IR 05000321/1981015
| ML20005B485 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1981 |
| From: | Kellogg P, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005B481 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-***, TASK-TM 50-321-81-15, 50-366-81-15, NUDOCS 8107080284 | |
| Download: ML20005B485 (5) | |
Text
-
.
aarco
- ja o
UNITED STATES
~g 8"
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
$
E REGION 11
g f
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.. Sure 5 3100 e
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 o
Report Nos. 50-321/81-15 and 50-366/81-15 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30103 Facility Name:
Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Bay'?y Georgia Inspector:
[
b b
[/
R. F.
Gers,' 5eriior Resi ent inspector
[ia ign Approved by:
b
[6 [ [/
. J. Kellogd, Sectibn/ Chief, Division of Date Sfgned Resident and Reactor P'roject Inspection SUMMARY Inspection on April 21 - May 20,1981
'
Areas Inspected This inspection involved 75 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of technical specification compliance, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurar.ce practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site securi ty procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, licensee event reports and NUREG 0737 action items.
Results Of the 11 areas inspected, no apparent violations or deviations were identified.
o
.-
-.
..
.. --
-.... _ -
. -.. - -... - - -.
.-
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Empicyees
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
- T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant Manager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of Maintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview
,
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 30 and May 20, 1981 with persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
.
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift l
logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and
L records of equipment malfunctions. This review included control room logs l
and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and
'
equipment tagout records.
The inspector routinely cbserved operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours. During normal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector l
conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to j
assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level. Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
l l
l
!
,-.. - -
,_, - ~
- - - -., _.,, -. -
-,
.... _, - _ -
- - -,
.. -,,.,.
..... - -.. - - -, _, ~. - - - - _. -
_-
.
.
.
e-2-Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Plant Tours (Unit 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was pronerly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible material and debris were disposed or expeditiously.
During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags and component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment and instrument calibration dates. Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
Within the areas inspected, no violation or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operations (LCO's) and results of selected surveillance tests.
These verifications were accomplished oy direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's compliance with selected LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Protection Units (1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures teken to assure the physical protection of the
.
facility met current requirements.
Areas inspected included the organization of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, door and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were folicwed.
Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Review of Noncoutine Events Reported by the Licensee (Units 1 & 2)
'
The following Licensee Event Reports (LERs) were reviewed for potential
generic impact, to detect trends, and to determine whether corrective j
..
-
- _ _ _
- _ _ - - - _ _ - -
--
)
.
-
-_ -
.
- *
.
.
-3-actions appeared appropriate. Events which were reported immediately were also reviewed as they occurred to determine that Technical Specifications were being met and that the public health and safety were of utmost consideration. Astericked reports were followed up indepth onsite.
LER No.
Date of Report
' Description 50-321/81-3 2/17/81 Bent HPCI lift rods *
50-321/81-4 1/29/81 Failure io approve procedural enanges*
50-321/81-5 1/19/81 D/W temperature recorder INOP 50-321/81-6 2/10/81 SBLC relief v.,1ve lifted low 50-321/81-7 2/19/81 Failure to submit special report *
50-321/81-8 3/10/81 RCIC exhaust pressure switches actuated high
-
50-321/81-9 2/24/81 Nitrogen tank less than 2000 gallons.
50-321/81-10 2/24/81 IA and IC D/G siesmic supports inadequate *
50-321/81-11 3/05/81 Radwaste discharge prior to sample *
50-321/81-12 3/19/81 RCIC overspeed trip failure 50-321/81-13 3/26/81 HPCI oil line failure *
50-321/81-14 3/26/81 Excessive leakage on LLRTS
,
50-366/81-3
/17/81 CMFLPD exceeded during operation *
50-366/01-4 2/20/81 RCIC turbine nozzle loads high*
50-366/81-5 2/12/81 Core Spray manual valves shut *
50-366/81-6 2/19/81 Failure of SBGT filter train
50-366/81-7 2/17/61 Reactor coolant not sampled *
50-366/81-8 2/12/81 CRD HCU pressure switches out
-
of calibration 50-366/81-9 3/05/81 Conductivity not measured 50-366/81-10 3/05/81 RCIC flow controller inop*
50-366/81-11 2/24/81 Nonrated window in fire barrier *
t m
m m
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
...
..
.9
-
/(
- -
.
.
-4-50-366/81-12 3/12/81 B. Train SBLC inop
.50-366/81-13 3/25/81 HCU accumulator low *
50-366/81-14 3/18/81 B SBLC relief valve lifted low" Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
10.
NRC Task Action Plan Requirements review (NUREG 0737) (Units 1 and 2)
The insoector has reviewed the licensees implementation of various requirements associated with the NRC Task Action Plan (TAP) in response to the Three Mile Island accident.
The current status is summarized below.
Item numbers refer to TAP line items.
Item No.
Description Implementation Date Completed I.A.1.1.1 951ft Technical Advisor 01/01/80 Yes
.
vn duty I.A.1.1.2 Technical Specifications 10/28/80 Yes I.A.1.1.3 STAS degreed engineers 01/01/81 Yes I.A.1.1.4 Long term program submission 01/01/81 Yes I.A.1.2 Shift Supervisor 01/01/80 Yes responsibilities I.A.1.3.1 Shift overtime limits 11/01/80 Yes I.A.2.1.4 SR0 and R0 Training 08/01/80 Yes Modification I.C.1.1 Small Break LOCA procedures 06/01/80 Yes I.C.2 Shift turnover checklist 01/01/80 Yes I.C.3.
Shift Supervisor 01/01/80 Yes responsibility I.C.4.
Control room access
~01/01/80 Yes I.C.5.
Feedback of operating 01/01/81 Yes experience I.C.6.
Verify correct performance 01/01/81 Yes
,
l of activities l
II.B.1.
Reactor coolant vents 07/01/82 Yes
,
II.B.2.1 Plant shielding design 01/01/80 Yes
!
II.B.3.1.
Interim post accident 01/01/80 Yes
!
sampling l
II.D.1.1 Submit SRV test program 01/01/80 Yes i
II.D.3.
Valve position indication 12/15/80 Yes II.E.4.1.1 Design dedicated hydrogen 01/01/80 Yes i
i l
.
-..---
-..
..-_.,..-. _...-.-..-.- -..----.- -