IR 05000440/1980019
| ML19345A732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/22/1980 |
| From: | Julie Hughes, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345A731 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-80-19, 50-441-80-17, NUDOCS 8011250053 | |
| Download: ML19345A732 (10) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:' ) . U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION , OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report Nos. 50-440/80 19; 50-441/80-17 Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 I.icense Nos. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P.O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Oli 44101 Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, OH Inspection Conducted: September 2 - 30, 1980 hs Inspector: J iughes jdj [O_,_ (( }' h,.<ca . - - - , Approved By: C. C. Williams, Chief / /' < R ' ' Projects Section 2 Inspection Summary Ins s tion on September 2 - 30, 1980 (Report Nos. 50-440/80-19; 50-441/80-17) Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector (RI) of safety related construction activities including welding of safety related fluid piping systems, welder qualifications, concrete preplacement, record review for diesel generator fuel oil storage tanks, licensee actions relative to IE Circulars and previously identified noncompliances.
This inspection involved 160 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
0011250 0 5}
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees
- M. Edelman, Ma' nager, Nuclear QA Department
- G. Groscup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department G. Ankney, Senior Licensing Engineer
- W. Kacer, General Supervising Engineer, CQS
- J. Kline, General Supervising Engineer, Construction
- B. Barkley, General Supervising Engineer, Design
- P. Martin, General Supervising Engineer, PQS G. Leidich, CQS QE Supervisor S. Tulk, CQS Electrical Quality Engineer A. Bolesic, Warehouse Supervisor Other Personnel AP. Gibson, CQS QC Supervisor (KEI)
C. Ilubbuch, CQS Mechanical (KEI) R. Crofton, CQS Lead Piping Quality Engineer (GAI) M. Kritzer, CQS Civil Quality Engineer (KEI) G. Parker, CQS Mechanical Quality Engineer (GAI) K. Peck, Assistant Project Manager (GAI) T. Bond, QA/QC Operations Manager, (NNIC) W. F. Newell, Jr., Senior Welding Engineer (NNIC) J. E. Staf fiera, QA Manager (NNIC) The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this reporting period.
- Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/79-07-01; 441/79-07-01) Some equipment has been stored outside since 1976 and the effectiveness of the canvas and plastic wrap should be evaluated.
The resident inspector toured the outside storage areas and found them to be satisfactory during this reporting period.
(Closed) Noncompliance (440/79-05-01; 441/79-05-01) Licensee failure to execute the program for inspection in the areas of NECC concrete preplacement activities, and GLCC and NECC concrete curing activities. On September 26, 1980, the inspector inspected the preplacement for NECC concrete pour No. 1BO-W201-660 at the fuel handling building. The inspector also inspected the curing process on September 28, 1980 and found both areas satisfactory.
GLCC has completed specified concrete work so that the inspector was unable to vitness curing activities. However, the inspector reviewed licensee CQC l surveillances/ inspection reports, dated June 6 and 7, 1979, and Site Activities Inspection Reports dated January 26, 1980 and April 19, 1980 for GLCC curing activities. This item is considered to be closed.
! l ! -2-
. (Closed) Noncompliance (441/79-07-02) Improper verification sign-offs for
Newport News Industrial Corporation (NNIC) manufacturing, installation and inspection sheets (MII's). The inspector reviewed the final documentation package including Nonconformance Report No. 38-89 dated August 10, 1979.
The inspector determined that the installation meets the specification requirements.
(Closed) Noncompliance (440/80-06-01; 441/80-06-01) Control room lighting fixture supports were not designatcd as seismic Category I.
The inspector reviewed the architect-engineer's calculations for seismic supports.
Engineering change notice No. 4900-33-791, dated July 10, 1980, was issued to incorporate the changes for lighting attachments in safety related areas on drawing D-220-002, Revision F.
The inspector has no further questions at this time.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Plant Tours, Units 1 and 2 One or more plant areas were toured several times each week during this reporting period to observe general construction practices, area cleanliness, and storage / maintenance conditions of equipment, piping, conduit, and diesel generator oil storage tanks. Two tours were made during the back shift.
No items of ncncompliance or deviations were identified.
2.
Observation of Concrete Work Activities, Units 1 and 2 The inspector performed a preplacement inspection of Placement No. IB0-W201-660 (fuel handling building wall) by National Engineering Cont racting Company (NECC).
On September 28, 1980, the inspector observed the curing process of concrete placement IB0-W201-660.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Licensee Action on IE Circulars - Units 1 and 2 The inspector reviewed the licensee's documentation for the following IE Circulars: a.
IE Circular No. 79-17.
The licensee had performed a systematic review of the Perry purchase orders and confirmed that no G.E.
Metalclad Circuit Breakers were supplied to the Perry plant during the period August 1, 1978 to July 1, 1979 as mentioned in the Circular.
b.
IE Circular No. 79-20.
The licensee had performed a systematic review of the Perry design and equipment specifications and confirmed that no GTE Sylvania Relays, Type PM Bulletin 7305, Catalog No. 5412-11-AC with a 120 volt AC coil were installed in Class IE equipment at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
( No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-3-
. _ m . _. _ _ - _ _. . ___. .. _ . _ _ . _ . _ .
4 4.
Observation of Safety Related Piping Welding Activities Unit 1 t -
' i The inspector observed the following partially completed and completed , welding activities (PPP): I a.
Containment Spray System Weld No. 01 on Isometric No. 1-E15-5.
b.
Containment Spray System Weld No. 02 on Isometric 1-E15-7.
j t c.
Containment Spray System Weld No. 06 on Isometric 1-E15-7.
d.
Containment Spray System Weld No. 07 on Isometric 1-E15-7.
! e.
Containment Spray System Weld No. 08 on Isometric 1-E15-7.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with the traveler, (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) welding procedure requirements were met; (4) the work area was free of weld rod stubs; and (5) physical appearance was acceptable.
i ! - During one weld joint fit-up, a 2 1/2 ton "come-a-long" was being ! ' l used. The inspector questioned the contractor's QC inspector about this process. The resident inspector was informed that by pulling , the pipe a few inches, a cold spring would not exist. The pulling i process utilizing a "come-a-long" was cancelled.
, The inspector observed the fit-up, tack welding, and root pass welding , j of containment spray system weld No. 05 on isometric 1-E15-5 for spool pieces 38RB and 39RB.
< , j No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
) 5.
. Control of Welding Materials ! , The inspector toured the PPP welding material issuing station located , i at the containment dome area.
It was determined that: i a.
The welding materials are properly identified and segregated.
! t b.
The ter trature of the rod oven (R0-15) is maintained and thermo-u ters are currently in calibration.
P ' c.
Records are properly kept.
d.
Issuance and~ return of welding materials are controlled in - accordance with approved procedures.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'
i
- 4-
-
9 ,, -, - - _.., - - -.. _. -...,,-, _.,w,,_, _.
c . .,., - _ -,,., -,,,,,, -, -,, - -,, - - -.,. _, _,. _ - _ -...,, _, .,. - -
. 6.
Review of Records - Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Tanks
The inspector reviewed the documentation package for four diesel generator fuel oil storage tanks and two high pressure core spray backup diesel generator fuel oil storage tanks.
It was determined that: a.
The certificate holder's Data Report for Nuclear Vessels, Form N-1A-N, was signed by the vendor.
b.
Report of tests and analyses was available.
c.
The manuf acturer's in process sheet, form QA 109, Revision A, was complete.
d.
Pneumatic test results were available.
e.
Corrosion allowance was analyzed for 1/16 inch.
f.
Statement of Conformance was dated August 20, 1979.
g.
Material test results were available.
h.
Certificate of Inspection by the designer (source inspection) was available.
The inspector noted that Nonconformance Report No. 1426 was issued because the final painting had not been completed during the source inspection visit.
The inspector asked the licensee's quality engineer if painting had been ecmpleted. The licensee determined that the final painting and the dry paint thickness had not been documented.
The Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) engineer then issued Noncon-formance Report (NR) No. CQA166, dated September 9, 1980, to verify that the interior paint thickness would meet the specification.
NR CQA 166 was closed out on September 16, 1980. The resident inspector has no further questions on this matter.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Safety Related Structure - Welder Qualifications The inspector reviewed qualification records of welders performing welding on the containment dome. The inspector noted a number of errors on the Welder Performance Qualification Record (WPQR), such as: QA failed to properly sign, date, or initial; the Destructive Testing Section of the WPQR was improperly completed, and Welder Performance Test Sheets (WPTS) were missing. The contractor started an extensive QA audit, document No. 701-9109, dated September 9, 1980.
The contractor considers that none of the errors found will jeopardize any existing qualifications. This matter will be reviewed in greater detail by the resident inspector. This item is considered unresolved (440/80-19-01; 441/80-17-01).
-5- , ' !
8.
Other Areas Inspected The resident inspector was informed on September 16, 1980, that a fire occurred in the lay-down yard while the shipping packaging was being removed from the Unit 2 core shroud. The fire occurred when the top cover plate, which was attached to the bottom plate by four 3/4 inch r,ods, was removed by the use of a cutting torch. The paper inner vapor barrier and polymer wrapping caught fire. The fire was extinguished by the site fire brigade.
Visual inspection indicates smoke deposits and melted plastic on approximately half of the outer ring of the separator tubes.
General Electric San Jose was contacted for final cleanup and inspection. This item will be c1csely monitored by the resident inspector.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to determine whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompli-ance, or deviations.
An unresolved item disclosed during this inspection is discussed in Paragraph 7.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted) on September 5, 10, 19, and 26, 1980. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspections performed. The licensee acknowledged the findings.
Attachment: Preliminary Inspection findings-6- ,
t.'s .OTTICE OT INSPECTIO;; AND D;TORCD:D;T ., .
.
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINCS . 1.
LICENSEE 2.
REGIO OFFICE Ckeelaid 5/echnN 7E Ed/1)//1A A 3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.. D TE OF IN PECTION
- hi
, bb ~ f-l$lCN)$ lY h$ t / / ' ' /, ( ]' 6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation were found.
. 7.
The following matters are preliminary inspection findings: x , . . . . I 8.
3 ese preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
- -
Management at the Region III Office and they will orrespo 3rith you ( concerning any enforcement action.
~ l W C' huclear ulatory Commission Inspector
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCD!EN] .
, PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS . I 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE 1.
LICENSEE . CL<oe.lau Eledvu-yQ Inam uwtmq Co, 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
D TE OF IN PECTION 3.
DOCKET NLHBERS 6b-WO: 50-441 cme M(f,.Y5A' M9
-/ WD , - Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation 6.
' ' were found.
The following matters are preliminary inspection findings: 7.
. . , N ! These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision / Management at the Region III Office and they will co respond v th you 8.
- concerning any enforcement action.
f ' .1- - - llff/tbV. clear Regul ory Commission Inspectoi ' .
- - 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENTORCuiu,. '
. PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS _ l 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE 1.
LICENSEE . $dd- /7 N b/ ILLuwm,6a agol ~ 3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
D E OF INS ECTION - Off /48,YPM197 9/5-l'1 20 / S0-Wo i sD - W/ , Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation }' 6.
were found.
The following matters are. preliminary inspection findings: 7.
. s' These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision / . 8.
the Region III Office and they will cor espond w th you Management at - concerning any enforcement action.
(- AO uclear 'Regu tory Commission Inspector- .
.-- -__ . _
- ] ___ ...___ - _... -._.... _. - - - - - t.. .0FFICE OT 1HSPECT10!; A1;D E!;r0KCEMEt;T . -
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS . LICENSEE . 2.
RECIONAL OFFICE . C/easlanc?Eledzic IE f,LLuntina,%y Ca DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSP'ZCTION o YY$l h* YYl {-ffk~N{{l[hfE-$ Z-Zb/$U / v { 6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no items of ' noncompliance or deviation vere found.
- 7.
The following matters a e preliminary inspection findings: a / . . . . . BemWEu P 8.
These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision / Management at the Region III Of fice and they will correspond.with you - concerning any enforcement action.
' AlWA& . 7ociearaesporyCommissionInspector }}