IR 05000425/1988068

Submits Results of NRC Review of Readiness Review,Phase 3, Module 23 Re Plant Security Documented in Insp Repts 50-425/88-68 & 50-425/89-07.Testing,transition Plan & Walkdown of Completed Security Sys Acceptable

ML20245D652
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	02/06/1989
From:	Ernst M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Hairston W GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8906270191
Download: ML20245D652 (2)

Text

.

_p..,

. .: .

ey

,

FEB 0 61989 Docket No.: 50-425 -

License No.: CPPR-109 Georgia Power Company ATTN: Mr. W. G. Hairston, III Senior Vice Presider:t

,

Nuclear Operations P. 0. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC EVALUATION OF V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW 0F PLANT SECURITY,.

PHASE 3, MODULE NO. 23 The NRC has performed a. review of the testing, transition p1hn, and walkdown of

. the completed security system for the Plant Vogtle Unit.-2 covered by Readiness Review Module No. 23, Phase 3, submitted on November 23, 1988. . This' review has been performed as part of- our routine inspection program and'is~ documented in Inspection Report Nos. 50-425/88-68 and 50-425/89-07 forwarded to you by letters dated January 19 and 30, 1989, respectivel Our review confirmed that testing of the Unit 2 security systems, which was deferred from . Phase 2, was satisfactorily ' completed during Phase It was further confirmed that all findings identified during Phase 3, along with two carryover findings from phases 1 and 2, were adequately resolved. . Based on NRC review'and inspection of these activities identified in Phase 3 of Module No. 23, we have determined that the testing, transition plan, and walkdown of the completed security system for Unit 2 complies with regulatory requirements and is acceptabl This decision is based on information currently availab1'e' to the inspector and reviewers. . Should information subsequently become available which was not considered during this review which conflicts with earlier information, it.will:

be evaluated to determine what effect'it may have on the above conclusio Please contact us if you should have any questions concerning this lette Sincerel fl W{ f"$W4

, h/./tW/

Malcolm L. Ernst I

Acting Regional Administrator cc: (See page 2)

l l

8906270191 890206 FDR ADOCK 05000425 Q PDC I 0

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

Z26/

_- _ ------- _ _

. ___

j,,.

.

- . ..

2 FEb 0 u 12 : q l

l cc: R. P. Mcdonald, Executive Vice i President, Nuclear Operations P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Director C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality l Assurance Manager j G. Bockhold, Jr. , General Manager, 1 Nuclear Operations J. P. Kane, Manager Licensing and Engineering J. A. Bailey, Project Licensing Manager B. W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge D. Kirkland, III, Counsel, Office of the Consumer's Utility Council D. Feig, Georgians Against Nuclear Energy State of Georgia bec: E. Reis, 0GC J. Hopkins, NRR  ;

M. Sinkule, RII DRS Technical Assistant NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk

, y i-

_

'

RII Rll 31p RII RII RII ,

,9f WC' y WpOprM,e.c .

Mf7 '

illman DThompson DMcGuire Patterson MSinkule 1 88 1//v/88 1/ o0/87 -J(,789 1/x/89 1/gf8y ,

, y n ' ,um _~ n , rar s y;

, p fj M * "' * * " k ~ '*

LReyw VBrownlee JStohr J/a /s 9 3 /N I 8'

IIh /88 1/3V80 1/ /86