IR 05000528/1984055
| ML17298B649 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1984 |
| From: | Fish R, Wenslawski F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17298B648 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-528-84-55, NUDOCS 8412140292 | |
| Download: ML17298B649 (6) | |
Text
U.
S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No.
Docket No.
50-528/84-55 50-528 License No.
CPPR-141 Licensee:
Arizona Public Service Company P.
O. Box 21666 Phoenix, Arizona 85836 Facility Name:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - Unit
Inspection at:
Palo Verde Site - Wintersburg, Arizona Inspection conducted:
November 16, 1984 Inspector:
R. F.
ish, Acting Chief Emergency Preparedness Section
//~ g.
Da e Si ned Approved By:
F. A. Wenslawski, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch lid<I D te igned Summary:
Ins ection on November
1984 (Re ort No. 50-528/84-55)
Areas Ins ected:
An announced, follow-up inspection of open items identified during the emergency preparedness preoperational inspection of April 11-22, 1983.
The inspection involved four (4) hours of onsite time by one NRC inspector.
Results:
The four (4) remaining open items were closed.
8412140292 84112b PDR *DOCK 05000528
r
DETAILS Persons Contacted G.
T.
E.
"R F
AD Anderson, ISC Systems Engineer Burton, Computer Systems Lead Engineer Edmonds, Startup Engineer Page, Manager, Emergency Planning and Preparedness Semper, Systems Engineer, Operations Engineering Yows, Supervisor, Site Emergency Planning
"Present at exit interview.
Licensee Action on Previousl Identified Items (Closed)
0 en Item (83-14-04):
The present Emergency Plan (Revision 3)
and staff augmentation capability were not consistent with Table B-l of NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
By letters dated August 20 and October 5, 1984, the applicant requested two temporary and one permanent deviations from Table B-1 respectively.
Revision 5 to the Emergency Plan was submitted to the NRC by letter dated September 11, 1984.
The NRC Emergency Preparedness Branch has found these proposed changes acceptable.
Revisions to the appropriate implementing procedures, presently being processed, will address the deviation discussed in the October
correspondence.
This item is considered to be closed.
(Closed)
0 en Item (83-14-14):
The Control Room (CR), Technical Support Center TSC
, Operations Support Center (OSC)
and Emergency Operations
'acility (EOF) had not been completed and the required equipment installed.
The filters in the EOF emergency ventilation system have been installed and tested.
The test results (Procedure No. 73TI-OZZ08) were examined during this inspection and it was noted that the results met the acceptance criteria.
The radiation monitors in the TSC and EOF ventilation systems have been installed and tested (Procedure No.
The examination of the radiation monitor test results showed the acceptance criteria had been met.
The safety parameter display system was demonstrated; however, some of the parameter data is not yet available on the displays due to a need for final connections or completion of testings.
This item is considered to be closed.
(Closed)
0 en Item (83-14-22):
The non-radiation monitors had not been installed, operationally checked and calibrated.
The seismic instrumentation has now been installed and tested.
According to the applicant the test results were expected to be accepted by the Test Working Group on November 16, 1984.
The applicant noted that a vendor representative was onsite prior to energizing the seismic system and during the preoperational testing.
This item is considered to be closed.
(Closed)
0 en Item (83-14-25):
The meteorological data acquisition system had not been installed and tested. 'he operability of one of the links transmitting the meteorological data from the base of the tower to the EOF and TSC was demonstrated.
The data was confirmed to be actual by reading the instrumentation at the base of the meteorological tower.
The applicant said replacement parts had been.'ordered to restore the second
~
e II g
~
~
~
data link and it was expected to be operational by mid December 1984.
This item is considered to be closed.
3.
Exit Interview An exit interview was held with the applicant at the conclusion of the inspection.
In addition to those so identified in Paragraph 1,
Mr. Gary Clyde, Operations Licensing Engineer, represented the applicant.
The inspector informed the applicant that the four remaining
"Open Items" were now considered to be closed.
No significant deficiencies or violations of MRC requirements were identified during this inspectio ~
~