IR 05000440/1980029
| ML19341D242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/1981 |
| From: | Julie Hughes, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341D238 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-80-29, 50-441-80-27, NUDOCS 8103050204 | |
| Download: ML19341D242 (10) | |
Text
- -
.-
-.._ -
.-
-
. _ _. --
-
.
.
.. -
.
-.
'e
'
i
I
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
.
i
REGION III
l Report Nos. 50-440/80-29; 50-441/80-27
..
Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 License Nos. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 I
-
'
l
?
Licensee:
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 j
Cleveland, OH 44101 i
)
.
l Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
l Inspection at:
Perry Site, Perry, OH I
4 Inspection C nduc ed:
cember 1-31, 1980 t
Inspector:
.Iu s
,
//
[/
f2f417.QL(_n-
'
'
i i
l Approved y:
C. C. Williams, Chief
/[/'// F/
I
Projects Section 2
!
l Inspection Summary
!
$
Inspections on December 1-31, 1980 (Report No. 50-440/80-29; 50-441/80-27)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector (RI)
.
of safety related construction activities, including welding of safety related
~
penetrations, water intake structures, concrete placement and radiography i
techniques relative to welding of reactor recirculation piping system.
This inspection involved 144 inspection hours by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
- i i
}
i
!
!
4 J
j i
6108060 M
.
,
J
-,. - - - -.
-
.
-.,..-
. -
,
.. -. - - -. - - -,. -... - - - - - - - -
--,
-
.
DETAILS
,
Persons Contacted
- M. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department
.
- C, Groscup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
- W. Kacer, General Supervising Engineer, CQS
.
J. Kline, General Supervising Engineer, Construction B. Barkley, General Supervising Engineer, Design
- P. Martin, General Supervising Engineer, PQS G. Leidich, CQS QA Supervisor
- K. Combs, CQS Engineering Aide S. Tulk, CQS Lead Electrical Quality Engineer E. Christiansen, Nuclear Electrical Engineer B. Walrath, POS QE Supervisor G. E. Gayton, CQS Mechanical Quality Engireer other Personnel R. Matthys, CQS Quality Engineer (CAI)
R. Williams, CQS Lead Mechanical Quality Engineer, (GAI)
R. Crofton, CQS Lead Piping Quality Engineer (GAI)
G. Parker, CQS Quality Engineer (GAI)
K. Pech, Assistant Project Manager (GAI)
P. Hunter, CQS Lead Construction Auditor (GAI)
The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this reporting period.
- Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Plant Tours, Units 1 and 2 One or more plant areas were toured several times during this re-porting period to observe general construction practices.
One tour was made on back shift.
No items of nopeompliance or deviations were identified.
2.
Observation of Radiography (Peabody Testing)
The inspector made a tour of the Peabody Testing facilities and a.
observed an in-process radiography (RT).
The following are the inspector's findings:
(1)
The NRC license expired August 31, 1980, No. 12-00622-07 covers IR 192 up to 100 curies and CO 60 up to 100 curies.
The licensee has an extension letter from the NRC Licensing Branch to continue using their existing licenses until the renewal has been reviewed.
(2)
Peabody does not have a CO 60 source or an X-ray machine on site.
2-
-
.
.
_
-
-
.--
.-_
.. _
-
.
,
(3)
The lab has one IR 192 source stored in a locked, lead lined box in a storage area.
,
(4)
A hand film processing tank and automatic processor are used to process film.
(5)
Survey meters are calibrated every three months. -
(6)
Pocket dosimeters are read and recorded every day when performing RT.
(7)
Film badges are processed and recorded every two (2)
weeks.
(8)
Acceptable colored rope and signs were available for
securing areas during when RT is being performed.
,
(9)
Decay curves of the IR 192 source are posted for the NDE personnel to use.
(10)
The lab uses Kodak industrial radiographic film only, Types AA and M.
!
(11)
No outdated film was observed.
l
)
(12)
Film cassettes were in acceptable condition.
(13)
Lead screens were in good condition.
(14)
Fluorescent screens are not used nor are there any onsite.
(15)
Peabody uses lead numbers for the number belt and a flasher for the identification.
(16)
The lab uses a Macbeth densitometer.
(17)
Peabody uses a film density step wedge traceable to the Bureau of Standards for calibration of the densitometer.
(18)
ASTM penetrameters are the only penetrameters used. The penetrameters had certifications.
(19)
Peabody had various thickness of shims to be used under the penetrameters.
i (20)
The lab uses a high intensity viewer for interpreting
'
radiographs.
(21)
The lab hauls the IR 192 source in a pick-up truck which does not have radioactive signs on each side or one in front or back.
The licensee is transmitting a letter to Peabody Testing, requesting that they install radioactive
j signs on their pick-up truck when hauling the IR 192 to i
an area for the performance of radiography.
!
-3-
'
I r
.., _. _ - - -,,,
.. _.,
-
. _ _,,. -
-
-
--
.
(22)
The inspector reviewed radiographic examination pro-cedure (RT) GEP-N-004 revision 0, dated March 25, 1980 and record of demonstration, dated June 25, 1980.
b.
The inspector reviewed radiographs of weld no. B33-1-B5, drawing no. 762E843, weld procedure #8.9.4.1, spool piece no. G005-B-1 to pump casing 1B33-C001B.
.
.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Installation of Safety-Related Penetrations The inspector observed in process work activities including welding, grinding and liquid penetrant (PT) testing of safety-related pene-tration P405 (chilled water return piping),
a.
The inspector observed the in process welding and grinding of the root pass of penetration number P-405 (chilled water return piping),
in accordance with ISO-1P50-8, weld process sheet for FW11, Pullman Power Products (PPP) welding procedure WPS 13/IT-8A.
During the inspection, the inspector observed the grinding (gouging) out of the root pass in the area of 12 o' clock to 3 o' clock. Upon question-ing the PPP QC inspector and welder, the inspector was informed that another welder had started the root pass weld. The PPP QC inspector stated that he was not positive that a full penetra-tion weld had been accomplished in the area of 12 o' clock to 3 o' clock.
It was documented on the weld process sheet that a repair was made, b.
During this inspection period, the inspector observed the liquid penetrant (PT) examination of the root pass for field weld no. 1.1 in accordance with PPP procedure IX-PT-1-W75 dated February 12, 1979.
The field weld appears to be satisfactory.
The inspector reviewed the following documents pertaining to c.
field weld no. 11: weld rod issue ticket which included weld rod type E6010-3/32, ISO drawing no. 1P50-8, and drawing no.
B-312-633 revision E; weld rod heat no. OF205814, welder's ID no. B-4 and date issued; weld procedure no. 13/IT-8A and Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 4970-44-366 for type "D" penetration field welds.
No items of noncompliance or deviations identified.
4.
Water Intake Structures - Observation of Welding Activities The inspector observed the fabrication and welding activities of the water intake structures being constructed by Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. (CBI).
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with welding procedures and specifications; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) the work area was free of weld rod stubs; and (4)
physical appearance was acceptable.
j No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-4-
_
_.
-
_ _.
--
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
+
i
'
5.
Water Intake Structures - Quality Records O
,
The inspector reviewed the following quality records and procedures, a.
CBI welding procedure, WPS-E7018/91931.
,
b.
Electrode' care, storage and conditioning procedure, ECSC re-vision 1.
c.
General welding procedure, GWPS-SMAWX revision 3.
!
d.
NDE procedure, MT12X revision 2.
c.
NDE procedure, RT2V revision 3.
'
f.
Review Record Drawing Table Checklist, which included; joint I.D., fit up checked, WPS used, NDE procedure, etc., all items dated and initialed.
g.
Reviewed Procedure Qualification Report, PQR 2183 and PQR 3660 (PWHT).
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Control of Welding Materials The inspector toured the CBI welding material issuing station lo-cated at fabrication site.
It was determined that:
j The welding materials are properly identified and segregated.
a.
b.
The temperature of the rod ovens is maintained and checked
I with a Tempilstick rated at 250 F.
$
J c.
Records are properly kept.
i-d.
Issuance and return of welding materials are controlled in accordance with approved procedures.
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Observation of Concrete Work Activities and Related Quality Records,
,
Units 1 and 2 Pre-Placement Inspection (RB1-HWT-6-654, December 13, 1980 and
RB2-HWT-3-630, December 14, 1980). The inspector performed a pre-placement inspection of Placement No. RB1-HWT-6-654 and RB2-HWT-3-630 (Biological shield wall), containing approximately 149 cubic yards of concrete and placed by National Engineering and Contracting
Company (NECC).
t l'
Placement Inspection (RB1-HWT-6-654)
a.
In Process Concrete Testing i
(1) The United States Testing (UST) field QC personnel per-
,
i
'
-5-
- - -
_
. -.
-
- - _ -
-.,,
__
.. _ _ _ _
_
.
_
..
-
. _.
_
.
r i
- formed slump, temperature and ; nit weight as follows:
.
Test Ticket No.
Slump (in.)
Temp. (OF.)
U.W.
50089 8 1/2"
198.56
,
50090 8 1/2"
198.56
50094 8 3/4"
197.87
50095 8 3/4"
197.81 i
50100 8 3/4"
197.83 l
50101 8 3/4"
198.36
-
.
All test results were within the allowed limits and per-formed at the frequencies specified. Placing temperature limits were 450 to 750 Slump limits 5" to 9" in accordance -
with ECN 793-20-128 dated August 15, 1978.
NOTE:
U.W. is Unit Weight.
(2) Field curing houses, which were suitably equipped to maintain freshly cast compressive strength cylinders a t the initial
,
'
curing temperature specified by ASTM C-31-o9, were inspected.
(3) The inspector reviewed the calibration for the testing apparatus used on pour RB1-HWT-6-654, and found the following equipment had current calibration data:
unit weight bucket #11, scale #17, and thermometer #142.
Placement Inspection (RB2-HWT-3-630)
b.
In Process Concrete Testing (1) The United States Testing (UST) field QC personnel per-formed slump, temperature and density test as follows:
Test Ticket No.
Slump (in.)
Temp. (OF.)
U.W.
50107 9"
200.10
'
50108 8 1/2"
199.46
50109 9"
199.46
50110 9"
196.29
50118 8 1/2"
197.97
,
50119 8 3/4"
198.90 All test results were within the allowed limits and per-
'
formed at the frequencies specified. Placing temperature
,
)
-6-l
-..--.
_ -. _ - - - _
_ - _ _
_ _ _i
_
.
!
limits 500 to 800 Slump limits 5" to 9" in accordance
! *
with ECN 793-20-128 dated August 15, 1978.
l l
NOTE:
U.W. is Unit weight.
(2) Field curing houses, which were suitably equipped.to main-tain freshly cast compressive strength cylinders at the initial curing temperature specified by ASTM C-31-69, were inspected.
(3) The inspector reviewed the calibration for the testing apparatus used on pour RB2-HWT-3-630 and found the follow-ing equipment had current calibration data:
unit weight bucket #11, scale #17, and thermometer #141.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Delivery and Placement a.
Concrete was pumped to the placement area and deposited via a
.
flexible hose with a maximum free fall of approximately eighteen
(18) feet in accordance with EON 793-20-128 dated August 15, 1978 and Bioshield Heavyweight.oncrete Model Placement Report dated August 2, 1978.
b.
NECC QC inspector was witnessing the concrete pour and checks
'
were being properly documented on the NECC placement checklist
,
form QP 10.1-1 revision 2 as required by NECC Procedure QP 10.1, revision 15.
9.
Other Areas Inspected - Unit 1 The inspector observed completed and partially completed painting a.
of the Reactor Building of Unit 1 at the 234 to 2500 azimuth and elevation 620' to 690'.
Work had been accomplished in April, 1980.
b.
The inspector reviewed Daily Surveillance / Inspection Reports pertaining to work completed.
The review included report numbers C-2964 dated April 15, 1980; C-2966 dated April 16, 1980; C-2968 dated April 17, 1980; and C-2974 dated April 18, 1980.
Reports
"
indicate that construction Quality control Inspector did first
line inspection on the surface prior to application of the Carbo-Zinc #11. Adhesion tests were conducted by 0.B. Cannon and the results are:
Dolly #1 - 410 lbs.
Dolly #2 - 750 lbs.
Dolly #3 - 500 lbs.
NOTE:
200 lbs. minimum is requirement.
-7-
,. -
.
_
.
The RI has no further questions at this time.
i o
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Exit Meetings
.,
The inspector met -with licensee representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted)
en December 12 and 19, 1980.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspectie a performed. Due to holidays, there were only two exit meetings held.
Attachment:
Preliminary Inspection Findings-8-
,
..
.. _. _..
,
...
........>:u--------
-
- -.... - - - - - _
..._
....
... -. -
.
.
.
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT g.
.
.
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS o
.
.
.
l'
I.
LICENSEE 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
IE REGION III
.
, _ _
3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION 12/8--12/80 50-440; 50-441 CPPR 148; CPPR 149
-
,_
6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation yy were found.
-
._
7.
The following matters are preliminary inspection findings:
_
N
,
.
.
.
%.
-
_.
- 8.
These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
Management at the Region III Office and they will correspond with you
-
concerning any enforcement action.
j'by us as SAT fNuc1eaeRy1storyComm1.sionInspector
r
.
.
.
.
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENTORCDIENT
.
.
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS O
-
.
l'
l.
LICENSEE 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE
,
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
IE REGION III
.
%
'
,
3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION 50-440; 50-441 CPPR 148; CPPR 149 12/15-19/80
6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation were found.
'
._
7.
The following matterr are preliminary inspection findings:
_
__
___
N
'
4 k.
%.
-
'
8.
These preliminary inspection findings wil,1 be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
Management at the Region III Office and they will cci espond vi you
-
concerning any enforcement action.
$/
' sh
' clear Regul ry Commission Inspector
.