IR 05000440/1981007
| ML20004C339 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/27/1981 |
| From: | Richard Lee, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004C336 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-81-07, 50-440-81-7, 50-441-81-07, 50-441-81-7, NUDOCS 8106030201 | |
| Download: ML20004C339 (7) | |
Text
A
-
,
,,
l'
r.-
w (
d U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
$
'
Reports No. 50-4/40/81-07; 50-441/81-07 Docket Nos.' 50-440; 50-441 Licenses No. CPPR-148 CPPR-149
'
Licensee: The Cleveland Electric-Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Facility'Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At:
Perry Site, Perry, OH Inspection Conducted: April 7-10, 1981 hNhk
.
( ),M2 2 2, /9h
Inspector:
R. Lee el
/
(filliams,ChiefW$b5"
~
hh.
M, 2 / # E /
Approved By:
C. W
/
Plant Systems Section v
/
Inspection Summary
. Inspection on April 7-10,-1981 (Reports No. 50-440/81-07; 50-441/81-07 Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of safety related electrical construction activities including cable tray and conduit installation work and records; cable tray and conduit support installation work and procedures; electrical penetration installation work; and, D.C. battery charger instal-lation work. 'The inspection involved a total of 34 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the six areas inspected, one item of noncompliance was identified (Severity Level V - installation of Class lE D.C. battery charger without written procedures).
,
l f
i
.
8106 08 OMO [
,
v
_ _
G y~
.,
- s
+
. i v ~.
.
y
,
-
y
_
-
-
.
y
"
-
-DETAIL _S?
.-
~ Persons Contacted.
,
Principal Licensee ~ Employees.
- G. Groscup, Manager, ' Nuclear: Engineering Department 1*W.-Kacer -GeneralfSupervising Engineer, CQS
,
~*P. Martin,.Gineral. Supervising Engineer, PQS~
- G. 'Leidich, CQS QA Supervisor
~
'
'*K. Combs, CQS Engineering Aide
~*S. Tulk, CQS-Lead Electrical' Quality Engineer
- R..Vondraseki General Supervising Engineer, PQS
- D. Graneto, Nuclear Engineer-
- D. Green, _3enior. Nuclear Project Engineer
- Other Personnel C. Hart, Manag'er,'QA Department (L.'K. Comstock)
J. Crawford, Lead Electrical QC Inspector, CQC (KEI)
~
B. Morris, Lead Electrical QC Inspector-(L. K. Comstock)
R. Coffman, Electrical QC Inspector (L. K. Comstock)
.
U.S.-NRC Region III
- J.-Hughes, Resident Inspector
- C. Williams, Chief, Plant Systems Section The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this reporting period.
- Denotes those persons attending the exit interview.
Functional'or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Electrical Raceways-Observation of Work Activities, Unit 1 The Region _III inspector observed the completed installation work activities for selected Class 1E instrumentation, control and leower cable trays and conduits, located in the Control Complex and Inter-mediate Buildings, and determined the following:
a.
Raceways were identified as specified on the applicable instal-lation drawings and procedures.
,
.b.
. Size and type of raceways were installed as specified on the applicable drawings.
'
c.
Raceway grounding and bonding was installed as specified on the applicable installation drawings and procedures.
- 2
$
'
,
-
-
,
.
.
,
?
-
_
..
.
t-
'd.
Raceways were~1ocated, routed and separated, including separation of. instrumentation, power, control, and non-safety related raceway, as specified on the-applicable drawings and procedures.
.
Work performance and inspection'pr'ocedures appeared to have been e.
' adhered to.
f.
Applicable L. K.'Comstock. installation and inspection ~ procedures were: Cable Tray and Conduit Installation Work Instruction 4.3.1 dated November 5, 1980 and Cable Tray and conduit Identification Work Instruction 4.3.2 dated January 15, 1981.
g.
Applicable Drawings:
Cable Tray No.
Layout Drawing 102A D214-121, Revision K 106A D214-112, Revision D 143A D214-131, Revision M
,
~
648A D214-141,. Revision E 4078A D214-432, Revision P Conduit No.
Layout Drawing 1E51F D215-211, Revision E IM51R3B D215-451, Revision D 1P42R14A D215-112, Revision 0 1R22H4A D215-122, Revision 0 1R33C-1205B
.D215-132, Revision 0 i
The inspector observed that separation criteria involving several
'
lighting conduits does not meet the specified cable tray separa-tion requirements. The Liceqsee produced Engineering Change Notice i
(ECN 6162-33 216 dated March 9,1981) requiring on-going relocation of these ligb+ing fixtures.
It was observed that,-at five cable tray locations, FSAR separation requirements of IEEE Standard 384-1974 were not met regarding sep-arttion distance. However, it was determined that the separa^ ion requirements will be met by subsequent installation of specified fire barriers, shown on the applicable layout drawings, and verified by subsequent Installation Inspection Checklist Form 17.
The inspector observed several Class IE cable tray separation
!
violations caused by incorrect. drain line and ventilation duct installations. The licensee stated that organized task groups, in areas of separation violations, are tagging and documenting all such violations on nonconformance reports for corrective h
action. This item was previously identified as an unresolved item in IE Inspection Report No. 50-440/79-09 and closed in 1980.
'
l I
No items of noncompliance or dev*ations were identified in this area.
i i
,
=
-3-
!
.
.,, -.. -, -
,... - -
vr s
>
-4'
2.
Observation of Class IE Components (Battery Chargers) - Work Activities, Unit 1
- The inspector observed'theLin process installation of D.C. battery L charger,. equipment.No.?R42S007, Division 1. Circuit EFD-12A, located at elevation 620 foot in the Control Complex Building. The' inspector
. reviewed A&E layout Drawing E-001-042, Revision 20, and Power Conversion Products' Company Vendor Cabinet Mounting Drawing D55-1557, Revision 5, Eat,the work location and determined that battery charger: R42S007 was-
~being installed in accordance with these drawings'except that anchor
. bolt torquing and bolt sizing'did not appear on these drawings. No other installation documentation was available'at the work location.
Installation of a Class 1E battery charger without documented procedures
. or instructions is contrary to the requirements of the licensee's QA Program.
Work was immediately stopped on this installation and an Audit Finding
. Report (AFR687) was subsequently issued to document this stop work action'on the-installation of D.C. equipment and battery chargers in accordance with contractors _QC procedures.
In response te questions regarding this matter, the licensee stated that L. K. Comstock Work Instruction 4.3.7, " Installation of Owner
'
. Furnished' Class IE Batteries, Battery Racks, and Battery Chargers" had been submitted by the contractor for review but was not approved.
,
at this time.
The Region III inspector informed the licensee that the installation ofta Class 1E battery charger, without approved installation procedures, is considered an item of noncompliance contrary to the requirements of l
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V as discussed in Appendix A~of this
'
report (50-440/81-07-01).
3-Observation of Electrical Penetrations-Work Activities, Unit 1
,
The inspector observed partially installed outboard containment electrical penetration No. 1R72S027 to ascertain that torquing of i
the outboard plates was in accordance with Westinghouse Manual
GAI 96-0272-002 and L. K. Comstock Procedure 4.3.10.
The inspector determined the following:
i l'
a.
Torque Wrench No 6-125 was being used for outboard plate bolt
,
torquing. Wrench calibration date of April 6, 1981 was current.
'
Calibration due date was April 13, 1981.
+
b.
Torque value of 65 15 foot pounds was used as specified.
L L
Containment in board electrical penetrations, identified as No. 1R72S017,
'
No. 1R725018, No. 1R72S026, No. IR72S027 and No. 1R72S028, were observed and the following was determined:
,
l
.
.
-4-P
,
-
..-,.w._
-r
-
,... -
,
-.
,
!
a.
The' type, identification, location'and aeparation was appropriate.
b '.
The. units were properly tagged for nonconformance to~ environmental qualification documentationJrequirements, by Tag K;.' N.R.-CQC 1226
~
' dated February 9, 1981, in accordance-with'QC Procedure 4.3.10.
c.
The units were' adequately maintained for-correct' nitrogen pressure and protected from construction damage in accordance with-QC Procedure 4.3.10 and manufacturer's instructions.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were. identified in.this area.
.
4.
Electrical-Raceway' Supports (Conduit and Cable Tray-Observation of Work Activities, Unit 1)
,
=The Region III inspector observed the completed' installation of seismic
. Class 11 cable tray supports (hangers) No. ICCI-T54, No. ICC2-C56, No. ICC2-C57, No. ICC3-C65, No. ICC3-C66, No. IIB 3-T18, and No. IIB 3-T38,-
located in the Control. Complex Building and Intermediate Building, to assure that requirements are being met in accordance with approved.
drawings and procedures in the following areas:
1.
Materials, type and size.
2.
Configuration, dimensicns and tolerances.
3.
Welding and weld materials.
4.
Location.
P 5.
Anchorage.
6.
Weld inspection and identification.
7.
Contractoi inspection activities.
.
No items.of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
.
5.
Electrical Raceway and Supports--Quality Records, Unit 1
'the Region III inspector reviewed QA records pertaining to the instal-lation and inspection of Class IE conduit, cable tray and associated seismic supports to assure conformance to applicable procedures and
,
!
requirements. The review included:
a.
L. K. Comstock " Cable Tray Installation Inspection Checklist" Form 17, " Conduit Installation Inspection Checklist" Form 82
-
and QC hanger inspection notations on A/E Cable Tray Support Drawings for cable trays No. 106A, No. 143A, No. 648A, and
{
No. 4078A; Conduits No. IM51R3B, No. IP42R14A,-No. 1R22H4A,
,
and No. IR33C-1205B;.and' Cable tray supports, (hangers)
No. ICC1-T54,' No. ICC2-C56, No. ICC2-C57, No. ICC3-C65,
No. ICC3-C66, No. IIB 3-T18, and No. IIB 3-T38.
j
-5-I o
i
-.. _.
,,
.,.
..
.
,,,
.__ _ _ _ _.. _. -. -.,,
.. ~
....
-
.
.s',
'.
t
.,
, e-
_.
t
-
,
_
<.
..
1b.
Cable Tray Support drawings SS-213-111 and SS-213-432, Revision A
.and SS-215-132, SS-215-122, Revision 0 which documented the QC inspector's initial, welder ID. number, fitup, visual inspection, location and dimensions verification results for the above hangers, plus magnetic particle test results for support ICC1-T54.
(
.c.
' Applicable Cable' Tray and Conduit Installation Checklists, Forms 17 and ;82, which documented installation, inspection and identification verification of.the,above raceways, including date and initial of the t
installing electrical foreman and QC inspector for the following items:
z.
Installation as per drawing; elevation correct; anchored down;
'
' orrect size, ' identification number _ correct, color and size of
,
'
number correct, location and. attachment'of number correct,-
roll-outs or protectors installed, correct. splice plates installed-
'bults tight on splice joint, sharp edges, burrs or projections removed; cleanliness, separation criteria observed, hanger details and location, damage, fittings correct and tight' and bends correct.
,
Grounding and bonding verifications <were included on applicable
CQC;(KEI) grounding checklists.
l The records identified the inspector, the type of observation, the governing documents, the results, the acceptability, and action taken in connection with noted deficiencies. The records were identifiable and retrievable, i-No items of noncompliance cur deviations were identified in this area.
'
6.
LQuality Assurance Implementing Procedures Review-Electrical, Units 1 and 2
'
The Region III inspector reviewed the following L. K. Comstock (LKC)
QA/QC approved procedures to assure that the requirements of the QA program have been established:
Cable. Tray and Conduit Installation Work Instruction No. 4.3.1 dated
November 5, 1980
Cable Tray and Conduit Identification Work Instruction No. 4.3.2 dated January 15, 1981 Installation of Electrical Penetration Work Instruction No. 4.3.10 dated l
February 24, 1981 Hanger Fabrication and Installaticn Work Instruction No. 4.3.11 dated January 15, 1981
!
The above procedures, as applicable, contained objectives, precautions,
sequence of events, prerequisites, approvals, acceptance-rejection
,
criteria, and identification of status requirements.
r t
,
)
'
-6-
!
E
,,
e-n r
,m--
n-
< -,
naw,
-. -
g
~w,-+
v,+e---
~w
-,e.
--- ~
-w-s e
P oi
'
-
t The procedures, as applicable, required records toLinclude dates;.
inspectors identity; qualitative and quantitative results; iden-tification and calibration of test equipment; adverse conditions;-
drawings, procedures, specifications, etc.; and evaluation of findings or results by technical personnel.
s
'No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
- Exit'Inte rview.
The inspectors met with licensee' representatives at the conclusion of the.
'
inspection. The inspectors-summarized the scope and findings of the in-spection. The licensee acknowledged the findings as reported.
>s
.
.
!
,
.
-7-
.
.
.....
.
...
. -
....
-,.. --.
,