IR 05000346/1982009
| ML20058E944 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1982 |
| From: | Byron P, Reyes L, Rogers W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058E920 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-82-09, 50-346-82-9, NUDOCS 8207300260 | |
| Download: ML20058E944 (5) | |
Text
r
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-346/82-09(DPRP)
Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo _ Edison Company Edison Plaza, 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 Inspection At: Davis-Besse, Oak Harbor, OH Inspection Conducted: May 6 - June 1, 1982 O
O 7//[ff1-~
Inspectors:
P.
on w
W.Rog$r
^
Reyes, i
7 5 J
ApprovedBy:[eactorP.cts Section 2C
/
/
Inspection Summary Inspection on May 6 - June 1, 1982 (Report No. 50-346/82-09(DPRP))
Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of followup of previous inspec-tion findings; monthly surveillance observation; licensee event report followup; IE circular followup; procurement; inspection during long term shutdown. The inspection involved a total of 157 inspector-hours by 2 NRC inspectors including 40 inspector-hours onsite during off-shif ts.
Results: Of the'six areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were found in five areas; one item of apparent noncompliance was identified one area (failure to follow lifted wire and jumper procedure - Paragraph 7).
8207300260 820715 i
PDR ADOCK 05000346 C
._-
~-.
-
.
- - - - -
- -
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- T.
Murray, Station Superintendent B. Beyer, Assistant Station Superintendent S. Quennoz, Assistant Station Superintendent P. Carr, Maintenance Engineer
- J. Werner, Administrative Coordinator D. Miller, Operations Engineer D. Briden, Chemist and. Health _ Physicist L. Simon, Operations Supervisor C. Daft, QA Director
- Denotes those attending the exit interview on May 28, 1982.
The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees, including members of the technical, operations, maintenance, I&C, training and health physics staff.
2.
Followup on Previous Inspection Findings
-
(Closed) Unresolved Item (346/79-13-04 and 346/79-13-05). Procedure defi-
'
ciencies. All the procedures-that were identified by the inspector have
been reviewed. The licensee has established a responsible individual for
'
the coordination of procedure reviews.
Procedures have been reviewed on an annual basis to satisfy Region III concerns on this area (see Inspection
.
Report 50-346/80-17). The licensee engaged a consultant to review plant procedures to establish uniformity and general upgrading. The consultant's review and recommendations have been submitted to the licensee and are being included in the Procedure Review Program.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (346/79-29-02). Steam generator level indication discrepancy between the startup range level indicators and the SFRCS level indicators. The inspector reviewed the licensee's calculation for channel error. The licensee's calculation indicate that the difference between
'
channels could be as much as 5.04 inches if the temperature shift is not j
included. Temperature changes in the location of the transmitters could
'
increase the difference between the channels. The total channel error has been accounted for the trip setpoint in the SFRCS. There is no automatic
'
function associated with the startup range level indication.
(Closed) Open Item (346/81-10-05). Testing of the component cooling water surge tank interlock. The licensee issued maintenance work order IC-324-82 to verify the operation of this interlock every 18 months.
(Closed) Open Item (346/81-10-01). Repair of valve DH62. The licensee has satisfactorily completed repair of DH62 and removed any binding interference.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (346/77-25-01). Station ground grid problems.
The licensee has completed the testing noted as incomplete in Inspection Report No. 50-346/81-22.
..
_
.
.
-
.
3.
Monthly Surveillance Observation
.
The inspector observed technical specification required surveillance test-ing on the Miscellaneous Instrument Daily Chechs (ST 5099.02) and verified that testing was performed in accordance with-adequate procedures, that test
,
'
instrumentation was calibrated, that limiting conditions for operation were met, that removal and restoration of the affected components were accom-plished, that test results conformed with technical specifications and pro-cedure requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
The inspector also witnessed portions of the following test activities:
ST 5030.15, "RPS Shutdown Bypass Pressure Trip" ST 5016.02, " Fire Protection System Electrical Pump Weekly Test" ST5099.01, " Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Checks" No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Licensee Event Report Followup Through direct observations, discussions with licensee personnel, and review of records, the following event reports were reviewed to determine that re-portability requirements were fulfilled, immediate corrective action was accomplished, and corrective action to prevent recurrence had been accom-plished in accordance with technical specifications.
81-52 Loss of Bus C1 by maintenance person bumping Breaker AC110.
'
81-65 Hourly fire watch missed in AC equipment room vestibule.
81-66 Failure of YV3 causing failure of essential Bus Y3.
81-73 MCCE11E de-energized due to source breaker being open.
82-05 RE 2007 containment SFAS radiation monitor failed low.
82-06 CCW pump 1 would not start due to inability of breaker AC113
to rack in.
82-13 RE 2007 containment SFAS radiation monitor failed low on two separate occasions.
82-14 Fire door 101A blocked open.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
1E Circular Followup For the IE Circular listed below, the inspector verified that the Circular was received by the licensee management, that a review for applicability
,- -
. _.
--
-. _
.-
_
. - - - - - - - -
..
-
,
d
.
.
..
-,
'
,
!
was performed, and that if the circular was applicable to the facility,
-
~
appropriate corrective actions were taken or were scheduled to be taken.
- IEC 81-01 Design Problems Involving Indicating Pushbutton Switches'Manu-factured by Honeywell, Inc.
-
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Procurement
.
The inspectors reviewed approximately 125 non."Q" purchase orders issued
'
.for services related to activities at Davis-Besse.
Non'"Q" purchase orders do not fall under the cognizance of the QA Department and are only subject to review by the issuing organization and not by the QA Department as are
_
"Q" purchase orders.
It was learned that the requestor determines whether j
a purchase order is "Q" or non "Q".
The licensee stated that non "Q" pur-chase orders which relate to services which affect safety systems fall under d
the umbrella of the engineering department.
Some of the non "Q" purchase orders concerned contracted services to com-pensate for insufficient manpower or technical expertise. The inspectors asked if the licensee reviewed the work of those organizations contracted for technical expertise or if the licensee was unable to review the work,
-'
,
who did the licensee contract to perform this task. The licensee was unable to answer the question. The inspectors review determined that non "Q" pur-chase orders had been issued for areas in which it is questionable if the
'
licensee has the expertise to review contractor work. Three examples are:
Profilemetry of steam generator tubes.
l ASME Section XI testing policy.
>
Analysis of the electrical distribution system.
'
,
It was determined that the' licensee does not verify the qualifications of the' contractor employees who were utilized under a non "Q" purchase order.
The licensee agreed to review his policy and provide clarification to the
'
inspector.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
I 7.
Inspection During Long Term Shutdown i
The inspector observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs and conducted discussions with control room operators during the month of May.
The inspector verified surveillance tests required during the ' shutdown vere
accomplished, reviewed tagout records, and verified applicability of contain-ment integrity. Tours of containment auxiliary building accessible areas,
.
including exterior areas were made to make independent assessments of equip-
{
ment conditions, plant conditions, radiological controls, safety, and
'
adherence to regulatory requirements and to verify that maintenance requests l
i l
-.~
,
. -,
. -, _,. -,
n---..
.-
..., -
-,.
,
..,, _ -- -
, - - _ -...
-.. - _ - - -
r,
"-
'
..
.
f.
had been initiated for equipment in need of maintenance. The. inspector observed plant housekeeping / cleanliness conditions, including potential fire hazards, and verified implementation of radiation protection controls. The inspector,'by observation and direct interview, verified that the physical security plan was being implemented in accordance with the station security plan. The inspector verified the implementation cf radioactive waste system controls.
The inspector reviewed the licensee's jumper / bypass controls to veri-fy there were no conflicts with technical specifications. During the review, the inspector determined that the wiring removed from radiation monitors RE 5030 and RE 5029 had not been appropriately tagged or spared as required by AD 1828.00. This failure to follow procedures is an item of noncompliance with Technical Specification 6.8.1 (346/82-09-01).
No other items of noncompliance or deviations have been identified.
8.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)
throughout the month and at the conclusion of the inspection on May 28, 1982, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection activities.
'
-
S-(*
5