IR 05000498/1988049

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-498/88-49 & 50-499/88-49 on 880815-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Piping Sys for as-built Verification in Unit 2.Unit 1 Not Inspected
ML20154A567
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  
Issue date: 08/26/1988
From: Barnes I, Garrison D, Gilbert L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154A559 List:
References
50-498-88-49, 50-499-88-49, NUDOCS 8809130015
Download: ML20154A567 (4)


Text

,

.

-

..

.

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report:

50-498/88-49 Operating License:

NPF-76 50-499/88-49 Construction Parmit:

CPPR-129 Dockets:

50-498 50-499 Licensee:

Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P)

P.O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility:

SouthTexasProject(STP), Units 1and2 Inspection At:

STP, Matagorda County, Texas Inspection Conducted: August 15-19, 1988 Inspectors:

d O - s>

F-M. - 5'?

/A-L. D. Gilbert, R7a~cToi'Tnspector, Paterials Date and Quality Prcgrams Section, Division of Reactor Safety 7 -d d. - 6 9 h D. L. Garrison,~ResWestlnspector,~7roject Date

~

-

Section D, Division of Reactor Projects 7 ^,%,, u

.

f - u - sT Approved:

v.

,

T.~Friiers. thTeT,~FaTelTaKEd-Qual t ty MYe

--

Programs Section, Division of Reactor Safety

$$$"$$o$ b ).[

a

-

.

.

f O

g

,

Inspection Sumary Inspection Conducted Augus_t 15-19, 19_8_8 (Report 50-498/_88-49)__

_

Areas Inspected:

No inspection of Unit I was conducted.

Results: Not applicable.

Inspection Conducted August _ 15_-19_,1_9_8_8 (Report 50-499/88,49]

__

_

Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspection of piping systems for as% uilt verification in Unit 2.

Results: Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

.

-

-

-

-. - -

.

.

.

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _

_ - -. __

'

-

o.

.

7,

...

-3-

'

l

,

DETAILS l

!

,

1.

Persons Contacted HL&P

-

!

!

  • J. T. Westermeier, Project Manager

'

  • T. J. Jordan, Project Quality Assurance Manager
  • A. W. Harrison, Supervisory Engineer

>

  • S. B. Patel, Senior Construction Engineer
  • G. Ondriskt, Startup Engineer i
  • S. D. Phillips, Project Complianca Engineer l
  • K. M. O'Gara, Project Compliance Engineer

!

  • R. R. Hernandez, Discipline Site Engineer BechtelEnergyCo_rporation(BECJ f

__

i

  • R. D. Bryan, Construction Manager

>

F. Almeida Engineering ABR Group Supervisor NRC i

  • J. I. Tapia, Senior Resident Inspector The NRC inspectors also interviewed other contractor personnel during the inspection.
  • Indicates personnel attending the exit interview.

Pipo,i,ng Syst_ ems _ As-Built Verification for Unit 2 (37051)

2.

i n

The licensee is using Standard Site Procedures SSPc34 and 39 for the generation and corrpletion of as-built design docurrents for piping and supports. The as-built drawings are scheduled to be completed by December 1, 1988.

Initial NRC inspection of the Unit 2 as-built verification of piping systems is docurrented in NRC Inspection Report 50-499/87-58. The NRC inspectors selected five additional isometric drawings of safety-related piping systems to verify that the as-built drawings correctly reflected the as-built condition of the piping systems as installed in the plant.

The following isometric drawings were selected as a representative sample of the piping systems:

Isoretric Drawing 2M369PCV217. Sheet A01, Revision 6. for the o

chemical and volurre control (CV) system piping from Penetration M51 to MS2 which included approximately 120 feet of 2-inch diameter Class 2 piping, 24 valves, and 8 pipe support.

-

.-

-

_.

=_

.

.-

C,

-

.

-4-l

o Isometric Drawing 2M369PRH259, Sheet 02, Revision 4. for the residual l

heat removal (RH) system piping from Penetration M55 to M76 which

'

included approximately 57 feet of 8-inch diameter Class 2 piping,

'

2 valves, and 3 pipe supports.

'

o Isometric Drawing 5F369PFC530, Sheet 01, Revision 6. for the spent

!

fuel pool cooling and cleanup (FC) system piping from the FC pump to the FC heat exchanger which included approximately 30 feet of 10-inch

,

>

diameter Class 3 piping, 1 valve, and 2 pipe supports.

o Isometric Drawing 2F369PS!572, Sheet 05, Revision 8 for the safety f'

injection (SI) system piping from the high head SI pump to Support RR39 which included approximately 27 feet of 6-inch diameter i

Class 2 piping and 4 pipe supports.

l o

Isometric Drawing 5F369PCS515 Sheet 03, Revision 7, for the containment spray (CS) system piping from the CS pump to Weld FW5396

!

which included approximately 85 feet of 3 and 8-inch diameter Class 2

!

piping, 1 valve, and 11 pipe supports.

l

[

In the area inspected, the as-built condition of the installed piping and

!

supports was consistent with the drawings and piping specifications for

!

piping location, size, and configuration; pipe weld location and

-

identification; and support location, type, and configuration.

j No violations or deviations were identified.

3.

Exit Interview The NRC inspectors met with the licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 on August 19, 1988, and sunmarized the inspection scope and

!

findings.

l I

!

I i

f k