IR 05000395/1990003
| ML20006G098 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1990 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20006G096 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-90-03, 50-395-90-3, NUDOCS 9003050042 | |
| Download: ML20006G098 (7) | |
Text
4
,
-
~. - - - -
.
.
-
o
- .t
- ,
,
,.,. (:.[ ~.
g>dCECod -
UNITED STATES p
%,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICM
"
SfI:
c f YA
'
REGION il
-
.
_
- 101 MARIETT A STRE ET. N.W.
"
I
&
ATLANT A. GEORGI A 30323.
x..... ;-
-
-
Report No.:50-395/90-03 Licensee: Stath Carolina Electric & Gas Company Columbia, SC 29218 Docket No.: 50-395 License'No.: NPF-12
' '
,
Facility Name: Summer Inspection Conducted: January 22-26, 1990 l
Inspector:
$
Wm, W-A - 7 " 10 J. R. Harris
~
Date Signed-Approved by:_
[;
ec -
S 7 -- f o-J T. E. Conlon, Chief Date Signed Plant Systems Section 1,
Engineering firanch
.
Division of Reactor Safety
'
SUMMARY
,
LScope:
This -. routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the -areas of' fire
'
' protection and followup of repair work on the Jockey Pump and the Integrated-L Fire' Computer system which receives an alarm when a fire occurs.
This was a.
L concern during an inspection conducted February 1-5, 1988.
-Results:
,
In the areas-inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.
<
During-this inspection, the licensee-was very cooperative in providing the
, ?-
inspector with applicable procedures, records and walkdown inspection of fire
. protection equipment and response.to previously identified items.
No
...l-weaknesses were identified during this inspection.
,
i i
'
I
- 9 gg*$8ci!MShY D Q
.
.
..
P
-. -
-
,
.
,
.
!
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- H. Donnely, Senior Engineer, Regulatory Interface
- G. Gibsoti, Manager, Nuclear Protection Services
- J. Parks, Fire Protection Supervisor
',
- H. Plemmons, Fire Protection Specialist
- W. Safely, Fire Protection system Engineer
- J. Skolds, General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations.
t
- M. Williams,' General Manager, Administrative and Support Services NRC Resident Inspector
- Leo Modenos
- Attended exit interview 2.
FireProtection/PreventionProgram(64704)
a.
The inspector reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative Procedures:
FPP-001, Fire Protection Monthly Valve Lineup Verification FPP-002, Fire Report, Revision 6, March 5, 1989 FPP-003, Control of Transient Combustibles, Revision 7, March 1989 FPP-004, Duties of Firewatch, Revisior. 7, April 6,1989 FPP-005, 8 urn Permit, Revision 7 June 7, 1989 FPP-006, Handling of Flammable Liquids and Gases, Revision 6, December 21, 1989 FPP-010, Fire Barrier Removal, Revision 4,1988 FPP-015, Fire Protection Procedure Shift Inspection, Revision 2, November 3, 1989 SAP-131, Fire Protection Program, Revision 4, December 21, 1989 Based on this review, it appears that the-above procedures meet the NRC guidelines of the document entitled, " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative Controls and
.
Quality Assurance," dated June 1977, b.
Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System
,
Surveillance Procedures:
'
STP-128.002, Fire Protection Monthly Valve Lineup Protection STP-128.011, Yard Hydrant Hose House Inspection
_
'
- w
.
..
,
if
-
.
.
.-
E STP-128.015, Fire Hose Station Three Year Inspection STP-128.019, Semi Annual Fire Door Inspection STP-128.021, Fire Service. Annual Flow Test q
STP-128.303, Auxiliary Building Pre-Action Sprinkler Operation Test s
STP-170.001, Electric Fire Pump Weekly-Test STP-170.003, Fire-Service Valve Operability Test-STP-428.060, Ventilation Fire Damper Inspection
The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement the surveillance requirements of the plant Fire Protection
-
Technical Specifications.
In addition, these procedures were r
reviewed to determine if they followed' NRC fire protection
[
guidelines.
c.
Fire P_rotection System Surveillance Inspection and Tests The inspector reviewed the following surveillance inspections and test records for the dates indicated:
STP-128.003, Fire System Annual Valve Flow Test, February 13, 1984
'
STP-128.004, Monthly Fire Hose Station-Inspection, October 6, 1989, November 5, 1989, December 4, 1989 and January 5,1990 Co System Valve Lineup Verification 31 Day STP-128.001, r
Surveillance, August 14, 1984, September 15, 1989,
<
October 10, 1989, November 5, 1989, December 4, 1989,
January 5, 1990 STP 128.019, Annual Fire Door Inspection, July 24, 1989 STP-128.021, Fire Service Annual Flow-Test, November 18, 1988
-
[-
STP-128.023, Three Year Air Flow Deluge Sprinkler Test, October 15 1988 STP-128.303, Auxiliary Building Pre-action Sprinkler Operation Test, Every Six Months, February 14, 1989, August 15, 1989 i
STP-128.050, Intermediate Building Elevation 412 Fire Barrier Inspection, Every 18 months, December 9, 1988 i
- y
!
.
.
'
p f
<
The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance test inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the requirements of the plant's fire protection program, d.
Fire Protection Audits The most recent audit reports of the V. C. Summer fire protection program were reviewed. These audits were:
Annual Fire Protection Audit No. II 19-88J conducted July 11-15, 1988 Triennial Fire Protection Audit No. II-14-89-J conducted July 10-14, 1989
'
These audits identified several Fire Protection discrepancies and
-
recommended improvements.
The corrective actions associated with these audit findings have been implemented or a date of completion has been scheduled.
e.
Fire Brigrade (1) Organization The total station fire brigade is composed of approximately 80 employees from the operations and maintenance staffs.
The on duty shift fire brigade leader is one of the reactor operators and the remaining four brigade members are composed of reactor operators and maintenance personnel. The inspector reviewed the on duty shifts for January 17 to January 23 and verified that sufficient qualified fire personnel were on duty to meet the requirements of the station administrative procedure SAP-131A.
}
(2) The-inspector reviewed the training and drill records for all the brigade members from the first quarter of 1989 through the fourth quarter of 1989.
Based on this review, it appeared that the brigade members had received the required training.
3.
Fire Protection Preplan The inspector reviewed the following plant Fire Protection Preplans:
FPP-050 Intermediate and Diesel Generator Building, Elevations 412, 427, 436, Fire Area Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Revision 0, November 11, 1988 FPP-051, Auxiliary Suilding, Elevations 374, 385, 388, 412, and 436, Fire Area AB-11, Revision 0, January 26, 1989
,
-
l t
.
[
'
.
I
,
,
FPP-053 Control Building Elevations 412, 436, 448 and 463. Fire Zones CB-1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9,10 and 12, Revision 0, January 27, 1989 t
FPP-054, Service Water Circulation Water Pump House, Fire Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Revision 0, January 2, 1989
'
Based on this review, the inspector determined that the above fire protection preplans adequately addressed the fire hazards in these areas.
'
4.
Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced fire drill.
The drill scenario was a fire in the main feedwater pum) in the turbine building.
The probable cause of the fire was a flammable liquid fire on the main feedwater pump.
.
.
Fifteen fire brigade members responded to the fire in the turbine building.
The brigade assembled adjacent to the area in full protective
'
fire fighting turnout clothing and self contained breathing apparatus. An initial size up of the fire condition was made by the brigade leader.
Three hose lines and a foam cart were used to suppress the fire. The fire was placed under control in 18 minutes.
The fire brigade utilized proper manual fire fighting methods and reacted to the drill scenario in an effective and efficient manner.
5.
Plant Tour and inspection of Fire Protection Equipment (1) The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equipment consisting of fire hoses, nozzles, tools ad miscellaneous equipment stored at the fire brigade equipment response locations on Elevation 436 of the turbine building and Elevation 412 of the control building.
A total of 10 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots helmets, etc.), five sets of self-contained breathing apparatus and 10 spare air cylinders are stored at the response center in the turbine building and five sets of self-contained breathing apparatus are stored at the control building response location.
(2) Outside Fire Protection Walkdown The inspector verifed that the two separate fire pump suction intake structures from the lake were in service and met the requirements of the technical specifications.
The two fire pumps were inspected and found to be in service.
The diesel fuel tank for the diesel driven
>
fire pump was full of fuel which met the requirements of the technical specifications, b
-
L
-
,
f
- '
.
,-
,
'
-
l The following sectional control valves in the outside fire protection water supply system were inspected and verified to be properly aligned and locked in position:
XVG-4014-FS, Fire Pump A&B Discharge Isolation Valve XVG-4013-FS, Fire Pump A&B Discharge Isolation Valve XVG-6947-FS, Yard Fire Hydrant INFS Supp y Valve XVG-6948-FS, Yard Fire Hydrant INFS Supp y Valve XVG-4073-FS, Yard Fire Hydrant INFS Supp y Valve XVG-4001-FS, Yard Fire Hydrant INFS Supp y Valve XVG-4020-FS, Yard Fire Hydrant INFS Supply Valve
'
r The following Fire Hydrants and fire hydrant equipment houses were inspected:
.
Hydrant Hose House - 1 Hydrant Hose House - 5
Hydrant Hose House - 2 Hydrant Hose House - 6 Hydrant Hose House - 3 Hydrant Hose House - 7 Hydrant Hose House - 4 Hydrant Hose House - 15 The equipment houses contained the required equipment as specified by NRF A-24, private fire service mains and the FSAR conunitments.
(3) Permanent Plant Fire Protection Features A plant tonr was made by the inspector.
During the plant tour, the i
following safe shutdown related plant areas and their related fire protection features were inspected:
Intermediate building, Elevations 412, 423, 436, 451, 463, and 476 Diesel generator building, Elevations 400, 427 and 436
,
Auxiliary building, Elevations 374, 397, 412 436, 463, 474 and 485 Fuel handling building, Elevations 436 and 463 Control building, Elevations 400, 412, 425 and 463 Service water pump house, Elevations 425, 436 and 441
\\
The fire / smoke detection system manual fire fighting equipment (i.e.,
J portable extinguishers hose stations) and the fire area boundary walls, floors, and ceilings associated with the above plant areas were inspected and found to be in service.
,
Durina an inspection conducted February 1-5, 1988, the Jockey Pump and the Integrated Fire Computer System which receives an alarm when a fire occurs were not in service.
During this inspection, the inspector verified the jockey pump was returned to service on April 25, 1988, and that the Integrated Fire Computer System was returned to service on May 6, 198 i
,
_
i
'
M.*
.
f
.
.-
i.-
6.
Exit Interview L
'
The inspection scope and results were summarized on January 26, 1990, with
. those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspector described the areas inspected ~ and discussed in detail the inspection results..The licensee
. did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided or reviewed E
by the inspector during this' inspection, l.
l-I f-;
.
L P I
.
.-
-
y
-
.
,.
-
,,,a--
..,i-.---,,
,
.,-e,.--
-
-
-.-