IR 05000440/1981006
| ML20008F846 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1981 |
| From: | Julie Hughes, Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20008F845 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-81-06, 50-440-81-6, 50-441-81-06, 50-441-81-6, NUDOCS 8105120153 | |
| Download: ML20008F846 (5) | |
Text
,
,o
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report Nos:
50-440/81-00; 50-441/81-06 Docket Nos: 50-440; 50-441 License.Nos: CPPR-148;^CPPR-149 Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
P. O. Box 5000
Cleveland, OH 44101
Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, OH Inspection Conducted: March 1-31, 1981
/Md /W Inspector:
J. Hughes YNM/
,
le!d:.
- 2 [y/f2
/
Approved By:
R. F. Warnick, Chief Reactor Projects Section 2B Inspection Summary Inspection on March 1-31, 1981 (Report No. 50-440/81-06; 50-441/81-06)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector of safety related construction activities, including followup on previously identi-fled items of noncompliance (Unit 1); followup on previously identified unresolved items; followup on 50.55(e) report; plant tours (independent inspection); observa-
,
!
tion of welding and NDE on instrumentation piping (Unit 1); observation of welding on containment shield door flow diverter assemblics (Unit 1); observation of weld-ing fitup on safety related piping (Unit 1); observation of installation of con-tainment ventilation system (Unit 1) supports; and observation of installation of fire walls. This inspection involved 142 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector including 16 inspector-hours casite during off-shif ts.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8105120/N
-
-
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
_ _ - _.
.
-
-s U
DETAILS Persons Contacted
- M. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department
- G. Groscup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
_
- J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry Plant Department J. Kline, General Supervising Engineer, Construction
- P. Martin, General Super */ising Engineer, PQS G. Leidich, CQS QA Supervisor K. Combs, CQS Engineering Aide
'
S. Tulk, CQS Lead Electrical Quality Engineer.
T. Thompson, CQS Electrical Quality Engineer Other Personnel R. Matthys, CQS Quality Engineer (CAI)
J. Jones, Manager QA Department (Johnson Controls)
R. Williams, CQS Lead Mechanical Quality Engineer C. Hunter, CQS Lead Construction Auditor (GAI)
J. Miller, Manager QA Department (PPP)
H. Reppert, Design Team. Mechanical Engineer (GAI)
j J. Abson, CQC QC Mechanical Inspector (KEI)
D. Duff, Quality Control Inspector (Johnson Controls)
The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this reporting period.
- Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Licensee Action on Previous Insnection Fir. dings (Closed) Noncompliance (443/80-25-01):
Fabricated spool pieces were cold pulled into position for alignment. The RI reviewed nonconformance report (NR) No. CQC-1922, Pullman Power Products (PPP) procedure IX-53, dated January 13, 1981 and Gilbert Engineer letter dated March 27, 1981. The design engineering group believes that the observed cold spring condition did not represent a detrimental effect to the pipe from an induced stress standpoint.
It is believed that the pipe didn't exceed its code allowable
'
stress limit. The RI has no further questions on this matter at this time.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (440/80-26-02):
Storage of shield door assemblies in Unit 1 appear to be questionable. The RI observed the storage and in-stallation of the shield door assemblies and found them to be adequate. See paragraph No. 3 of this inspection report for details. This item is closed.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (440/80-28-01; 441/80-26-01):
PPP, site availability of reports covering vendor audits. The RI reviewed CEI Project Organization CQE ' Audit 493 dated February 2, 1981 which states in part " external (Vendor)
audits, including the audit (s) of CEI as a material supplier are performed by the Pullman-Vendor Audit Group, under requirements of the Pullman Shop Quality Assurance Program". The requirements for distribution: Audit re-ports are distributed to the supervisor responsible for the activity being-2-
.
-
-
-
o
'
audited and management personnel for review, evaluation and action. The manual also states that audits shall be available to the Owner and Authorized Nuclear Inspector for review. The Quality Assurance Program does not reference that vendor audits will be available at the site. The RI has no further questionc on this matter and this item is closed.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (440/80-28-02; 441/80-26-02):
Newport News In-dustrial Corporation (NNIC), record status of internal audit schedules and lack of distribution of audit reports. Review of the NNIC site internal audit schedule now bears the signature of the Audit Coordinator and revision number and date; the contractor notified the RI that this document in the
'
future will be treated as a quality document. Distribution of audit re-ports is not a contract committment according to Specification 709.
Audit reports are available for review by owner and other agencies at the NNIC site office at this time. This item is closed.
Licensee Action on Other Items - Units 1 and 2 (Closed) 10CFR50.55(e) Report, Subject: " Deficiency concerning lamination identified in ASTM A36 gusset plate hanger supports steel material".
The RI observed and reviewed the licensee random sampling inspection program and determined that gusset plates that were installed prior to February 1, 1980 (498 hangers) were inspected and acceptable in accordance with Project Organization Engineering letter PY-KCH/CEI-1316. Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 3862-33-545 was subsequently issued that added stricter requirements for hanger support steel.
This ECN changed the material from ASTM-A-36 to ASTM-A-36-S1 or ASTM A516 Grade 70-S8 in an effort to reduce the probability of receiving laminated material in the future.
The inspector has no further questions on this subject.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Plant Tours, Units 1 and 2 (Independent Inspection)
One or more plant areas were toured several times during this reporting period to observe general construction activities.
Two tours were made on back shift.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
2.
Observation of Instrraentation Work and Work Activities, - Unit 1 The inspector observed in-process work activities including welding and liquid penetrant (PT) testing of safety related instrumentation piping in the containment dome for the Hydrogen Analyzer System.
a.
The inspector observed the in-process fit up and welding in accordance with Johnson Controls I/F Planner No.1H51-P022B revision 0, weld data report for FW2, FW4, FW6, welding pro-cedure WPS 808, revision 3.
b.
The inspector witnessed the liquid penetrant (PT) examination
,
of the final field weld no. 4 in accordance with J ohnson Controls procedure QAS-1002-PNPP, revision 5.
The field weld appears to be satisfactory.
-3-
C
.-
c.
During this repsrting period, the inspector reviewed training and qualification records for the quality control inspectors (2) performing the above mentioned activities.
Certificat' ion and training was current and in accordance with Johnson Con-trols Procedure QAS-1003-PNPP, revision 3 titled, " Training and Qualification of Nondestructive Examination Personnel".
~
d.
The inspector reviewed qualification records of welders per-forming welding on the instrumentation piping and determined that Welder Performance Qualification, Test Records and
Welder Process Performance records were current.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
- 3.
Installation of Safety-Related Shield Door and Flow Diverter As-semblies - Unit 1 The inspector observed the alignment and welding of the shield doo'rs and flow diverter assemblies located in the Unit i reactor annulus.
Work was being constructed by NNIC.
a.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with welding procedures and specifications; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) the work area was free of weld rod stubs; and (4) physical appearance was acceptable.
b.
The inspector reviewed the weld history records for the shield door assemblics and determined that the following was being adhered to: welding instruction 946-N-WOO 1; welding pro-cedure WPS 1.1.018, Visual inspection procedure 948-N-N002 (VT);
magnetic particle test procedure 948-N-N003 (MT) and non-conforming report NR 96-880.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Observation of Safety-Related Piping Activities - Unit 1 The inspector observed the containment spray piping system being aligned for fit-up for field welds; FW110, FW111, FW138 and FW139 and determined that activities were in accordance with procedures and drawings.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Observation of Safety-Related Ventilation Supports - Unit 1 (Independent Inspection:
During this reporting period, the inspector observed the installation of the containment ventilation system supports and determined that the seismic supports were in accordance with procedures, drawings and specifications.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-4-
-
.
-
-
-
.
a F
e 6.
Other Areas Inspected - Units 1 and 2 (Independent Inspection)
The inspector observed the installation of fire walls (gypsum wall board) being installed in the control complex building. The licensee informed the inspector that an engineering analysis had been con-
-
ducted by the architect engineer for a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> fire rating. However, the inspector's concern is, has a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire test been conducted on the actual configuration installed in accordance with ASTM-E-119.
On March 27, 1981 the architect engineer informed the licensee that fire wall testing will be included in Penetration Seal Contractor specification SP98. This includes the 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rating per ASTM-E-119 for various penetration types thru concrete, g3 psum board, BR plate walls and floors. This item is considered an unrecolved itom pending the licensee review.
(440/81-06-01; 441/81-06-01)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to determine whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during this inspection are dis-cussed in Paragraph 6.
Exit Meetings The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted)
on March 6, 13, 20 and 27, 1981. The inspector summarized the-scope and findings of the inspections performed, i
.
l
-
-5-
.
-
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
-
.
.
.
.