IR 05000440/1980024
| ML19345D126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/22/1980 |
| From: | Fiorelli G, James Keppler, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345D124 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-80-24, 50-441-80-22, NUDOCS 8012090145 | |
| Download: ML19345D126 (7) | |
Text
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EhTORCEMENT
REGION III
,
_
--
Reports No. 50-440/80-24; 50-441/80-22
-
Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Licenses No. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 Licensee:
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Meeting At: Cleveland, OH Meeting Conducted: October 1, 1980 NRC Personnel Present:
J. G. Keppler, Director RIII G. Fiore11i, Chief, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch C. C. Williams, Chief, Projects Section 2 J. E. Konklin, Perry Project Inspector, RIII D. M. Houston, Perry Project Manager, NRR bWl-cmav b%
Approved By:
G. Fiorelli, Chief Reactor Construction Rh2/J'<
.
Engineering Support Branch
'
Meeting Summary Management Meeting on October 1, 1980 (Report No. 50-440/80-24; 50-441/80-22)
Areas Discussed: Management meeting held at the NRC's request to discuss the regulatory performance of the activities at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant as concluded in the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) program.
Results: A summation of the licensee performance evaluation was presented.
Areas of interest were discussed with corporate management.
The performance at Perry, Units 1 and 2, was considered to be adequate.
l l
-
8 012 o g y jg$-
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted o
-
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Pefsonnel Present -
"
.
--
D. Davidson, Vice President, System Engineering and Construction G. Groscup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department M. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department 2.
Areas Discussed A summary of the SALP program was presented, including its a.
development, the basis for evaluation, and its purpose.
b.
The results of the NRC's evaluation of the licensee's performance were discussed (a copy of the evaluation is attached).
c.
Several topics related to enforcement, the inspection program, and regulatory planning were discussed with the licensee.
3.
Major Observations Within the areas reviewed during the past year, the noncompliance a.
history is not of significant regulatory concern.
The number and severity of noncompliances were average relative to other comparable construction sites in Region III.
Evaluation of the noncompliances by type and area indicated no specific areas of significant concern.
b.
Eight construction deficiency reports of problems were reported by the licensee in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) during the past year.
Six of the eight reports were based on Part 21 reports from vendors or on defective materials received at the site. The other two items reported were considered to be within the control of the licensee. No instances were identified by RIII in which an item which should have been reported was not.
c.
Current conduct and management of construction activities at the Perry site indicate that proper management controls, communications and' interfaces, supervisory reviews, record control systems, and personnel attitudes are in place. No significant problems were identified in these areas.
d.
Management effort should be applied toward minimizing potential problems in the areas of ASME Code certification activities, turnover of systems from Construction to Operations, development of an adequate Operations organization, and preparation of operating procedures.
-2-
.
4.
Overall Assessment
.
The overall regulatory performance of Cleveland Electric Illuminating during the past year, as related to the Perry Project, is considered to be adequate.
e
-
L.
Planned NRC Actions The licensee's performance to date, and the stattis of RIII inspections, are such that no changes are planned in the routine inspection program at Perry.
Attachment:
Licensee Performance Evaluation i-3-
,
.
.
-
.
._
.
.
.
.
.-
_
~.
._-
,
.
.
.
'
REGION: III LICENSEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (CONSTRUCTION)
s Faci _lity:
Perry Units 1/2
-
Licensee:
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co:pany
"
Unit Identification:
Docket No.
CP No./Date of Issuance Unit No.
50-khD CPPR-lh8/05-03-77
50-kh1 CPPR-lh9/05-03-77
.
'
Reactor Information:
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 j
!
MWt'
1205 1205
,
i Appraisal Period:
July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1980
Appraisal Completion Date:
July 21, 1980 Review Board Members:
J. E. Konklin, Project Inspector, Reactor' Construction and Engineering Support, Branch, RI M. D. Houston, Project Manager, NRR C. C. Williams, Project Section Chic.
RC&ES, RIII G. Fiore111, Chief, RC&ES, RIII
,
i J. G. Keppler, Director, RIII E. W. K. Lee, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII
.
J. Hughes, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES',RIII K. D. Ward, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII W. J. Key, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII R. B. Landsman, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII C. E. Jones, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII K.-Naidu, Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII C. A. Erb. Reactor Inspector, RC&ES, RIII
.
'
,
,, -. -.,,
.,
, -,
, - - -,.
. -,
, -, -
-
-..
.
.-
_.
.
_ _
. _ _ -
_.
-..-
m L
.
.
A.
Fuwbet and Nature of Ncncomt11cnce items
'
i
Noncompliance Category:
Unit 1
_ Unit 2 Unit 3
>
Violations
,
-
!
Infractions
13
-
-
"
!
-
,
,
Deficiencies
3
-
<
- Areas of Noncompliance:
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3-
~
j (list Areas as Required)
(Points)
(Points)
Points
i Inadequate QA records
6
'
Inadequate inspection
20
-
,
-
.
Inadequate procedures and
30 i
failure to follow procedures Inadequate control of
20 j
special processes
-
Lack of timely corrective
10
-
action
,
Failure to identify non-
10
-
conforming materials
)
Inadequate training of
personnel
10
-
Failure to identify component 10
-
to be covered by QA Program j
Improper issuance of
10
!
documents
-
j Failure to specify appropri-10
-
ate Codes & Standards
-
TOTAL:
126 136
!
B.
Number and Nature of Deficiency Items
Deficiency in natural gas pipeline break analysis. 9/7/79 i
Splitting of Rockbestos Cable Jackets. 10/3/79
-
Deficiencies in ITE 4.16Kv switchgear.
10/23/79 Insufficient Class B fill wateistops. 12/6/79 j
Pump failures in hydrogen analyzer systems. 4/22/79 i
Deficiencies in Cutler-Hammer motor control centers.
5/28/80 l
Deficiencies in Rosemount pressure transmitters.
6/3/80 i
Insoluble water-soluble purge dam material.
6/12/80
!
C..
Escalated Enforcement Actions Civil Penalties i
None
Orders
.;
1.
}
None
.
j Immediate Action Letters
j
'None
!
-
.
,
.
!
i
<
e
,w-e
, -..,,,
,
-r.,.
,v.
- - -
---n,-n- - -,.,
-
.
H: 2955 (App.B)
L
..
D.
Management Conferences Held Durino Past Twelve Months
'
A meeting was held on November 19, 1979 at the CEI Corpora'te Offices in Cleveland, Ohio, among CEI corporate management and RIII management,
.
to review the overall status of the Perry construction. activities and to discuss specific technical areas of interest.
'~
.
E.
Justification of Evaluations of Functional Areas Categorized as Requiring an increase.in Inspection Frequency / Scope 45ee evaluation sheet)
The licensee's performance to date, and the completion of RIII inspections, are such that no changes are required in the routine inspection program at Perry.
!
.
G
&
e 2955-B-3 4/15/80
\\
'
.
Inspection Frenuency and/or Scope FUNCTIONAL AREA Increase No. Change Decrease
,
~
1.
Quality Assurance, Management & Training x
,
2.
SubsIructure& Foundations X
3.
Concrete X
.
4.
Liner (Containment & Others)
x l
5.
Safety-Relhted Structures X
6.
Piping & Hangers (Reactor Coolant x
.
& Others)
7.
Safety-Related Components (Vessel, Internals & HVAC)
X 8.
Electrical Equipment x
9.
Electrical (Tray & Wire)
x 10.
Instrumentation X
11.
Fire Protection X
12.
Preservice Inspection x
13.
Peporting X
.
~
s
,
!
'
G s. 9a l reh ~
(pesignated Reg <iort)L/ Manager)
Or *Ls u :39.i9&'
'
Date
.