IR 05000369/1982013
| ML20053A779 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1982 |
| From: | Burnett P, Jape F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053A772 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-369-82-13, 50-370-82-07, 50-370-82-7, NUDOCS 8205270268 | |
| Download: ML20053A779 (3) | |
Text
-
- q,,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
S E
REGION 11
I 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o%g
ATLANTA, G EORGIA 30303
.....,o Report Nos. 50-369/82-13, 50-370/82-07 Licensee:
Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 Charlotte North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: McGuire Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 License Nos. NPF-9, CPPR-84
'
Inspection at McGuire site on Lake Norman, North Carolina b
Inspector: _
_'
'
_
_
Date' Signed P. T. Burnett
[L Approved by:
~
~
Date Signed
'
F. Jape, tion Chief Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on April 20-23, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 27 inspector-hours onsite.
Operational activities of Unit I were observed. Pre-operational test procedures and one completed pre-operational test package were reviewed for Unit 2.
Results No violations or deviations were identified.
8205270 &S
/
-
,
e
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- M. D. McIntosh, Station Manager
- G. W. Cage, Operations Superintendent
- W. M. Sample, Projects & Licensing Engineer
- H. B. Barron, Operations Engineer
- J. W. Boyle, Performance Engineer
- M. E. Pacetti, Station Safety Review Group
- D. B. Lamphe, Licensing Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included one shift supervisor, one assistant shift supervisor, two operators, two engineers, and two office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector P. R. Bemis, Senior Resident Inspector
- P. C. Hopkins, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 23, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
Management confirmed that reasonably firm dates for commencement of two milestone tests for Unit 2 were June 1,1982 for cold hydro and August 1,1982 for hot functional.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Unit 1 The inspector toured the control room, observed the activities of the operators and discussed the significance of lighted annuciators with them.
The activities of performance personnel engaged in obtaining a routine core flux map were observed and discussed with one of the engineers.
Following these discussions the inspector had no further questions.
t
-
,
6.
Unit 2 The following documents related to the organization and management of preoperational testing were reviewed:
-
Station Administrative Policy Manual, sections 3.2 and 4.1,
-
Station Directive 3.1.2, System / Structure Transfer Activities, Revision 12, issued 3-5-82, and
-
Station Directive 3.2.2, Preoperational Testing, Revision 3, issued 6-5-81 The procedures listed below were reviewed for conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.68, ASNI N18.7-1972 and FSAR commitments and acceptance criteria:
-
TP/2/A/1200/01, Component Cooling Functional Test, approved 3-15-82,
-
TP/2/A/1200/04A, Containment Spray System Functional Test, approved 12-21-81, and
-
TP/2/A/1200/05A, Residual Heat Removal System Functional Test, approved 11-12-81.
One < ompleted preoperational test package was reviewed for conformance to the requirements above. The package included:
-
TP/2/A/1200/03A, Upper Head Injection System Functional Test, approved 2-5-80, performed 3-5-80 to 11-12-81,
-
Eleven changes to the procedure as originally written,
-
Completed test data sheets, and
-
Test engineer's logbook The test logbook appeared to provide a complete and detailed record of test performance sequence, difficulties and resolutions. Following discussion of test changes and performance with the test engineer the inspector had no further questions.
,
l The inspector toured areas of the containment and auxiliary buildings to become familiar with the plant layout in preparation for later test-witnessing activities. In support of that effort, some plant layout l
drawings were reviewed before and after the Unit 2 tour.
i
l i
l l
l