ML20043H698

Submits Correction to 890721 Response to Deviation Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/89-26 & 50-368/89-26.Development of Q,F & s Preventive Maint Procedures Included in Business Plan as Item C.2(2) W/Completion Date of 901031

ML20043H698
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	06/18/1990
From:	Ewing E ENTERGY CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
0CAN069005, CAN69005, NUDOCS 9006260312
Download: ML20043H698 (2)

Text

- - - - - - - wv--

.-( )

d Enterg 7 1" : g ' ; g *"= '"c- 1 g{ g g RusseitvMe, AR 728o1 ToI501 DG4 3100 l

l

-June 18, 1990-OCAN069005  ;

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Document Control Desk Mail Station P1-137 Washington, D. C. 20555

SUBJECT:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313/50-368  ;

License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Correction to Response to Inspection Report.

50-313/89-26; 50-368/89-26 Gentlemen:

Our letter of July 21, 1989 (0CAN078918),-responded to Deviation 313; 368/8926-01 concerning completion of.the Preventive Maintenance _(PM) Program. ,

This response included tables showing the number of preventive maintenance procedures required, draf ted, and approved as of October 1988 and July 1989.-  ;

These tables were in error as the numbers given inadvertently included non-safety related procedures. -The commitment in response to the original violation (Violation 313; 368/8730-01, ANO response (0CAN118707)~ dated-November 30,1987) included only safety-related components (those:designatcd Q, F, or S) as did the Notice of Violation itself. . 'Also, the text.of ~ the deviation response accurately stated that the October 31, 1990,.complet'on r date was for procedures for safety-related and other selected components. '!

However, the numbers for non-safety-relate'd procedures were . included in the tables due to a miscommunication between' Plant Licensing and the personnel ,

responsible for the PM program'when the letter.of July 21, 1989, was '

prepared.

t The development of Q, F, and S preventive maintenance procedures is included in the ANO Business Plan as item C.2(2) with a completion:date of October 31, 1990. The program is currently on schedule to meet the' commitment.

The program status as of May 27, 1990, was as follows:

Preventive Maintenance Procedures for Q, F, and S Components:

Elec Mech I&C Total Required 115 101 179 395 Drafted 110 93- 154 357 Approved 88 83 125 296

% Drafted 96% 92% 86%. 90%-

% Approved 77% 82% 70% 75%

j 0kNObb b3 p

l

'C q

. U. S. NRC .

' Page 1  ;

, 9CAN869085 June 18, 1990 i 1

I 1

Preventive Maintenance Engineering Evaluations (PMEEs):- j Required 173 Drafted 166 ,

Approved 166 1

% Drafted- 96%

% Approved 96%

Repetitive Tasks: l Elec M_ep I&C Total Total 1518 838 839. .3195 Planned 1162 560 -556 '2278 Approved 818 506 391 '1715 Scheduled 799 489 381 1669 3

% Planned 77% 67% 66%- 71%-

% Approved- 54% 60% 47%- 54%

% Scheduled. 53% 58% 45% 52%

The total number of procedures, PMEEs, and repetitive tasks will vary over time due to changes in plant ~ configuration and requirements.

This matter was discussed with Mr. Tom Westerman of the NRC Region IV staff _;

by Mr. James Fisicaro of my staff on June 15, 1990. If you have any questions  :

concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Fisicaro, 501-964-3228.

I Very truly yours, E.[. Ewing ,

General Manager,-

Technical Support and Assessment l

ECE/JDJ/sgw L cc: Regional Administrator Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas' 76011 1

s

!