ML17341A247
| ML17341A247 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1981 |
| From: | Chonin N CHONIN, N., ONCAVAGE, M. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17341A248 | List: |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8106190309 | |
| Download: ML17341A247 (47) | |
Text
> 05@~ 48 Wiley < s~Q
/~~/<'NITED STATE OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION >ee~~@Ce BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD v
In the matter of C~
) Docket Nos. 50-250-SP
/g ) 5 50-251-SP FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COM
~ oposed Amendments to Facility (Turkey Point Nuclear ()) JUN l)81981 rating Licenses to Permit Generating Unites Nos. 3 p,s, wm4ai~>~ am Gener ator Repairs) and, 4) 6' CON/I 5$ QH Q)
POSITION AS TO ACTION THE'OARD SHOULD 6'NTERVENOR'S TAKE REGARDING THE DISPOSAL OF THE SOLID WASTE RESULTING FROM THE STEAM GENERATOR REPAIRS Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order of the Atomic Safety Licensing Board dated May 28, 1981 at page 43,'paragraph 4, Mark P.
Oncavage files the following position as to whether the Board can or e should take any action regarding solid waste resulting from steam generator repairs at Turkey Point, including the imposition of license amendment conditions.
Statement of Facts There is presently on site at Turkey Point facility approximately 400 drums containing solid waste with low level radio-activity. The Final Environmental Statement states that the estimated amount of radioactive solid waste generated from the steam generator repair ranges from 1100,cubic meters to 2300 cubic meters per unit.
This estimate excludes the lower a;ssemblies that will be removed during the repairs and the normal amount of.,solid waste from operations which amounts to approximately 575 cubic meters per unit per year. (See affidavit of, Douglas King on Contention for Board). The FES also shows that the waste limitation for Turkey Point waste at the Barnwell, South Carolina, disposal site is 57 cubic meters per month, starting in
~r,n9 szo6~soso t gb /
October, 1981.
Given the
~
limited disposal allocation at the Barnwell
~ ~ ~
site, the licensee will not be able to ship the solid waste generated
~ ~ ~
from the steam generator repairs to its normal disposal facility.
This creates a unique question as to what .will happen to the solid waste resulting from the steam generator repairs, as the Board has recognized in its May 28, 1981 Order.
10 C.F.R. Sec. 20.301 says:
"No licensee shall dispose of licensed material except: a) by transfer to an authorized recipient as provided in the regulations in Part 30, 40 or 70 of this chapter, whichever may be applicable; b) as authorized pursuant to Sec. 20.302; c) as provided in Sec. 20.303 or Sec. 20.304, applicable respectively to the disposal of licensed material by release into sanitary sewerage systems or burial in soil, or in Sec. 20;106 (radioactivity in effluents to unrestricted areas). I.25 FR 10914, Nov. 17, 1960, as amended at 39 FR 27121, July 25, 1974j" e At present the Florida Power 8 Light Turkey Point facility does not have an "authorized recipient" for the solid waste generated by units 3 and 4. The Steam Generator Repair Reports provides no f
procedure or release into'he sanitary sewerage system as set forth I
in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 20.303 or for disposal by burial in soil as set forth
.in 10- C.F.R. Sec. 20.304 or re].'ease in effluents areas as provided for in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 20.106. The only remaining permissable procedure is that set forth in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 20.302, which describes the method for obtaining approval for proposed disposal procedures.
10 C.F.R. Sec. 20.302 says:
"Any licensee or applicant for a license may apply
to the Commission for approval of proposed procedures to dispose of licensed material in a manner not otherwise authorized in the regu-lations in this chapter. Each application should include a description of the licensed material and any other radioactive material involved, including the quantities and kinds of such material and the levels of radio-activity involved, and the proposed manner and conditions of disposal. The application should also include an analysis and evalua-tion of pertinent information as to the nature of the environment, including topographical, geological, meteorological, and hydrological characteristics; usage of ground and surface waters in the general area; the nature and location of other potentially affected faci-lities; and procedures to be observed to minimize the risk of unexpected or hazardous exposures.
b) The comniss"on. will not approve any appli-cation for a license to receive licensed material from other persons for disposal on land not owned by the Federal Government or by a State government.
c) The commision will not approve any application for a license for disposal of licensed material at sea unless the applicant shows that sea disposal offers less harm to man or the environment than other practical alternative methods of disposal.
[25 FR 10914, Nov. 17, 1960, as amended at 26 FR 352, Jan. 18, 1961; 36 FR 23138, Dec. 4, 197lj" Given the requirements of this regulation and the restrict-ions.on disposing the solid waste at the Barnwell, South Carolina facility, the Intervenor takes the following positions en the disposal of the solid
'waste resulting from the steam generator repairs at Turkey Point:
POSITION I The licensee should submit to the Commission for its approval an application that sets forth its proposed disposal procedures.
t This application should include a description of the radioactive material involved, including the quantities and kinds of such materials, and the levels of radioactivity involved. It should include the proposed manner
and conditions of disposal and an analysis of the nature of the environ-ment into which the material will be disposed along with a description of the nature and location of other potentially affected facilities.
POSITION II All parties to this case and all other interested persons should be given a fair opportunity to comment on the licensee's applica-tion to dispose of this material.
POSITION IlI A. The Board should direct the NRC staff to prepare an environmental impact statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 and pursuant to the Nuclear
'Regulatory Commission regulation 10 C.F,.R. Part 51 relative to the t generic solid low level waste disposal issue, The handling, transporting and disposition of the solid waste which vill be generated by the repair is a major federal action that may significantly effect the human environment, or B. The Board should delay the repair and appoint the EPA as the lead agency for preparing the Environmental Impact Statement on the waste issue. The staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has shown a predisposed bias and prejudice toward conducting these repairs and could not under NEPA do a fair and impartial evaluation of the environmental impact of the solid waste issue. (See Section 103, NEPA) This is shown by the staff's total disregard for the waste C
issue in the environmental impact statement. This is further shown by the staff's an'd licensee's disregard for the safety aspect of allowing t hundreds of fifty-five gallon drums of radioactive waste to stand in an open dump without any security whatsoever.
t Statement The Board should (FES) prepared POS1TION by the IV rule that the Environmental Impact staff is inadequate for its failure to discuss the environmental impact of the handling, transporting, and disposition of the solid waste which will be generated by the repair. The impact of the waste issue was not addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement.
POSITION V The Board should direct the NRC staff to send the Environmental Impact Statement back to the agencies for comment on the solid low level waste issue. The agencies, whose comments are attached to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, had no information concerning the low level waste issue, and therefore, did not have the opportunity to comment on this issue.
POSlTION VI Any issuance of an amendment to the license should be delayed until such time as an environmental impact study is done concerning the low level waste issue and/or until such time as the present Final Environmental Impact Statement properly addresses the waste issue.. These repairs should be delayed until the NEPA require-
,.ments, are 'followed, including sufficient time to comment on the waste issue-and an appropriate public hearing is held concerning the waste issue.
POSITION VII The Board should direct the staff to contact the t appropriate State of Florida agencies and allow the State'f Florida to complete studies that are presently being taken concerning the issue of the disposal of the solid waste. Attached to this filing are
0 documents which would reflect that the University of Florida is resently studying the low level waste issue. A solution has not been found to the pxoblem of the disposal of low level waste generated in the State of Florida exclusive of the waste that will be generated by the repair itself.
POSITION VIII The repair should be delayed until the NRC completes its review of the disposal of low activity bulk solid waste. The NRC is presently studying the issue in advance of instituting lg C.F.R.
Part 61. The Board should direct Florida Power 8 Light to reveal in the record whether Florida Power 8 Light intends to apply for a license amendment relative to becoming a waste recipient or in the alternative whether they intend to petition the NRC for an exception authorized by 10 C.F.R. Sec. 30.11-20, Sec. 40.11-14, and/or Sec.
70.11-14 POSITION IX The Board should direct the staff to require Florida Power 8 Light to determine that all solid radioactive waste leaving the reactor site for burial contains no detectible free liquids as defi.ned by Appendix II of NSI-ANS 55.1-1979.
POSITION X The Board should reject the amended license application
.and prohibit the repair because the licensee under the existing regulations has no legal manner in which to dispose of the low level waste which wz.ll be generated by the repai'r. The land on which Turkey
' 'tuated is privately owned land and therefore the licensee P
V could not obtain a license as a low level waste storage facxlxty.
~ ~
t The Board should POSITION XI require the staf f and licensee to examine the low level waste disposal capacity of Turkey Point for the life of the plant.
POSITION XII The Board should allow the Intervenor the right to reopen Discovery on the Solid Low Level Waste Issue. The Board itself realized that there has not been sufficient time to develop a record on this issue. ( See May 28, 1981 Order at p. 40).
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE The environmental impact of maintaining the reactor site as a Nuclear Waste disposal site during the license term has never been considered by this Board, nor by the commission.
The Licensee plans to construct a facility at Turkey Point which will be suitable for temporary storage of low dose rate LLW containers in the event it becomes necessary to retain LLW on site. (See University of Florida LLW Report at p. 71.)
The Commission has under study whether an off-'site storage solution for Nuclear Waste will be available by the years 2007-2009 and if not whether wastes can be stored on sites beyond those years, until an off-site solution becomes available (Notice of the proposed rule making regarding the storage and disposal of nuclear waste (44 FR 61373, Oct. 25, 1979)). If that were the issue in our case then the Board could not consider it as the Commission has decided that that issue should not be
'addressed in an individual license proceeding..
The Board is not being asked to consider the environmental impacts that are associated with the storage of LLW after the expiration of the operating license. The Intervenor asks that the Board consider th environmental impact that will be associated with the on site storage of low level waste in 1981 and the balance of the life of the plant. The term "on site" storage is significant because Florida in an agreement
State. (See Article II of Agreement between the State of Florida and NRC.) "On Site" storage vests jurisdiction in the NRC and this Board (See Letter attached dated March 31, 1981.)
CONCLUSION i
The Intervenor has couched the action he feels the Board should take in alternative positions. He is not privy to.the Licensee's plans concerning the waste issue and will not have any information until June 15, 1981. The decision this Board makes concerning radioactive waste disposal will effect Dade County and the State of Florida for generations. Any one or more of the positions may be applicable after the licensee's plans are revealed. The Intervenor should be given the oppor-tunity to pursue discovery after the Licensee files their documents on June 15, 1981. The discovery cut-off did not comtemplate this additional issue. A public hearing should be held. Public debate is the only manner in which these vital decisions can be fully aired.
DATED this the ~I@ day of June, 1981.
LAW OFFICES OF NEIL CHONIN, P.A.
Attorneys for Intervenor Suite 1400 Amerifirst Bldg.
One S. E. 3rd Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: 377-3023 By eel C onion
I r 5vc. i+m 4600.l
. f6->9) tLeprnces Porto r c.A-F-203 tJ.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NOTICE OF GRANT AVSARCJ Under authority of Publr'c Law 95-224 and svbf'ecr ro penin nt kgr's.'ation, reriufations and policies applicaolc ro fc relepirJer ae proflrens Il J. Federal Grant 5 Cooperati ve Agreement Act, of 1977 41 U.S C 501 et sea I
- 1. PROGRAM TITLE /Cire rpeCrTJC prOgrarrI title/
In-State Storage o Low Level Radioactive Waste
- 2. G RAHTE E ffJeme, eddrca, ZJP codcl 2, G RANT SeO, e. AMEHOMEHT NO, State of Florida DE- F607-80 I Dl 2149 Dept. of Health 8 Rehabilitative Services.
III'.
- 5. BUOGET PERIoo 1317 Winewood Blvd., Ta'llahassee, Fi 32301 TELEPHONE- F oms Da te o f Award Th.vr 9-30-80 904-487-1004 6: TOT*I PROGRAM PERIOD Fro: Date of Award Tnr I 7-1-81
- 7. COHGRESSIONAI. OIS'rAICT 9. TYPE OF GRANT AWARD II ~
)a. Revision B. STATE, CITY, COUNTY I b. Continuation e. Supplement Florida, Tallahassee, Leln Ic. Renewal 10, NAME OF GRANTEE PROJECT, DIRECTOR 11, ADDRESS OF GRANTEE I'ROJECT OIRECTOR Ulra Clark San.e as Block 2
- 12. GRANTEE TYP Q STATE Q LOCAL GOV ERHMElvT Q NONPROF IT Q OTHFR ALITHORIZEDGRANTEE 1aa. APPROPRIATION SYMBOL 14,ALLOTMrNT SYMBOLJFUND CLASS 15a. EMPLOYER I.D.NUMBER 89X0220. 91 1596001874
- b. 8 ra R Number '.D-00-91Jf250 b. Vendor Code
,820201007
- 16. AWARD COMPUTATION (Ferferer fvndr onryJ 1r CURRENT BUOGFT P'6 RIOO INFORMATION
~
- a. Amount awarded prior budget periods S a, F vdarai sharc of approved budget S
~ b. Amount previously awarded currant .
budget period c.,current fiscal year funds, this amard
- d. Total amount awarded for program s
s 35 000.00
'b. Non Fcdcral share of approved c.
budget Tual approved budget s
s period 59,862.00
- 18. This p nt award, consl"!ng of Pa.. I-Budget Plan and Part lIZonditions, attached hereto, will be administered In accordanct with the following docutnentt which a:e hereby Incorporated by reference:
- a. Gzantapplicationdated April 21, 1980 Es negotiated.
~ =P b; Pro~m guidelines app1icable to thh grant:
PVtfc) HOne (Da Je)
- c. DOt= Assistanc" Regulations, 10 CFR 2-600, as an:ended, subparts A Sc. 8
- d. Othe."documents asapp!icable OMB Circular A-162 and Federal Management Circular (FMC 74-4f
- 19. SPECI AI. CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS GRANT AWARD Part III, General Provisions, is attached and made a part'f" th) s Grant'.
M A R KS: 'O..RE
~ ~
- 22. AWA ROE~ ar /7 StaISyoer i. of authorized z 'D3.recz - pre ca~in
~
Pzcsclz 5Yfzce (Si'gna rureJ (De ra J 2LQ.~Cae ~~oe g~ g f I f7irfe of aurhorizedsiffning office'aJJ f7frfeJ HAIJIE OF GRANTEE ORGANIZATION State of Florida Dept. of Health 5 Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood 8lvd. {Dat Tallahassee, .Florida 32301 Grants Officer AWARDING OFFICER lit e
~ r
~
PROPOSAL State of Florida
. Headquarters Health and. Rehabi3.itative Serivces Tallahassee, Florica for a. stucy of IN-ST'Z STOiQC:- OF LQN-L=W:.L R'iDIOACTIXr. HASTE .
~ ~
By
~ ~
Departnent of Enviro'nmental =-ngineering Sciences University of Florida Gainesville, Florida February 21, 1980
In State Sto ape of Lou-}.evel % 'oactive tiastes Proposal Outline by Depa tment of Environmental engineering Sci.ences P incipal Investigator:
M. Emmett Bolch Co-Investigator:
Cha les'; Boessler 110 A. P. 33.ack Hall, Un'vers'ty of Florida Cainesville, Florida 3263.3.
(90C) 392-0836 or (904) 392-0842 XNTAODUCTION It is beco.-..-.ing inc"easingly evident "'".at.a plan fo storing loM-level radioactive iastes { ~ ~)3) in the State of:lor'ca, in lieu of out-of state storage, may be -eaux, e d . Thee purpose u o" th's proposal is to e'stablish a-frame~os upon vh' h' a "soun d low-3.evel radioactive waste storage
~ ~
policy
~
can b based.
The F3.orida Department of Health and ¹habilitative Services has been assigned the lead in deve3oping this. plan =or the State of F}orxda'The basic obgectxve o f th is proposal is to orovide A hRS N'th approx nm- nths ate3.y 24 mm-monks exoertise and consulting on th's subject. An ex~ected product s a complete
~ ~ ~
written recordd o a ll inpu tss, coosideraticns co alternatives and cr~teu.a used the development off th e S" a te's e s plan. The final document should provide the cornerstone upon ~ h'xc 1 egisi 1a ti've and/or re"ulatory act@on can be based.
t
~
-.r -~ =D R=SZARCH There is a my ai'd o f data sources and stuccoes cies on fragments and spectra nhases o the LLRH problem. The Departmentt o ~ Znergy
~ er'gy is the lead Federal agency an d has. o fared technical assistance. ihee majo LLFit generators of the state have indicated a willingness ~ ess to ass'st 'nn so solving this problem. The v'e P ro'ect 3 w'll be expected' cent alize thee f3.ow o o infomation, sort and separate the inputs, and gene a tee sumrn summaries l '
app xc ab3.e to Florida's unique situa ta.on.
Dr. Bolch zs c. aim an of the University oA A=3.orida's Ad hoc Committee on.
Campus -l Low- eve 1 Radioact ve Vas e Y~nagemen That coamit ee along with the hei p o D . Bol ch's winter class o .
graduaa" e stu " c ends " in Radioact=ye Vaste to De c=~pus problem zn late w ate Dace;,her, Dr. Roessle is began e an cha'rman o f t.4 e wv es 5. ga e U nve 'ont"o sity's' Radiation Control Cont"o omm'i Committee omm omm'socia"ed 3.979.
and prxnczpaal investi-gator o ~ sev sever'al studies dea3.ing in withwx the radiation hazards as with phosphate mining in
~
P3.orxda.
~
OBHCTIV S ~ 1 The: specxzzc o '-'ectives
' can be assoc're
'.tec th nine fundamenia t asks Th s fo3.3.ows:
TASK 3. is to l d ve op a background domumen Thxs document wx3.1 bass,cally identi y and interpret the p roblem at haa d Xt wall include a hast o rica3.
pe "spec" ive (past and 'cent
'cent) as we3.1 as an analysxs sis o~
sos of LLRt9 generation in hach-a Florida (p esent and future) and an a,n oossib3.e oo po conseauenceses oof discontinued generation.
ASK 2 as to consider the de g ree to wh'ch the ~ e actual generation tion of o initi in'~
volumes can be reduced. Thee T radioactive waste co llecticn ra ec and disposal system his tori cal3 y be en a ca "ch-all ch-a for const ~ er able volumes o ther -"oe ex~N II mininus ~ I "pote~txa3.ly, chemic al3. y " or "biologxca 11X" contaminated eas~ stes Thus < so.
of the initia3. volume may be reduced by, publishing reduce stric'ct but workable guide 4
i- - the genexator. On-site "releases s" nee need to be carefully re-examined. Cex pcducts, procedures, and techn aues may a need n to be discontinued, either tempox'arily or permanently.I TASK 3 is to revie~ the cu xent processing and waste an treatment options avail&le. This xeview is intended to start at a the site of gene=ation and continue th roug h a 13. phases of the low-3.eve3. raaioacctive waste. Options withi each generator
'I faci3.ity vill be investxga i a ed. e . Commercial options wil3. be reviewed from pick-,up to reprocessang too f'~a.l depositi'on. Every volume reduct on a~terna~iv 1" "'ve w'll be listed'along w'th advanta a van g es aand disacvangates.
TMK 4'.s to ceve op a cooperative 1'-a scn between stage, genera o=s and pedera agencies. h.'s ask is essent'a. 1 o "be completion of the other tasks and.as an as such suc vill xep esent .
a continuing exoxrt'. efofrt'.'ne major goal will b to an informationt c leaxing'house ea which wi3.1 serv e to faci3.itate data
'"ganiz.'e ex b'e ween the agencies'-and generators.,
K "5 is to develop a state plan p an o LLM. This segment of the study esse."."' 11 y sse~e as a 'genera1 overview i.e o" poss' ossible solutions to the prospec Ha,<or facvors, such \
o~cs; as economics;, .'.-."
.-." insic to the evolution of a s an "illbe revie"ed. In addition, a. tame table for solutions wil3. be prese is to specific fox intexim emergencies.
~ ~ ~
ASK 6 deve3.op s ra~eg es
". =.-==ary measures, for eo:amp volu~ reEuctxon, for lee, vo ea g enexating faci 1 be proposed as we 13, a s an assignment ox prioriit to each generator so
'= .". "essary some d t' production o LL~ may be of cu tai3.ed.
ASK 7 'is to develop an inventory o and o~ to characterize available sx storages. A se.arch for possib3.e sites i:n coopera ion with 4 th state
~ ~
'es will be conducted; ites the rates w'l then be evaluated accor dn ' to developed for that purpose. w'a"=--.etexs 4
SK S is tto d eve op sspecifications velop c fo" the physical facility. Feasibility 44t s -o" modification
- 0 mo 1 a. o" eyisting facilities o" "h const uction of ne~
cili"'es vill be made. Soeci ications for the a'cility and accompany ng facilities and operations vill be prescribed."
TASK 9 xs tto d eve 1 opp an economic economi scenar'o..he task ~il'1 involve detailing the economics of the LLR4 sto"age program, and ~ill esult zn a syn~ieszs o physical site costs, program ad;~nistra ion, fee ~edulles s >ed g p unative fines and an escrow or trust fund A final obgectxve b
vx h~e "~o integrate the in=ormation obtained from each task -nto a, Lhasa storage plan upon ~hich state policy may he implemented.
~ ~
~ ~
~ l ~
0 ln'.er s!a'.e Federal In!efoctice Qf~
Qg4 Other n
lnforma 'Ros'.ric- Sta tion Sot ui jons Ies'lions'tBofn Gearing well,etc.
House Non- Rod. On GeMf a i of s Sit e 4 Plans ot Ylosles Relecse Costs Utility . ERATIV" Othor Locolion Rons ond LIASOiN 'EIE- Gener cling CQAliAQeA.
cies QN PiF CO6litio Produc',s ass:foal AOI'Cic Techniques FEO.
Genero- Conse- Segregalio. assisi Pfocedufes Qua nlily tice of Ll cuwces d Criteria RVii in "i~!i.
orido 2
WASTc G ..egula hans l REDUCTION 8 o
pmonHislof.ical Baseline DOCL Tfons- Time-fol loble for H clear totior, Univ. Hcsw. ? es!ricif Iernaliv Solutions Recent Power IMmwell
~eto- Research th&icat, em/of ofy elc. Plants cr O:hef Store e 5 Al'I. to ST"lc PL" N Out of S~. l cng Term 3
li~ lg!V LEVB Tron~ SIoro C,'PoiOQ .'v'GT Services CFflDN-", Rciccolion e.
General Gen fol Eccnofn'Ic General Sile . Focili ty S-enerio Out of Sl ale
'E~ri Criteria Crilerio Poc3co Qing Tfa~t. P;ocess.
7 County IhV=h!TORY by iero SO'MMi e County
~
'~ of Genera OII iAI c,GIES
.~R IN:-R::Al E.ii'c RGB4-
~ eafc Utility Coparty nv ni v
~r 4 4 Facility Se" f ega lian ticricf clt S.'o i e vgo i
Vl ighi-ag Para-meters fcr Site Studies ofafcny in location Leaol cinerator cJlgin eflnQ Conslroint. Enviofnrrent In!efIOCi!ity ical Economic Volume Tronsfer Reduction Sloroge struci Cop ocily Conloiners Es=~ Time itic or Trusl Frcme Hondling or V Er pansian fons~ t.
Fund c +j PHYS)CAL Accessory 9 FACIUTY Fcc ili ties I.'anitcring FCO~MttC SPECIF! CALM Securil y SCENIC R10 Adjun-l FtÃAL PMM Fccilit ie s. Air Ouoti y Physicol Fee FOR LLHV Oper otions Program Sil e Sc¹du'le S!IRC& Grc und Adminis- Eorrs r lrotion Costs Handling va.e Co"static n Prepc falioi Oper.t.taint. Ux~gtefmSecurity
~
r
~
o Other lnforma clRosii ic Sta! es lion (
1 lonstBcf fl Sotutbns Gearing well,etc.
House On Gefv ra(Of s Non- Rod. .
T Sit e 4 Plans ot hlostes Relecse Locolion s Ulili1y . ELoTIV" Olher Plons ond LtASGN B=- ~rating "lassie'os1 Contingen-cies ATOrtS
~nntitie Products FED AN."'C= Techniques Ouonlily Genera-tion of LL RW in
. ~s Conse-af ~rogation assisi Criterio Procedures
'~t'orido'n.'-TMI 2
WASTr G ~u(lotions I
Historical G-KU Rc. DUCTION 8
Boselin KICK VEh~(
Trons- Tirne-al Has~. Nucleor to lior loble for Recenl Univ. P. est fic(I1 olutions M~~icot, Power from ell lernoliv (etop- Reseorch moni etc. Plant s cr O:hef i empor afy Store e 5 All. to S(ATE P~N Out of St.. Lcng Term 3 Transport Stora e vQfnme(( c Services I Rei"-olion Gen rol Genefol Focili ty Econontc Cut of Genefal Sil e Poc'r aging, Stole
(=,ocess.
~cm Crilerio Crlleno S-enerio lNV"NTORY by ier ore 5 ( 6~1 cai aCYCJ Mi e.
of Ger(era-
- VERG" Mm XPt'RiPS County ccrc fa'&t'ounty 4
Vl>>gh'i- Utility ol'cpoc(t of c'l "pgc'ion r(g Para- Silo Sat. To meters Studies y
~nofo')r(g S:rection Stoa e 1 vn( v ~eral
~ ~. (,(efo(~ in Lacolion f n fo1or Eng(n erlng Cons', r oint.
n ortopt(ty Fconomic Envbmrrsnt Votu ~ (e ironsfer PLASM ical RedJction Cop ocily Storage Es-m struq. Contain%5 or Trust Time From'e Handling or P'tic Er ponsion ranspor t.
Fund C gi PHYSlCAL Accessory a 9 FACtLtTY Fccilities l 'bn(tcring ECGA&tlC 5" ENc.RIO SPECt RCAlKN Security Adjun=i FINAL Fccilit ies. "ir Quo'li Fee Oper olions Program Physicol FOR L LF.'(tf Adminis- Sit e Cos1 s Schodule S irt Gr 'Jn" Eafrr fro lion Hond'ling Co,"stfu"! ion ice P;cpa fat(of(
Oper l 'oinl Lsxg lefm Security v v v
~+r A. Principal Investigator Dr H. Emmett Bolch will be responsible for overall supervision and organi ation of the project, liaison with HAS and compilatzon ox all repo ts.
- 3. Faculty L".vesti atox's Dx. Charles . Roessler wall superv'se u' g -aduate a .stucents and provide editor' assistance. A th'rd 4 ~ c acuity ma y be su p ooxted in an
\
a=ca of neede" ewer ise.
~ ~
C. Students l
One g'raduate student will se~e as project, manager.
I' na er The ot e othe th students will be .selectec f ~ a dcc g"ee d'or -"ee o competence in areas needed for accoIImplishment of tasks.
D. Stt r Othe= staf" needs 'ncludc='pa"t-mme, undergraduate ass stu I ~
and secretaria1 help.
O~iS The Principal Investigat~ .w ~~3 be esponsible fox'ubmitt'ng reouxr ed re p orts and special eports xn a .format compatible with the for Hi5.. The anticipated reports a"e scheduled are sc e on the tine-1'eeds l
figure ~
~
I II
~
.I ~
~ l
~ ~
l I ir C
~ 5 rS 7
LXAZSOiV The main line of cor;.munication and interaction will between the Principal Investigator, Dr. Bolch,, and Mr. Ulray Clark of HRS. Other exchange of information, ideas and'uggestions between various investiga and other HBS personnel is encou aged; however, Hr. Clark and Dr. Bolch should be in orated of such communication
\~
.i t: ". ~
BUDG T The b eaicdown of salaries among professors, staff and graduate studen s is an esti;.ate oz optimal cis-r bution of pe sonnel required achieve'the assigned tasks. The princ'-al 'investigator may chanc e t'ai dist=ibution as dictated by available =ersonnel and thei professional qualifications. Monies may not be t ans e red be ween categories (Sala=ies, =cu'pment, Z~enses, Travel, and Indirect Charges) without writ en approval o a representative o HRS.
TM FQ~
~ ~
Zve~ effort will.be madj, to co=ole e the various phases of this l
0 project as soon as possible. The attached figure is a proposed tisane with scheduled repoa far.41+4 g".ant tagks.
~
~~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
I~
I~
a, i
~
i, ~ ~
r5
,rr
BUDGET i HZLbs l.lO'A >AS A. Sa.1 aries
- l. P.Z., M. Emmett Bolch 20% 7,000
~,
- 2. C P.X., Charles =. rassler 12.5X 4, 300
- 3. BA Faculty 8% 2, 800 6 ~ Secreta ial 4,500
- 5. Graduate Assistants 50'-3./3, 2-1/2 29,500
- 6. Hou=ly Zr.".ployees 2o300
- 7. Fringe Bene 'ts ". f,Lg p.~, g co qg>
A SUB OTAL $ 54,150 B. ='uioment
=-ile Cabinet, C 'e, Drafting, etc. $ 300 C. E>~ens es o Office, xercx, elephone,'omputer 'print'ng reprints, books, etc. $ 2,500 Travel:, Tallahassee, Xn-state and out-of-s ate .
meetings upon recommendation o 3,800
$ 6,300 HRS'OTAL~
DZR-CT COSTS $ 60o750
',.D. Xndi ect Costs 15%* of items,A,= B,'n8 C as negotiated w"th state E
agency. S 9'12 TOTAL KQUDTFD $ 69,'862
e
~
I }
W" ~
~ \
I. .. ~ 4 i
I j I I
~ ~ ~
j ~ I- I I ~
I QPh'g /J'6 7" I
~~
~ rt I ~ ...}..
t I ~ ~ I ~
- /o.i..
I ~ I I I I I I i I t ~
Ps/ T Xf ~ I
~ A ~
I I
~
~
'RAFT
~ ~
1 MSij I \ I I
I
~ ~ ~~ W t ~ I ~. ~
~ I ~~
t ~
t I I~ ~ . ~
'P@'PY:
C>>
e ~
I I
. 7-legf- '
pj's/5L.,
I: t
' . ~
i DNA i I I ~ ~ ~
e I I~ ~
' I I I
I I
'bahama I I I
l ~ ~ ~ ~ t I
I I I ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I t ~-
] t I
~ I
~ I C ~ I II >sr<'q C.onYlNV,(~c>: K,FF.e R7 I
I( uP DI<'rZS I j V p 5 >1'r t I ~ ~
I
~ ~
I I li Al A. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ Iq I Ct g ~
't
~ ~* ~ I ~ e I ~ I ~
~
I I*
I I I I I
I t
OYCAVjR,W ~ ~
pRP r-l-A sl( 6 ~ I ~
. 'l F( h DhhrY .. I e
e I e
YP r
~ ~ e
'( t058 7 . ~
}
~
DRh>< I
/
I qft(> P((u(lL-I
~,t e
~ ~ ,t ~ ~ l ~ ~
I ~
I PflTA j
Professor Environmental'ngineering Science~ .. << ~sville, t
904/39 2-08 36 5.e.. C.>~ c ~:
..--gp;l" t RECORD r ~ re of Birth: October 27, 1936 Place o, Birth: Lenoir, North Caro
- ~ ri tal Status
- Harried Children: Two SCHOLASTIC TRAI<'tING 1959 University of Texas, Austin, TX; 'Bachelor of Science in Civil Eng 1964 University of Texas, Austin, TX; t'<aster of Science in-Environment Engineering University of Cali'fornia, Berkeley, CA; Doctor of Philosophy, Haj Engineer, Minors; Radiological Health, Chemistry-chemical enginee EXPERIENCE 1939-62 First Lt., Sanitary and Industrial Hygiene Engineer, U.S.A.F. Aerospac Lackland, TX.
1956-70 .
Assistant Professor, University of Florida 1970-77 Associate Pro<essor, University of Florida 1972- Associate Professor., University of Florida {Courtesy, Dept. of Nuclear 1973- Consultant, Florida Power Corporation, St. Petersburg, Consultant, Tennessee Yalley Authority; Chattanooga, TH Florida'974-1975-76 Consultant, P"C-"O-Environmental, Inc:, Cincinnati, OH 1977- Consultant, Nucle=-r Safety .Associates,'ethesda, Yary]and 1977- -Full Professor, University of SOCI ETI ES AND ORGA.")12ATIONS American Nuclear Soci'ety; American Public f:aalth Association; Chi.Epsilon; Conf Radiological Health; Florida Chapter of the Health Physics Society; Florida Cha.
American Huclear Society; 'Health Physics Society; Interna'tonal Radiation Prote Florid'merican Association; Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi, Omicron Delta Kappa A'<'ARDS C1TATIOMS AND BIOGPAPHICAL HANUALS tlen of Science, 1969; Who's Who in the South and Southwest, 1969 FIELDS OF 1NTEREST
- Radiation protection, radiotracer techniques, industrial and radioactive waste
"'nvironmental surveillance and radioecology.
PUBLICATIONS Honographs: Author-one chapter, Co-author-one chapter Referred Pub'lications: '17, Examples: Health Physics, Bioscience, J. Banit.
Div. ASCE, Anal. Chem., Environ. Res., Arer. J. Publ.'Health and Hat Environ. 111.
R Other Papers: 42, Examples: Proceedings =of Health Physics Society Yidyear Contract Reports to Florida Power Corporation,,Contract Reports to EPA, Contract Reports to Florida Phosphate Council.
Presentations not Published in Proceedings: 22, Examples: Health Physics S Annual Y<eeti'ngs, American Nuclear Society Annual Heetings, and State th of Local 'AHS or HPS Chapters.
Consulting Reports: 20, Examples: Environmental Impact Statements, Radiolc Assessments and Radioanalytical Results of Interpretation.
Environmcnta i 904/392-0836
-rgRD .
\
Place of Dirth: Elysian, LeSueur County, Hinn., USS Children: . Seven AB hla>>kato State Colle ~c, hfankato, Minnesota (Bio)ogy, Chemistry) 1955 hlS Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. (Radiat. Biol.) 1956 (AEC Rad. Physics Fellc MPH Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (Occup. Healtn) 1959 (AEC Ind,. Hygiene Fellc PhD Univ. of Florida, Gai>>csville, FL (Environ. Engr.) 1967 (USPHS Rad. Health TraiT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE June 1956 - Aug. 1956 AEC Radiological Physics Fellow, Brookhaven National Lab.
Sept. 1956 - Aug. 1958 Health Physicist, Res. Div., Curtiss-lsright Corp.
July 1959 - Jan. 1965 Radiologic 1 Physicist, Fla. State 'Board of Health (FSBH)
Sept. 1967 - June l972 Assist. Pro, Radiation Biophysics, Dept. of Radiology, Unii July 1972 - June 1973 Assist. P of., Dept. of =nv'"on. Engr. Sci., Univ. of July 1973 P of., Dept. of Envi=on. Engr. Sciences, Univ. or Floe Florid'ssoc.
PROFESSION'AL 6 SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS llealth Phys'cs Soc.'Cha"ter Member, -Bd. of Directo=s 1974-1977); Fla..Chapt".r, (Charter hlember, Pr s. '969); Am. Public H al:h Assoc.; Am. Assoc. for the Adva>
-Heal'oc.
Science; Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc.; Fla. Sect., Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc.;\ Am. Conf. of (
Incrust. Ilygienists; Soc. o the Sigma Xi.-
Ab'ARDS, CITATIONS AND BIOGRAPHICAL hlVKALS t
Certified by the Am. Bd. of 'Health Physics, 1961;'Hember of Am. Bd. of Health Physic An. bien 4 Nomen of Science; @ho's Who in the Sooth and Southeast; Personalities of t I IELDS OF 'NTERFST.
Health Phys'cs; Fnv'ronmc>>ta'adiation,'atural Rad'oactivity; Radiological Techni Instrumentation; Occupat ona'ealth. ~
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
'C; E. Roessler, G. S. Roessler., 'and B. G. -'Dunavant, 'Unusual Benavior of Cesium. in Florida Biosphere," Jour., Fla. Academy of Sciences, ~2, March 1969, No. 1, 1-'ll.
~
C. 'E. Roessle",N. E. Bolch, J.. G~~ le an N. B. Johnson, Jr., "A Utility-Sp'onso Environmental Surveillance and Radioecological Research Program for a Coastal hu
'-Poi:er Planq" A. J. Pub. Health, 62, 'Oct. 1972, No. 10, pp. 1379-1386.
C. E. Roessler, D. G. Price and D. S. Spencer, "A Hospi-al Plan for Emergency Sand Radiation Accident Cases," Health Physics in the Healin 'Arts,* (Symposium Procee DH."<<.4'ublication (FDA) 73-8029, pp..517-527, hlarch 1973.
C. E. Roessler, li'.-'E. Bolch,'r. and C. Groome, "Urzn um and Radium-226 in the Lit Enviroment of Florida Phosphate Regions." Natural .Radioactivity in hlan's En (Proceedinps, Tenth hlidyear Topical Symposium, Health Physics Society, Oct. l E. lloesslcr, B. G. Du>>avant, and T. R. 'Turk, "An Occupational Health and Safet for a Major University," J. of Chem. Ed., 54, Page A77, Feb. 1977.
C. E. Roessler, R. Kaut~,. 4'. E. Bolch, Jr., anW. A. Yethington, Jr., !'he Effec and Land Reclamation on the Radiological. Characteristics of the Terrestrial of Florida's.Phosphate Region." The Natural Radiat. Environ: III, (S>-posiu.,
0 UliSOT.IC XT;D PROPOS .I SUI~! I ITTED TO TIIE DEPARTl!"'I"T O.- Eh'ERGX FLORIDA DEPARTHE".T 0" 1:EALTii 2QiD REHABILITATIVE S" RVICES RADXOLOGICAL HE<;L H SERVICES 1309 Nines"ocQ Boule:varc'.,'uilding 6 Tallahassee, Florica 32301 PURPOSE: A STUDY BY THE Uli XVERSXTY Oi': LORIDA UHDER CONTRACT !CXTH PROPOSER TO PREPARE A COHTXii -EaXCX PLAti FOR "IIPTERIH" LO'i LEVEL RADIGACTIVI". 1'!ASTE (L~~") STQPNQE, X.E. i TEhPOK~PZ STORAGE OF LL" TI1AT EXCEED ."'= DISPOSAL LIMITS OF EZISTIHG FACXLXTI "S i UNTIL SUCH TXJ E:.HAT i'DDITIONAL REGIONAL FACILITY FOR DISPOSAL OF .=.LF; ) ASTES XS ESTABLISHED.
"PROPOSED DURATION: "'"LX" (12) HONTHS
)4iGUli" "i'QUESTED ' 69 g 7l3 00 Ri"i<UL'ST"'D S i ARTIUG DATE: JULY 1, 1980 STATE GOVERN<'. IEI"T AGENCY
~'RIllCXP~<L Xi~VESTXG?-
I TOR: ULRAY C.'T."
JIN IST: =. OR ( PADXOLOGICAL HEALTH SERVICES R'DI (90') ~ e7-3.0~ C BUSINESS CONTACT: CHRXS 1!GORE GRANTS '¹r.GE!.ZHT (90<) ~88-9C90 D7F~E OF SU13c! ISSION: APRIL 1, 19 SO
't OThER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERHIIE';iT AGENCIES TO NHXCH THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN SUBIQTTED. AND/OR THOS:" FUNDING THE PROPOSED EFl OR: 1901iI'HIS PROPOSAL I'AY BE SUBJECTED TO EX EK AL REVXEh'.
t S XGHATURE . 0!."
ULIU' CLARK ADI1XH XSTRTs TOR PRIHC 'PEAL RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH SERVICES DATE:
l.'VESTIGATOR SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER OLIVER H. BOORDE DIR:"CTOR CE:iTRAL OPERATIONS SERVICES D. hl,
~ ~
~
UNX%'ERSITY OF FLORXDA FOR A CO?7TX?'1GE?4CY PIA?57 OF LOW LEV.":L )Z<DXO.5CTXVE W?5ST)'URPOSE ZiND SCOPE: The attached is an unsolicited proposal for tha preparation of an in-depth study by the University of Florida of Xn-Stn storage of Low Level P. Qioactiva Waste under contract with. proposer.
study will include a plan for "interim" low level radioactive waste (LI storage, i.a., temporaxy storage of LLW t:hat e>:caads the disposal limit of existing facilities, until such time that an additional regiona3. fac for disposal of these wastes is established.
>>~,
B?55CYiGROUND X
,thc
)FOF<3TXON: The avents of the past several months x egardir closing of two ox the three LLW disoo al sites and the volume restx tions placed upon the major site
- '1 benefits av xla e to '.i.e ol
>>y>>
serving Florida have precipit;ated a
..Xnabilitv to dispose o nuclear waste materials threatens to negate thc f h.
c from ~na use ox nuc. aar technology.'c have these banef it" been more avide,.t than zn the mal o nuc ear medicine and rasea"ch, Countless lives have been saved's a result of valuable .contribution hat radiopharmaceuticals have m Qe toward improve diagnostic and tharape: tic procedures. Also of great significance, is the substantial part being p3.ayed by nuc~r power, electrical genaratir stations in suoplying about 20."o of the electrical needs. of Florida.
Nuclear power reactors oroduce the qreatast bul)c of LLW generated 'n Florida. This waste consists of spent resins, filter sluctges, evapora bottoms and dry waste, such as 'contaminated clothing, paper ar.d tools.
Waste produced by m c'."'cal and academ>>ic research facilities is composed of contaminated protective clothing, paper, equipment, and animals sacrificed after beinc: injac cd with radioactive materials. Xndustria LLW,, in addition. to c"ntaminat:ad materia3.s previous3.y mentioned, irclu le t-ovar scrap mater'al from manu acturing and m'ining recovery'opera" Xn most cases, LLW or nuclear waste; must.,at present, be disposed'o burial A <acilitias licensed by tie -aiba Nevada, Washington, arid South Carolina.
Xn Ju3~1979, tha Govarnore of the three States notified tha Nuclear Regulatory Co~mission {?'RC) of t:he sex ious and repeated Qisra ara, for rules govarnino the shiom5ants of LLW to tha burial facilitias. Last October, the Washington and NevaQa LL4 facilities were t:amporarily cl by tha Governors of those, State" in response to a series of such. inci
' 5 Both-have reopened, but are thrceataned to be clo ad again if problems continua. Xn.addition, the State o South Carolina has dccic)ed to im vo3umc restrictions on all shiom. arnwell sita. South Car currently leases t: he Barnwell dispos 1 sita to Chem-Nuclear, Inc.
Chem-Nuclear was c.viscd by South Carolina that thc.y must reduce ann shipments to tha>>facility 50- by 1981. T)>a shipmc.nts accepted were zcducaQ from 200,000 to 189,000 cubic fact per month in November 197 will be reduced to 100,000 cubic feet per month by. December 3.981.
pi rcantaga 5 .
o f reduction c ear w may no be 1el8 01 XQa 3pplied equally ran 1n 1s d'or each 1 egc'M ~
state. It is not In February 1980, the Department of Jfeal" h anQ Rehabilitative Se1V1ces 3.earned that the Todd Shi obuildi"ig Company in Texas had stopped recei vina shiimnents of LL'.; =.o. storage. Tn1s has ad ec o 0 ia problem since it is ertim. tod that some 6,000 to 17.,000 cubic feet per year had been s!s'"o d to Todd from Florida.
Severa of our.major un1versztzes w1x nave o s ore i on c i s until other arrangements are made.
The attached tables give a description of the total LLN generated in Florida.
In regards to capability of Florida Lice",.sees to meet South Carolina's
'volume reduction recu'ements, Florida's four opera"ing nuclear power reactors produce about 70~ of the LL':: genera ed in Florida. Both companie opera"i>>g reactors are co..".-acc1ng the present time have reduced volume as far as possible.
The Florida Power and Light Company (=><<L), the operator of three reactors p oduces apploxlmately 3,500 c'c a 1,700 cubic foot allotment at Barnvell or Februar . 'PGL is feet per month and has
'f exce s o f l8 months.
'>>ill curren-'lv matrnc a s :dv of their Ll'.; a.-" nas reported that evan e i do store on site not i:=-ve a stora e ca acity in L"lorzaa x'ower Co porei~vn '(rrCr s>>>>s qc)lc'l es alJvul 3 f 0 h
-0 of LLN per month;rhen not i.n an, outage. Outages produce abou~
4,500 cubic feet .per,month. The FPC Barn ell allotment is 1,400 cubic,feet for Februarv. FPC reports that they can store in two loca"ions inside the plant and just ou side the plant fence. The
.company has plan ready for construction of a building to store their LLY.
Contracts with Flo"da lledical Licensees have indicated that, in gene larger hospitals have the abi3.ity to s're lour level radioactive wast (LLN) on site for per'ods ranging from one month to twelve months.
Since the radioisotope of choice in the majority of diagnostic procedures is technetium 99m, which has a half-life. of .six hours, the bulk of LLY. can be decayed and dispose" of as non-radioactive trash.
The majority of the smaller hospita's have difficulty in storing L 4-Informants have stated that the .waste sto:age situation in the t1iami area has weached a critical state. Fl hough hospitals and clinics are now making efforts to reduce volu.-.ie, storage room is 1imii ed.
The majority of Florida's universities have used Bad Servi.ces, Inc.
as their agent for disposa3. of LLh'. T;ad Services shipped the materi" to Todd )iipyard in Texas wh re it remained in storage. In mid Febr Todd announced that it would no longer "ccept LLtl for storage and on Febru rg 28, Bad Service reported to the Department of tiealth and Rehabilitative Services that they c;ould >>o longer. handle LLN of a>>y 3:ind.
Si.nce Universities had not been usi.>>g 'the Barn'yell burial site<
they did>>ot receive an allotment a>>d at thc present time must ship (2)
~
the Ifanford, Hashington, t 1 research ive d'al or'he Beatty, method would using'adioactive m Nevada, tcrl.a s.
1 sate.
force the universities Th tie are now storing L~N n camou anc. can con inue 4to do so as long as space zs avai'1 a bl e. hey do not consider this method of storage desirable.
Tn d ustrl.a LLN accounts for about 15% of the total waste genera e d t in Florida. These wastes are generally o g half-life but, can be stored on company property. Xn Industrial users have not expressed any immediate waste storage problems.
'CO?vCLUSXON: The Florida Department o* Health 1 .h and a Rehabilitati.ve S 61..vices has been assigned the lcac agency r ole for developing
.a state plan for LLN emergency and iempoxary stora Xt is propose d t. 'hat a thee Department e
i ag e and disposa contract with the Department 1
f E 'ronmental =-naineering Sciences, Unl.versi -y oof FloriQaI
~
to conduct a study consisting o* nxne eadem n
- 1) Bac):ground document
- 2) Analysis of the Qegree to which generation of xnxtial ~ ~ ~ ~
volumes o LLH can be reduced
- 3) A revl.ew oi curren ent processipc p a..Q waste treatment optl,ons a.~ c...
- 4) Pro oco 1 + or- liaison bet~!eon generators and Feoera again
- 5) Comprehensive State Plan for Lh'torage an and dii~ps osal
- 6) Speci. f*v, st.J. ave jies
~ ~ ~
r ivi circ.~ >~is~~<<
- 7) Xnventorv'f available sites e) Physical speci ications for interim storage facilitl.es
- 9) Economic scena io A final objective of the study is to prov de a sound bas~s for promulgation o= a State policy on LP,.
Total Lo~ I evel Radioactive Haste Generated HitI in 'e (Percentages bv State o =lorica Source) lledical .=.Bcilities CQIL-Berclal Po.der a..d t'n" vers'3.z~ es. Reactor Nastes 18%
.68-o 18 Industrial Nastes 14-o 4~
Corimercial Po"er Peacto= Hastes ( No. o 'Zns a 1 lations 3) cubic T$'pical .
4'Bste co~i. tee-'/v Ra ionucl 'c'.es Half-Li e 51 Spent
-sludces, res', and
='
evap-ter Cr I~w'13
.'. 27. 8 aays days cra"or bottoms 47,033 2 p 563 re 45 davs AviiJ 4 ~~~~~
VV4 ~
V C- i 4V 4 VU
~ ~
~i ra Cc 71p
~
C Aware
~.-as, e anG con-=~- '60
'5 5.26 years
~
inated equipment 45,091 477 Zp. 243.7 days Irrad~ ai ed coH!- 134
- 2. 06 years ponents 883 ,38,200 136 Cs 13 days 137C 30.2 years l40 BB 1 2. 8 days Tota1 93, 007 41'q0 141 32 . 53 days "ec" .cal Pacilit's 4
.-6 Uni~'e=sities (No. of installatio s 81) 4 cu&ic. Typi cal i'as e 0 zalea t/
'- c PBc:. GnuclLces it alf Li-e 3.,H 12.3 years
~iol oglcal 2,013 8'0 1
Scini ~' aticn Vials 10'-'S7 C 5730 + ar s
~
Sol~G~fxed Bnc 14.3 days Absorbed Licuics 1,660 6 32'"'s Drv 9,887 37 86.7 days 51 27.8 GBys 67G hours 0 Pjloi 24,046 cl Tc 99m l 25I 131 4
- 78. 2 6.GG7 llours "59.7 dBys 8;1 Gays
0 FLOR 'A Tucus"=ia1 Nastes (I"o . o= 'easees !i/Z:)
cubic Typic21
- La"/v= C'v- Red" o'3L'C13.c-es ~
gQ S Es-=:wia~ec S~e e Tc"a.1 ..19,209 l' ~Ul 0 iv il U 238 4 >: 10"9 ZI 3 12 3 yep C 14 %~5,730 To-'a1 Volume Gene Pm 147 2.6 year 136,261 a"eQ.'i bin S"a-e v ~