IR 05000387/1982024

IE Insp Rept 50-387/82-24 on 820706-09.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness Program, Selective Exam of Procedures & Representative Records, Interviews W/Personnel & Observations by Inspector

ML20062F780
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	07/22/1982
From:	Crocker H, Sakenas C, Rich Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062F774	List: IR 05000387/1982024 ML20062F772
References
50-387-82-24, NUDOCS 8208120140
Download: ML20062F780 (6)

Text

. .

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 1 Report No. 50-387/82-24 Docket No. 50-387 License No. CPPR-101 Priority --

Category B-1 Licensee: Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 28202 Facility Name: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Inspection At: Berwick, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: July 6-9, 1982 Inspectors: #M -MA-C. Kak(nas, Radiation jibecialist

'/

dater" P ')

W n

//

SYf5 dat6 R. Smith,RadiaTionpecialist Approved by: , t H. W. Crocker,M hief, Emergency 7 F2/Ddat6 Preparedness Section, DEPOS, RI Inspection Summary: Inspection on July 6-9, 1982 (Report No. 50-387/82-24)

Areas Inspected: Special announced inspection follow-up of significant-findings from appraisal of the applicant's emergency preparedness program performed on April 12-22, 1982 and discussed in a comfirmatory action letter dated May 24, 198 The inspection involved 74 inspection hours by two regionally based NRC inspector Results: Of the items addrassed in Appendix A to NRC Report Number 50-387/82-12, all but one were closed out at the time of the inspection, with the remaining item closed out bythe NRC resident inspector.

8208120140 820727 PDR ADOCK 05000307 G PDR

. .

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Butler, I&C Supervisor Cantone, Manager, Nuclear Support Doebler, Chemistry Supervisor Miller, Radiological and Environmental Services Supervisor Rosykowski, Emergency Planning Supervisor Thompson, Assistant Superintendent Wike, Supervisor, Emergency Planning 2. General During the period of April 12-22, 1982, the NRC conducted an appraisal of the state of emergency preparedness for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. As a result of this appraisal, the NRC identified nine items requiring resolution in order for the applicant to achieve an adequate state of emergency preparednes These findings were documented in a letter to the applicant dated May 24, 198 In a letter to the NRC dated June 14, 1982, the applicant committed to complete all nine items prior to fuel load. The purpose of this inspection was to review the status of the applicant's actions in relation to resolving these items prior to fuel loa . Applicant Action on Previous Inspection Findings (50-387/82-12) (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 1)

Revise the list of alternate EOF Support Managers to include personnel at levels of management who can meet the EOF Recovery Manager Qualifi-

'

cations, and provide the required training to those individual (50-387/82-12-03)

The inspectors verified that the two individuals selected as alternate EOF Support Managers meet the criteria established in procedure ND1-QA-10.8.1 and received all training required of the EOF Support Manage This item is close (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 7)

Complete all Emergency Preparedness Implementing Procedures, including management review and approval (50-387/82-12-29).

The inspectors verified that all Emergency Preparedness Implementing Procedures were reviewed by the PORC and issue This item is close . - . . ~

. .

, (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 3)

,'

Complete all required training for emergency response personnel in the applicable implementing procedures as listed in the training matri (50-387/82-12-06)

'

The inspectors verified that all trainirig specified in the training matrix as required was completed for each functional area identified

> during the appraisa This item is close (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 2)

!

Demonstrate by unannounced drills that the additional specified persons in the proposed staffing plan can be onsite in about 30 or 60 minutes after initial notificatio Records must be kept for these drills.

,

(50-387/82-12-05)

The inspectors reviewed records notification of completed drills for

'

TSC personnel. All personnel could respond within 30-60 minutes of notificatio This item is close (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 8a)

'

Revise the Implementing Instructions to clearly indicate to the Emergency Director his responsibility for making initial offsite protective action recommendation (50-387/82-12-33)

The inspectors verified that procedure EP-IP-002 was revised include the Emergency Director's responsibility to make offsite protective act >n recommendation This item is closed.

i (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 8b)

J

'

Develop EAls corresponding to the PAGs cited in EP-IP-033 for use by

the Emergency Director, incorporating the relationship between contain-ment monitor readings and offsite projected dose rate (50-387/82-12-34)

The inspectors verified that EAls were developed for the specific initiating conditions identified during the appraisal.

> This item is close l l

l

!

!

.- _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ __ - I

. .

g. (Closed) (Appendix. A, Item 9b)

Prepare initial offsite notification messages, to include protective action recommendations which are. based on current and projected plant conditions (that is, core inventory, as well as radiological dose projections). (50-387/82-12-38)

The inspectors verified that procedures were provided for these action This item is closed, h. (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 8c)

Provide for making protective action recommendations based on current and projected plant status as evidenced from control room instrumentation prior to an imminent releas (50-387/82-12-35)

The inspectors verified that procedures were provided for making the protective recommendation The item is close l 1. (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 5)

Complete the installation, testing, and calibration of the post-accident sampling syste (50-387/82-12-12)

The inspectors examined the installation of the post-accident sampling system (PASS) and noted that all components were installed. The inspectors reviewed records of calibration of the installed components and a functional test of the system and determined them to be adequat The inspectors reviewed training records of chemistry personnel in procedures EPIP-043, 045, 046, 047 and verified that training was completed as require This item is close j. (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 4)

Ensure that all emergency equipment, supplies, kits, and facilities I used by emergency response personnel and emergency response teams are completed, stocked, and available at the proper location (50-387/82-12-09,19,21,22,27)

The inspectors noted that all emergency equipment and supplies were available at the proper location This item is close _ - - - - - - . - - .

. .

k. (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 6)

, Complete the installation and testing of the public prompt notification

! system. The test shall be an integrated " operability" test of the installed systems and shall be activated from the location specified in the emergency procedures. The test is intended to confirm that the integrated system can operate properly upon activatio Results of the test shall be documente (50-387/82-12-28)

'

The inspectors verified that installation and testing of the public

prompt notification system was completed by the applicant through

direct observation of about 15% of the installed sirens and operability test records.

i The applicant stated that the system was designed to provide an alert tone to the population within a ten mile Emergency Planning zone, followed by an Emergency Broadcast System message activated by either Luzerne County Civil Defense or Columbia County Emergency Management Agenc The applicant stated that a booklet explaining the system and

,

actions to be taken by residents would be distributed by PEMA before September, 198 .

l The applicant determined through a phone verification survey, sampling j residents within five miles of the site, and remote area observation

! by PP&L employees during the full scale test that the system coverage j was 92% and that municipal plans included specific means to assure i complete coverage. Schools, nursing homes, and hospitals would be notified at the alert stage and industries at the Site Emergency by ,

phone from the county EO The inspectors reviewed draft procedure 001-399, addressing testing and maintenance of sirens, and noted that a silent test would be conducted bi-weekly and a growl test would be performed quarterly.

.

Based on the above information this item is close . (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 9a)

,

Complete the purchase, testing, and distribution of the pagers which

,

will be used for staff augmentation. (50-387/82-12-37)

!

'

The inspectors verified that the pager system was in place and operabl This item is closed.

l m. (Closed) (Appendix A, Item 8d)

Revise the Emergency Plan to reflect the revisions of EPIP-00 (50-387/82-12-36)

i j

'

_ _ . _ _ _ . - _ , . _ _ ,. . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ .- _ , _ _ _ . _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . - _ . _ -

. .

The inspectors verified that the revisions to EPIP-001 are being reflected in the current revision to the Emergency Plan (Revision 6)

which is in preparatio This item is close . Exit Interview The inspectors met with the applicant representatives (denoted in Detail 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on July 9, 198 The inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.

l

. . - . - _ . . _ . _-