IR 05000346/1982004
| ML20042B921 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1982 |
| From: | Holzmer M, Peschel J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042B912 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-82-04, 50-346-82-4, NUDOCS 8203260274 | |
| Download: ML20042B921 (5) | |
Text
_ _.._ _
. _
___
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
.
'
.
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-346/82-04 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3
.
Licensee: Toledo Edison Company j
Edison Plaza, 300 Madison Avenue i
Toledo, 011 43652 Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Oak liarbor, Oli Inspection Conducted:
anuary 18-22, 1982 Ifzme
/
A Inspector: M Approved By: J scle, Acting hief 72.-
.
l nagement Programs Section
'
'
Inspection Summary Inspection on January 18-22, 1982 (Report No. 50-346/82-04)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensed operator i
requalification training; non-licensed training and QA program. The inspection involved a total of 28 inspector-hours onsite by one h3C inspector.
Results: Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified in two areas and one item of noncompliance was identified in one area (failure of licensed operators to complete required reading).
i l
l
-
!
l i
8203260274 820223
,
gDRADOCK 05000346 PDR
-
-
--.
-..
.
. -. -
- - - -
- - -
..
O
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- J. Hickey, Training Manager
- B. Wernec, Administrative Coordinator
- W. O'Connor, Supervisor - Nuclear Operations Training C. Daft, Manager - Quality Assurance J. Freels, Supervisor - Nuclear Maintenance Training The inspector also interviewed several other licensee employees in-cluding reactor operators, shift supervisors, instructors, training staf f personnel, craf tsmen, technicians and clerks.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview on January 22, 1982.
2.
Requalification Training The inspector verified that any changes made to the requalification program were in conformance with requirements and commitments; verified that the licensee has a prepared schedule for conducting required lectures, the licensee has prepared lesson plans or other documentation which adequately describes the scope and depth of the lectures, and the licensee has evaluated the results of the most recent annual examinations and identified deficient areas to be covered in the lecture series; and verified through record review of one control room operator holding an NRC Reactor Operator license and one shift supervisor holding an NRC Senior Reactor Operator license the availability and adequacy of copies of the most recent annual written examination and the individuals'
response, and documentation of attendance at all required lectures, required control manipulations, performance evaluations, additional training received in identified deficient areas, required procedure reviews, and oral exams. 'In addition, the inspector attended one hour of requalification lectures.
a.
Documentation Reviewed
.,
AD 1828.06, Revision 3, Required Reading
-
-
AD 1828.07, Revision 2, System Walk-Throughs and Oral Examinations AD 1828.09, Revision 0, SR0 Training
-
AD 1828.10, Revision 1, Davis-Besse Operator Training Program
-
-
AD 1828.15, Revision 2, Requalification
-
Training records b.
Findings Noncompliance 50-346/82-04-01 Contrary to 10 CFR 55 Appendix A, licensed operators and senior operators were not remaining cognizant of design, procedure and facility license changes (required reading).
-2-
.
Of approximately 30 licensed persons, 7 were found to have citable deficiencies in required reading. Required reading is issued three or four times each month and is sent by copy to each individual. The cover sheet is to be signed, indicating complete revica, and returned to the training department. November 15 was arbitrarily chosen by the inspector as a date before which required reading could reasonably be expected to have been completed.
Issue Nos. 81-22 through 81-38 were reviewed and were issued between July and November 1981.
Results are tabulated below:
Licensed Operator / Senior Operator Issue Number Not Read No. 1 81-27, 81-33 No. 2 81-28, 81-33 No. 3 81-32, 81-35, 81-36, 81-37, 81-38 No. 4 81-33 No. 5 81-33 No. 6 81-33 No. 7 81-34 c.
Discussion Senior individuals in the plant operations staff were not included in the preceeding figures, but deserve special comment.
Individuals in these positions might ordinarily be expected to be up-to-date on most design, procedure and facility license changes. Additionally, including them would not significantly alter the nature of the non-compliance. For this reason, it was considered unnecessary to accurately determine whether they had missed any significant matters in the required reading. However, since they are included in the required reading system, they should set the example for other members of the department by ensuring that their required reading is complete.
It would be a good management practice for these individuals to have their required reading up to date before requiring their subordinates to do so.
Unresolved Item (50-346/82-04-02): Licensed cperator and senior operator training records for the current year of the requalifi-
,
I cation cycle were stored in non-fire rated cabinets. All training records are being converted to a new microfilm document retrieval and storage system.
All records of training have been incorporated into the system except for those records indicated above. These
,
l records were being withheld until record type codes could be esta-l blished and the software obtained to improve retrieval of these l
records. The inspector determined that steps are being taken to l
effect thir change, and will verify completion in a future inspection.
l l-3-
!
!
.
.
3.
Training The inspector attended four hours of the licensee's General Orientation Training and verified that lesson plan objectives were met and that training was in accordance with the objectives of the General Orientation Training Program (AD 1828.03, Revision 3).
The inspector verified by direct questioning and record review of three new and four existing employees that administrative controls and pro-cedures, radiological health and safety, industrial safety, controlled access and security procedures, emergency plan, and quality assurance training were provided as required by the licensee's technical specifi-cations; verified by direct questioning of two craftsmen and two technicians that on-the-job training, formal technical training commensurate with job classification, and fire fighting training were provided; verified by direct questioning of one female employee that training concerning prenatal radiation exposure was provided as described in R.G. 8.13.
a.
Documentation Reviewed
-
AD 1828.00, Revision 3, Personnel Training Program AD 1828.03, Revision 3, General Orientation Training
-
-
AD 1828.04, Revision 2, Personnel Training Program
-
AD 1828.11, Revision 2, Maintenance Section Training AD 1828.12, Revision 2, Chemical and llealth Physics Training
-
Training Records
-
b.
Findings No apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were found.
c.
Discussion Unresolved Item (50-346/82-04-03):
It could not be determined during the inspection the extent to which attendance at monthly training meetings was required for various plant personnel.
These training sessions are scheduled and run by the Safety Coordinator. Furthermore, the inspector was unable to determine
,
in which procedures the duties of the Safety Coordinator were specified. This matter will be examined in detail in a subsequent inspection.
,
l 4.
QA Program Annual Review The inspector verified that personnel implementing changes to the approved QA program understood the significance of the changes, and whether implementing procedures conformed with the QA Program changes.
a.
Documentation Reviewed
-
Toledo Edison Nuclear QA Manual
-
QAP Summary Change Sheets (21)
-
QAP 2160, Corrective Action, Revision 7-4-
_
-.
- - - - - -
-.
. - - - _ - _. ~.. -.--
_
- -
--
-
..
-
.
.
QAP 2131, On-Site Cleaning / Cleanliness Control, Revision 1
-
QAP 2130, Handling, Storage and Shipping, Revision 2
,
-
'
QAP 2100, Inspection, Revision 2
-
'
QAP 2080, Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and
-
Components, Revisien 4 QAP 2050, Instructions, Procedures and Drawings, Revision 2
-
QAP 2030, Design Control, Revision 6
-
QAP 2020, Quality Assurance Program, Revision 5
-
QAP 1030, Assignment of QA Personnel, Revision 4
-
i QAP 1010, Administrative Control of the Toledo Edison Nuclear
-
i QA Manual, Revision 2 i
b.
Findings
No apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were noted.
I
'
c.
Discussien None.
!
5.
Unresolved Items
.
l Unresolved Items are matters about which more information is required l
in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, Items of
!
Noncompliance, or Deviations. Unresolved Items disclosed during the
!
inspection are discussed in Paragraphs 2 and 3.
'
l
6.
Exit Interview
)-
The inspectors met with licensee representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 l
at the conclusion of the inspection on January 22, 1982. The inspectors summarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.
I
!
!
,
!
!
!
I i,
-5-
,
!
,,,,.
- - - - - _. - - _, -,. - - -
.,.....
-, - -
.-.-,
- -.,,,--.~ - -.. -
., -
-