Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
|---|
TAC:ME2731, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Withdrawn, Closed) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, ... further results|Request]]
- Acceptance...
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: CNL-14-077, Responses to Degraded Voltage Issue Requests for Additional Information, ML101050203, ML102240630, ML102290358, ML102290360, ML102290361, ML102290362, ML102290363, ML102290364, ML102290365, ML102290366, ML102290367, ML102290368, ML102290383, ML102290384, ML102290385, ML102290386, ML102290387, ML102290388, ML102290389, ML102290390, ML102290391, ML102290392, ML102290403, ML102290404, ML102290405, ML102290406, ML102290407, ML102290408, ML102290409, ML102290410, ML102290411, ML102290414, ML102290439, ML102290440, ML102290441, ML102290442, ML102290443, ML102290444, ML102290445, ML102290446, ML102290447, ML102290448, ML102290458, ML102290459, ML102290460, ML102290461, ML102290462, ML102290463, ML102290464... further results
|
MONTHYEARML0933702752009-11-24024 November 2009 Final Safety Analysis Report, Amendment 95, Cover Letter Project stage: Request ML12192A3682009-12-0909 December 2009 Tennessee Department of Health Public Health Assessment 2009 Project stage: Request ML1001916862010-01-11011 January 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report, Amendment 97, Section 8 - Electric Power Through 8E-12 Project stage: Request ML1001914212010-01-11011 January 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report, Amendment 97 Project stage: Request ML1002204742010-02-0505 February 2010 IP 37002, Construction Refurbishment Process - Watts Bar Unit 2 Project stage: Request ML1005500072010-03-11011 March 2010 Request for Additional Information Related to Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment 95 Related to Section 4.2.2, Reactor Vessel Internal Components Project stage: RAI ML1007100112010-03-12012 March 2010 OL - List of Documents for Docketing Referenced on Page 5 of the Site Audit Trip Report Project stage: Request ML1010502032010-04-0808 April 2010 Additional Information Regarding Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 7, Instrumentation and Controls Review - Requested Common Q Proprietary Documents Project stage: Other ML1010405732010-04-0909 April 2010 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Amendment Related to Section 4.2.2, Reactor Vessel Internal Components Project stage: Response to RAI ML1011701022010-04-27027 April 2010 Notice of Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority to Discuss Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Final Safety Analysis Report Submittals Project stage: Request ML1011303512010-05-0505 May 2010 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure (Tac No. ME2731) Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML1016102902010-05-27027 May 2010 Transmittal of Amendment 99 to Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Project stage: Request ML1016203602010-06-17017 June 2010 Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to Discuss the Complete Status of TVA Hydrology Issues Including the Flooding Effects on the TVA Operating Nuclear Plants Project stage: Request ML1014500842010-06-23023 June 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Reactor Systems, Nuclear Performance and Code Review, Ansd Plant Systems Project stage: RAI ML1015402502010-06-24024 June 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Nuclear Performance and Code Review, Plant Systems, and Testing (Tac Nos. ME2731 and ME3091) Project stage: RAI ML1017903992010-06-28028 June 2010 Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Section 4.2.2, Reactor Vessel Internal Components Project stage: Request ML1016200062010-06-29029 June 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Nuclear Performance and Code Review (Tac No. ME2731) Project stage: RAI ML1015304742010-07-0202 July 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Mechanical and Civil Engineering Systems Project stage: RAI ML1016000262010-07-0808 July 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report, Amendment Related to Quality and Vendor Branch Review Project stage: RAI ML1015303542010-07-12012 July 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Electrical Engineering Systems Project stage: RAI ML1018001562010-07-15015 July 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Chapter 8, Electric Power Project stage: RAI ML1020202812010-07-30030 July 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Chapter 3.11 Project stage: RAI ML1023003322010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-9 (Dwg No. 1-47W611-67-5, R10) Project stage: Other ML1022904662010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-3 (Dwg No. 1-47W845-3, R23) Project stage: Other ML1023003332010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-10 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-1, R27) Project stage: Other ML1023003342010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-10 Sh a (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-1A, R16) Project stage: Other ML1023003352010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-11 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-2, R15) Project stage: Other ML1023003432010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-12 Sh a (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-3A, R7) Project stage: Other ML1023003442010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-13 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-4, R17) Project stage: Other ML1023003452010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-11 Sh a (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-2A, R8) Project stage: Other ML1023003462010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-12 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-3, R12) Project stage: Other ML1023003472010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-14 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-5, R14) Project stage: Other ML1023003482010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-14 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-67-5A, R2) Project stage: Other ML1023003492010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-16 (Dwg No. 1-47W859-4, R23) Project stage: Other ML1023003502010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-17 (Dwg No. 1-47W859-3, R18) Project stage: Other ML1023003512010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-18 (Dwg No. 1-47W859-2, R36) Project stage: Other ML1023003522010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-19 (Dwg No. 1-47W859-1, R47) Project stage: Other ML1023003602010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-23 (Dwg No. 1-47W611-70-1, R9) Project stage: Other ML1023003612010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-20 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-70-1, R23) Project stage: Other ML1023003622010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-21 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-70-2, R29) Project stage: Other ML1023003632010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-21A (Dwg No. 1-47W610-70-2A, R15) Project stage: Other ML1023003642010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-22 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-70-3, R17) Project stage: Other ML1023003652010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-24 (Dwg No. 1-47W611-70-2, R11) Project stage: Other ML1023003672010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-25 (Dwg No. 1-47W611-70-3, R4) Project stage: Other ML1023003682010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.2-25A (Dwg No. 1-47W611-70-4, R4) Project stage: Other ML1023003692010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.3-1 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-32-1, R15) Project stage: Other ML1023003702010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.3-2 (Dwg No. 1-47W610-32-2, R19) Project stage: Other ML1023003732010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 9.3-6 (Dwg No. 1-47W848-1, R24) Project stage: Other ML1022903682010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 8.3-14B (Dwg No. 1-45W760-82-1, R17) Project stage: Other ML1022903652010-08-0505 August 2010 Final Safety Analysis Report Figure 8.3-7 (Dwg No. 1-45W760-211-9, R16) Project stage: Other 2010-05-05
[Table View] |
Text
Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 March 18, 2013 10 CFR 50.49 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-391
Subject:
Request for Additional Information Regarding Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related Section 3.11 - Revised Response (TAC No. ME2731)
Reference:
TVA letter to NRC dated August 3, 2011, "Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 -
Request for Additional Information Regarding Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related Section 3.11-Revised Response (TAC No. ME2731)"
[ML12167A221]
In late January 2013, NRC made an informal verbal request for information to facilitate the final review of Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 3.11 on Equipment Qualification (EQ). The request covered two issues. The first related to 16 Category II cables discussed in the referenced letter. The second request was for TVA to identify whether Teflon has been used in primary containment electrical penetration assemblies.
This letter provides the requested information.
During verification and validation of Unit 2 EQ cables, it was determined that procur'ement and installation dates of some Unit 2 EQ cables did not meet the cutoff dates for procurement (May 23, 1980, as specified in IE Bulletin 79-01 B, Supplement 2) and installation (February 22, 1983, as specified in Regulatory Guide 1.89, Revision 1). One population of such cables was discussed in the referenced letter, and the acceptance for their use was documented in Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) 22.
The following table provides the procurement information on the remaining population of Category II cables that have been qualified on the same basis as was described in SSER 22. There are less than 40 cables in this group. This group includes the cables
V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 March 18, 2013 discussed in the referenced letter and cables from two additional contracts. The additional contracts were identified during a recent review of EQ cable contracts. The table shown below updates the information that was provided in the referenced letter. The change to the number of Category II cables and contracts involved was verbally discussed with the NRC.
Contract Manufacturer 71C070005476202 Triangle-Pwc-lnc.
77K0500822401 American Insulated Wire Corp 79K0500824597 American Insulated Wire Corp 79K0500824965 American Insulated Wire Corp 80K0700826542 Rockbestos Company These were new cables installed in the plant for the first time in Unit 2. Material purchased under these contracts has been determined to meet the qualification criteria of NUREG-0588 Category II using the guidelines established in IEEE 323-1971.
Material was purchased under Contracts 71C070005476202, 79K0500824597, 79K0500824965, 79K0500824965, and 80K0700826542 prior to May 23, 1980, and was on hand as part of TVA stock before February 22, 1983. Some of this material was installed in Unit 2 between 1980 and 1983 and some was installed in the 1983 to 1985 timeframe.
Material from each of these contracts was also installed at other TVA facilities prior to the February 22, 1983, date and is in full compliance with the qualification criteria of NUREG 0588 Category II as documented in site EQ Binders. Unit 2 material from these contracts is considered equally qualified as those at other TVA facilities.
NRC addressed the equipment qualification of electrical penetration assemblies in SSER 22 with an open item for the NRC staff to confirm that the assemblies were installed in accordance with the EQ tested configuration and that the feedthrough modules were manufactured by the same company as the tested modules consistent with the information in the EQ test report. NRC's review of the penetration assemblies was documented in Inspection Report 2011-607, and the open item was closed. In response to the verbal NRC request, TVA confirmed the WBN Unit 2 containment electrical penetrations have been qualified to an integrated dose of at least 1.2 E8 rad gamma as well as the other normal and accident containment environmental conditions. Inner and outer containment seal integrity is maintained as established by the qualification testing. The primary containment electrical penetrations for WBN Unit 2 use a polysolmide sealing material and Kapton cable insulation.
The Kapton insulation is a thin tape that is amber in color. The insulated conductor has a minimum of two half-lapped layers of Kapton with a layer of Teflon FEP (Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene) that serves as an adhesive between the layers of Kapton. This is the qualified configuration. TVA has confirmed that the feedthrough modules do not contain extruded Teflon cable insulation or Teflon seals. In 1985, Conax identified that a limited number of their penetration designs did use extruded Teflon cable insulation and/or Teflon as the seal material. Conax made the requisite 10 CFR Part 21 Reports at that time. The Part 21 Report listed the nuclear units that installed extruded Teflon cable insulation or Teflon seal penetration designs. WBN was not one of the plants identified as affected by Conax. The Part 21 Report also stated that the penetration design with Kapton insulation such as that used at WBN Unit 2 was fully qualified.
,,j U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 March 18, 2013 There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Gordon Arent at (423) 365-2004.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 1 8 th day of March, 2013.
Respectfully, Raymond A. Hruby, Jr.
General Manager, Technical Services Watts Bar Unit 2 cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Resident Inspector Unit 2 Wafts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381