IR 05000348/1981010
| ML19350E750 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1981 |
| From: | Burnett P, Fiedler R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350E746 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-81-10, 50-364-81-13, NUDOCS 8106230493 | |
| Download: ML19350E750 (3) | |
Text
~
.
.
.
> g,,,,
..
' '
- '
'S,,
UNITED STATES l
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,,
g c
REGION ll
' -
O 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 o
JitN 0 21981
- * ~ *
m i
\\
LJ Report Nos. 50-348/81-10 and 50-364/81-13 Licensee: Alabama Powar Company 600 North 18th Street Birminghan, AL 35202 Facility Name:
Farley Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 Inspection at Farley Site near Dothan, Alabama Inspector:
EM1A f-2 s - 8/
R. L. Fiedler Date Signed Approved by:
/z wW
[Jf M
?.7. BurndtG%ctinWSection Chief Date Signed
-
-
Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division
-
,
SUMMARY Inspection on April 29 through May 1,1981 Areas Inspected This routine, anncunced inspection involved 19 inspector-hours on site in the areas of witnessing precritical tests and a tour of the Unit 1 auxiliary building and control room.
Results Of the two areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8106,430 N
\\
_. _ _ _
. ~.
- .
..
..
0.
m-REPORT CETAILS 1.
Persons Conticted Licensee Employees
- W. G. Hairston, III, Plant Manager
- J. D.' Woodard, Assistant Plant Manager
"K. W. McCracken, Technical Superintendent
- H. M. McClellan, Technical Supervisor
- 0. R. Culver, SAER Engineer
"J. W. Kahle, SAER Engineer R. C. Rogars, Technical Supervisor R. H. Marlow, Reactor Engir.eer Cther licensee employees contacted included numerous operators.
NRC Resident Inspector W. H. Bradford, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview
.
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 1,1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on, Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved itams were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Unit 2 Precritical Testing The inspector observed portions of the following precritical test::
a.
Verifictaion of Rod-Position-Indicating System 55-7-512 b.
Rod Drop Time Measurement (hot Jll flow) 55-7-513 The above tests were observed by the inspector to verify the following:
a.
That a procedure of the appropriate revision was available and in use by test personnel.
--
.
.
_
.
-
.
,
.
p. f, '..
.-
-
'b.
That all test prerequisites and initial conditions were inet.
c.
That special test equipment required by the procedure was calibrated and in service, d.
That' the test was performed as required by the procedure and that changes to the procedure were made in accordance with acministrative requirements.
e.
That test coordination was adequate.
f.
That a quick summary analysis was made to assure proper plant, system or component response to the test.
g.
That"the collected data were forwarded to the prope psrsonnel for i
final analysis.
Within the areas inspected, there were no violations or deviations identi-fied.
6.
Tour of Unit 1 Auxiliary Building and Control Room The inspector conductec a tour of accessible areas to determine by observa-
. tion that plant can'ditions and activities were in accordance with applicable
. requirements.
-
-
,
Within the areas inspected, there were no violations or deviations identi-fied.
!
,
b
. _. -