ML20057B183

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 910220 Meeting W/Alleger & Client Re Concerns Identified to Director on 910118
ML20057B183
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/12/1991
From: Wise R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20057B156 List:
References
FOIA-92-584 NUDOCS 9309200123
Download: ML20057B183 (16)
v • d • e


Text

-

c # * %,g UNITED STATES 2%

'S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, _; f)e S

\\-

C REGION IV 2'

e 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SulTE 1000 March 12, 1991 2# ~/ U MDDRANDUM FOR:

Allegati - File RIV-91-A-0018 R/jhAllegationsCoordinator FR34:

f '

I

SUBJECT:

SGNAR'I OF 2/20/91 MELTIIG BEIhTIN AIHER, CLIDir AND NRC On February 20, 1990, approxirately 10:00a, Bruce Earnest aM myself zet with the alleger and his client at the alleger's home to discuss concerns that had been previously identified to Racer, OI on January 18, 1991.

The alleger's client, a previous Ca=unications Supmisor at CPSES, had been ternmated in a reduction of form. The alleger's client has returned to work at CPSES in another capacity since the termnation.

The alleger and his client provided for our review, nunerous apparent intenul rencranda, ard notes relative to communications concems that were discussed durirg the :neetirg. 3he concerns prirarily dealt with failurcs, outages, ard equipnent problems associated with telephone ccrinunications. No apparent NRC regulatory ratters were noted during this review of dccanentation, if safety related concerns or docunentation is available, it was not presented for NRC review during the rectirg.

The al)eger reportedly has 16 reel to reel tapes (photograph of tapes) of maccurg CPSES telephone conversations. Each tape reportedly has a capacity of 24 hcurs.

The alleger believes that any corr /ersation can be recorded at the discretion of an operator by sirply turnirg a key activated switch.

The alleger stated that he plans to listen to tapes to determine if issues of NRC interest exist. The alleger will contact NRC is somethmg is identified.

The allcger ard his client were adviscd of DOL rights relative to possible employrent discrirdnation concerns at the cen lusion of the rectirg.

,~

9309200123 930420 f

4 PDR FOIA MORRIS 92-DB4 PDR

't f

t e-Memo to file: RIV-91-A-0018 l 1

?Mrch 11,1991 i

'Ihe alleger contacted RIV re: content of one tape - corwersation between Mr. Scott ard NRC about the airlock mtter. Additionally, the alleger provided information about possible unauthorized use of Iraterials designated for wic.ruction, diverted frm site.

1

'Ihe AC requested that the alleger consider providing the tapes to NRC

{

for review to determine if safety concerns exist. 'Ibe alleger is riimmciry the mtter with his " clients", and will infom NRC of their decision.

i i

l 1

CONVERSATION RECORD

! TlWEcf;3 y y/ /9j DATE 0 visrT O CONFERENCE NLEPHoNE hCOMING Naut /swoot, INT j

Location of Visrt/ Conference:

O ouTooiNo Naut Or PERSomcs> CONTACTED OR IM CONTACT CRGANIZATION (Omce. oest Durose.

TREPHONE N@.

l l

i wtTH YOU etcJ g

k/ C/CE V ha Y I

I SUBJECT adn L /x:

CPSGS

/

i

SUMMARY

l - n),Y b-

&l " l-D

/

/

)

(W 2-S n WS /~T m.<d&

fas.

A/l

/N&s c

/

M 2.

Ow L

1 n nX A e nLacM

/

/9 AMONS cms / $EF

?

Vm=

lw _k m

,M rWx4 W k*

r 14.

WA Sm Y ~ $Uk-h b

[.

b} W m-J

~ f / 1,. Y.< S a l g r

/

r

/

/

Y,.. E.,l sm --

,m -a

..Jxo,

-dd &.

s n

,N~Y

,MJ wm.

/$.

/

lx c

ACTION REQUIRED NAWC OF PERSON DOCUWENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATURE DATE ACTION TAKEN

\\

StGNATURE TTTLE DATE J

l sans-not e us u osem--n.auraoss CONVUtSATION RECORD N ",mg

~

TlWE DATE CONVERSATION RECORD j 9p y/y/,f O V 5'T C CONFERENCE g LEPHONE NAmusvueot i INT COMING Location Of Visit / Conference:

O OuroOiNG NAME OF PERSON (s) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT CRGANIZATION (Omce, cept buroes.

TELEM40ME NO.

I wiTH vou etc.:

Yt Cs/C-V DDW SUBJECT c / r 65 1

SUMMARY

hr

$~s d_

n&s_

n i

n8

__-n ur dfS6/

0- ws c5 T i

I

/

/

b&

IM Wb M

o_

ts2 / J c &, -nJ, s,

rAfx w 14 2 2-nW-L-.

=w dwk.

,~

r M YL en t ) n t-s_x A

  • e~

/

w e

7 ACTION REQUIREO NAME OF PERSON DOCUMINTING CONYERSATION i StGNATURE DATE l

Y ? Tl

/ f ACTION TAKEN i

l h TuRe mu OAT sons. ion

. u p o sem-m -s m umas NN RWD 8P'""'"' '*"w" mgm m

~ _. _

..u.

t

' T3ME DATE CONVERSATION RECORD 075T y/g/g TYPE nourtNG O visrT O CONFERENCE TELEPHONE MAWE/swen, m i

O INCOMING Locateon of Vesrt/Conferenes:

[UTGOING NAME OF PERSONf3) CONT ACTED CM IN CONTACT ORGANIZATION (Omee, cept buress.

TELE. PHONE NO.

l WITH YOU etcJ e

Mieny 90 w' l

1 SUBJECT f/EIJ!PA464 A /t 7 I C L L

/W 0/kL lAS N-rmm i

1 Yr ohhf l

.s w

go./

w

?? yA

/

M Ys b

!s.sf Y)'. A / $ G a ~>,.ll-m e ir n/YJ r a

h

/

sb r_Yu T 5.

Ef:AA

.o sj~s./D c 4/

Mf/ r_

(

/

f

. mYx JW y)~f

/

ES W1.- rnr

~z

--.L -- A w -~, X i

- ~

fM /*

J h'f A A*.s W.

2, L

/

N

?#*

PP mes i

A2jAs-A

_4&-

f f

s

.As a mms s24 v s-lja w f'

/

I w/

A L-

' K J1

~ -,

~- "

i

/

/

/

c>*, [ s - / -

MYa s-j.s i

D., s- = m-

/

/

/

I L

ACTION REQUtRED i

t i

i l

I $3GRATURE DATE i

NAME OF PERSCM DOCUMENTING CONytRSAT10N k

/

/

ACTION TAKEN i

saaATu=E mtz oArt 4

J..

m l

30rTI 101

  • Usp o. tems-+91 2&a/60023 CONVERSATION RECORD N "o [ g t

.. a

,,4.ggy,%,

e F L L E L

..+....#*//

1 1-i

[~ ' ',

"1 IN THE UNITED ffATES DI57EIC* Com ggl95 1

^

~

FCR THE NCRTHERN DISTRICT CF NANCY DOMENTT*

PCRT WCRTM CIVISICN SY -

caou'y R. MICW DCW, I

Plaintiff, i

vs.

I CIVII. A.TrION No.

CCtGNC'M. PIAK STEAM II.ECTRIC STATICN $

i 255g TIXAS UTII.ITIES CCRPCPATICN, and

  • HE h".'CI.IAR RET ATCRY CCHMIS5!CN, i

CA - 4 ' 91 2.f.nd.nss.

l PIAINTIFF'$ CRIGINAL PETITIM FW l

TINPCHIAR RINFRAININ3 CRDER AND PRELIMINERY IMR31cf'!CN TO 'ITE HCNCRABLE JUDGE OF SAID CCWP:

R. MICKY DCW, plaintiNf, cc= plains of CCMANCHE PEAK FTEAM ELIC"'RIC FTA-TICN, "'EKAS UTI"I IIS CORPCRATICN, and THE 20:"!AR REGUI.ATCRY COMCSSICN, de-fondants, and fer cause of actica shevs:

I.

i i

Plaintiff is an individual residing in~Erath County, Texas, which is in the Northern District of Texas.

safendant C:IGNCHE PIAK FTEAM E.EC".'RIC 1

STATICN is a corporate facility evned and operated by defendant Texas Util-ities Corporation, with its principal place of business being in Glen Rose, Sccurval Ccunty, Texas, which is in sha Northern District of Texas, and ser-

]

vice cay be had at this location.

Omfendant TEXAS UTIllTIES 'CCGtPORATICN is a cer;cration ince.v rated under the laws of the State of "exas, with its corporate certi.v. w t 4 in -sh. city.ir m 'i t mm. emilas ccunty, Texas, and service may be had at this locatien. Defendant THE NUC:.ZAR RE3CIATCRT CCl4-Qy

a h

MSSICN is an agency of the Qtited States government, h p

'f in ington D.C., with its regional offices located at Region V hea i

i ny be had at this the City of Arlington, Tarrant Cbunty, Texas, and serv ce a i

location.

II, Plaintiff alleges that his clai:ss are of the claims of a class i

impracticable, pie, that the class is se m:marous that joining all umebers is l

and that the in-that there are gestions of law or fnet cesson to the c ass, i

dividual na.med as plaintiff harein vill fairly and adequatel n-Further, plaintiff alleges that this cause of action tarests of the class.

l is caintain3Me ptsuant It11e 23(b)(1)(A)(3)(2), and (3) ol f law cr fact j

of Civil Precedure for the reason that there are questions o i

t we to the :: asters of the class which predominate over any i

other' feeting enly individual members and that a class' action is: s oversy.

avat,able rathods for the fair and efficient adjudication cf the c III.

10, 1991, in a posit on of a

i t

Fisintiff is, and has been, since January o

liataral gat-l a detailed, bread, and panie,ilar, in-depth investigatice, on ec I

Steam Electric Sta-ters, into not eniy the operations of the Comanche Peak Cn, or about, January 10, tion, but its safeguards, and security, as vell.

1 i ed by the Cessn-l 1991, plaintiff was hired by an individtal, currently sep cy idence she had in her-.

che Peak facility, to investigate certain data and ev blem she had' l

possession, and attasps to negotiate an intarnal remedy to a I

l vith har enployer.

~

1 IV.

i e in In the course of plaintiff's examination of the ratorials p 2

N.FF'S ORIGDN, rearJGf M N MC N DmAsseras - M

~

l I

s his custody, plaintiff discevered nt::erous ::scoranda describing, with certa clarity, pnic s'ituatiens, acergency situations, and other itema cf such imert that plaintiff felt obligated to centact defendant The Naclear Regu-Cten doing so, defend-latory Cc:: mission, and advisa them Of his disc =very.

ant NRO sent two cf its investigative efficials to pinintiff's he:a, and af-tar regaesting to take sc::e dccuments back to Wahingten, D.C. With th vised p aintiff they vould be in touch vith him in two days, a copy cf the receipt fer pinintiff's documents is attached hersto, arked Dchibit A, an

-had*

- eest:

i

. Aftar:crnar-- - ~,s,. -

inccrporated herein as if fully set cut at length.

passed,,.,and. pla.i.ntiff tsd'fecsived'noN6:'ii"fr52!3Ffesfin 11recN5Eact viTtha~o.f. fics. ~of tha C:=t:i.s.sion_ar -o.f.at,.,h.e'9,_.ac n

.a..n a

~.,

MaifG Wsh1Wn,TC7to'a'5cEUTn3heidela$

PfarWigth,1,3hy ly.3ctXMEi@H.gth_(sMim,Jrem 3e,regicnal"bfficemaIlirs;rihigiatter; h.ad'..been,.w..ie,d in J.e.sponse t. ort.he '.vi..s.it of,Ghs?)

r.

cat

.w a

-~

n..

~.

p.

)

d incorporated herein al if fully set r-

.-. ~.

.g 7,, attach 6dyharetog marked *Dthibit l an

,.,, - ~., Scut at length, and that isttar nde e0 plats disclaimer of all plaintiff's

~..#

a.s,. -

allegations and quosciens.

Upon furthat contact with NRC headquarters, yet ancther visit was schedcled to pisintiff's heme, this ti.m to interviev vitnesses, with exac Thajp(fic sis 7)

'- f tastimony to safety and security vielatiens and cysrsights.

T arrived,mnducted'Iengthy-intarvisys/tcok~itiltiple'tiotesT;14ft'f and,3

'a

- '# ' ~.

~

has ' teen no responsa fro = them en these issuas ras'of rths-date

~

V.

._,..~-m--..

-Alsoi cams 'into pitintiff's pesssssl.

b,y no.cmanaxcetrary:to;that

)

enc i'

laws o.f tha United States, or the Stata of.Tene,16.res ii sa,ch..w.ith 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. capacity, which centained.,poni

~

FIADirIy?'S ORIG'DE ymnCN FOR T90 AND PMJXDOJd' D

idivig.7 of 2hesevnver_saticca F r.eveal.e. d -in~ con.f.i.dene.s. viin.

.a w

~.

ix'b t9een'~siisbera.~of)[tfand.iuiCW"

~

'ual"Wh5.7..W.1.1.s..te.n.e.d_~t..o..th.emn. :enta.i.n. 'tt s..u.

l 921saTRequiatery 00::missicn'and officfals of defanda

_. ~._.

s

~ n

.hasards, problees, resolutices, suggestions for n nectY!if,3taH _.

dir4 en regar Wsihfs h0i./

j Ydselutien,7and'en at-least cne occasion,',permissionT6'lgn Fliich hafi enfy be'

~

j ardess~coEditiorFalleving tham to' continue;'fer reasons

~

~~

J

~

ErtJ arcartained.Vf'thellayir4 of,thess tapes..in.~6 pen *T:

VI.

Tai'.ing to obtain any oceperation frc= def ant. ant NRC, p sation preached defendant Texas ttilities directly, in the course of c this plaintiff, as vail as plain-with various officials cf that defendant, d in cns specific instance tiff'a a::picyer, vere threaraned acre than ones, an Federal Sareau sufficiently encugh that plaintiff filed a ec q 1aint with the ffered what of *nvestigstien in Fort 'trth; and plaintiff's e@loyer vas e accunted to a hribe to separate her frc= plaintiff, Cn er about ths 2hd day of Tehruary, 1991, two efficia i

iff to meet viti endant Texas Utilities Corperat:en care to the he:m cf pla nt e

After 9 hcurs cf di we.asions plaintiff and the peccie ha vas representing.

Plaintiff centacted defendant Co.

the officials left, and, again, no word.

h ir facility for canchs Peax and arrangerants were cada fer a caeting at t e h those offic-yet nr.cther e=picyte to discuss definate safety violations ials, ar.d plaintiff was to be presant.

1 VII.

991, During the course of that reeting, en the 1st day of W1,1 i

i ith regard to the labe this plaintiff heard testircny of actual violat ons w wherein.

in t.he unit ? rs ing cf pressura valves, and li=1t svmt. arm F1AINr1Ff'S CR1GDEL rsmiCN FCst TRO AND PNW

- - - - - - - - ~

There vas tast-there was rampant mislabeling, or lack of labeling entir:1y.

1::eny that the labeling could only he d ne by carrying design plan crder to ascertain the correct 1ccatica for the labels, and it was ccanon "here was tasti::cny that this practisa had a.lso practiaa te ce vithout them.

i teen prtrvalent in the thit 1 area, and it vus certainly conceivabia that in an energency situatien the vreng valve, er n =islabeled valve could en, or off, in the vreng rannar causing an a::negency, or perhaps trafedy As a result of these conversaticns, and the infor-ration preffered,

=njcined with tasti::cny ::ade in a television interview wherein anotha p1=yee stated he had perscnally transfered electrical viri.g into a
enduit which fed the safeguards connection betvoen thits 1 & 2, which the individual repcrted the danger, but been stripped of its insulatient the same individual stated that the it was never inspected, or cerracted:

7:ality centrol Officials gaits of tan raraly " signed-off" their inspectic withcut actually :sking thams aEd31aint..if.f.;.be.ca.:.:e;so.'e.m......en.e d tero.gy

nediatelya.c,seted. ths..NRCr va..s - again,til.ar:i.s.s.ad.e andrasicf:tha a

.. ~ -.. -.

w,...

~

....r..

~ PSIE l'3Tnct" going 30 fiz:nedia~titlyJad-T this-f111ngrhas learnyd that defardant'::

f ress ths. labeling Tutters bevill attend to-it'thrt:cgh angaudit*,~ tnt ^noty in'the'.::cediate 'futurei J VI!!.

O.s *eclaratien of Independanen, supported by the Constitution of t United States cf Ararica is the scia assuran== that the citiz The thited Stater try vill have life, liberty, and the Farsuit of happiness.

~

gcVern::ent has passed unitiple lays to insure this pursuit of the Health and Safety Act to the CC-out danger to life, and property, frc:

cupatienal Haalth and Safety Act, and the Enviren::entat ProLeest hb l

Wi'cenc..uetr-o_f 'ths'd.e.f_e.n.._d.a. ny','Gda_sc_ribed be._

ri' w

~.,

avefy~idgii"1Tif, act',kiidTi6t3EF7~Es'iiEs%Eu ed'Efra:Ecroir s T

e- -

. -- -, ~, --,,s.-r 1 the Ltited States (cr.Its cigza.... ~d ths[r apparant refusal +.o-addres

- - ~, - -,... -.

ns,.an istion?iCt5e"irc~ssest

~

inspect;"cr correct'ths problers brought to thefr att seWof Epubli~c'and priyate'raltaasance thaicati3E:ca/

IX.

As a direct and proxt::: ate result of the cenduct of the defendants' herein, there exists a documented, and cerr berated situation of prob blic, and the property of trajedy, danger, and injury to the lives of the pu

?.ere exists a very Ital i m.inant and irreparable dan-the public at large.

ger to sli, and the tetal less, in lives, injuries, and property e L515sidefendantsCare 'pravanted frc:n y=::tinuing Jtheir /

acerately :casured.

present 'cenduct.r1nspee:.icns are perfor::md,-and cor.rectio

-...s.

~

by :the C0urt/~the dangers her.ein described. vill'ce.n. tinue to

~

' 'Ein.*

What'in all probability ylil lead'to i~ dajedy,

)

resultant icsses frn::

he'Tncalcu1&b18.I X.

i For the harm and darage done to the plaintiff, in the exposure to a pcssihie trajedy, and for the ham and darage that vili cen P.tch plaintiff has no adequate re:mdy at lav.

intervantion cf this Court, If plaintiff darages are centinuing, and to a large degree incair.:lable, if the avaits the ha;;ening cf an smergency shttd0vn of tha facility to see at s0:n point in ti::n corrected, he tzy not.

errors he kncvs of vers in fact, 4

informa-ever be aware cf the answer if his allegations are correct and the tion acerate.

'00ERETCRI, plaintiff requests that:

A temporary restraining order be issued without notice to 1

ants, rastraining defendants', their agents, servants, and employees, free directly er indirectly refueling tha thit i reacter at the Coranche Peak Steam Electric Station located in Glen Ecse, Texas; centinuing ccnstre.=tien en the W.it 2 reaeter of the C:aer.cr.s peak Steam Electric Station, loca or issuing any license to cparate the afcresaid facilit) at Glen F.cse, Texas:

until such tt a as an independant inspecti n team can ascertain that the definate safety hazards described in this petition have been idantified and corrected to the exact specif1:ations of the regulatiens of the !A: clear Rag-ulatcry C::rt.ssion.

2.

sfendants' be cited t appear and sh=v cause and that en such hearing, a preli=ina.ry injun :ica te israed, enjoining defendants, their agents, serrants, and egicyees, frc= directly or in'directly refueling the Unit ; reacter at the C0:anche Peak Staaft nectric Statien iccated at Glen centinuing cenetraction en the thit 2 reac:cr of the 0--anche Fnse, w :

. ak Steam nectric Station 1:cated at Gian R:se, Texas; er issuing any lie-N ense to Operate the aferesaid facility until such ties as an independant in-specti:n tea = can ascar: min that the definate safety harards described

etition have toen identified and,cerrected t0 the exact specificaticas of the.VJelear ?sguiascrf Cem.issicn.

A per:nnant injuncti:n be crdered en final trial of this cause, 3.

enjoining defendants', their agents, servants, and ag icyees, frem directly reacter at the 00:anc*.a Peak Steam Elme-cr indirectly refueling the Unit i tric statica located at Gian Tcse, "exas censinuing construction en the th 2 react 0r at the C :anche Feak Stea.: Electric Station located at Glen Ecse, Or issuing any license to the aferesaid facility until such tira as Texast an independant inspectics team can ascertain that the definate safety I

ards described in this petitien have been identified and corrected to the

exact specificaticas of the !Atclear Regulatory Cerr.issicn.

4.

cn final trial, plaintiff have judgment against defencants' fer darages in excess of the mini:.:.m jeisdictional limits of the Court, pcst-1 judg ent interest as provided by law, c sts of ccurt, and such other and fur- ;

ther relief, at law or in equity, as to vnien plaintiff ray be justly entitlec '

7Aspectfu11y s'dmitted,

,..t CW DcW. pec se 586 N. Clinton Stephanv111e, Texas 76401 (B17) 965-2405 Petititmar i

VERIFICEFIQi STATE CF TDQW5 I

t I

cacwrr cF ERAIs I

1 BrycRE ME, the undersig.ed tictary Phlic, en this day personally ap-l 1

l peared R. )CCW DDW, who, being by me duly svorn on cath deposed and said that he is the plaintiff in the abcVe-entitled and nu.hred causes that he J

has read the abcVe and foregoing Petiti:n Fer Tempers./ Restrair(rg Crder a

and Preliminary Injunctions and that every staternat centained tharein is within his pers=nal kncviedge and is tree and correct.

p u,w.

.. = m. m.v,

?jk??.

tK.D ?.'""

4.a ql.1 m,-

3..scu :cu

+ ' 9 g.' n;:.-e -

gggggag 5

l SUBSCRIBED AND SHCIRN TO EEFURE ME, en tha 8th day of April,1991, to certify which vitness =y hand and efficial seal'.

g'i' *.

/

f

./

\\

Netary P211c, State of Tsxas

,i

h e

Q #

tvf. P < & L,~ 4 c L _ W -

I N gj,N9 W4&

I

.c~

A p A4

& ri-4/" n l.

W

- ML s W i~M-~ A & b.R~

.~

%,4,;

r n w n a a s u m.

/p#0 ~

% ~LC W,:.rwy&

a$gf," " *-

a

~

- n,

%I% %

m

~d~ sa nc, M

~ @

.l W &

m W.

s u A A L q.~~~

J fa L 4 r~ s

, ]

~

dQ L

~

J.

A L -p a 44. -

J M

- Q ray-O & ~dd ~- g g -Dw & L l

/

J l~ n y 4~Jg.

wu w - > u +,f.

% <A -~

y.

J T e n &n w

aa

- m.

m h h

7 y,-awm eu a

& PX~ 5~ A-y

-J.

) L(

am u

-..t 3

f

)

l i

s y -

n a a e.

og a s e %%

m - p - m W &.-

i i

j

& 4*

f W @p Qw-a N

a a c; 1x-+wl

~- n o

d 4 h M

,4C @ 4 d

l A

'rm %d f - /y wu

&~/f Y A $-

7 i

M 1M [

g

^-9 1:

9n. % n w - & Le. A A mf& A %

v L:~

~& " 4W w.A~~ - ikA&fMs-

)

A M o~d & &

s A A W.

j l

l

J-t i

CONVERSATION RECORD

/3'ffl.A. 9/j 7/9 f

. Ti.E TYPE mog ness O vis3T O CONFERENCE g-TnIPHONE,

NAmE/svueot, int

@COMIM Location of Viset/ Conference:

O ournoiNo NAME OF PERSONts) CONTACTED CR IM CONTACT CWGAN!ZAT8CN (Omce, oest Dureau.

TELEPHONE Mot WITH YOU MtJ 8

IC/L V O.? J l

sua;EcT Fn L AZ_-

.e t-l

SUMMARY

i h_

1 h_

lV W m

/

/

/

WL s.dwxh

//_

w m

sw

/

(

' 9, l'f /,

JL.,

l fM

/ N Hr i

k i

I 1

i f

l l

)

l ACTION REQUIRED I

i Naw[ or Ptason oocuwtNTING CONVERSATION iPGNATURE DATE W

/

f4 W

ACTION TAKEN

' f j

k I

sm=ATu=E TrrtE oAn i;

J } l, i

V r

r 30271-let e ustLeo.ieus-49124s/6co23 CONVERSATION RND N '"f g m

I

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20057B183&oldid=4479754"