IR 05000387/1987007
| ML20205R841 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1987 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Schulingkamp C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205R800 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-378-87-07, 50-378-87-7, 50-388-87-07, 50-388-87-7, NUDOCS 8704060462 | |
| Download: ML20205R841 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:' .
- -
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-387/87-07 Report No.
50-388/87-07 50-387 Docket No.
50-388 NPF-14 License No.
NPF-22 Licensee: Pennsylvania Power and Light Company ' ___2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Facility Name: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Inspection At: Salem Township, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: March 2-6, 1987 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: _ September 15, 1986 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors: b.il _,8 bllf._.
%u?A
u., R. J. Bailey, Physical SecdVity Ins (e'ctor date a b.L i h!. $r kinu {wn 3 DV ?1 C. Schulingkainp, Physical 5fcurity Inspector
date _ _ h _ 8 /4-[[ Approved by:
f. R. Keimig, tChief, feguards Section ~ date Division of Ridiat Safety and.
Safeguards Inspection Summary: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection' on March 2-6,1987 (Combined Inspection Nos. 50-387/87-07 and 50-388/87-07F Areas Inspected: Training and Qualification and Security Contingency Plans. Programmatic Results: The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements.
i $?S*INES$$ll$7
1
. __ ... _- __ ._ .. _ _ . , DETAILS
1.
Key Persons Contacted J. A. Blakeslee, Assistant Plant Superintendent R. J. Stotler, Supervisor of Security , ( R. Hudson, Corporate Security J. Stair, NRC Senior Resident Inspector L. Plisco, NRC Resident Inspector , , The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary guard force.
2.
Independent Inspection Effort ' During this inspection, the inspectors conducted a programmatic review of .the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan , and the Security Contingency Plan. Observations concerning these plans
are as follows: a.
Physical Security Plan (PSP)
The inspectors determined that the licensee is adequately imple- ] menting the NRC-approved PSP.
Observation 1: A structure within the protected area and addressed in the PSP was not included on a referenced drawing. The security ! supervisor acknowledged this omission and stated that the structure would be included in the next revision to the drawing, f , THIS PM/fMP" CONTAINS S/JEGUARDS INF0Dr.1/,T!0N AND IS NOT TOR PUBUC DISCLO!,'JRE,liiS I ;iENT!ONALLY LEFT DLANK.
i i , i i i i ! , -., - _.,--,. --,,- -..,--- ---- -. -~. - -, _ -, -. -,.,,... - - -. , - - -..,, .. -,. ... .
_.
_- .. - . _.
-. . -. - - .
i ' < Tlil5 PARAGR.4Pl! CONTAINS SAFEGUAfiDS
INFORMATION MID IS NOT FOR PUBLIC
j DISCLOSURE,IT 15 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
,
i , a i l f! 15 A'"' !;0NTAINS SAFE'iUARDS i l INF0El.i.ON MiD IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE,IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
t ! , f b.
TrainingandQualificationPlan(T&C), i The inspectors determined that the licensee is adequately imple-i menting the NRC-approved Training and Qualification Plan.
The inspectors found that the licensee had conducted an in-house security Training Records Audit between January 26 and February 11, - 1987. The audit covered a physical review of all entries in the security training files involving crucial tasks, the crucial , security task record book, computer task tracking documents and
i individual training records. The report indicated that approxi- ! mately 45,000 entries were reviewed for accuracy. There were no ' discrepancies and/or errors which could have resulted in a security force member occupying any security position with an expired crucial task certification.
The report indicated that all administrative
errors identified were corrected, c.
Security Contingency Plan (SCP) t The inspector determined that the licensee is adequately implementing the NRC-approved Security Contingency Plan.
I ! . ,
' .! .- - -. . - - - - . ... . .. - . - m . . m. .
. _ _.
_ _ _. _ . _.. _. _ .. _ _ _... - _.. _ _ _ _... _... _..____ _.
. . ..
. '
4
- Tills PAU%F"':0NTAINS SAFEGUARDS
- _
lilFORin.I'CN "'O 15 NOT FOR PUBLIC j DISCLOSU2E,iT IS INTENT!0NALLY ,
LEFT BLANK.
' ! ! !-
' THIS PA:iAG9AP.4 (:0HTAINS SAFEGUARDS i INF0;'t.;AT!0N AH915 NOT FOR PUBllC i DISCLOSURE,lf 15 INTEN110NALLY l LEFT BLANK.
I
! !
3.
Exit Interview i j The inspectors met with licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at i the conclusion of the inspection on March 6, 1987. The purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presented.
At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the ! l licensee by the inspectors.
'
! i ? i i ! j ,
i , . ! l ! i ! ! } ' a ' .- - - - - - - . - - - - - }}