IR 05000498/1988049

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-498/88-49 & 50-499/88-49 on 880815-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Piping Sys for as-built Verification in Unit 2.Unit 1 Not Inspected
ML20154A567
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/1988
From: Barnes I, Garrison D, Gilbert L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154A559 List:
References
50-498-88-49, 50-499-88-49, NUDOCS 8809130015
Download: ML20154A567 (4)


Text

,

.

-

.. .

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-498/88-49 Operating License: NPF-76 50-499/88-49 Construction Parmit: CPPR-129 Dockets: 50-498 50-499 Licensee: Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P)

P.O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility: SouthTexasProject(STP), Units 1and2 Inspection At: STP, Matagorda County, Texas Inspection Conducted: August 15-19, 1988 Inspectors: d O - s> F- M. - 5'?

/A-L. D. Gilbert, R7a~cToi'Tnspector, Paterials Date and Quality Prcgrams Section, Division of Reactor Safety

~ -

7 -d d. - 6 9 h D. L. Garrison,~ResWestlnspector,~7roject Date Section D, Division of Reactor Projects v.7 ^,%,, u

.

Approved: ,

--

f - u - sT T.~Friiers . thTeT,~FaTelTaKEd-Qual t ty MYe Programs Section, Division of Reactor Safety

$$$"$$o$

a b ) .[

.

.

f O g 4

,

Inspection Sumary Inspection Conducted Augus_t 15-19, 19_8_8 (Report 50-498/_88-49)__

_

Areas Inspected: No inspection of Unit I was conducte Results: Not applicabl Inspection Conducted August _ 15_-19_,1_9_8_8 (Report 50-499/88,49]

__

_

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of piping systems for as% uilt verification in Unit Results: Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie .

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - -. __

'

- .

... 7,

-3- '

l

,

DETAILS l

!

, Persons Contacted HL&P-

!

  • J. T. Westermeier, Project Manager  !

'

  • T. J. Jordan, Project Quality Assurance Manager
  • A. W. Harrison, Supervisory Engineer >
  • S. B. Patel, Senior Construction Engineer
  • G. Ondriskt, Startup Engineer i
  • S. D. Phillips, Project Complianca Engineer l
  • K. M. O'Gara, Project Compliance Engineer  ;
  • R. R. Hernandez, Discipline Site Engineer  !

BechtelEnergyCo_rporation(BECJ

__

f i

  • R. D. Bryan, Construction Manager >

F. Almeida Engineering ABR Group Supervisor NRC i

  • J. I. Tapia, Senior Resident Inspector The NRC inspectors also interviewed other contractor personnel during the inspectio * Indicates personnel attending the exit intervie . i n Pipo,i,ng Syst_ ems _ As-Built Verification for Unit 2 (37051)

The licensee is using Standard Site Procedures SSPc34 and 39 for the generation and corrpletion of as-built design docurrents for piping and supports. The as-built drawings are scheduled to be completed by December 1, 198 Initial NRC inspection of the Unit 2 as-built verification of piping systems is docurrented in NRC Inspection Report 50-499/87-58. The NRC inspectors selected five additional isometric drawings of safety-related piping systems to verify that the as-built drawings correctly reflected the as-built condition of the piping systems as installed in the plan The following isometric drawings were selected as a representative sample of the piping systems:

o Isoretric Drawing 2M369PCV217. Sheet A01, Revision 6. for the chemical and volurre control (CV) system piping from Penetration M51 to MS2 which included approximately 120 feet of 2-inch diameter Class 2 piping, 24 valves, and 8 pipe support . - .- - =_

.

.-

-

. C,  ;

-4- l

!

o Isometric Drawing 2M369PRH259, Sheet 02, Revision 4. for the residual l

'

heat removal (RH) system piping from Penetration M55 to M76 which included approximately 57 feet of 8-inch diameter Class 2 piping, '

2 valves, and 3 pipe support '

o Isometric Drawing 5F369PFC530, Sheet 01, Revision 6. for the spent !

fuel pool cooling and cleanup (FC) system piping from the FC pump to ,

the FC heat exchanger which included approximately 30 feet of 10-inch >

diameter Class 3 piping, 1 valve, and 2 pipe support o Isometric Drawing 2F369PS!572, Sheet 05, Revision 8 for the safety f'

injection (SI) system piping from the high head SI pump to Support RR39 which included approximately 27 feet of 6-inch diameter i Class 2 piping and 4 pipe support l o Isometric Drawing 5F369PCS515 Sheet 03, Revision 7, for the containment spray (CS) system piping from the CS pump to Weld FW5396 !

which included approximately 85 feet of 3 and 8-inch diameter Class 2 !

piping, 1 valve, and 11 pipe support l

[

In the area inspected, the as-built condition of the installed piping and !

supports was consistent with the drawings and piping specifications for !

piping location, size, and configuration; pipe weld location and -

identification; and support location, type, and configuratio j No violations or deviations were identifie l 3. Exit Interview The NRC inspectors met with the licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 on August 19, 1988, and sunmarized the inspection scope and !

finding l I

!

I i

f k