ML20064H434

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0 on 781114:4 of 6 High Pwr Rod W/Drawal Prohibit Trip Points Were Set Too High.Accepted Test Procedure Voltage Range Permitted RWP to Be Set Higher than Tech Specs Allow
ML20064H434
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/1978
From: Gahm J
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To:
Shared Package
ML20064H431 List:
References
LER-78-035-03L, LER-78-35-3L, NUDOCS 7812200210
Download: ML20064H434 (4)


Text

w. 4. .euwLcan nsuvux vn a w . .uaa.w.,

JRC FORM 364 ,

t7 77) '

, ,, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT

~

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRE 3 INFIRMATl!N)

CDNTROL BLOCK: l 1

l l l l l lh 6

o l ia l9 I C 10 I F l S l V l 1 l@l 0 l0 l- uCENSE UCENSEE CODE 14 15 l0 l0NVMSER l0 l0 l0 l- l0 l025 l@l4 26 l1 l1 l2TYPE UCENSE l0JOl@l$ 7 CAl T $8l@

CON'T olil 8

3ou[f'60I L @l 0 15 DOCKET 61 10 10 10 12 l 686 17 NUMBER 69

@l1 11 l1 1417l8@l1121114l718l@

EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PRG8ABLE CONSEQUENCES h I o l a j l Af ter performance of a surveillance test. four of six high power Rod Withdrawal Pro- I l o l a I l hibit (RWP) trip points were left at a setting slightly greater than 30%. Table I l o I .31 14.4-4 of LCO 4.4.1 specifies a setting of less than or equal to 30%. Therefore, this l,-

I o i s l I condition is reportable per Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification AC 7.5.2(b)1. l.

l 10181l I

L2).7J l l

isl I 80 7 89 E 00E Su C OE COMPONENT COOE SU8 O'E SU E lOisi 7 8 11181@ LRJ@ Iz l@ I z i z i z i z i z i z i@ Iz i@ Lzl@

9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVistON EVENT Y EAR REPORT No. CODE TYPE No.

LER

@ sy,/RO a

g I71al

_ 21 22 l-l 23 l01315!

24 26 W

27 1013I 28 29 It I 30 l-l 31 LOJ 32 EN AC ONP NT ME HOURS S8 1 FOR 8. SV L MANUFA RER lo 33 l@l34 zl@ l z l@

3S LzJ@

36 101010101 37 40 I48 v l@ INI@

42 Izl@ Izl91919l@

43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h I

I i i O I IProcedure was defective because che accenenkle vntenta vnn te ni l mtra d in Pha li ii l l procedure permitted RWP to be set too high. Surveillance test was revised and I

(

[T., fl jnuclear instrumentation recalibrated to new criteria. I l

t i l 31 l I

lt I fl I a 80 7 a 9

% POWER OWER STATUS IS RY DISCOVERY OESCRIPTION

$T I1 15i Wh l016 10 l@l N/A I [J},jhlRoutineOAAudit l ACTIVITY CO TENT 8CELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE I116llzIhlZl@l N/A l lN/A I 44 45 80 l 7 8 9 to 11 l PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUM8ER TYPE DESCRIPT1CN I

l l i l 71 l o l o l o l@l z l@l'*N/ A

  • PtRsONN E'L imau'RS Es i NUMBER DESCRIPTION l

i li la l8l 9o l o l o l@l12N/A i

7 11 EO LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACluTY Q TYPE DESCRIPTION v N/A l I: 191 7 8 9 I z l@lto 80 DE CRIPTION I:Iol ISSUEf@llN N/A l llllllllll l!l2

/ /d A We #4R pw/ ~ 303) 785-2253 _

a p*

. REPORT DATE: December 14. 1978 REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE 78.-35 ISSUE O OCCURRENCE DATE: Novemb er 14, 1978 Page 1 of 3 4

FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO P. O. BCi 361 PLATTEVILLE, COLORADO 80651 REPORT No. 50-267/ 78-35/03-t-0 Final '

IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:

Af ter performance of a routine surveillance test, four of six Linear Channel-High Power Rod Withdrawal Prohibit (RWP) trip points were left at a setting I

greater than 30%. Table 4.4-4 of LCO 4.4.1 specifies an RWP trip point setting of less than or equal to 30%. Therefore, this condition is reportable per Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification AC 7.5.2(b)l.

EVENT DESCRIPTION:

On July 20, 1978, a routine surveillance test of the Linear Power Range Chan-nel Calibration was performed. This surveillance test specified a high power RWP trip point voltage of 2.0 volts with a voltage tolerance of 0.05 volts.

The 2.0 volt trip point corresponds to a reactor power of 30%. Therefore, when the + 0.05 volt tolerance was utilized, a trip point in excess of 30%

reactor power was possible.

l The "as left" conditions for,the surveillance test were as follows:

Channel ,

" As Le f t" Volts Equivalent Power

(":

3 2.01 30.2%

i 4 2.02 30.3%

l l 5 2.02 30.3%

6 2.02 30.3%

7 1.99 29.8%

8 2.00 30.0%

i The settings of Channels 3, 4, 5, and 6 were less conservative than those i

established by the Technical Specifications, but did not prevent the fulfill-ment of their functional requirements.

The discrepancy between the surveillance test and the Technical Specification setpoints was discovered during a routine audit performed by plant Quality

Assurance personnel.

1

REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE 78-35 ISSUE O Page 2 of 3 CAUSE l DESCRIPTION:

The procedure was defective because the acceptance voltage range stated in the surveillance test allowed four RWP trip points to be left at a setting greater than 30%. The voltage tolerance of 10.05 volts was specified because it is within the_a_ccura.:y capability of the test instrumentation.

CORRECTIVE ._.

ACTION:

~

~~~~ The is~uMiilance test setpoints have been revised to a voltage range of 1.93

__1_0.06 volts,_which corresponds to a reactor power of 29 i 1%. The nuclear instrumentation has been readjusted using this revised criteria.

(m. No further corrective action is anticipated or required.

L ..?

D 96a

,a urwW O

g 5

<,w*

  • . REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE 78-35 ISSUE O Page 3 of 3 Prepared by: ( 0 ./4 /

Charles H. Fuller Technical Services Technician '

Reviewed by: /[ /

. W Mm echnical Services Supervisor O

Reviewed by.

Frank M. Mathie Operations Manager Approved by: ,

Mtv.d u Don Warembourg f[

Manager, Nuclear Proddttion O