IR 05000400/1980026
| ML18017B318 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/1981 |
| From: | Bryant J, Maxwell G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B315 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-80-26, 50-401-80-24, 50-402-80-24, 50-403-80-24, NUDOCS 8102040096 | |
| Download: ML18017B318 (8) | |
Text
~PR RK0Ij
+**++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 400/80-26, 401/80-24, 402/80-24 and 403/80-24 Licensee:
Carolina Power 5 Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Facility: Shearon Harris Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402 and 50-403 License Nos.
CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160 and CPPR-161 Inspection at Shearon Harris site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspector:.
(.. i'..;.r. i.
G. F.Mxw
/
Approved by:J.'.
Brya t, Secti'on C ref, R 8ES Branc SUMMARY Date Signe Date Signe Inspection on November 1, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine resident inspection involved 94 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of licensee identified items; concrete; lakes and dams; equipment storage; and welding.
Results Of the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in two areas; two violations were found in two areas (violation-failure to follow procedure, paragraph 6.b and violation-failure to store equipment in accordance with instructions to prevent damage or deterioration, paragraph 7.b).
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- P.
W.
Howe, Vice President, Technical Services
- N. J. Chiangi, Manager, Engineering and Construction gA
- R. M. Parsons, Site Manager
- A. M. Lucas, Sr., Resident Engineer
- G. L. Forehand, Principal gA Specialist G.
M. Simpson, Principal Construction Specialist
- E. Kelly, Senior gA Specialist Other licensee employees contacted included 17 construction craftsmen,
technicians, 5 mechanics, and 14 office personnel.
Other Organizations
- J.
G.
Reyes, USNRC visitor
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 26, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Finding Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Licensee Identified Items a 0 b.
c ~
(Closed)
Ommission of rebar; reactor auxiliary building south shear wall, 401/79-23-02.
Based on RII review of correspondence sent by CPSL and subsequent inspections and reviews by RII and CP8L letter to RII dated June 9,
1980.
This item is considered closed.
(Closed)
Omission of rebar in the exterior wall of Unit 1 containment building, 400/80-11-02.
Based on RII review of correspondence sent by CPSL and subsequent inspections and reviews by RII and CPSL letter to RII dated June 30, 1980.
This item is considered closed.
(Open)
Ommission of rebar in the reactor auxiliary building 400/80-16-01.
A review of meetings, correspondence relative to this item, and observation of current site rebar inspection practices has
been made.
However, a final evaluation will be withheld pending receipt, review and acceptance by RII of CP8L's final report.
This item remains open.
6.
Concrete, Lakes, and Dams - Units 1-4 a ~
b.
Observed portions of concrete placements being made in:
Unit 1 reactor common building (pours numbered 1ACSL28018 5 1ACSL28019).
Also observed the west auxiliary dam spillway (pour number WADST131), Unit 1 reactor auxiliary building (pours numbered 1 RASL-286003,
RAXW257010,
RAXW282005, 1 RASL236002).
Observed portions of the installed reinforcement steel for pours numbered 1RAXW282005 and 1 RAXW271009.
Placement of concrete was continiously monitored by inspection personnel.
Placement activities pretaining to delivery time, free fall, flow distance, consolidation and testing conformed to specification requirements; except as detailed below.
Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector appear in the'SAR Section 5,
EBASCO Specification CAR-SH-CH-6, CP8L procedures gCI-13.3, WP-5.
Observed that four concrete cylinders, which were sampled as required by gCI-13.3, Revision 1, Paragraph 5, for pour number 1 RAXW257010, were not maintained within the required temperature parameters of ASTM C-31 for the first 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of curing time (60 F-80 F).
The inspector informed the responsible CP8L gA inspection and management of this condition.
As a result, a nonconformance report was written to document the specific unsatisfactory condition (NCR C-373).
CPSL gA inspectors and test technicians were instructed to use designated curing boxes for the initial curing of concrete test specimens and re-instructed on the proper method of testing and curing of concrete test specimens.
Informed CPSL management personnel that failure to control the curing of concrete cylinders in accordance with prescribed instructions is contra'ry to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10CFR50, as implemented by CPSL's PSAR Section 1.8.5.5, CP5L's Corporate gA Program, Part I, Section 6.2.2 and Construction gA procedure gCI-13.3, Revision 1, Paragraph 5.
This is a violation; Failure to follow procedure (400/80-26-01).
However, since sufficient corrective action has been taken to correct the one instance where the procedure was not being complied with and responsible inspection personnel have been reminded of procedural requirements, a written response will not be required for this item.
c ~
Observed in-process work on the main dam diversionary piping.
CPEL has conducted a proto-type test on the technique that will be applied to plug the two diversionary pipes which are currently preventing the build-up of water in the main dam.
The technique involved placing gate type forms inside the two ten foot pipes and pumping concrete and into the pipes for a span of about one hundred and ten feet (reference EBASCO drawing CAR-2167-G-6232).
Except as noted, no violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
7.
Equipment Storage Units 1-4 a ~
b.
Toured all of the warehouses which contain safety related valves, pumps, motors and electrical equipment.
Observed the general storage conditions of the various equipment; i.e. - location, identification, temperature control, humidity, cleanliness, material control.
Observed the stored conditions of the reactor vessels for Units 2, 3 and 4.
Observed a Unit 1 feed water isolation valve FW-V-28 serial number 58827 stored outside and unprotected from the environment.
The safety-related valve displayed an inspection status tag indicating that the valve was supposed to be stored in accordance with ANSI N45.2.2 as Level C storage.
Further inquiry revealed that the valve should have been stored in accordance with ANSI N45.2.2 as Level B storage not Level C.
However, in either case the valve was not protected from the environment as required by CP&L procedure AP-XIII-05, Paragraph 3.3.3 or 3.3.4.
Informed CP&L management personnel of this unsatisfactory condition.
As a result, CP&L gA documented the condition on a
nonconformance report (NCR M-057).
Immediate corrective action was taken to adequately protect the aforementioned valve.
CP&L conducted a
meeting with site personnel who are responsible for inspection and maintenance of valves and piping spool pieces.
During this reporting period, subsequent to the CP&L meeting, the inspector observed no instances where valves were not being adequately stored and protected from the environment.
Informed CP&L management personnel that failure to store safety related equipment in accordance with established instructions is contrary to Criterion XIII of Appendix B to 10CFR50, as implemented by CP&L's PSAR Section 1.8.5. 13, CP&L's Corporate gA Program Part I, Section 6.2.5 and construction administrative procedure AP-XIII-05, Paragraph 3.3.2.
This is a violation; Failure to store equipment in accordance with instructions to prevent damage or deterioration (400/80-26-02).
However, since sufficient corrective action was taken to resolve the one unsatisfactory condition identified and CP&L is conducting closer coordination between those responsible for maintenance and those who requisition materials; a written response will not be required for this item.
Except as noted, no violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
8.
Welding - Unit 1 a
~
Selected ten drawings which were being used in containment building, Unit 1 for erection of steel.
Compared the drawings with the latest CP&L lists for control documents; the ten drawings were found to be current revision b.
Observed welding in process and examined the fit-up of six socket welds; 1-SW-106FW 324, 1-SM-106FM 323, 1-SW-106FW322, 1-SM-103FM313 1-SW-103FW312 and 1-SW-103FW311.
The code applicable to the welding was ASME Section III, Class 3.
The in-process welding was in accordance with the applicable welding procedure; 181, Revision 3.
Observed the responsible Ag welding inspection personnel conducting inspections in accordance with QCI-19.1 and MP-06, Appendix D.
The welds were conducted by welding personnel who had current qualifications for the processes being applied.
C.
Observed burning and welding at four locations throughout the plant; portable fire extinguishers were located in the proximity of the affected work areas.
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie '