ML12306A075

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RIV-2006-A-0033 - Callaway
ML12306A075
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 04/17/2009
From:
NRC Region 4
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0126, RIV-2006-A-0033, 4-2006-025
Download: ML12306A075 (4)


Text

RIV-2006-A-0033 Callaway DRS 1090 DAYS ResDonsible Branch: OB Concern 1 01 Action: Investigation High 01 Report: 4-2006-025 An (b)(7)(c) as not attentive to his duties for months.

Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed 1 Acknowledgement Letter ACES 4/13/2006 5/13/2006 5/11/2006 2 Initial ARB Meeting 4/13/2006 5/13/2006 A4/25/2006 Concern 1- OB to inspect.

Concern 2- O to investigate.

Concern 3- ACES to Offer Early ADR Concern 4- OB to inspect.

Concern 5- OB/RPBB to coordinate and review ECP file regarding Licensee's investigation and OB to inspect.

3 Inspection 06 4/2512006 :212612007 OB to inspect Concerns 4, and 5.

4 ADR Offered ACES 5/11/2006 5/25/2006 6/8/2006 Alleger declined early ADR - didn't think that he could prove his case by mediation.

5 01 Investigation 01 4/25/2006 1/30/2007 01 to investigate Concerns 1, 2, 6, and 7. - Not substantiated.

6 ARB Meeting ACES 5/15/2006 Clarify Concerns assigned to 01:

OI to investigate Concerns 1 and 2.

7 ARB Meeting ACES 5/22/2006 (1) OB/ACES to contact alleger to clarify Concern 4, specifically regarding what is meant by "carrying him" during requalification, If not a regulatory issue, OB to document.

(2) Regarding Concern 5, 08 to continue review based on 01 investigation results.

(3) Split Concern 1 into two for the 10 CFR 26 issue and the 10 CFR 55 issue.

8 Phone Call w/Alleger ACES 5/22/2006 !5/24/2006 OB/ACES to contact alleger to clarify Concern 4, specifically regarding what is meant by "carrying him" during requalification. If not a regulatory issue, OB to document.

9 Phone Call w/Alleger ACES :5/22/2006 Phone call w/Alleger to dicuss an additional concern.

10 Review Submittal OB 5/23/2006 5/23/2006 OB to review additional information provided by the alleger.

Page 1 Page 1 4/1712009.

4/1712009. ,\

RIV-2006-A-0033 Callaway DRS 1090 DAYS Responsible Branch: OB 11 ARB Meeting ACES 5/23/2006 j5/30/2006

1. Based upon conversation with alleger, determined that there wasn't a "cover up" as originally implied in concern and that there was no violation of requirements for Concern
4. OB to provide closure basis.
2. For Concern 7, request 01 investigate with a high priority. OB to review conduct of OPS procedure.

12 Status Letter ACES 5/30/2006 !6/6/2006 13 Phone call from Alleger ACES 6/8/2006 Alleger returned OAC call and advised that he wanted an 01 investigation.

14 Closure Memo OB 10/16/2006 Concern 4 15 Status Letter ACES 12/8/2006 Provided resolution of Concern 4.

16 01 Investigation ACES 6/8/2006 12/5/2007 01 investigate Concern 3.

17 Awaiting 3 Wk Comments ACES 2/12/2007 3/5/2007 3/5/2007 18 Closure Letter ACES 3/5/2007 4/4/2007 '4116/2007 19 Investigation Closure LTR ACES 4/16/2007 14125/2007 20 Final QA Review ACES 4/16/2007 !4126/2007 21 File Closed ACES 4/26/2007 22 Staff Review ACES 18/15/2007 DRS/OI/ACES met to discuss UCS' request to discuss allegation. Formulated the following action plan:

(b)(7)(C)

1. Confirm with ral:r that he authorizes

-2. -Confirm-withI- - hat NRC has received his e-mail

3. Discuss FOIA issue with chief of the FOIA
4. Discuss potential FOIA processino deQe-
5. Discuss obligation to discuss withl(bJT)(c)I
6. Reconsideration at ARL 23 Followup ARB Meeting ACES 8/15/2007 8/20/2007 18/20/2007 ARB provided with status (see 8/20/07, email from Deputy DDRS to Regional Counsel) 24 ARB Meeting ACES i10/24/2007 01 to open case supplemental to 4-2006-025 (from RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 7)

DDRS to contact the concerned individual (CI) with regards to the letter received on October 9, 2007, from the cG's attorney. Specifically to ask:

(1) if the Cl's attorney is aware that the Cl has contacted NRC and (2) would the Cl mind if we contacted the attorney to comply with the attorney's request from the letter received on October 9, 2007.

4/17/2009 PaOe 22 Page 4/17/209

  • R-R-V2006-A-0033 Callaway DRS 1090 DAYS Responsible Branch: OB 25 Letter to Alleger ACES Il1/15/2007 26 Other ACES '10/29/2007 Reopened file for 01 to perform supplemental investigation and interview additional witness.

27 Of Investigation 01 10/29/2007 '12/3/2008 Based upon new information, 01 was requested to reopen 01 Investigation and perform supplemental investigation activities.

28 Letter to Alleger ACES 2120/2008 12/21/2008 29 Review 01 Transcript OB 3/10/2008 3/24/2008 3118/2008 30 Status Letter ACES 7/2/2008 31 Awaiting 3 Wk Comments ACES 12/8/2008 12/29/2008 12/16/2009 32 Closure Memo OB 12/8/2008 12/30/2008 13/2/2009 Re-opened Concern 1 for 01 investigation based on new information. Need closure for Concern 1.

33 Closure Letter ACES 3/2/2009 3/1212009 :3/26/2009 34 1nvestigation Closure LTR ACES 3/26/2009 4/7/2009 4/7/2009 35 Phone Call w/Alleger OB 11/14/2009 36 File Closed ACES :4/7/2009 Concern 2 01 Action: Investigation High 01 Report: 4-2006-025

{(b)(7)(C) _] told licensee management about the problem but management took no action to addess the issue until they were forced to by the Employee Concerns Program Investigation.

Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed I Closure Memo ACES .4/26/2007 Concern 3 01 Action: Investigation High 01 Report: 4-2006-035 You were subjected to retaliation for reportinG the fitness-for-duty problem to the Employee Concerns Program in that you did(b)(C)()

(b)(7)(C)

I Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed I Closure Memo ACES 14/16/2007 4/17/2009 Page 33 Page 411712009

-RIV-2006-A-0033 Callaway DRS 1090 DAYS Responsible Branch: OB Concern 4 01 Action: No 01 Report:

The operations crew in which the alleged inattentlve(b)(7)(C) resided and other levels of licensee management may have been "carrying" th " or licensed operator requalification. c Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed 1 Closure Memo ACES ,12/8/2006 Concern 5 01 Action: No 01 Report:

Based upon your coi erns, the NRC Inspected an additional concern that althouoh the allegedly inattentiv (b)(7)(C) ?as purportedly (b)(7)(c) the licensee had not(b)(7)(C) land therefore, the individual may be placed on shift as needed.

Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed 1 Closure Memo ACES ;4/16/2007 Concern 6 01 Action: Investigation High 01 Report: 4-2006-025 You believe that there was a failure of the licensee's fitness-for-duty program in that 20 to 30 individuals had regular contact with thel (b)(7)(C) but did not pursue resolution of his lack-of-attention to duties.

Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed I Closure Memo ACES 14/16/2007 Concern 7 01 Action: Investigation High 01 Report: 4-2006-025 On more than one occasion, an on-shi (b)(7)(C) eft the control room areaJfr to 5 hours. During these absences, the shift crew could not contact th01b7F1 yany communications method. Th"f(b)( 7 q,- )(c) may P~urling note dsigiiaed another Individual to assume the (b)(7)(C)uin these absences.

Action Branch Assigned Planned Completed 1 Closure Memo ACES '4/16/2007 411 7~2OO9 Page 44 4/17172009