ML12277A266

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information: North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2 -10 CFR 50.54(p)(2) Changes to Security Plan
ML12277A266
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/03/2012
From: V Sreenivas
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Heacock D
Dominion Generation
References
Download: ML12277A266 (3)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:58 AM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: 'Tom Shaub'; 'david.sommers@dom.com'; Pascarelli, Robert

Subject:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 -10 CFR 50.54(p)(2) CHANGES TO SECURITY PLAN NSIR REVIEW - TAC D91660 10 CFR 50.54(p)(2) CHANGES TO SECURITY PLAN By letter dated July 30, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML12214A581), Dominion Generation, submitted Dominions Physical Security Plan (PSP), Training and Qualification Plan (T&QP), and Safeguards Contingency Plan (SCP), Revision 15 for the Surry Power Station.

The enclosure to the letter contained Safeguards Information and has been withheld from public disclosure.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is currently reviewing the submittal to ensure compliance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(p)(2). NRC staff has determined that the additional information requested below is needed to complete its review.

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI)

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANYNORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DOCKET Nos. 50-338 AND 50-339 Section 15.1 of the PSP describes illumination at the site. Describe the type of alternative technology being implemented at the protected area (PA) perimeter to augment illumination. Describe how the alternative technology provides the capability to perform PA perimeter assessment in no-light or low-light conditions and specifically during the loss of normal power. Describe how the alternative technology is integrated within the protected area perimeter intrusion detection and assessment systems to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(7)(i)(C), 10 CFR 73.55(i)(2), and 10 CFR 73.55(i)(3)(vii). See Security Frequently Asked Question (SFAQ) 10-15. Additionally, appropriate changes should be made during the next revision of the sites PSP to ensure the language clearly describes the type(s) of technology used to augment illumination for the assessment of the PA perimeter in no-light or low light conditions and during the loss of normal power, and how the technology meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(7)(i)(C), 10 CFR 73.55(i)(2), and 10 CFR 73.55(i)(3)(vii).

Regulatory Basis:

Consistent with 10 CFR 73.55(c)(3), the licensee shall establish, maintain, and implement a PSP which describes how the performance objective and requirements set forth in this section will be implemented.

Consistent with10 CFR 73.55(e)(7)(i)(C), isolation zones shall be monitored with assessment equipment designed to satisfy the requirements of Section 73.55(i) and provide real-time and play-back/recorded video images of the detected activities before and after each alarm annunciation.

Consistent with 10 CFR 73.55(i)(2), intrusion detection equipment must annunciate and video assessment equipment shall display concurrently, in at least two continuously staffed onsite alarm stations, at least one of which must be protected in accordance with the requirements of the central alarm station within this section.

Consistent with 10 CFR 73.55(i)(3)(vii), the licensees intrusion detection and assessment systems must be designed to ensure intrusion detection and assessment equipment at the PA perimeter remains operable from an uninterruptible power supply in the event of the loss of normal power.

Consistent with 10 CFR 73.55(i)(6)(iii), the licensee shall describe in the security plans how the lighting requirements of this section are met and, if used, the type(s) and application of low-light technology.

1

Please submit the response to these RAIs by November 2, 2012.

V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,

Project Manager, Rm.#O8F6, LPL2-1 North Anna Power Reactors, Units 1 and 2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing-NRR (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov

      • This email message, and any files transmitted with it, may contain confidential, non-public, sensitive and proprietary data intended solely for the person(s) to whom this email message is directly addressed. Unauthorized use of the data contained in this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email Reply and delete the original message and any attachments without keeping a copy***

2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 495 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121003105800)

Subject:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 -10 CFR 50.54(p)(2) CHANGES TO SECURITY PLAN Sent Date: 10/3/2012 10:58:15 AM Received Date: 10/3/2012 10:58:00 AM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Tom Shaub'" <tom.shaub@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'david.sommers@dom.com'" <david.sommers@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

"'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4258 10/3/2012 10:58:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: