ML20247K669

Partially Withheld Notice of Violation Resulting from Investigation to Determine Whether Willful Matl False Statement Was Made in Physical Security Plan (Ref 10CFR2.790(a))

ML20247K669
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	05/19/1989
From:	Knapp M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19064A265	List: ML20247K669
References
EA-89-076, EA-89-76, NUDOCS 8906010359
Download: ML20247K669 (3)

Text

n,unwesuttuq %

~ -~

~

~~

k:. 2 & g /&Jis

' $0 ' p L

(acc) pd:e.n.wrP f a yke;psseui D 19-R9

'+c (ORGA!UZAUCS)

,, (Did2) ;. -~

L NOTICE OF VIOLATION y

L-Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Docket Nos. 50-3e7 50-388 Susquehanna Units 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-14; NPF-22 EA 89-76 As a ' result of an investigation conducted by the NRC Office of Investigations, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the " General Statementof Policy and Procedure for.NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, 53 Fed. Reg. 40019 (October 13,1988), the violations are set forth below:

A.

License Condition 2.0 to Facility Operating Licenses NPF-14 and NPF-22, requires the licensee to implement fully and maintain all provisions of the NRC-approv'ed Physical Security Plan.

N S P!OE0?llll [21[hp]$ gj,rg y gg_

I?!F0Elii;;,3 gg jg g 7g UIDSMiII!S lliisilaggy LEif Wn.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement III).

B.

10 CFR 50.54(p)(1) requires, in part, that the licensee may make no changes which would decrease the effectiveness of the Physical Security Plan prepared pursuant'to 10 CFR 50.34(c) without prior approval of the Commission.

E3 P!?..",0MNi (MIES 005C C IS Ci f7 r;;nggch li !S nasbE LLil E K This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement III).

8906010359 890518 PDR ADOCK 05000387 F

PDC a-____________-__--.

y 7..

Notite of Violation 2

Pursuant to the provision of.10 CFR 2.201,. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company

.is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of. Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason (s) for this violation, if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the'results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be.taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the

..date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause'shown.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Malcolm R. Knapp, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Dated t King of Prussia

.this{dayofMay1989 i

Y

g':,y, y,, e f-SYNOPSIS TEis PIIE 00Hilf!$ SAFEEUES DIO.? T C! I.D IS EST FOR Fi2G DiSCLOSEE; IT IS liiiEhTiDNAllY LEFT BLAHX.

li*