Text

Enclosure to NL-13-089, Seismic Walkdown Report Update, Part 2 of 6
	ML13176A013
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/24/2013
From:	Lo K; Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	NL-13-089
	Download: ML13176A013 (157)
	v • d • e

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-291 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE NF] U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 33 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[Z NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U- N/AD Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[] N[: UD- N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI LID N/AD-anchors?

Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipmeni class name from IEPRI 10125286. Appendix B: Classes of EqUipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-292 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y- NO U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Etquip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI Nil U[] N/AL]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration consistent with plant documentation.

See list of references under comments section.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y- N' U[D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[l ND UD- N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YrI Nil- Ui N/AL]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIZ ND UD N/AD Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ Nil U]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-293 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y-- ND U[iI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E- N[1 UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-22503-7, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS 9321-F-22513-9,DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT EL EVA TIONS 9321-F-10533-4, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS 9321-F-10553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 33,-0" SEWS for Diesel Gen No. 33 and 31 A WC-021 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/19/12 Steohen Yuan V 10/19/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-294 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y] NFI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Photographs Note: Diesel Gen No. 33 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-295 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z N[D U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UEl N/A--

The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEJ NEI UDJ N/Ar-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI uDl N/AD1 anchors?

The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

the equipment class name from IEPRI 10252W6. Appendix B: Classes olEqTuipMent.

rEnter EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. 1P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-296 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NZ U-I N/AD-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 9321-F-70033-16indicates that the bolt diameterfor the rack is 5/8'. SEWS for RACK9 evaluated the anchorage using Y2 "diameter bolts. Calculation IP3-CALC-STR-00990, Rev. 2 evaluated the anchorage using Y2" diameter bolts. Field measurement determined that the bolts are Y2"diameter. Both documents indicate that the Y" anchors are acceptable; therefore, the anchorageis free from adverse seismic conditions. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03200.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[E ND UD- N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND UD N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/AD Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-297 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z NF UD-7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN] NFI- UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YL- NEil U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

I 983M0727 9321-F-70313,Rev. 16, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMPROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH I INS TRUMENTA TION 9321-F-70533, Rev. 24, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMP ROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH 2 INS TRUMENTA TION 9321-F-70033-16, TRANSMITTER RACK PIPING ARRANGEMENT SH 2 INSTRUMENTATION SEWS for Instrument Rack AWC-012 Evaluated by: Kai Lo *- 6 1 Date: 10/15/2012 Mag-gie Farah . 10/15/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page C-298 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ ND U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK Photographs Note: Rack#9 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-299 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YEJ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YUi NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is an in-line instrument.Anchorage configuration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YDI NEI uD N/AE]

Not applicable since it is an in-line item.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOI NEI uED NIAZ oxidation?

Not applicable since it is an in-line item.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI- NDI UD- N/AZ anchors?

Not applicable since it is an in-line item.

Enter the equipment class namne fom EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: C'lasses of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-300 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ NFD U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NEI U-I N/Ai (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configurationverification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NO UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NO UID N/A-Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI U- N/AD Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N-- UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-301 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NR UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nr-l UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25883-24 Primary Auxiliary Building Composite Piping Arrangement at El 73'-0", Sheet No. 1 9321-F-25153-22Primary Auxiliary Building GeneralArrangement, Plans at El 55'-0" and 73'-0" 9321-F-70413-11 Primary Auxiliary Building InstrumentArrangement, Sheet No. 2, Instrumentation AWC-034 Evaluated by: Stenhen Yuan Date: 10/23/2012 Paul Htebsch Date: 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0 Page C-302 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YFJ ND U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Photographs Note: NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN Note:

TEMP ELEMENT TE-130 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-303 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[I ND- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEl NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YOl NDi U-- N/A[--

The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-D N/AD oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO ND UD N/AD anchors?

The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPR I11025286. Appendix B: Classes of'Equipnlent.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-304 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO-- NEI UD N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configurationvenfication.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YFN NO ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ ND UID N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[D N/AD-]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND1 uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-305 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NF-] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO-- NE u--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Observed P1-1445 tubing inside a cantileveredP1000 Unistrutchannel that is attached to the back of AFWP32-LOC-PNL, the P1 000 unistrut has an unsupported length of approximately 69" (see photo.) This documented in CR-IP3-2012-03246.

LB-01 evaluates this condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

AWC-012 Evaluated Date: 10/12/2012 Maaaie Farah Date: 10/12/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-306 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status. Y[* ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Note: AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL Note: Tubing attachedon the back of STATION AFWP32-LOC-PNL with a long unsupported length EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-307 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP3 Status: Y-I NEI U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEl NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YDI ND UF- N/AD Direct anchorageis to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage. The anchorageof the support frame to the concrete is free of bent, broken or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NDJ UM N/ADJ oxidation?

Direct anchorageis to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage. The anchorageof the frame to the concrete is free corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UD1 N/AD anchors?

The anchorageof the frame to the concrete is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.

Enter the equipment class namn from EPRI 1 025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-308 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YD- Nn ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOl N[-- UD N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl url potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Direct anchorageis to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage. The anchorage of the frame to the concrete is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NO UOI- N/AD Fluorescentbulbs above the panel need to be restrained. This is not considered to be an impact condition for this panel.

CR-IP3-2012-03481 has been written to address this condition.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI LIF] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment.?

Masonry block wall near the panel needs to be evaluated. Calculation 6604.210-1-CB-OO1-F, G, H has evaluated the wall and found it to be seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N] uD N/AD Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-309 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P3 Status: Y-- NF1 UX Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NF] U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Block wall was evaluatedper the IEB 80-11 bulletin as noted in #8 above.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI u--i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References.

9321-F-70403-17 PrmaryAuxiliary Building Instrument ArrangementSh No. 1. Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design A WC-029

.Lf Evaluated by: Stenhen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012 Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0, Page C-310 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status. Y[:] ND U[:]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL Photographs nole: I-tonr view EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No lP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-311 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YE]- NE] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL Note: Side View Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-312 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P11 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 156-0" Room, 31 DIESEL GENERATOR Area ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U-- N/AD Observed four anchor bolts one at each comer of the panel. Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ ND UD:] N/A[-D oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDJ ULD N/AD-]

anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

Enter the equipment class name lionm EPRI 1025286. Appendix 13:Classes of EqUipnelnl.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-313 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[X ND-] UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P11 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NEI- UD N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configurationverification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[EJ Nil ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO ul-1 N/AD--

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UD-] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/AD--

Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ ND- uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-314 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YM, NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P/I1 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NO UFi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Paneldoor was opened. Anchorage and intemals were examined and found acceptable.

References.

9321-F-22503-7,DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN 9321-F-22513-9,DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATION AWC-019 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/23/12 KaiLo /c- 10/23/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C0315 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[] ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P11 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL PhotoaraDhs Note: 31 EDG PNEU Control Panel Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-316 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[1 ND* UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YrZ NDI UD- N/AD1 Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[- NDI uD- N/AD1 oxidation?

Yes. the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDI U-I N/AED anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equip*nent class namec 1-omm EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Eqtipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-317 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NEI Ul N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configurationverification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI UD-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND UD N/A[-]

Yes, soft targetsare free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM ND UD-] N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND uD N/AD Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-318 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YLJ NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[M NE] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinetdoor needs to opened for intemals inspection.

Cabinetdoor was opened and intemals were examined and found acceptable. 10/17/12.

Reference:

9321-F-33833, Rev. 12, ELECTRICAL NODES FOR EQUIPMENT IN CONTROL BUILDING SECTION "A-A" & "B-B' A WC-007 Evaluated by: Date: 10/10/2012 Olk M i.... e F-1..

.. .. Date: 10/10/2012 Kai Lo ~/C(6 Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0. Page C-319 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YPI NI] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Photographs Note: HJ9 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-320 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE- NE-ý U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NO UI- N/ArT Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIE NI U-I N/AD-oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YX NO U- N/A--

anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

Enter the equtipment class name firnt EPR I1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipient.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-321 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 WP3 Status: Y-- Ni U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEI- u- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN1 N[D U--i potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NIl U-- N/A[-D Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UD- N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI u[-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-322 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI uD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinetwas opened and no adverse conditions were observed.

Reference:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENTARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-002 Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch - Date: 10/09/2012 Magqie Farah Date: 10/09/2012 Kai Lo 6c Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-323 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status. YM] N[- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Photoqraphs Note: E Note: FRONT VIEW OF COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-324 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE NDI ULIM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchorage. The panel anchors to column H8-19.5.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U-I N/ADl The anchorageis free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NI ULID N/AD-1 oxidation?

The anchors at the bottom of the panel exhibit minor corrosion which is judged to be acceptable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YD] NDI ULD N/A]

anchors?

The anchorageis not attachedto concrete.

Enter the equipment class name lirom EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of EqUipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-325 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y- NDi UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UI- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND UD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y-- ND UD- N/AD Soft targets are free of impact by nearby equipment and structures.

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NDI UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescentbulbs need to be restrained. Not considered a threat to this panel.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[- ND UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

The equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-326 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NFE U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NEI U-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-H-70076, Rev. 1, ATMOSPHERIC STEAM DUMP CONTROL PANEL 9321-F-70313, Rev. 16, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMP ROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH 1 INSTRUMENTATION 9321-H-67394, Rev. 1, ATMOSPHERIC STEAM DUMP CONTROL PANEL INSTRUMENT ARRANGEMENT AWC-014 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/16/2012 I,

Paul Huebsch Date: 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-327 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ N[J UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Photographs Note: EQUIPMENT TAG EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-328 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YEI Nn UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCC1 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK #31 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchors

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN ND UIJ N/AD The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI UD N/A-oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND UD N/AD anchors?

The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name lirom EPRI 1(125286. Appendix B: Classes if Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-329 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ll ND UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCC1 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK #31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UD- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM ND- uD-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE ND-] UDI N/AD1 Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment.?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[Z NDI uDl N/AD Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ ND-] U[D]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-330 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N[-- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCCI Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK #31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE- NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Drawings:

1. 9321-F-25153-22, PAB GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS ATEL.55'-O" & 73'-0"

2. 9321-F-25113-21, PAB GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SECTIONS, SHEET NO. 1

3. 9321-F-13163-4, PAB MISCELLANEOUS PLATFORM & LADDERS

4. 684J839

5. SEWS Sheet CC Surge tank #31

6. AWC-025 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012

/~L ,/

Paul Hu*.h.£nh PaulHuebsch C Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-331 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[J NE-l UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCC1 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK #31 Photographs Note: CC SURGE TANK #32 TANK ANCHORAGE Note:

I I Note: SUPPORT STEEL EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-332 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: YM ND-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. CSATBA2 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID STG TANK 32 (32BAT)

Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[--

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NDI UD- N/AD Yes. the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UD N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM NEI UD1 N/AD-anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

Enter the equipment class name from EPR I 1025286. Appendix B Classes oflEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-333 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YF[1 ND U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. CSATBA2 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID STG TANK 32 (32BAT)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YF- NDI UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageconfigurationis consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y- NDI UDF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[E ND uD N/A-Yes, soft targetsare free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[I ND UD N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE] NDI uD N/A[D]

Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-334 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YN N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. CSATBA2 Equip. Class 1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID STG TANK 32 (32BAT)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE- NO UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

932 1-F-11723-8 PrimaryAuxiliary Building Concrete, Floorat Elev 73'-0" East End 9321-F-25153-22 PnmaryAuxiliary Building GeneralArrangement, Plans at El 55'-0" and 73'-0" SEWS Sheet Boric Acid Stg Tank 31 9321-F-26103-16 PrimaryAuxiliary Building GeneralArrangement, Sections Sheet No. 2 CR-IP3-2012-02713 AWC-025 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/23/2012 Paul Huebsch Date: 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0 Page C-335 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: Y- NE-l ULI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. CSATBA2 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID STG TANK 32 (32BAT)

Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: View of equipment EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-336 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[M NE[l UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. CSATBA2 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID STG TANK 32 (32BAT)

Note: View of anchorbolts Note: View of head EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-337 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YN N--] Ui--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. RWST-31 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description REFUEL WTR STORAGE TANK (31RWST)

Location: Bldg. YD Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEZ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loosehardware? YE NDI UED N/A-Several bolts lacked full engagment (approximately one thread is not engaged). This is judged to be acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND uD N/ADl oxidation?

Some bolts exhibit slightly more than mild surface oxidation. The condition is not advanced and bolts should be cleaned and coated to provide protection againstfurtherdeterioration. The currentcondition is considered acceptable. CR-IP3-2012-03236 has been issued to remedy this condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y] NEI UD N/A-anchors?

Minor tight surface cracks were identified on the RWST-31 foundation.

The cracks are not nearthe anchors and are judged to be acceptable as they seem to be normal concrete shrinkage cracks.

Enter the cquipment class name from EPRI 102528t*. Appendix B: Classes ofrEquipment EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-338 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ ND UD7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. RWST-31 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description REFUEL V-I-R STORAGE TANK (31RWST)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ ND- ULI N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configurationis consistent with plant documentation. See references under Comments.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YU- NDI UD-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y-NUND UD N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YDI NDI uD- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

It does not apply because the tank is in the yard. There are no overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, or masonry block walls above and nearthe tank.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uD- N/ADJ There is sufficient flexibility at the nozzle connection to the tank.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[Z NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-339 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. RWST-31 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description REFUEL WTR STORAGE TANK (31RWST)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE* NE] UF-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Caulking at the base of the tank is detiorated. Recommend upgrade/replacementof caulking to prevent water intrusion under the tank. Coatingof the anchorbolts is recommended to prevent further corrosion.

References:

SEWS for Refuel Wtr Storage Tank 9321-F-25233-5, NUCLEAR TANK FARM GEMERAL 9321-F-10023-22, PLOT PLAN IP3V-91-14.6-0073, Rev. 1 A WC-011 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10/12/2012 V ~*'~

~~p~*i*.

M..*nni* F* r* h Marr-ie Farah Date: 10112/2012 Kai Lo Date: 10/12/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0 Page C-340 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 -- --

SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[M ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. RWST-31 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description REFUEL WTR STORAGE TANK (31RWST)

Photographs Note: RWST-31 Note: Lack of full engagement EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-341 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 8 IP3 Status: YE* NZI IDU*

(SWC) SWELl-095 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

Location: Bldg. YD Floor El. 69-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the Rem one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UD N/A[:]

The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[J ND U] N/AD--

oxidation?

Anchor bolts show evidence of having some surface corrosionnearthe base before being painted. The anchors are currently well protected from corrosion by a surface coating.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YIiJ NM U[D] N/AD anchors?

Local concrete cracks are found in the concrete base at and away from the locations of anchor bolts. The cracks are noticeable and generally tight and closed. Structuralmonitoring maintenace tale programe per EN-DC-150 for CST tank under license renewal will track these cracks.

Enter the eiluipment class name fiom F.PRI 10125286, Appendix B -Classes of EqUipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-342 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 8 IP3 Status: Y[Z ND UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y- NDI UD N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage is consistent with the plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[D ND UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes. based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YDI NE- UD N/AD Lighting poles are in close proximity to the tank. The seismic adequacy of the poles and their bases is evaluated in LB-11.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Two pipes originateat the top of the tank and span to the bottom of the tank without intermediatesupport. These pipes would exert nozzle loads on the tank walls during a seismic event. It is necessary to determine the adequacy of the nozzle connection and the stress in the unsupportedpipe due to seismic loading.

-- Pipe line 1028 & 1080 are shown on Dwg 9321-F-22433and analyzed in prob 469.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[Z ND uD- N/AD Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-343 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 8 IP3 Status: Y[Z Ni-- U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Most of the adjacentconduits show evidence of varying degrees of surface corrosion.

Cabinets adjacentto the tank could not be opened due to the large number of fasteners secunng the covers.

References:

SEWS for CST and attachedcalculation (18904-1P3-SQ01 7, Rev. 0) 9321-F-10023, Rev. 22, PLOT PLAN AWC-018 LB-11 C:VOI~ae f uyý f- ;

Date: 10/17/12

vatuut e y PaulHuebsch 10/17/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0 Page C-344 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 8 IP3 Status; YFý ND ULO]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

Photographs Note: Equipment Tag EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0 Page C-345 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 8 WP3 Status: Y[W NEl UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

Note: Iypicai ancnor Dolt aetail Note: Crack profile at location intermediate between anchor bolts. Note that the crack continues through the coating indication that the crack has been active since the coating was applied.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-346 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 8 IP3 Status: Y'1 ND UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STOR TANK (31 CST)

Note: Pipes which span the height of the tank without intermediatesupport.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0 Page C-347 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 7 of 8 1P3 w1ithou.

e tank Note: Cabinet which is missing bolts in face without iintermediate n e Jtem I Isupor I t.il II support. I lu l71 plate.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0 Page C-348 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 8 of 8 IP3 Note: Platform base plate with two bolts and Note: Overview of plafform four holes.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-349 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y -] N-1 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. EDG-31-FO-DTNK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY(31 EDG)

Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 26'-0" Room, 31 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U[- N/A-]

There are two saddles supporting the tank, each with 4 bolts. Two of bolts on the north saddle are missing nuts (see attachedphoto). This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03382.

LB-07 evaluation was performed and concluded that the existing bolting configuration is structurallyadequate (without the two nuts).

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U-- N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YD1 NO UD1 N/AN anchors?

Not applicablesince the saddle is attachedto structuralsteel (angles).

Enter the equipment class namne frorm EPR I 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-350 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NFi UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. EDG-31-FO-DTNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY (31 EDG)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[J NDI UD N/AD--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configurationis consistent with IP3V-0353-O001, Rev. 2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See #2.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDl uDI N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UID N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/AD-Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND-] uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-351 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 WP3 Status: Y[ N-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. EDG-31-FO-DTNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY(31 EDG)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI[ U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

IP3V-0353-0001, Rev. 2 SEWS for F.O.Day Tank No. 31 and 33 AWC-019 LB-07 CR IP3-2012-03382 Evaluated by: Maqqie Farah Date: 10/19/2012 KaiLo I10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0 Page C-352 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 - ---

SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z N[D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. EDG-31-FO-DTNK Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY (31 EDG)

Photographs I Note: bolt with missing nut. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-353 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 IP3 Status: Y[X NF UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. CSAHNRT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YtZ NEI UID N/AD Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI uLIE N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE- NW--UW- N/Ai anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipment class name li'm IiPR I 10252W6. Appendix 13 .C'lassesol' Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-354 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 IP3 Status: YN NR-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. CSAHNRT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDI UD N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageconfigurationis consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NDI UDF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] ND] Uli N/AD1 Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y" NDI UEl- N/A[D]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

Equipment removal areain adjacentwall is covered with shielding and the outside of the wall has a metal door. No seismic impact.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YLJ NDl UID- N/AD:]

Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND- UiD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-355 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 1P3 Status: YE N7] U7-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. CSAHNRT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

1. DWG 9321-F-11713-8, PRIMARY AUXILIARY BUILDING CONCRETE FLOOR AT ELEVATION 73'-0" WEST END

2. SEWS NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31

3. AWC-034 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/23/2012 Date: 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineenng Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-356 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP3 Status: Y[A NFD UD]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. CSAHNRT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31 Photographs Note: View of front pedestal EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-357 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 1P3 Status: YL NR U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. CSAHNRT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31 Note: View of wall and conduits Note: View of equipment and conduits NW Note: View of exchangerremoveable head EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-358 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP3 Status: YF] ND Uij Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 CSAHNRT Equip. Class2 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCH NO 31 fuipment removal area at out., ? wall Note: View of rearwall/

Note: View at removeable head EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-359 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: YN ND U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. ACAHCC1 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 31 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEZ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE ND ULI] N/AD Two of four anchor bolts are not fully engaged, missing 1/16" threads.

Percalculation IP3-CALC-MULT-00734, page 6 for bolt size of Y2 "

diameterand over, 0. 136" recess is allowed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEZ NDI UD1 N/AD oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YA ND] UD N/AD anchors?

There are indicationsthat previous cracks have been repaired.See photo.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 10025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0 Page C-360 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. ACAHCC1 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N[] u-- N/AD--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configurationis consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI- UrI N/AD Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND UD- N/AD All attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE-l U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-361 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[E N-I U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. ACAHCC1 Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y- N[il U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes. we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Drawings:

1. 9321-F-25153-22,PAB GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS A T EL.55-O" & 731-0"

2. 9321-F-25103-23,PAB GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS AT EL.15', 32'-6", 34'-6"& 41'

3. IP3V-299-0006 R1, COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER AS BUILT OUTLINE.

4. SEWS Sheet 31 I/A Cmpr CI Cooling Wtr Hx

5. AWC-025

~N' Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/12

<~2 kY /~ ~Q Pail Hp~h.wch 10/22/12 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-362 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[J N[] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. ACAHCC1 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 31 Photographs Note: Note:

View from 55' floor. View from73' floor EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page C-363 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YEI N[n U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. ACAHCC1 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 31 Note: Note:

Two of four anchor bolts are not fully engaged. There are indicationsof repairedcracks.

missing 1/16" threads.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-364 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: Y[1 NF-D U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. IACCHT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 32 IAC INST AIR CC HEX Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15ý-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[* NL[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, part of the anchor check.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM NEI UD-- N/AD-1 The anchorage was observed to be free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ ND U[D] N/A[:

oxidation?

The anchors were observed to be free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE N[-] U- N/A[--

anchors?

No cracks were found in the concrete near the anchors.

the equipment class name li-om [PRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes ot'Equipmeent.

tEnter EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-365 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YNI ND-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. /ACCHT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description 32 lAC INSTAIR CC HEX

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDI NZ UD- N/ADT (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchor bolt spacing is 42"vs 3" as indicatedon drawing 9321-F-19543, Section K-K. The base plate size is equal to 4" x Y2" x 0'-9" vs.

drawing at 6" x Y2" x 0-10".

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y-Z NDI uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The increase anchorbolt spacing will provide greaterout of plane moment capacity and is conservative. The decrease in base plate size is not criticalsince the assembly will act as a rigid frame and the component integrity will not be compromised since the base plates will be loadedprimarily in compression and the decrease in bearing capacity is not considered significantfor the minimum weight of the component.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YDI ND ur- N/A-Not applicablesince there are no soft targets.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI ui- N/A[-D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI uDJ N/AD1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE1 NE UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-366 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YEZ Ni D UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. IACCHT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description 32 IAC INST AIR CC HEX Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[- Nil ul--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Leaking valve adjacent to the exchanger (SWN-TCV-1 113) was observed. The condition was tagged as being addressedby WO 51456228.

References:

9321-F-19543-10,CONTROL AND DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDINGS CONCRETE PLAN EL. 15'-0" IP3V-299-0001. Rev. 1, DETAIL: COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER IP3V-299-0002, DETAIL: COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENTARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-002 Evaluated Date: 10/09/2012 Maaoie Farah ii=W Date: 10/09/2012 Kai Lo 1f. 6 Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0. Page C-367 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[ NLII UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. IACCHT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description 32 IAC INST AIR CC HEX Photographs Note: 32 IAC INST AIR CC HEX Note: Exchanger31 mounted above Note: Exchanger 31 mounted above Exchanger 32 Exchanger 32 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-368 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[j N[D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. IACCHT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description 32 /AC INSTAIR CC HEX Note: Exchangersupport Note: Upper Exchanger EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-369 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YrZ Ni U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-AR-TNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description AIR RECEIVER 30 GAL. TANK # 32 (32ART)

Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 32 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD-- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is not part of the anchorage configurationverification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[j NEI U[:- N/A --

The anchoragefree of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U-- N/AD--

oxidation?

Observed minorsurface corrision;however, SEWS judged not to be a concern. Therefore, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[:] NEI U[:] N/A[

anchors?

Not applicablesince the anchorageis attached to steel grating.

Enter the equipment Class namc from EPR I 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ot'Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-370 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND I UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-AR-TNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description AIR RECEIVER 30 GAL. TANK # 32 (32ART)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-- NDI UD- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince it is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI uID N/AD-Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND uD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Gratingabove the tank is well supported. Therefore, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND-- UD N/AD1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

The equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-371 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[1 N[] u-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-AR-TNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description AIR RECEIVER 30 GAL. TANK # 32 (32ART)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-LL-67954-1, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING EL. 15?-O"AIR RECEIVER TANK GRATING SUPPORTDETAIL 9321-F-10543-10, CONTROL AND DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDINGS CONCRETE PLAN EL. 15,-0' 9321-F-40483-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING HEATING & VENTILATION PLAN & SECTION 9321-F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATIONS A WC-020 Evaluated by: Magqie Farah Date: 10/23/12 Kai Lo /C- 6 10/23/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0 Page C-372 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status- YEj N-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-AR-TNK Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description AIR RECEIVER 30 GAL. TANK # 32 (32ART)

Photographs Note: Air receiver 30 gal. tank #32 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-373 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ N-] U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. ACAPPW1 Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refuelinq Water Purification31 Pump and Motor Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NO uD- N/A[D Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEz NEI uD N/AD--

oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI U- N/AD-anchors?

Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

I Enter the equipment class name tioni EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes ol'Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-374 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[-E Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. ACAPPW1 Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water Purification31 Pump and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NI-] U[I N/A[--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration is consistent with drawing 9321-F-11683-10.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEk- N[-I U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE[ NEI U-- N/A-1 Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YLI NO U-- N/A-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Observed fluorscent bulb directly above ACAPPWI that is not secured to the light fixture. During a seismic event the bulb may fall and strike the pump's oil reservoiror nearby equipment. This is addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03653.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N[-- U[] N/AD-Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEINO UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

See #8.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-375 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] NR UR-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. ACAPPW1 Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water Purification31 Pump and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NO U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-11683-10 A WC-033 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/22/12 Kqi I n 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

-ngineenng Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-376 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NEI UEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. ACAPPW1 Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water Purification31 Pump and Motor Photographs Note: Refueling Water Purification31 Pump and Note:

Motor EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-377 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] ND-ý U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. SFPC-31PP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 31 and Motor Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 41'-0" Room, SPENTFUELPI.TPUMP Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[Z NDI U-i N/AD-Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE7 NDI UD- N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDJ UD-7 N/ADl anchors?

Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-378 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. SFPC-31PP E( quip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 31 and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[D NEI UD- N/A[-]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageis consistent with plant drawing 9321-F-12003-7.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-- N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Platform above is well supported. Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl UD: N/AD-Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND UD--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-379 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND-1 U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. SFPC-31PP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel PitPump 31 and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References.:

A210606-0 9321-F-12003-7 9321-F-25143-14 IP3V-0209-0081-1, sheet 1 IP3V-0415-0002-1, sheet 13 AWC-41 Evaluated by: Maqqie Farah Date: 10125/12 KaiLo C 610/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-380 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[) ND ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. SFPC-31PP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 31 and Motor Photographs Note: spent fuel pit pump 31 & motor Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-381 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE- NFi UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. SFPC-32PP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 32 and Motor Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 41'-0" Room, SPENTFUEL PIT PUMP Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorace

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE- N/AD Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-I N/ADI oxidation?

Yes. the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NEI U-- N/AD1 anchors?

Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. \ppendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-382 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YN ND-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. SFPC-32PP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 32 and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEL UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorageis consistent with plant drawing 9321-F-12003-7

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEZ NED UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE ND UD N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Platform is well supported. Therefore, yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND UD N/AD Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND-- U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-383 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND u--D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. SFPC-32PP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 32 and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[N NEI UFD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

AWC-041 9321-F-12003-7 9321-F-25143-14 IP3V-0415-0002, Rev. 1, sheet 13 IP3V-0209-0081, Rev. 1, sheet 1 A210606-0

-aA Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo /C . 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-384 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE3 NDJ UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. SFPC-32PP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 32 and Motor Photographs Note: no photos attached. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-385 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE N-I U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. ACAHSFI Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ Ni:

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE* ND U[D N/AD Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[E ND UD- N/AD oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDI ui1 N/AD--

anchors?

Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1(025286. Ap\pendix B: Classes olEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-386 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. ACAHSFI Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NDI U- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageis consistent with plant drawings 9321-F-1 1973-8 and 9321-F-12003-7.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI uED N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Oberserved two masonry block walls at the south and east side of the room. The block walls are seismically qualified in calculation 2123-039-001.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND UDl N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-387 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y- NR-] U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. ACAHSFI Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25143-14 IP3V-299-0008-1 9321-F-11973-8 A WC-042 Calculation 2123-039-001 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah j qdw`--ý Date: 10/25/12 KaiLo 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-388 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[* ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. ACAHSFI Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Photographs Note: spent fuel pit heat exchanger Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-389 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: YIZ N-- UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. PUMP #31 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC Primary Loop Pump 31 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yil NOZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[-D UFD N/AD Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[lJ ND_1 UDl N/AD-oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO ND UD1 N/ADý anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

I Enter the equipment class name friom EPRI 11025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-390 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YN N7 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. PUMP #31 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC PrimaryLoop Pumo 31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YLI NDI U- N/AW (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] ND U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEZ NO U- N/ADJ Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[E N[] ULIE N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-391 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ N-I UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. PUMP#31 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC PrimaryLoop Pump 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[- uLi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A WC-043 9321-F-25143-14 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah J5 CLI Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo z 6 I 1 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0. Page C-392 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] ND ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. PUMP #31 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPCPrimary Loop Pump 31 Photographs Note: Pump #31 Primary Loop Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-393 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ Nn- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment IDNo. PUMP #32 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC PrimaryLoop Pump 32 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorageconfigurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yf-- NO UD- N/AD Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEZ ND UD- N/ADl oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE ND UD-l N/ADl anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchor.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1(125286. Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-394 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. PUMP#32 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC PrimaryLoop Pump 32

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO] NE] uI N/AW (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] U- N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UE- N/AE]

Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-395 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y2 NFD U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. PUMP#32 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC PrimaryLoop Pump 32 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[N Nil UF-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A WC-043 9321-F-25143-14 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah J*ý- Date: 10/25/12 KaiLo 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page C-396 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[jj ND-- UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. PUMP #32 PRIMARY LOOP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description BUSFPC Pnmarv Loow Pump 32 Photographs Note: Pump #32 primary loop Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-397 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z N-- U--1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. BSFPC Plate Heat Exchanger Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BUSFPCParaflow Plate Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ- NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U- N/AD--

Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDI LE-] N/AD]

oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI uD- N/AD anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

IEnter the equipment class name from EPR I 1025286, Appendix B: Classes oUEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-398 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. BSFPC Plate Heat Exchanger Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BUSFPC Paraflow Plate Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NZ UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing IP3V-2022-O001 shows the anchorage details for the Plate Heat Exchanger This drawing shows the base plate attachedto the wide flange has one bolt. SWES noted that there are 3 extra bolts on this base plates which is acceptable since the extra bolts provide more capcity.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI uD N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND uD-] N/A[-D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEJ ND UD N/AD Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uD]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-399 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YM N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. BSFPC Plate Heat Exchanger Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description BUSFPC Paraflow Plate Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E NEI UD-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

A WC-043 IP3V-2022-0001, Rev. 1, sh. 1 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo / /c 6 ' 10125112 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0, Page C-400 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[M NR U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-00 Equipment ID No. BSFPC Plate Heat Exchanger Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BUSFPC Paraflow Plate Heat E)----------

Photographs Note: BSFPC plate heat exchanger Note: base plate with 3 additionalbolts.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-401 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP3 Status: YE] Ni D UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-008 Equipment ID No. SFPB Bndge Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[Z NEI U-I N/AD[

Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO UED N/AD--

oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[D] NDI u-- N/A[

anchors?

The crane is attached to structuralsteel.

Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equlipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-402 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: YE NDI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-008 Equipment ID No. SFPB Bndge Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N[D U-I N/AZJ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince is not part of the anchorageconfiguration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[Z ND: UD-- N/AD--

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UD N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ N[D] UD:] N/AD1 Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-403 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YE Ni D UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-008 Equipment ID No. SFPB Brddge Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[J Ni: UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25143-14 9321-F-13063-5 9321-F-13883-9 A WC-043 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo __ 6_ 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0. Page C-404 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YM ND ULI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-008 Equipment ID No. SFPB Bndge Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane Photographs Note: SFPB bridge crane Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-405 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P3 Status: Y] ND-] U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-008 Equipment ID No. SFPB Bridge Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel PitBridge Crane Note: no photos attached Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-406 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YfN NM UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-009 Equipment ID No. FSB Crane Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 137 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEIL UL] N/AD Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UD- N/AD--

oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YDi ND ID- N/A]

anchors?

Not applicablesince the anchorageis attached to steel.

IEnter the eqUipment class name fioni EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-407 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-009 Equipment ID No. FSB Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI ND-] UD-- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not partof the anchorage configuration venfication.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y- N[:] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YLI NDI UD- N/AZ Not applicable since the crane is not a soft target.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI Uti N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD1 N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-408 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YM NFI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-009 Equipment ID No. FSB Crane Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[:] UD-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25143-14 9321-F-13063-5 A WC-043 Evaluated by: Magqqie Farah aý- Date: 10/25/12 KaiLo Ic6 ji ,10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0. Page C-409 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y] NLI U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-009 Equipment ID No. FSB Crane Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Buildincq 40/5 Ton Crane Photographs Note cae~

FS Note: FSB crane Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT D - AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) Page D- I of 192

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-2 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND-- UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -006, 017 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ ND UD N/AD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipmentin the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[-] U[-- N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE] N-- UD N/AD]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-3 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YEZ ND-- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -006, 017

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI- u-l N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Junction box cover adjacentto Appendix R EBR-8-EDG cabinet directly above C02-CP-IA cabinet only has two of four screws in place (see attachedphoto). The plate is light in weight and the existing screws are tight and secure. This is judged to be adequate.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI U-- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[Z NDI UD N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UDI N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-4 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YO; NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -006, 017

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

)

Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch Date: 10/09/2012 Maggie Farah 10/09/2012 KaiLo Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev 0. Page D-5 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND UEI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. DG Floorl, 15-0"17 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL1 -006, 017 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-6 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 IP3 Status: YE ND UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWITCHGEAR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -099, 090, 056, 057, 071, 014, 015, 013 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y- NEI uD- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipmentin the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDI U[:] N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE] NEI UD- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appearto be inside acceptable limits.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is verly large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEIL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-7 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YE* NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' SWITCHGEAR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-099, 090, 056, 057, 071, 014,015, 013

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[D1 UD N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescentfixtures are secured to the supportingstructure and are acceptable. However, the bulbs are not secured and could be loosened and drop in a seismic event. Judged seismically acceptable given hard targets in the area. This has been documented in CR-IP3-2012-03123.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEZ NDI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] NDI uD- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-8 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 1P3 Status: YX NEI UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWITCHGEAR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELI-099, 090, 056, 057, 071, 014, 015, 013

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Speakers are supported directly off of conduit and there was a concern that in a seismic event that the speakers could rotate and impact valves IA-642 and IA-73-1. A closer review determined that the speakers could not impact the valves. Therefore, this is not a seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed a crack crossing the east bolt of a conduit support on the north wall for conduits coming out of Relay Box TR-2 KOO. The conduit support consist of a P1000 Unistrut with two 3/8" diameter bolts supporting -1Y 2" and -%" diameter conduits (see attached photos). A sketch of the crack and the supportis shown below for clarification.This is evaluated in LB-16.

P1000 Unistrut 3/8" dia. bolt Observed a Unistrutconnection angle clip has play in it which allows the spring nut in the Unistrut to wiggle and not tighten the bolt. The tube track is adjacent to the heater25 in the Controlbuilding elevation 15. This allows the unistrutto wiggle but is still operable. Not a seismic interaction issue since it will not dislodge and small load. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-3416.

Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch Date: 10/09/2012 Maqciie Farah 10/09/2012 Kai Lo Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0, Page D-9 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[* NEI UFi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' SWITCHGEAR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELI-099, 090, 056, 057, 071, 014, 015, 013 Photographs i

A nxvv Note: crack near the east bolt EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0. Page D-10 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[1 N-- UF-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWITCHGEAR ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL1-099, 090, 056, 057, 071, 014. 015. 013 i i Note: crack going through the east bolt Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-11 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YrZ ND I ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area1 A/C EQUIPMENTROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 1-054, 055 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NO] U- N/A[l potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-- N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YEI] N[E UD N/Al'l raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Unistruton masonry block wall 53B is missing an anchor. The base of the Unistrutis supported with duct tape and the Unistrutnow has approximately 4 feet of unsupportedcantilever. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03129.

If tile room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-12 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YO* N-- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area1 A/C EQUIPMENTROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 1-054, 055

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[-] uW-- N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N-- uD- N/A[-

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NDI U-- N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] NO U-- N/A--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The nitrogen tank at IA-PCV-817 is adequately supported at the wall.

However, the steel cap for the tank is loose on a wall channel behind the tank and could be displaced by a seismic event and strike nearby equipment. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03128.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-13 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI U[D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 A/C EQUIPMENTROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 1-054, 055

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YFJ NEI U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch , .*. ,, Date: 10/09/2012 Maggie Farah aA Date: 10/09/2012 KaiLo .- 6 Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-14 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NO UPZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' AC EQUIPMENTROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 1-054, 055 Photographs Note: No photos attached. I Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-15 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YEZ NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area 1 Battery Room 31 SWEL Components: SWELl-065 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UD N/A-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE ND UD N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NDI UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-16 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[Z ND uE--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 3X-O" Room, Area 1 Battery Room 31 SWEL Components: SWELl -065

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND:] U[D N/A[D]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y- ND] UD- N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND U[D] N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-17 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 Battery Room 31 SWEL Components: SWELl -065

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil uF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch . Date: 10/10/2012 Maggie Farah 10/10/2012 Kai Lo Ic 6 ,10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-18 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NEI UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area' Battery Room 31 SWEL Components: SWELl -065 Photographs Note: No photos attached. I I Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-19 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NDI UEZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM 32 SWEL Components: SWELl-066 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE ND ULI N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ ND_1 UDI N/ADl significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN ND UD1 N/AFD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., 'urbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-20 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM32 SWEL Components: SWELl -066

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U-I N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[O ND-] UDj N/Ar-D interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD1 N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-21 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YEj NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area 1 BATTERYROOM 32 SWEL Components: SWELl-066

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[D U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch - Date: 10/10/2012 Maooie Farah 10/10/2012 KaiLo /c2 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-22 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YO- NF] UFD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0 Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM32 SWEL Components: SWELl -066 Photographs Note: No photos attached. I Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-23 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YW ND UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 BATTERYROOM34 SWEL Components: SWELl -068 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UID N/AD]

significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[Z ND UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is vei-v large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet firom the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-24 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 BATTERYROOM34 SWEL Components: SWELl -068

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEE ND UD N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[] ND UD1 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] ND uD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-25 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33'-0" Room,Area1 BATTERY ROOM 34 SWEL Components: SWELl -068

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmentin the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch

Date: 10/10/2012 Macqiqie Farah , 10/10/2012 KaiLo /c" I 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-26 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y- NEI UFL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB FloorEl. 33-0" Room,Area 1 BATTERYROOM 34 SWEL Components: SWELl-068 Photographs Note: No photos attached. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-27 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YO NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-O" Room, Area1 CABLE SPREADING ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL1-019, 073. 074, 070. 063, 064, 059, 016. 060, 020. 012, 075, 089, 018, 069, 072 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YD NE UD N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Cable tray 34K support againstthe north wall is missing a Unistrut bolt.

The supporthas 3 bolt holes with only two bolts in place (see attached photos). This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03281.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y- NEI UD N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage appears to be free of degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y- ND uD- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very' large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-28 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area 1 CABLE SPREADING ROOM SWEL Components: SWELI-019. 073, 074, 070. 063. 064. 059, 016. 060, 020. 012, 075, 089, 018, 069, 072

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NEI U-D N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Observed unrestrainedfluorescent bulb in the entire room. During a seismic event, the bulbs may become loose and strike nearby equipment. All fluorescent bulbs need retainers. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03123.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEZ NO UD N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI uD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A small cable is running outside of the cable tray and draped over the cable tray supports instead of being run in the cable tray. The location is nearthe RTA breaker cabinet. This is not judged to be an adverse seismic interaction but is a housekeeping consideration.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-29 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YEA NO UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 CABLE SPREADING ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-019. 073. 074, 070, 063, 064. 059. 016. 060. 020. 012. 075. 089.

018. 069, 072

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[* NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There are masonry walls in the south east corner. These walls were considered as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis as walls 53D and 54 and were found to be satisfactory.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Walked-down the entire room.

Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch "-.."Date: 10/10/2012 Maqqie Farah Date: 10/10/2012 Kai Lo Ic Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page D-30 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND UE*]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 CABLE SPREADING ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -019. 073, 074, 070. 063. 064. 059, 016. 060, 020, 012, 075, 089, 018, 069. 072 Photographs Note: Cable tray 34k Note: Missing anchorin centerfor cable tray 34k EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-31 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 3 IP3 Status: YE NEI UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI IuD N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Panel DS-LP-501 (non-seismic)base plates have four bolt holes but only two bolts in place (see attachedphoto). This panel support is located approximately 10 feet away from 34MCC, if the structural integrity of the supportis compromised during a seismic event, the MCC will not be impacted since the panel is approximately 10' away.

Therefore, the anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UI- N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Yes, the anchorageof equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YDI NO uD- N/AD1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Firewaterand waterlines do not appearto be seismically supported.

This has been documented in CR-IP3-2012-03656.

Conduit and cable trays do not appearto be seismically supported. This has been documented in CR IP3-2012-03656.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NO uD-- N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescentlight bulbs are not restrained.This is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03661.

If the room in which the SWrEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Th is selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-32 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 IP3 Status: YM NEI U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 15'-0' Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl-007

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YOI NO UD-- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Non-seismically supported water lines are near 34MCC. See question

3 above.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YD] NO UD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Two unrestrainedequipment are stored approximately 15 feet away from 34MCC (see attached photo). This has been documented in CR IP3-2012-03661.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E ND IuDý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10/11/2012 Maggie Farah Date: 10/11/2012 KaiLo -c , 6 1 Date: 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page D-33 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3 IP3 Status: YW ND ULIF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 1

Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area SWEL Components: SWELl -007 Photographs Note: Missing two anchors from DS-LP501 Note: Unrestrainedequipment near 34MCC Disconnect Switch for LP501 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-34 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: Y[ Nr- UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yll NE UD N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Controlpanels TWS#31, #32 and #33 - all nuts on the base plates are heavily corrodedwith substantialloss of cross section. TWS #34, #35 and #36 are less corroded but also exhibit considerable loss of cross section. CR-IP3-2012-03640has been written to address this issue.

The base plate of Unistrut column supportingconduits has 3 out of 4 anchor bolts missing. The nuts on the opposite base plate are heavily corroded. CR-IP3-2012-03640has been written to address this issue.

SCWP panel base plate has corroded nuts and the panel adjacentto TWS #34 is missing an anchor bolt in its base plate. CR-IP3-2012-03640 has been written to address this issue.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y-I N[R uD N/AD I significant degraded conditions?

There is degradationof base plates and anchors on conduit supports and electricalpanels as described above.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet fr'om the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-35 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[ NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -008

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD- N/A[:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith otherequipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND-- uD- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y- ND uD- N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NZ- uD N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The Common Alarm Panel adjacent to the cabinet has padlocks hanging loose on Unistruts.

Notebooks and ear protection box are sitting loose on an adjacent panel. This is not a seismic adverse condition, it is a housekeeping issue.

The above items are addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03640 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-36 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: Y] NO U[O Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -008

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE1 NO Ur--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This was not part of the area walkby (i.e. within 35 ft of SWEL1-008); however, it is necessary to note this condition. Leaking pipe near Screen Wash around column line 18 that was covered with a plastic to prevent water from spreading. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03640.

Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10/11/2012 Maggie Farah Date: 10/11/2012 KaiLo /c 6- Date: 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page D-37 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NFI UEi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -008 Photographs Note: Control Panel /TWS #31 Note: Control Panel TWS #32 Note: Control Panel TWS #31 Note: Missing three anchorbolts EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev 0, Page D-38 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[M NF UF-l Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -008 Photographs Note: Leaking pipe nearScreen Wash around Note:

column line 18 EN-DC-168 REV 0

NL-13-089, Enclosure to NL-13-089, Seismic Walkdown Report Update, Part 2 of 6

Contents

Text

References:

References:

References:

References:

Reference:

Reference:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

Navigation menu

NL-13-089, Enclosure to NL-13-089, Seismic Walkdown Report Update, Part 2 of 6

Text

References:

References:

References:

References:

Reference:

Reference:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

Navigation menu

Search