ML20056B218

NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Requests Extension of Time Until 900831 to File Response to Licensing Board 900717 Order,Per 10CFR2.711.W/Certificate of Svc

ML20056B218
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	08/10/1990
From:	Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#390-10717 90-601-01-OLA-5, 90-601-1-OLA-5, OLA-5, NUDOCS 9008150218
Download: ML20056B218 (4)

Text

.

i..

, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  %[n9c

~F

-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARISO AUG 13 P6 '17 -

rrr Ki 0F SECRElART In the Matter of )

)

Docket Nos. 50-250 50-251 OLA 5OLfAiS*WU ^ S VIM

)

FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ) Technical Specifications COMPANY =) Replacement

)

(Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 ) ASLBP No. 90-601-01 OLA 5 and4) )

NRC STAFF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME _

o, I. INTRODUCTION On July 7,1990, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated to preside over the above-captioned proceeding issued an order which requires a response to be filed by the Staff by August 14,-1990. Memorandum and Order (Motion to Dismiss).

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Q 2.711 of the Commission's regulations, the Staff moves the

-Licensing Board for an order extending the time for the Staff to file its response until August 31,1990. Staff counsel has contacted counsel for Applicant, Florida Power and Light Company. Applicant's counsel had no objection to this motion, provided that the Applicant receives an extension of time until ten business days after the filing of the Staff's response. In the original order, the Applicant was given ten business days to comment on the Staff's filing. !

II. ARGUMENT After receipt of the Licensing Board's order of July 17, 1990, the Staff factored Since NEAP has been dismissed as a party to this proceeding, the Staff did not discuss this motion with counsel for NEAP.

p$$

O

$$$$ JO Y

t 2'-

2-the issues raised in the Ucensing Board's request into its review of the License Amendment which is the subject of this proceeding. Thus, the technical information relating to those issues will be contained in the Safety Evaluation accompanying the amendment. Due to the size of the amendment, the Staff has determined that it would

- be extremely difficult to complete all of the mechanical processes attendant upon the issuance of a License amendment by August 14, 1990, the date on which the staff's

- response must be filed with the Licensing Board. These activities include the compilation, reproduction, quality control and distribution of the amendment and its supporting documents. Therefore, the Staff is requesting an extension of time to file its response until August 31,1990. ' This extension will allow the Staff to complete all of these activities. The staff will make every attempt to issue the amendment and complete >

its response to the Licensing Board prior to the extended deadline.

III. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, and for good cause shown, the Staff moves the~

Licensing Board, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. ! 2.711 of the Commission's regulations, for an

- extension of time until August 31,1990, for the Staff to file its response to the Licensing Board's order of July 17,'1990. As noted above,- the Applicant does not object to this extension.

Respectfully Submitted:

i k ' ',

i, h Janice E. Moore Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 10th day of August,1990

COLr.liLD

~E USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Of fICC 0F SECRf1ARY In the Matter of. ) Docket Nos. 50 250 Old[$N0c

) 50 251 OLA 5 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT )

COMPANY ) Technical Specifications

) Replacement (Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 )

and 4) Facility Operating )

Licenses Nos. DPR-31, DPR-41 )

CERTF ICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of 'N (C STAFF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME" in the above-captioned proceedlag have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or as indicated by an asterisk through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, or by facsimile transmission as indicated by a double asterisk, or express mail as indicated by a triple asterisk, this 10th day of August,1990:

Peter B. Bloch, Chairman" Elizabeth' B. Johnson" Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Oak Ridge National Laboratory Board Panel P.O. Box 2008, Bethel Valley Road U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Building 3500, Mail Stop 6010 Washington, D.C. 20555 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Dr. George C. Anderson"' Steven P. Frantz, Esq."

Administrative Judge Harold F. Reis, Esq.

7719 Ridge Drive, N.E. Newman & Holtzinger

' Seattle, WA 98115 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20036 John T. Butler, Esq.

Steel, Hector & Davis Atomic Safety and Licensing 4000 Southeast Financial Center Board Panel (1)*

Miami, FL 33131-2398 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Nuclear Energy Accountability Adjudicatory File (2)*

Project Atomic Safety and Licensing Post Office Box 129 Board Jupiter, FL 33468 0129 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

r u;g +

y 'y:

iqi , , ' -

,hj j .  ;

1. pid'l' ,

'V a ,

, *i

'o , , Office of the Secretary (2)* Atomic Safety;and IJcensing Appeal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission . Board Panel (5)* .

. Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,

? Attn: ~ Docketing & Service Section Washington, DC 20555 cl Stewart Ebneter m Regional Administrator 1 USNRC, Region II

, 101 Marietta St., N.W.

Suite 2900

' Atlanta, GA 30303 [

f, ' :'

m n

!! 6

) .s U 'd'f7 /fTJ L N '? (T> W 1 Janice E. Moore

Counsel for NRC Staff-k .%

t

. ty m

l, -

I l:

i l