. g.. - *
^a 1e e
...**.. 4..***y..*a a.
=
e..
.-k.*.e.,
e
e. 4. s..ee e.%
q 3....
..a..
e...e. g....
a
.~
...e.*,...
..d *
.e..,.
=
.J
..e o
e *:
-.e 9 et..
e, p,.,e.P
.. = * *.
.,.
g
. e5... C.
3.*. 4.* s. J. a..',. o'. J ).
.Q
,1.
- 3.. A *
. s.
44 *
'.9*.4..s...
w 4,*.a..*
.t..*a.***
M.
..a****
1...=
.,=.
=g
- a. d.....
e.*+
- a. a.
. e g.
g ei e,.
. e.o.
q@.
...m 4..
h' O...rg.
.. g W... d e) ep e8 a
6 e V -e e.
.*Mg@.
.# 6e. 8.E.--...*
.a
.a.. -4...f.. y W.
. +
.3...a...
e.....
..a.
.e+t.*
3 A. *.
...-.3.**'*a
..s e.. e.t a.
e g
.g.
. =
- e. 4-9=
-.an e ' e.
=e==.4 g,
....g.
.e2 e a a
s
.b 1
.. g,4.
.a g
e....
..e..
.p aug 4 -.D.
..s*
4
g 9
O e
'e e..
.& Q. e e......
~.um..,,,.
.e, *..
e
- g.
.w.
.... a p
4
.e.d e e =e.
-+..
e g
y
.g e.
as
<. * =. g,.
g
. * *" g
...e..
...g e
, e
....4e.
4 g
g e
6
<*t.
,=..m.,,e.
..f
. e y.
. e.. es.
g p
.
w 9
+
s y
D e
g 4. tu.
4.
44 0g a
ga gg.
.e,a...**.
e....
....g. a..*.*
m.
4.,...,,.....,.
- 4. g..
. ' ^ -.*
a-
, animeg
-. g
.g
'B D
8' m.
OI
.+
. e.
=
.=
r
.e.
e,,
g
.-.J
...*44
.s 3
.. 3. su_.. -.
gse q
. e
...e....
e
..m f.
s.
as g
=
e 9.
4 4
9 t
O
I t~
l '
e s
- a e
' t.
9
\\
e.
p.
e..
4.
m*
4..e.
3e e9
el=.
.J*..
.*?* * *- *
.. J.,
ww.
um=g
. D ewe
.Js
.a w
. se i
a...,.,,g..e...qg
. =., -.,,
..,.3 gr e
..w.w.*
. A.
g
.e e e e
.e; *
......m.s't.3
.e
. = -
e.
' 4 a
.4aey.m
.si.Are ea e
.. u$ $. J **
e gl
.**be.
.a 2..=o*...
- m..n.
.. e,
+
i 1
g
.a.
= 3
..e
- J....
a.
(
e,
... =
s A.4
. a..e. g = =.4.
. g..
.2
. 3.....
4.
4.=...
e e
+.
.?
..m &. e.mo m..
.1 g
4 e
4.
=. 3 a.
4 -
..e 4.,
e.
4.
....., +
.e.
..e. se es.4. e.=. -..
4 4.e
=
w g.
. A...
ew.
e 4
.e g
e e.
.e en 4 e.
s.
b
.m-g 98 4...
4 e
8
e D
e e
O 4
i m,
e g..
.4
.. $.ge'mee
. m w
e, e
e
.,.se e
4,
, - e g
e.
=. *-
.e
.e
.=*.#
=. ""
....=
s.ge as..
g g 9 e
.e