ML20086J998

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Twelfth Interrogatory Re Contention VI-1 (Qa/Qc).Documents, Logs & Repts on All safety-related Welds Requested
ML20086J998
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/1984
From: Romano F
AIR AND WATER POLLUTION PATROL
To:
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20086J956 List:
References
NUDOCS 8401260172
Download: ML20086J998 (2)


Text

q AIR and WATER Y

Pollution Patrol 1

BROAD AXE, PA.

January 14, 1984 Troy B.

Conner, Jr. Esq.

Conner and Wetterhahn 1747 Pennsyovania Ave.,

N.W.

2 Washington, D.C.20006 kj 4

Dear Mr. Conner:

E In The Matter Of E

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-352 B

(Limerick Generating Station and 50-353

[

Units 1 and 2) f:

AWPP's (Romano) Twelth Interrogatorv re Contention VI-l Pursuant to the Board's Order concerning formal discovery, f-AWPP requests the following re Contention-VI-l (Quality Assur-

~

ance/ Control)

AWPP requests specific material that will not re-quire searching through voluminous records.

Re" Applicant's Interium Report to the Licensing Board Relating to Contention VI-1" dated Sept. 16, 1983, in particular, Affi-E davit of Vincent St Boyer, wherein Mr. Boyer affirms "there are pi initial indications, not yet confirmed, that some additional de-l ficiencies may be present" l

(1)

Please provide all documents, logs, and reports on

~

l l

all safety related welds involved.

d (2)

At 5b page 3, what deficiencies noted; what correct-ive action; completion date and manner of correction; and by whom p

u 1

signed off?

l Re par. 12

( 3)

What were the "four minor deficiencies noted"?

g (4)

Is 1% of accessible welds improperly inspected per-mitted by NRC?

h (5)

How were those 4 dispositioned?

)

(6)

How were the remaining 31 welds dispositioned?

(7)

Re paragraph 13--

(a) one re-inspected weld out of j

16 is 6%.

Are those 6% improperly inspected welds

~

within NRC Quality Assurance / Quality Control perm-h issible limits?

(b)

On what basis it there assurance that "engin-(

B401260172 840111 PDR ADOCK 05000352 1

0 PDR

i.

AIR and WATER Pollution Patrol BROAD AXE, PA, (2)

AWPP's Twelth Interrogatory re Contention VI-l continued:

eering analysis (is) continuing to disposition the 212, partically or totally inaccessible welds..." will, without any doubt what soever, that they in fact are not deficient? (AWPP has not re-ceived any report although stated to be done on October 15, 1983.

(c) 19 minor deficiencies out of 47 is approximately 25%.

Is 25% of welds previously inspected and checked off as properly performed permitted by QA/QC of the NRC?

(d)

Re_ par. 14, What does Applicant mean by "represen-tative number of welds for which the subject inspec-tor was responsible?

(e)

How many welds will be in the " representative number"?

(f)

Who determines which welds will be in the "repre-sentative number" selected?

(g)

What is the total proportion which the "represen-tative sample" is to represent?

(h)

Will that number meet statistical procedures re val-idity of results?

I (i)

Please provide affidavit that above statistical stap-dard is met.

(j)

Please provide complete, information, reports, logs, inspectors involved, tests to be run, welds involved and locations of such welds.

(k)

Were any other welders or welding inspectors separated discharged, or transferred due to improper workmanship, efficiency, or other deficiency, including use of l

drugs or alcohol.

Respectfully submitted, AIR & WATER POLLUTION PATROL l

Frank R.) Romano, Chairman 61 Forest Ave.

FRR/jch Ambler, Pa. 19002

-