IR 05000400/1980008
| ML18017B081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/1980 |
| From: | Mcfarland C, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B079 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-80-08, 50-400-80-8, NUDOCS 8005210114 | |
| Download: ML18017B081 (8) | |
Text
E'S REoy
~40
~o Oy J
0O I
C
gO
+a*++
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION II
101 INARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 APR 4880 Report No. 50-400/80-08 Licensee:
Carolina Power 8 Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-400 Iicense No.
CPPR-158 IJ Inspection at S
aron Harris site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspector:
C. R.
McFa land Date I
Approved by:
J. K. Ra 'sch, Acting Sect on Ch f, RC S Branch Da e SUMMARY Inspection on March 19-21, 1980 Areas Inspected Signed S gned This routine, unannounced inspection involved 23 inspector hours on site in the areas of reactor vessel installation, safety-related components installation, and concrete placement.
Results Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'
8 oog210114
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees W. Kincaid, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering
+P.
W. Howe, Vice President, Technical Services
>"T. H. Wyllie, Senior Construction Manager, Nuclear Construction
>R.
M. Parsons, Site Manager
+A. M. Iucas, Senior Resident Engineer M. W. Pritchett, Senior Construction Specialist-G.
M. Simpson, Principal Construction Specialist - Inspection S. Radford, NSSS Coordinating Area Engineer G. L. Forehand, Principal Site QA Specialist
+D. C. Whitehead, Senior QA Specialist, Material Control G. Daniel, QA Technician, Mechanical Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, QA technicians, and QA specialists.
Other Organizations J. Poythress, General Superintendent, Daniel Construction Co.
(DCC)
+T. Glennon, Project Manager - Harris, Rigging'International (RI)
- W. F. Hirth, Chief Engineer, RI E. Wilkins, Project Manager, RI
- J. Iavering, Project Engineer, RI-R. F. Kempker, QA Engineer, RI
+Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized with those persons indi-cated in Paragraph 1 above on March 21, 1980.
3.
Iicensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.
A new unresolved item was identified during this inspection and is discussed in Paragraph C
il 5.
Independent Inspection The inspector observed the preplacement cleaning of the Tank Building area for the structural concrete foundation and supports for the refueling water storage tank.
The work area was protected from rain and the cleaning operations were being conducted with reasonable care and diligence.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Reactor Vessel Installation The inspector talked to the COL and RI staff about the subject and reviewed work procedures (WP), construction quality control (CQC) procedures, construc-tion quality assurance (CQA) procedures and technical procedures (TP) used by CPRL and the work procedures used by RI for the work involved with the transporting the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) from the storage yard to the containment vessel.
The inspector observed the work in progress for rig-ging the lifting device for placing the RPV on the crawler transporter and the final assembly of the heavy liftderrick, the Carolina Giant, that will be used for placing the RPV into the containment building.
Due to the status of work the CPGL QA work has been limited to reviewing procedures and observing the assembly of the rigging and lifting equipment.
The NRC RII inspector did review the exchange of correspondence between CPM and RI relative to CPSL comments on the RI work procedures.
The RI work procedures include an inspection plan and checklist items that are to be inspected by the RI QA engineer.
The inspector did review the signed checklist for assembly of the Carolina Giant with the RI QA engineer and staff.
The following documents were reviewed:
CPK WP-06 Inspection and Testing of Hoisting Equipment and Rigging Used in WP-07 "Special Lifts" CPSL WP-07 CP&L WP"21 COL WP-119 CPM WP-121 CPM TP-28 RI 960"10 Large Vessel and Equipment Offloading Inspection of Equipment 8 Rigging for General Lifting Reactor Vessel Setting Installation of Reactor Vessel Insulation Inspection of Equipment for Setting and Grouting Instructions for Lifting the RPV from Storage and Placing it on the Crawler Transporter
-3-RI 960-12 Instructions for Unpending, Iifting and Placing the RPV
'at the Containment Building RI Drawings 960-010, 050, 101, 120, 151, 375, 380, 385 and 700 CPGL CQC-5 Hoisting 8 Lifting Equipment control
COL CQA-5 CPM CQA-12 Document Reviews Mechanical Equipment'nstallation Monitoring COL CQA-20 Surveillance of Contractor Welding and Related activities CPSL QAP-10.3 NRC RG 1.38 Contractor Audits QA Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving Storage and Handling Items for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.2 Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage and Handling Items for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI B30.2.0 Safety Code for Overhead and Gantry Cranes ANSI B30.5 Safety Code for Crawler, Iocomotive, and Truck Cranes ANSI B30.6
'afety Code for Derricks The review of the above documents and discussions with the CPSL and RI staff indicates that CQA appears to need a procedure for the surveillance of contractors on-site work on Q-list items.
CQA-20 provides such a proce-dure for contractor welding work by Chicago Bridge and Iron Company and CP&L appears to need a general CQA for other contractors such as RI, or a series of CQA's for each contractor performing onsite work.
The procedure and checklist should address the requiiements in the utilities committments to the NRC including the QA program and the referenced Regulatory Guides (RG) and ANSI standards.
This item/concern will be unresolved item 400/80-08-01, Contractor Surveillance Procedure.
The review of CQC-5 indicates that the COL staff performs surveillance of hoisting equipment and rigging as described in WP-06 and WP-21 and that CQA recognizes a need to revise CQC-5 to add WP-06 and WP-07 with appendices one through ten.
This is identified as inspector followup item 400/80-08-02, Surveillance of Hoisting and Lifting Equipment.
The review of CQA-12 and TP-28 indicates that the CPM, QA staff routinely designate hold points for certain lifting and inspection operations identi-fied in TP-28.
The method used to determine the QA hold points is to be
reviewed by the inspector at a subsequent inspector.
This is identified as inspector followup item 400/80-08-03, QA Inspection Holdpoii'its.
The review of WP-119 indicates a need for acceptance criteria for surface contact in section 4.16 and axis orientation in section 4.17.. CPM. has planned to revise the procedure and will include these items in their current plans 'to revise WP-119.
This is identified as inspector followups item 400/80-08-04, RU Setting Acceptance Criteria.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
Safety-Related Components The inspector talked to the CPSL and RI staff about the subject and reviewed the WP's, CgC's, CgA's and TP's to be used by CPRI, and RI for the work involved in transporting the steam generators (SG) and the pressurizer (PRZ) from the storage yard (SY) to the containment building (CB).
No work on these items was in process at the time of the inspection, however the lifting device for placing the SG's and PRZ on the crawler and the heavy liftderrick to be used for placing these items into the containment building are the same devices that are to be used for transporting and lifting the RPU as discussed above in Paragraph 6.
The following documents were reviewed (in addition to those listed in Paragraph 6,
as applicable to SG's and the PRZ):
CPM WP-120 CPM WP-121 RI 960-15 Setting the Steam Generators Pressurizer Setting Instructions for Iifting the SG from the SY and placing It on the Crawler Transporter (CT)
RI 960<<16 RI 960-17 Instructions for Securing the SG to the CT and Trans-porting it from the SY to the area of the'Power Block where the load will be lifted from the CT Instructions for Unpending, Lifting and Placing the SG at the CB RI 960-20 Instructions for lifting the PRZ from the SY and placing it on the CT RI 960-21 Instructions for Securing the PRZ to the CT, and Trans-porting from the SY to the area of the Power Block where the load will be lifted from the CT
RI 960-22 Instructions for Unpending, Lifting and Placing the PRZ at the CB No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie y
~