IR 05000348/1982016
| ML20058C813 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley |
| Issue date: | 07/01/1982 |
| From: | Bradford W, Brownlee V, Peebles T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058C802 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-82-16, 50-364-82-15, NUDOCS 8207260451 | |
| Download: ML20058C813 (7) | |
Text
%
UNITED STATES g
'),
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.e o
G REGION 11 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
%,
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
Report Nos. 50-348/82-16 and 50-364/82-15 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, AL 35202 Facility Name:
Farley Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 Inspection at Farley s'te near Dothan, Alabama Inspectors:[
m WW M
[
N H Brad ord, Senior ent gppector Dat4 Signed M
.
li /YG
-
"
'
A) Peebles, Residentprispectoff
// DaYe S'igned f#s /#d[ [q Wit U
l / /fc b Approved by:
/ /
V. L. IJrownlee, Section Chief, Division of (/ Daye Signed Project and Resident Programs SUMMARY Inspection on May 17 - June 15, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine inspection involved 140 inspector-hours on site in the areas of monthly surveillance observation, monthly maintenance observation, operational safety verification, independent inspection effort, and review of routine events.
Results No violations or deviations were identified.
8207260451 820701 PDR ADOCK 05000348 G
PDR i
._
- _ _. _ _ _
_
.
__
_ _ _.
_ __
._ _
_____ _._
_
>
.
.
t
.
i i
DETAILS
.
1.
Persons Contacted l
Licensee Employees
-
W. G. Hairston, Plant Manager J. D. Woodard, Assistant Plant Manager D. Morey, Operations Superintendent
R. S. Hill, Operations Supervisor
!
W. D. Shipman, Maintenance Superintendent l
C. Nesbitt, Technical Superintendent L. Williams, Training Superintendent
.
R. G. Berryhill, Systems Performance and Planning Superintendent
{
L. A. Ward, Planning Supervisor W. C. Carr, Chemistry and Health Physics Supervisor
ti. W. Mitchell, Health Physics Supervisor R. D. Rogers, Technical Supervisor
,
i J. Odom, Operations Section Supervisor
,
i T. Esteve, Operations Section Supervisor R. Bayne, Chemistry Supervisor J. Thomas, I&C Supervisor J. Hudspeth, Document Control Supervisor
'
K. Jones, Material Supervisor R. H. Graham, Security Supervisor L. W. Enfinger, Administrative Superintendent W. G. Ware, Supervisor, Safety Audit Engineering Review i
I Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operating
,
personnel, maintenance and I&C personnel, security force members, and office personnel.
>
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized during management inter-views held throughout the reporting period with the plant manager and selected members of his staff. The licensee acknowledged the inspection
findings.
'
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
.
Licensee corrective actions for Violation 50-348/81-31-01 and 50-364/81-
-34-01, inadequate plant procedure to provide strict key control for valve locking, were reviewed and the inspector had no further questions.
,
4.
Unresolved Items
>
,
!
!
t l
,,......, _. _..,, _,-
.
-
.
. _.. -. _ _ -,.,., _ _. -. _.. _
- _.. _. _ _. _,..,.. -,, _
,.,. ~ _. _ _, _,, - _,
. -..., -,
k
-
.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Monthly Surveillance Observation The inspectors observed Technical Specification required surveillance testing and verified that testing was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, that test instrumentation was calibrated, that limiting conditions for operation were met, that test results met acceptance criteria requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
The inspector witnessed / reviewed portions of the following test activities:
FNP-2-STP-109.0 Power Range Neutron Flux Channel Calibration.
-
FNP-1-STP-150.0
-
Turbine Water Induction Protection Operability Test.
FNP-1-2-STP-1.0
-
Operations Daily and Shift Surveillance Requirement - Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4.
FNP-1-STP-27.1
-
A. C. Source Verification.
FNP-2STP-7.0
-
Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio Calibration.
FNP-1-STP-5.0
-
Full Length Rod Operability Test.
FNP-1-STP-18.6
-
Containment Mini-Purge and Exhaust Isolation Test.
FNP-2-STP-11.2
-
RHR Pump 2B Inservice Test.
FNP-0-STP-28.1
-
Diesel Generator 2C Operability Test.
FNP-1-STP-28.2
-
Diesel Generator 1B Operability Test.
FNP-2-STP-28.2
-
Diesel Generator 2B Operability Test.
FNP-1-STP-3.1
-
Borated Water %urce Operability Test - Modes 1, 2, 3, aui 4.
FNP-2-STP-62.0 -
-
Main Turbine Operability Test.
FNP-1-STP-15.0
-
Containment Air Lock Door Seal Operability Test.
FNP-1-STP-34.1
-
Containment Inspection (Post Maintenance).
FNP-1-STP-33.1
-
Safeguards Test Cabinet Train A Functional Test.
FNP-1-STP-22.16
-
Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inservice Test (Tavg 547 F).
.
.
Within the areas inspected there were no violations or deviations identi-(
fied.
6.
Monthly Maintenance Observation Station maintenance activities of safety-related systems and components were observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with approved procedures, regulatory guides and industry codes or standards and in conformance with Technical Specifications.
The following items were considered during this review:
limiting conditions for operation were met while components or systems were removed from service; approvals were obtained prior to initiating the work; activities were accomplished during approved procedures and were inspected as appli-cable; functional testing and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to service; quality control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials were properly certified; radiological controls were implemented; and fire prevention controls were implemented.
Work requests were reviewed to determine the status of outstanding jobs to assure that priority is assigned to safety-related equipment maintenance which may affect system performance.
The following maintenance activities were observed / reviewed:
a.
Diesel Generator 1B preventative maintenance.
b.
Unit No. 2 Spent Fuel Pool Modification (change out of spent fuel racks with high density racks.)
c.
Diesel Generator 1-2A preventative maintenance.
d.
Diesel Generator 2B preventative maintenance, t
e.
Rebuilding of spare charging pump in hot machine shop.
I f.
Torqueing of Diesel Generator Spider bolts.
g.
lA hydrogen recombiner.
j h.
1B service water pump, i.
Certain modifications to the fire protection system.
Within the areas inspected there were no violations or deviations identi-fied.
i
-_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..
.
7.
Operational Safety Verification The inspectors observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs and conducted discussions with control room operators during the report period. The inspectors verified the operability of selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout records and verified proper return to service of affected components. Tours of the auxiliary, diesel, turbine building and containment were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions, including potential fire hazards, fluid leaks, and excessive vibrations. The inspec-tors by observation and direct interviews verified that the physical security plan was being implemented in accordance with the station security plan.
The inspectors observed plant housekeeping / cleanliness conditions and verified implementation of radiation protection control. The inspectors walked down accessible portions of the following safety-related systems on Units 1 and 2 to verify operability and proper valve alignment:
a.
Auxiliary feedwater system (Units 1 and 2).
b.
Unit 1 and 2 component cooling.
c.
Units 1 and 2 charging / safety injection systems.
d.
Unit 1 and 2 containment spray system.
e.
Various instrument calibration and repair throughout the plants.
f.
Certain accessible hydraulic and mechanical snubbers.
g.
Units 1 and 2 service water system.
h.
Certain fire protection systems.
i.
Diesel Generators starting air, jacket water and fuel oil systems.
j.
Station electrical boards in the control room and various parts of the plant for proper electrical alignment.
k.
Portions of various other systems (safety-related and non-safety related) were observed for proper alignment and operation on various plant tours throughout the report period.
Within the areas inspected, there were no violations or deviations identi-fied.
l I
- _ - _ -- _ -- _ _--- _ _ _ __ __ - - _ -
_-_-__ _-_-- A
,
____
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
'
.
.
.
8.
Independent Inspecticn Effort The inspectors routinely attended meetings with certain licensee management and observed various shift turnovers between shift supervisors, shift foreman and licensed operators during the reporting period. These meetings and discussions provided a daily status of plant operating and testing activities in progress as well as discussion of significant problems or incidents.
9.
Review of Nonroutine Events Reported by the Licensee The following licensee event reports were reviewed for potential generic problems, to determine trends, to determine whether the information included in the report meets the NRC reporting requirements, and to consider whether the corrective action discussed in the report appears appropriate.
Licensee action with respect to selected reports were reviewed to verify that the event had been reviewed and evaluated by the licensee as required by the Technical Specification, that corrective action was taken by the licensee, and that safety limits, limiting safety settings, and limiting conditions of operation were not exceeded. The inspector examined selected Plant Operations Review Committee minutes, incidents reports, logs and records, and interviewed selected personnel.
Unit 1 LER's 81-66
-
Reactor coolant system oxygen concentration high.
Containment spray header installed incorrectly.
82-01
-
82-07
-
Shutdown panel pressurizer level failed high.
82-08 Main steam flow transmitter failed low.
-
Pressurizer pressure transmitter failed low.
82-09
-
82-10
-
Reactor coolant system leakage above allowable.
82-11
-
Containment air Lock inoperable.
82-12
-
Turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump inoperable.
82-13
-
Containment atmosphere activity monitors inoperable.
82-14
-
Reactor coolant system T-Avg loop inoperable.
82-15
-
Spent fuel pool radiation monitor inoperable.
82-16 Shutdown panel pressurizer Level failed high.
-
82-17
-
Feedwater flow channel inoperable.
-
--__-__-
..
.
82-18
-
Motor driven auxiliary feedwater pump flow control valve binding.
82-20
-
Diesel 1B inoperable due to cracked fuel oil pipe.
Unit 2 LER's 81-39
-
' A' train penetration room filteration system inoperable.
81-53
-
Diesel generator '2c' inoperable as air supply closed.
81-56
-
Containment spray additive tank isolation valve closed.
82-11
-
Vital bus 'B' inverter inoperable.
82-12
-
Boron injection tank heat tracing train ' A' inoperable.
82-13
-
Radiation monitors for containment activity inoperable.
82-14
-
'B' train chlorine detector inoperable.
82-15
-
Plant vent stack effluent monitor inoperable.
82-16
-
Pressurizer pressure decreased below limit.
82-17
-
Control rods inoperable due to faulty card.
82-21
-
'2A' Recombiner Oxygen analyzer inoperable.
82-22
-
Containment isolation valve fuse replaced.
(
l l