IR 05000410/1985005
| ML17054B486 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1985 |
| From: | Gramm R, Lazarus W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17054B485 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-85-05-MM, 50-410-85-5-MM, NUDOCS 8503220404 | |
| Download: ML17054B486 (6) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
85-05 Docket No.
50-410 License No.
CPPR-112 Prior ity Category A
Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 300 Erie Boulevard S racuse New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Inspection At:
Scriba New York Inspection Conducted:
Fe ruar
1985 Inspectors:
amm, S
n r Resident Inspector da e
Approved By:
rus, Ch
, Reactor Projects Section 2C, D
Acting)
da e
S" Mana ement Conference on February
1985 Re ort No. 50-410/85-05
~Summar:
Special management conference convened at the request of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation to inform Region I of the proposed amendments to the Management Analysis Corporation Phase IV Report and to provide an interim assessment of the licensee hardware re-verification efforts.
The meeting was three hours in duration.
8503220404 850305 PDR ADOCK 050004l0 P.DR
. (
DETAILS 1.
Attendees Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration C.
G.
Beckham, Quality Assurance Manager, NMPC (MAC)
W. J.
Donlon, President, NMPC B.
G. Hooten, Executive Director Nuclear Operations, NMPC (MAC)
C.
V. Mangan, Vice President Nuclear Engineering, NMPC J. Norris, Independent Assessment Project Manager, MAC J. A. Perry, Director of Quality Assurance, NMPC (MAC)
D. L. Quamme, Project Director, NMPC (MAC)
G. Warner, Independent Assessment Project Leader, MAC U.S. Nuclear Re ulator Commission NRC J.
M. Allan, Deputy Region Administrator, Region I E. Blackwood, Executive Coordinator Regional Operations Office S. J. Collins, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, Region I S.
D. Ebneter, Director, Division of Reactor Safety R. A. Gramm, Senior Resident Inspector NMP-2, Region I T. Murley, Regional Administrator, Region I R.
W. Starostecki, Director, Division of Reactor Projects 2. N~
An outline was presented regarding the conduct of the Management Analysis Corporation (MAC) corrective action assessment review in response to the Construction Appraisal Team (CAT) inspection enforcement action.
The work effort occurred in four distinct phases.
Phase I covered the deficiencies identified during the CAT inspection; Phase II covered the most recent Region I Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance; Phase III involved Niagara Mohawk deficiencies; and Phase IV was devoted to contractor identi-fied deficiencies.
The final report which summarized the MAC findings for all phases of the work scope was recently provided to Region I.
Several amendments, were proposed to the final report.
Region I acknowledged the amendments and recommended that they be amended via letter to the report in lieu of text revision.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) presented a preliminary analysis of the MAC findings.
The study found that over 96% of the site deficiency documents that were sampled, were satisfactorily resolved.
The analysis indicated to the licensee that the problems are primarily historical in nature and are not reflective of current work activities.
The licensee committed to provide to Region I a formal response by March 29, 1985 that will address all the MAC findings and recommendations.
Region I indicated that NMPC needed to additionally address the group of ITT-Grinnell Welding NDE documents that failed the MAC tightened sampling revie V
~
The licensee presented an interim status of the si te hardware re-ver ifica-tion inspections conducted to date.
The status report indicated the ma-Jority of the deficiencies will be dispositioned
"accept-as-is" by engi-neering.
The licensee stated that generic specification and FSAR revis-ions were to be implemented to relax certain inspection criteria.
The licensee further stated that the data indicate the necessity to conduct thorough walk down inspections at turnover.
Region I. stated that generic specification changes will be closely re-viewed to assure the adequacy of technical requirements for inspection and installation.
Region I will require assurance that the hardware sampling has adequately defined the worst case deficiencies for engineering review and that current gC efforts are to be monitored to ensure adherence to current requirements.
Region I indicated that no further review is expected of the MAC generated documents generated during the corrective action assessment.
At the close of the meeting, Region I informed the licensee that a further meeting on the final resolutions of the licensee hardware re-verification program would be necessar lt
~