Text

Initial Exam 2011-301 Final Administrative Documents
	ML113340420
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	11/28/2011
From:	; NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
To:	; Progress Energy Florida
References
	50-302/11-301
	Download: ML113340420 (61)
	v • d • e

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ((I.jm Rye,- Date of Examination:

Developed by: Written - Facility NRC D // Operating - Facility NRC D Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.i.e and f; C.3.d)

{-70} (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

(-45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-3D 1-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.i.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) I)!

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (Cli; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent Jj (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) _I V

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 2011 Crystal River NRC Exam Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Item .

Task Description V Initials b*

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. AK MVS W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l R NRC NRC of ES-40l and whether all KIA categories are appropriately_sampled.

T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics AK MVS

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

AK MVS

2. a. Using Form ES-30l-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major AK MVS transients.

S Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of b.

applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or AK MVS significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

A T

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. AK MVS

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-30l-2:

(I) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form

...2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonn AK MVS

3. (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit lest(s)

A4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form w ,.5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

I b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

T (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified AK MVS (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. AK MVS

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the

. appropriate exam sections. AK MVS G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate AK MVS

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 AK MVS E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. AK MVS R

A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. AK MVS

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) AK MVS Printed Name / Signature Date Alan Kennedy 06-27-li

a. Author Mark VanSicklen 06-27-i I

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supeivisor LhcAJI.AAwJ .,

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column C; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of I F:\NRC -201 1\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 0.docx ES-201

I Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 ES-201

1. Pre-Examination for the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10/05/11 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled examinations to any persons who have not been as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, examination administratio n, except as specifically noted below and be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of training content or r is acceptable if the individual does not select the authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicato (as documented in the facility provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements of the examinations and/or an licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation NRC chief examiner any indications or enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination NRC licensing examinations administered To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination during the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10/05/Il. From the date thatl performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

DATE NATU E ( ) DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

/7 SlGNURE(1)

1. ALAN KENNEDY SNOI / AUTHOR /& VkQt/

2. ,Q-iD JA _-

3. /1 &4Yf A Zec :/?

i5?

/2 ///

5. *7tLAc -

7

jt

6. (flc- \& .J/J So 1 /vro S-TIi iZ(

7. IAI/ i-( ( i 1 1 c- 5i/

9 8 iDL tk6.,-vi NO u/Ji -*

NOTES:

. . 0 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 09112111 thru 10I05I11 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10105/11. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. fl J 4

UJ os str. NPc/c,uOtWt NT C / (1

//v ,3.1) ?. z//

2.

3. i2, SL4,o L-S%t2ff v,,,

, F(e- iQv c-ii

4. 301t Tjifr

5. ,A1f çii ThJ L1c1iI

6. M/y(

/ / /M /// J//

7. Jc 77 5, f61/

g QrS . ?Jcic QfS SPec /zOi

8. bq NOTES:

0 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 09112111 thru 10/05111 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide perlormance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10105/11. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATJJRE (1) DATE IGNATUR- ( ) DATE NOTE 1.-.,iz i- 9 -2h-/J L47f5

3. cLft4\L, QtLtLc&i o/dI/U Qt4 O1 I4n93

4. 1?e((9

/%6C 7 /

5. B/?y4N Ii/r

6. ft- S 1/7 7-7-/f 7L\\/J jq 71

I ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10/05111 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or of examination administratio n, except as specifically noted below and be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion or communicato r is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility an licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or indications or enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 09112111 thru 10/05/11. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

c IO

1. I .*

ci ul L 1

2. ( K5QX *,

IAI(- /

y

3. £L &J q 1

71

4. r4 ///

5. 7/cq/jJ9: ;4///

I Z(

6.

7. 5L theML5 I2i

8. 1.

M NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 09/12/11 thru 10105111 as of the date of my signature. agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 09I1 2111 thru I 0I05I1 1. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE

1. Lç / q 2 tf

2. JII3 ftiIl 9-z .//

4. _*So-) Ccj1c (

1 11Lz-1 t-cj

5. s T (3Dv] -7s M

6. j(Q /t It cJ4j Y//ü

(_/ /1 0

7. 1/ 1 1Z,1(/)L- 10/3/K

8. 1e nr 1

Ar 7 NOTES:

ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/29/11 Examination Level: RO SRO Operating Test Number: 1 (NRC)

Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code*

RO & SRO - (CO1) - Perform an RCS boron change calculation.

Conduct of Operations M, R K/A - G2.1.37 RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 OP-304 RO & SRO - (CO2) - Calculate SDM with a misaligned rod.

K/A - G2.1.7 RO 4.4 SRO 4.7 Conduct of Operations D, R SRO Only - After completing the SDM calculation determine required ITS actions, if any.

K/A - G2.2.40 SRO 4.7 SP-421 RO & SRO - (EC1) - Perform a QPTR calculation.

K/A - G2.2.12 RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 SRO Only - After completing the QPTR calculation Equipment Control M, R determine required ITS actions, if any.

K/A - G2.2.40 SRO 4.7 SP-303 RO & SRO - (RC1) - Determine stay times using survey maps.

Radiation Control D, R K/A - G2.3.4 RO 3.2 SRO 3.7 DOS-NGGC-0004 SRO Only - (EP1) - Determine Emergency Action Level and Protective Action Recommendations.

Emergency Procedures D, P, R K/A - 2.4.41 SRO 4.6

/ Plan K/A - 2.4.44 SRO 4.4 EM-202 All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless Note:

they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( < 3 for ROs; < 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

Type Codes & Criteria:

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( > 1)

(P)revious 2 exams ( <1; randomly selected)

Page 1 of 1C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-1 (JPM Admin Outline) NRC 2011 Rev 0.docxES-301

ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Control Room / In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test Number: 1 (NRC)

Control Room systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

Type Safety System / JPM Title Code* Function

a. CRDS - Perform actions of AP-504 D, S 1 K/A - 001A4.15 RO 3.1 SRO 3.1 (AP-504) [RO]

b. ESFAS - Respond to an ES Actuation [SRO-U]

A, EN, N, S 4

K/A - BW/E03EA1.1 RO 4.1 SRO 3.8 (EOP-3) [RO, SRO-I] Primary

c. PPCS - Respond to a stuck open PZR spray valve A, D, L, P, 3

K/A - 010A4.01 RO 3.7 SRO 3.5 (AP-520) [RO, SRO-I] S

d. EFW - Establish Auxiliary Feedwater flow N, S 4

K/A - 061G2.1.20 RO 4.6 SRO 4.6 (EOP-04) [RO, SRO-I] Secondary

e. CSS - Initiate Reactor Building Spray [SRO-U]

A, L, M, S 5 K/A - 026A3.01 RO 4.3 SRO 4.5 (EM-225C) [RO, SRO-I]

f. EDG - Synchronize Off-Site Power with EDG-1A D, S 6 K/A - 064A4.09 RO 3.2 SRO 3.3 (AP-770) [RO, SRO-I]

g. CWS - Start CWP-1C While at Power [SRO-U A, D, P, S 8 K/A - 075G2.1.31 RO 4.2 SRO 3.9 (OP-604) [RO, SRO-I]

h. WGS - Respond to a Waste Gas Header leak A, D, S 9 K/A - 060AA2.05 RO 3.7 SRO 4.2 (AP-250) [RO, SRO-I]

SPARE MU - Restart a MUP following an RCS leak isolation D, S 2 K/A - 002A2.01 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 (AP-520)

In-Plant Systems* (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U)

i. ECCS - Respond to a CFT Low Pressure condition [SRO-U]

D, E, L, R 3 K/A - 006A1.13 RO 3.5 SRO 3.7 (AP-404) [RO, SRO-I]

j. HRPS - Place a Hydrogen Analyzer in Service A, D, E, L 5 K/A - 028A4.03 RO 3.1 SRO 3.3 (EOP-14) [RO, SRO-I]

k. WGDS - Perform a Waste Gas Release to the RB [SRO-U]

D, R 9 K/A - 071G2.3.11 RO 3.8 SRO 4.3 (OP-412A) [RO, SRO-I]

SPARE FS/OTSG - Transfer excess secondary inventory to FST D, E 8 K/A - 038EK3.06 RO 4.2 SRO 4.5 (EOP-14, Enc. 9)

All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety

functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank <9/<8/<4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant >1/>1/>1 (EN)gineered safety feature (control room system) - / - />1 (L)ow Power / Shutdown >1/>1/>1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) >2/>2/>1 (P)revious 2 exams (randomly selected) <3/<3/<2 (R)CA >1/>1/>1 (S)imulator Page 1 of 1C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-2 (JPM MCR-Plant Outline) NRC 2011 Rev 3.docx ES-301

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 2011 Crystal River NRC Exam Facility: Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Operating Test No:

Initials

1. General Criteria A B*

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with AK MVS sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered AK MVS during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1 a.) AK MVS

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within AK MVS acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent AK MVS applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

initiating cues

references and tools, including associated procedures

reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: AK MVS -

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance AK MVS criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) speciSed on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with AK MVS Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Namyignature Date

a. Author Alan Kennedy 07/25/1 1

b. Facility Reviewer(*) Mark VanSicklen 07/26/11

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) I Lih

d. NRC Supervisor L() T NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 Operating Test Number: I (NRC) nitias QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out AK MVS 4.c.

of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. AK MVS

3. Each event description consists of:

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event AK MVS

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

the expected operator actions (by shift position)

the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario AK MVS without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 1,1

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain AK MVS complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time N/A N/A constraints. Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. AK MVS

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonTlance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to AK MVS Jk ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. AK MVS All_other_scenarios_have_been_altered_in_accordance_with_Section_D.5_ofES-301.

1 1. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-30 1-6 AK MVS (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and AK MVS events_specified_on_Form_ES-30l-5_(submit_the_form_with_the_simulator_scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. AK MVS Target Quantitative Attributes . Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) 1 2 3 4

1. Total malfunctions (58) 6 7 7 8

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2 1 2 2

3. Abnormal events (24) 2 2 2 2

4. Major transients (12) 1 1 1

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 1 2 2

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 1 0 1 1

7. Critical tasks (23) 2 3 2 3 June 27,2011 E:\NRC - 2011 \EXAM Submittal\FonTl ES-30 1-4 (Scenario Quality Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 1 .docx ES-3 01

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios - SRO-I3, SRO-I4, RO-5 P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I

M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T O R T O R T O R T O M(*)

N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P R I U T P E

RO RX 4 6 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I-3 I/C 2/5 1/5/8 5/8 3/4/7 11 4 4 2

/8 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 5 6 4 2 2 1 TS 2/3 1/2 1/4 6 0 2 2 RX 4 6 5 3 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I-4 I/C 4/5/ 1/3/4 1/5/6 2/3/8 13 4 4 2 10 /7 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 5 6 4 2 2 1 TS 2/3 2 0 2 2 RO RO-5 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 5 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4/9/

2/3/8 1/4/6 1/4/7 12 4 4 2 10 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 5 6 4 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

6/27/11 Page 1 of 3 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-5 (Transient and Event Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 3.docx

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios - SRO-I1 & I2, RO-1, RO-2, RO-3 & RO-4 P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I

M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T O R T O R T O R T O M(*)

N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P R I U T P E

RO RX 4 6 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I1 & 2 I/C 4/5/

1/5/8 1/4/6 2/5/8 12 4 4 2 SRO-U 10 MAJ 7 7 5 6 4 2 2 1 TS 2/3 2/3 1/4 6 0 2 2 RX 4 5 5 3 1 1 0 RO RO-1 & 3 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4/9/

1/5/6 2/3/8 9 4 4 2 10 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 6 3 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RO-2 & 4 RX 6 2 1 1 0 NOR 5 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 2/3/ 1/3/4 5/8 1/4/7 12 4 4 2 8 /7 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 5 6 4 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

6/27/11 Page 2 of 3 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-5 (Transient and Event Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 3.docx

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios - SRO-U1 & SRO-U2 P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I

M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T O R T O R T O R T O M(*)

N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P R I U T P E

RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3/4/7 2/5/8 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 2 2 2 1 TS 1/2 1/4 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

3. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

4. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

6/27/11 Page 3 of 3 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-5 (Transient and Event Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 3.docx

2011 Crystal River NRC Exam ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Crystal River #3 Date of Exam:09/12/11 thru 09/23/11 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO RO RO SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 1/2/3/ 2/3/4/5 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/5 2/3/4/5/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/4/5 1/2/3/5 2/3/4/5 1/2/3/4 1/2/4/5 5/6/7 /7/8/9/ 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ /6/7 7/8/9/10 5/6/7/8/ /6/7/8 /6/7 /7/8/9/ /5/6/7/ /6/7/8 Events and Conditions 10 7 7/8 9 10 8/9 Comply With and 1/2/3/ 1/2/4/5 1/3/4/ 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/4 1/2/4/5/ 1/3/4/5/ 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4 1/2/4/5 1/3/4/5 1/2/3/4 4/5/6/ /6/7/8/ 5/6/7 4/5/6/ /5/6/7/ 6/7/8/9/ 6/7 /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /6/7 /5/6/7/

Use Procedures (1) 7/8 9/10 7/8 8 10 8 8 9/10 8 Operate Control 1/2/3/ 1/4/5/6 1/3/4/ 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/4 1/4/5/6/ 1/3/4/5/ 1/2/3/4 4/5/6/ /7/8/9/ 5/6/7 4/5/6/ /5/6/8 7/8/9/10 6/7 /5/6/7/

Boards (2) 8 10 7/8 8 Communicate 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4 1/2/3/4 4/5/6/ /5/6/7/ 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ /5/6/7/ 5/6/7/8/ 5/6/7 /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7 /5/6/7/

and Interact 7/8 8/9/10 7 7/8 8 9/10 8 8 8/9/10 8 Demonstrate 1/2/3/4 2/3/4/5/ 1/3/4/5/ 1/2/3/5 1/2/3/4 2/3/4/5 1/3/4/5 1/2/3/5

/7/8 6/7/8/9/ 7 /6/8 /7/8 /6/7/8/ /7 /6/8 Supervisory Ability (3) 10 9/10 Comply With and 2/3 2/3 1/2 1/4 2/3 2/3 1/2 1/4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

6/9/2009 5:36 AM Form ES-301-6 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-301-6 (Competencies Checklist) NRC 2011 Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO - PWR Examination Outline - (Sept, 2011) Form ES-401-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2011 RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4

1 18 3 3 6 1.

Emergency

& Abnormal 2 N/A N/A 9 2 2 4 Plant Evolutions Tier 27 5 5 10 Totals 1 28 3 2 5 2.

Plant 2 10 2 1 3 Systems Tier 38 5 3 8 Totals

3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Abilities Categories 10 7 2 2 1 2 Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by + 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7.* The generic (G) K/As in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to section d.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable K/As.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#)

on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

June 21, 2011 Page 1 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 1 E/APE # / Name / K K K A A G K/A Topic(s) IR Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 007EA2.04 - Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a reactor trip: If 007 (BW/E02 & E10) reactor should have tripped but has not done so, Reactor Trip - Stabilization X manually trip the reactor and carry out actions 4.6

- Recovery - 1 in ATWS EOP (not linked to 10CFR55.43) 008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident / 3 009 Small Break LOCA / 3 011 Large Break LOCA / 3 015/17 RCP Malfunctions /4 022 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup / 2 025 Loss of RHR System / 4 026 Loss of Component Cooling Water / 8 027 PZR Pressure Control System Malfunction / 3 029 ATWS / 1 038EG2.4.20 - Knowledge of operational 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture / 3 X implications of EOP warnings, cautions, and 4.3 notes: Steam Generator Tube Rupture BW/E05EA2.1 - Ability to determine and 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line interpret the following as they apply to Rupture - Excessive Heat X Excessive Heat Transfer: Facility conditions 4.2 Transfer / 4 and selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations.

054 Loss of Main Feedwater

/4 June 21, 2011 Page 2 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 1 E/APE # / Name / K K K A A G K/A Topic(s) IR Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 055 Station Blackout / 6 056 Loss of Offsite Power /

6 057AA2.06 - Ability to determine and interpret 057 Loss of Vital AC the following as they apply to the Loss of Vital Instrument Bus / 6 X AC Instrument Bus: AC instrument bus alarms 3.7 for the inverter and alternate power source.

058 Loss of DC Power / 6 062AG2.2.36 - Ability to analyze the effect of 062 Loss of Nuclear maintenance activities, such as degraded power Services Water / 4 X sources, on the status of limiting conditions for 4.2 (Raw Water/RW) operations: Loss of Nuclear Services Water (RW) 065 Loss of Instrument Air /

8 BW/E04 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink / 4 077 Generator Voltage and 077AG2.2.37 - Ability to determine operability Electric Grid Disturbances / X and/or availability of safety related equipment: 4.6 6 Generator voltage and electric grid disturbances K/A Category Totals 3 3 Group Point Total 18/6 June 21, 2011 Page 3 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 2 E/APE # / Name / K K K A A G K/A Topic(s) IR Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal / 1 003AA2.02 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Dropped 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 X Control Rod: Signal inputs to rod control 2.8 system 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod /

1 024 Emergency Boration / 1 028 PZR Level Malfunction

/2 032 Loss of Source Range NI / 7 033 Loss of Intermediate Range NI / 7 036 (BW/A08) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak / 3 051 Loss of Condenser 051AA2.02 - Ability to determine and interpret Vacuum / 4 the following as they apply to the Loss of X Condenser Vacuum: Conditions requiring 4.1 reactor and/or turbine trip 059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste Rel. / 9 060 Accidental Gaseous Radwaste Rel. / 9 061 ARM System Alarms / 7 June 21, 2011 Page 4 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 2 E/APE # / Name / K K K A A G K/A Topic(s) IR Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 067 Plant Fire On-site / 8 068 (BW/A06) Control Room Evac. / 8 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity

/5 074 Inad. Core Cooling / 4 076 High Reactor Coolant Activity / 9 BW/A01 Plant Runback / 1 BW/A02&A03 Loss of NNI-X/Y / 7 BW/A04 Turbine Trip / 4 BW/A05 Emergency Diesel BW/A05AG2.2.12 - Knowledge of surveillance X procedures: Emergency Diesel actuation 4.1 Actuation / 6 BW/A07 Flooding / 8 BW/E03 Inadequate Subcooling Margin / 4 BW/E08 LOCA Cooldown - BW/EO8EG2.4.18 - Knowledge of the specific Depress. / 4 X bases for EOPs: LOCA Cooldown / 4.0 Depressurization BW/E09 Natural Circ. / 4 K/A Category Totals 2 2 Group Point Total 9/4 June 21, 2011 Page 5 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G K/A Topic(s) IR 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 003 Reactor Coolant Pump / 4 004 Chemical and Volume Control / 1 & 2 005 Residual Heat Removal / 4 006 Emergency Core Cooling / 2 & 3 007 PZR Relief/Quench Tank / 5 008G2.4.41 - Knowledge of the emergency 008 Component Cooling X action level thresholds and classifications: 4.6 Water / 8 SW / DC cooling 010A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the PZR PCS; and (b) based 010 Pressurizer Pressure X on those predictions, use procedures to 3.6 Control / 3 correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Heater failures 012 Reactor Protection /

7 013 Engineered Safety Features Actuation / 2 022A2.02 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the CCS; and (b) based on 022 Containment X those predictions, use procedures to correct, 2.6 Cooling / 5 control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Fan motor vibration June 21, 2011 Page 6 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G K/A Topic(s) IR 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 026A2.08 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the BSS; and (b) based on 026 Containment Spray /

those predictions, use procedures to correct, 5 X control, or mitigate the consequences of 3.7 those malfunctions or operations: Safe securing of containment spray, when it can be done 039 Main and Reheat Steam / 4 059G2.1.25 - Ability to interpret reference 059 Main Feedwater / 4 X materials, such as graphs, curves, tables, 4.2 etc.: Main Feedwater 061 Auxiliary /

Emergency Feedwater /

4 062 AC Electrical Distribution / 6 063 DC Electrical Distribution / 6 064 Emergency Diesel Generator / 6 073 Process Radiation Monitoring / 7 076 Service Water / 4 078 Instrument Air / 8 103 Containment / 5 K/A Category Totals 3 2 Group Point Total 28/5 June 21, 2011 Page 7 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G K/A Topic(s) IR 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 034 Fuel Handling Equipment / 8 035 Steam Generator / 4 041 Steam Dump/Turbine Bypass Control / 4 045 Main Turbine Generator / 4 055 Condenser Air Removal / 4 056 Condensate / 4 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 071G2.2.38 - Knowledge of conditions and 071 Waste Gas Disposal X limitations in the facility license: Waste 4.5

/9 Gas disposal 072 Area Radiation Monitoring / 7 075 Circulating Water /

8 079 Station Air / 8 086 Fire Protection / 8 K/A Category Totals 2 1 Group Point Total 10/3 June 21, 2011 Page 9 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G K/A Topic(s) IR 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 001 Control Rod Drive /

1 002 Reactor Coolant / 2

&4 011 Pressurizer Level Control / 2 014 Rod Position Indication / 1 015A2.05 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the NIS; and (b) based on 015 Nuclear X those predictions, use procedures to correct, 3.8 Instrumentation / 7 control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Core void formation 016 Non-nuclear Instrumentation / 7 017 In-core Temperature Monitor / 7 027 Containment Iodine Removal / 5 028 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge Control / 5 029A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or 029 Containment Purge / operations on the Containment Purge 8 System; and (b) based on those predictions, X use procedures to correct, control, or 3.6 mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Maintenance or other activity taking place inside containment 033 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling / 8 June 21, 2011 Page 8 of 9 C:\Users\pcapeh60\Desktop\WORK\2011 CR\Form ES-401-2 (SRO Written Exam Outline) NRC 2011 (401-2) Rev 0.docx

ES-401, Rev. 9 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 SRO - 2011- Crystal River 3 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 20 II I RO SRO-Only Category KIA # Topic I I I I IR I # I IR I # I Knowledge of administrative requirements for temporary management directives, such as standing 2.1.15 orders, night orders, Operations memos, etc. 3.4 I (not linked to IOCFR55.43)

1. Ability to locate control room switches, controls Conduct of and indications and to determine that they are Operations 2.1.31 correctly reflecting the desired plant lineup. 4.3 I (not linked to IOCFR55.43)

Subtotal 2 Knowledge of the process for conducting special or 2.2. 7 infrequent tests. 3.6 I

2. Knowledge of maintenance work order 2.2.19 requirements. 3.4 I Equipment Control Subtotal 2 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under 2.3.4 normal or emergency conditions. 3.7 I 3.

Radiation Control Subtotal 1 Knowledge of how abnormal operating procedures 2.4.8 are used in conjunction with EOPs. 4.5 I

4. Knowledge of RO tasks performed outside the Emergency 2.4.34 main control room during an emergency and the 4.1 I Procedures I resultant operational effects.

Plan Subtotal 2 I Tier 3 Point Total I I 10 I I 7 I June 27, 201IF:\NRC - 201 1\Outlines\Written\SRO NRC 2011 Written Exam Outline - Generic (401-3) Rev O.docx

ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2011 RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4

1 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 6 1.

Emergency

& Abnormal 2 2 2 1 N/A 2 1 N/A 1 9 4 Plant Evolutions Tier Totals 5 5 4 5 4 4 27 10 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 28 5 2.

Plant 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 3 Systems Tier Totals 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 38 8

3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Abilities Categories 10 7 3 3 2 2 Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).