IR 05000321/1981017
| ML20030D324 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1981 |
| From: | Belisle G, Davenport K, Fredrickson P, Jackson L, Skinner P, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030D318 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-81-17, 50-366-81-17, NUDOCS 8109010180 | |
| Download: ML20030D324 (14) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- . . ' +s Meoq'o
/ UNITED STATES ~g !' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
E hEGION 11 [[ 101 MARIEiT A ST., N.W.. SuliE 3100 o, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-321/81-17 and 50-366/81-17 Licensee: Geor';1a Power Company 170 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia and Company Offices in Atlanta, Georgia /, i < Inspectors: ff y y /t_ g _ 7 J u f?/ G. A. Belisle ' " > Dat'e Sig'ned Nf.DEv4v4v11 - e '? 3Q _.8/ K4Dagenfc/ t J, ~ Dat Si ned W&&~ 7bo/VJ P. E.
re kson Dite Signed /M 7 5e/D _ L.H.J .so ate Signed
- $M 80fSl
- - P. H. Skinr(er . __Date Signed - , , Approved by:_j W/ Y/ / . Upright,' ctio 'hief Dgte Signed . . Engineering I ecti Branch
Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on June.29,1981 - July 2,1981 i Areas Inspected i ' This routine, announced inspection involved 116 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters, offsite review commit-tee, surveillance implementation, surveillance and calibration control program, and licensee action on previously identified inspectice items.
8109010100 810731 PDR ADOCK 05000321 G PDR __._ - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _.. _, ...,_ _ .. _. _ -. _ _. _. _.... _. _,. _, _ _ _ _...
- ._ . _. _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _. .. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ..,. - . . . .
. i i Results Of the five areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i
e i i l } t e i f ....,., - _ _ _.
- - _. =- - - . , . . . . REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persor,s Contacted Licensee Empioyees
- E. Aldridge, Material Supervisor
'S. Baxley, Superintendent Operations
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
- C. Boatwright, QA-Project Coordinator Engineer
- J. Boykin, Chief Engineer
- J. Bray, Q. A. F.R.
- R. Day, Document Control Supervisor
- P. Forne', Jr., Sr. Q. A. F.R.
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant Manager
- D. McCuster, QC Supervisor
- C. McDaniel, Superintendent of Administration S. Mayhew, Plant Engineer
- C. Miles, Jr., QA Field Supervisor
- W. Nickerson, Manager, Engineering Services
- W. Rogers, H. P. Superintendent
- D. Savage, Supervisor Nucleac Procurement Standards
- W. Thigpen, Sr. Q. A.F.R.
- R. Tracy, Sr. Engineer
- H. Walker, SRB Chairman
"J. Watson, Sr. Q. A. F.R.
- C. Whitmer, Vice President Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, and office personnel.
NRC Senior Resident Inspector
- R. Rogers
- Attended exit interview on site July 2,1981
- Attended exit interview at company offices on July 1,1981.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 1,1981. at the Company Offices and on July 2,1981, at the Hatch site with those persons indicated in p?ragraph 1 above. The licensee was informed of the inspection findings discussed in the enclosed report.
The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings.
. - -. -- -
-. -- . - . . -.. - . -, t . . . . . .
3.
Licensee Action 01 Previous Enforement Matters Items of noncompliance from Inspection Reports 50-321/80-23 and 50-366/80-23 were reviewed with respect to the corrective action as stated in licensee
letters dated September 15, 1980, September 23, 1980 and February 17, 1981.
a.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (366/78-44-01): Maintaining the "Q" list.
AFR 78-1 was acequately closed out and a consummable list has been provided to the site.
b.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (366/78-44-02): Consummable/ Expendable. AFR 109 of audit 79-MT-2 has been adequately closed out concerning the use of consummable/ expendable items.
c.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/80-28-01): Quality Assurance (QA) organization-failure to obtain prompt corrective action. The inspector reviewed changes to the QA management effort which have been imple-i mented to improve the ef fectiveness 6f the QA program.
The Vice President-Power Supply Engineering and Services is involved in the day-to-day operation of the QA department and conducts a monthly meeting to discuss the effectiveness of the QA program. The Manager of QA or his representative attends the site monthly management meetings.
' Also, he attends the weekly Nuclear Generation staff meetings and
periodicai er meets with the Manager of Nuclear Gere 'ation. QA-05-13 has been changed to delineate the method for escaiution of site QA , concerns to corporate QA. A review of the NRC and QA open items list i has shown a definite improvement in proper followups and correction of identified items.
d.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/80-28-02): Failure to establish an inspection program - lack of independence, alternate inspection program not documented and certification of shipping inspectors. The inspector reviewed HNP-321, Quality Control (QC) Work Inspection Program, Revi-sion 7 dated 2/81. This procedure contains. definitive guidance for required QC inspection of activities affecting quality.
(1) Failure to Establish an Inspection Program - Lack of Independence.
i The licensee has revised the QC inspection program as defined in HNP-821.
This procedure has eliminated the alternate inspection , i program and incorporated direct inspection effort by QC personnel.
(2) Failure to Establish an Inspection Program - Alterrate Inspection Program Not Documented. The alteraate inspection program has been i , eliminated and a new program has been incorporated whereby direct l observations (when required) are performed by QC inspectors. The QC department performs inspection in accordance with approved procedures. Presently, approximately 75% of these procedures are
l ! l
i $
. . . .
in use; the remainder are being developed. The inspector reviewed the following QC procedures: A-MC-02 Installation / Maintenance of Centrifugal Pumps, Revi-sion 0 dated 2/81 A-MD-01 Seismic Supports for System Piping, Revision 0 dated 2/81 A-MM-01 Fire Protection, Revision 0 dated 3/81 A-EA-01 Direct Current Driven Motors, Revision 0 dated 5/81 A-EC-02 4160 Volt Switchgear Maintenance and Cleaning, Revi-sion 0 dated 2/81 A-El-01 4160 Volt AC Circuit Breaker Maintenance, Revision 0 dated 2/81 The inspector randomly selected maintenance requests completed since the implementation of this program and verified that QC inspections are being performed.
The following maintenance requests were selected for review: 1-81-4402 dated 5/30/81 1-81-1529 dated 3/6/81 1-81-3956 dated 5/18/81 1-81-2501 dated 4/8/81 (3) Failure to Establish an Inspection Program - Certification of Shipping Inpectors. Th.e inspector reviewed HNP-823, Qualification of Inspection Personnel, Revision 7 dated 1/81.
This procedure specifies qualification requirements of personnel for frspection, testing or examination activities concerning safety-related activities anc it establishes a ers of certifying the carat:fi t-ties of inspection personnel.
The inspector reviewed the qualifications and certifications of 19 personr4 ard.ert?:ed tnat their quali fications and t.erti ficatt oas were ir at:cN ece with HNP-823.
e.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/80-2E'03): Fati o in re m *d to 4A't findings.
Procedure GA-CS-;E ras t*er r e. f t e-d in de' % t** site reBC*dil prC]raJ, ard prGCeCv'O "A -l15 - 1 ) 4 *, be**
- Ya ;t i t;
T'4** . a corporate CA Audit Ffedfe; 5 *. a t n h:m - t ?-t t% ?*ca'; t, e o Ire i n s', e c t D c re v " Nad Pe 3 ?a r-4,' ! * * ' ' A ~ ' ' ~ ~ * 't' 4* serifiec in8% L ', t ? ift* 4*C "S';;*4t* M 'i'
4** "- + t4' i ' '
- racked.
> . n .. - - - - -. x.- - - -... -
-- - - - ... _ .. - - . - - - - -. - -. - ... - . . j
. l
1 I f.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/P0-28-04): ' Failure to respond to audit finding reports.
The inspector reviewed the results of 10 audits
conducted since June 1980.
These 10 audits identified 32 audit
findings, consequently 32 audit finding reports (AFRs) were issued. Of these 32 AFRs, 3 were not responded to within the required time frame.
' These three were associated with the following audits-80-ADM-1, conducted 7/7/80, item 1/43; 80-ETS-1, conducted 8/7/80, item 1/46; l and, 80-MC-1/41, conducted 6/30/80, item 1/44.
In February 1981, the ' ' licensee devoted increased errpnasis on a trend analysis system which led to better tracking of AFRs and since implementatian, only one ' item (audit 81-SC-1, item 1/22) exceeded the requircd response time and this was due to an administrative oversight (change of personnel responsibilities). Of 21 AFRs written, 13 were responded to in less time than required. No violation is assigned for the late responses , i received prior to the implementation of the increased emphasis given
to trend analysis or for the one item identified (1 of 21) since the implementation of this system because they appear to be anomalies and j do not represent the effectiveness of the AFR response system.
e-l g.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/80-28-05): Failure to control vendor technical manuals.
The licensee has generated a master manual list which references all vendor' technical manuals that are currently being ,
used on site. A random selection of plant procedures (calibration
and maintenance procedures) was reviewed to ensure that technical ! manuals referenced are on the master manual list. The controls of the l master manual list are delineated in HNP-813, Drawing Control, revision
11 dated 8/80.
! h.
(Closed) Infraction (321/80-28-06): Failure to follow procedure. The , inspector reviewed procedure HNP-821, Quality Control Work Inspection i Program, Revision 7 dated 2/81. The use of alternate inspectors has j been deleted from the procedure and the function that they performed - has been assumed by the QC department.
The inspector reviewed 25 comple'ed maintenance requests (MRs) and found no examples where parts i required by the work performed were not identified by the MR or with an l Inventory Material Request (IMR).
i.
(Closed) Infraction (321,366/80-28-07): Lack of qualitative or quantitative acceptance criteria for determining when the inspection j activity must be accomplished. The inspector reviewed HNP-821, Quality ' Control Work Inspection Program, Revision 7 dated 2/81.
HNP-821
describes activities that are to be monitored by the QC group for inspection programs-. j.
(Closed) Deficiency (321,366/80-28-08): Failure to review the status and adequacy of the QA Program - implementing procedures. The inspec-tot reviewed procedure QA-02-03, Procedure / Document Review, Revision 0
. -
_ _.. -.., - -,, _,. -. .,. ' ,.. -,_,_ ~... _ ._.,.__..._.._-,_,.._-_,...-..__-,..m.._._,.._
- - - .- . . _- - _. _ _ - . - - - . - -. --. . .
. . ,
,
dated 9/80.
This procedure describes. the niethod to insure that the required biennial reviews are conducted on QA Department procedures.
The inspector also reviewed selected QA procedures for review compli-ance.
j k.
(Closed) Deficiency (321 0 66/80-!") ~9): Failure to review plant procedures. The inspector reviewed the current controls used to verify '
the review of plant procedures as required by the accepted QA Program's i endorsement of ANSI N18.7-1976. Tb? licensee has established a review committee that meets weekly to determine what procedures require , review. This determination is based on whether the procedures are safety-related or non-safety-related.
For tho.:e procedures that are ' determined to be safety-related, the procedures are reviewed as , required by ANSI N18.7-1976.
The inspector reviewed a total of 37 procedures, determined to be safety relatad, that had been reviewed.
1.
(0 pen) Deficiency (321,366/80-28-10): Failure to control changes to purchase requisitions.
The inscector verified that a change to Appendix A and Section 17.2 (Operational QA Program) of the FSAR was submitted to the NRC on October 15, 1980, for a clarification of the licensee definition of " procurement document." More information has been requested by the NRC, leaving tie request undecided at the conclusion of this inspection.
Procedure PSES-12100, Procurement, Revision 1 dated 9/80 has been changed to reflect the proposed clarifi-
cation of this matter. The inspector alsu determined that the Super-visor, Nuclear Procurement Standards has incorporated an interim oral ' i review system for purchase requisition changes made at the corporate level. An oral method is contrary to the documentation requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V, however, use of the oral change review system has not been initiated. The licensee will change to a documented interim review process. This item remains open pending the
I final NRC action on the proposed FSAR change and the review of the interim change review system.
j m.
(0 pen) Deficiency (321,366/80-28-11): Shipping damage inspections not
documented and storage of records in block house.
The inspector reviewed this area and determined the following: )j The action taken to resolve the shipping damage inspection finding - was to submit to the NRC a proposed change to Secti,on 17.2 of the ] FSAR to take exception to ANSI N45.2.2 and implement inspections
at the time material is withdrawn from the warehouse for use. The NRC did not approve this and the licensee has furnished additional . information to the NRC for clarification.
- The block house does not-contain any quality related records at this time. The QC and Administrative Assistant stated that the j records still in the block house will not be retained. In i a . - - _ _ _ _ _, _,. -. _ _ -,. _._.
- .. _ _ -.. - ., ._ . .
- _ __ . -. . . . .
j , addition, the block house is scheduled to be torn down in approxi-mately two weeks.
i This item will remain open until the NRC takes final action on the licensee's FSAR change request.
n.
(0 pen) Deficiency (321, 366/80-28-12): Failure tc properly store , items with weld end preparations. The licensne has submitted a change to the FSAR to redefine the commitment to ANSI N45.2.2 section 5.2.1.
This change was not approved by NRC and a second submittal to NRC has been made but has not been acted on. The interim action of placing QC hold-tags or the installation of the required protective measures to ensure that no damaged material is used in a safety related function has been implemented. This item remains open pending a review of the final NRC disposition of the FSAR change request.
o.
(0 pen) Unresolved (321 366/80-28-15): Environmental Technical Speci-fication 2.1.4.b.
The LRC has not as yet provided a written reply to the Technical Specification change re:uest; but, as identified in the origi.nal report, oral approval was granted by the NRC on January 24, ' 1980, for this portion of tne change request.
p.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (321,366/80-28-16): QA involvement in review / approval of implementing procedures. The inspector interviewed cognizant QA personnal and determined that changes to plant procedures ' due to QA review are being rapidly incorporated into the next revision of the procedure.
The inspector reviewed a memo from the Assistant Plant Manager to department heads dated March 23, 1981, (APM-81-43) directing that QA review comments be incorporated into procedures.
Five procedures (HNP-2-3002, 3003, 3105, 3106, 3107) were reviewed to verify that the required changes had been made.
A total of 29 procedure changes were required as the resuit of this memo.
Since the issuance of the:e procedure changes, the licensee is assuring incorporation of QA comments into procedures by performing a review of applicable procedures as part of the QA audit function. If procedures ce found that require changes, the deficiency is identified as an audit finding and an AFR is written. The corrective action for the AFR assures incorporation of required changes to procedures.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Offsite Review Committee (40701) References: (a) iechnical Specifications (b) SRB Charter, Revision 13 dated 5/18 i - - - - - - - ----. -- -. . - _ - -. - - --
-. ... . . _ _. - .. -- .. . .
. .
1 i (c) SRB-001, Conduct of Safety Review Board (SRB) Activi-ties, Revision 2 dated 5/81 i (d) SRB-002, SRB Procedures, Revision 2 dated 5/81 i (e) SRB-003, Reports and Requests, Revision 2 dated 5/81
(f) SRB-008, SRB Audits, Revision 5 dated 5/81 The review was to verify that SRB membership and qualification are as required by the Technical Specifications; that. meetings convened during the praicus year wer e held at the required frequency; that reviews included persons who constituted a quorum and possessed expertise in the areas
reviewed; and that the SRB reviewed activities as required by the Technical Specifications.
In order to verify implementation of the SRB the inspector reviewed the 1980 and 1981 SRB minutes. Based on this review, two inspector followup items were ider.tified and are discussed in the following para-graphs.
a.
SRB Member Audit Schedules j_ Reference (f) requires that each SRB member submit an audit program schedule to the chairman on or before January 15, each year. Of the seven members responsible for scheduled audits, four did not submit a , schedule as required. Interviews with the members revealed that the QA Department audit schedule was the main source of SRB audits and thus members did not feel that a separate SRB schedule was required. All members do have a schedule and are knowledgeable of their requirements.
This item is identified as an inspector followup item (321,366/81-17-02) pending NRC review of the 1981 SRB audits and the submission of the 1982 audit schedules.
b.
SRB Member Qualifications
j ANSI N18.7-1976, Paragraph 4.3.1 requires that SRB personnel "shall be specified in both number and technical discipline." The licensee did ' not have a written resume specifying the " technical discipline" for three of the nine SRB members. In a letter dated June 5,1980, the SRB , chairman stated that he nad reviewed the qualifications of the SRB members and found them technically satisfactory to meet reference (a) i and ANSI N18.7-1976 requirements.
The inspector also reviewed the
qualifications of the SRB and found them satisfactory. This item is identified as an inspector followup item (321,366/81-17-03) pending the NRC review of the written resume of the remaining SRB members. The , chairman sent a letter dated July 1,1981, requesting updated resumes ' from the SRB members.
> . 6.
Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control Program and Surveillance i Implementation (61700, 61725) References: (a) Technical Specifications (b) HNP-831, Technical Specification Surveillance Program, Revision 5 dated 6/78 l
-,,,,.........._ m-_.
-m....- .._..._.,.,.,___.--.-_-..._._.~_.,.m.. . . . _. -., _ _..._.. -. .
- - . . . . .
(c) HNP-904, Inservice Inspection Program, Revision 3 dated 4/81 (d) HNP-2-1050, Surveillance Checks, Revision 16 dated 2/81 (e) HNP-2-3303, HPCI Pump Operability, Revision 7 dated ' 3/81 (f) HNP-2-3006, MSIV Closure Instrumentation FT & C, ,
Revision 4 dated 6/81 (g) HNP-2-3405, RCIC Pump Operability, Revision 10 dated
4/81 ' ' (h) HNP-2-3559, Liquid Effluent Radwaste Monitor Instru-mentation FT, Revision 3 dated 5/81 The inspector reviewed references (b) through (h) to assure they met the , requirements of reference (a), the accepted QA Program and ANSI N18.7-1976 , I as endorsed by that Program. The' inspector reviewed the following aspects of surveillance implementation and the surveillance testing and calibration control program: ! ! - A master schedule has beca established for the calibration / surveillance of safety and non-safety related equipment that includes the frequency j for each calibration / surveillance as well as the group responsible for ' performance of this action [ - Responsibilities have been assigned for updating this master schedule - Responsibilities have been established for conducting calibration / ! surveillance testing in accordance with approved procedures which include acceptance criteria and reauired verification that limiting conditions for operation were satisfied ,
- Verification that the surveillance of safety-related systems or components is being conducted in accordance with approved procedures as required by the Tecnnical Specifications and Inservice Inspection (ISI) program for pumps and valves ' The inspector reviewed various surveillance requirements for the HPCI pumps, . RCIC pumps, MSIV Closure Instrumentation Functional and Calibration, ! Radiation Protection for Main Steam and Liquid Effluent Radiation Monitoring j Instrumentation Functional Test.
The specific surveillance requirements ' reviewed are listed below: UNIT 1 HNP-0-3303-1, HPCI Pump (DP1), Revision 7 dated 3/81 HNP-0-3303-2, FPCI Turbine Data, Revision 7, dated 3/81 HNP-0-3303-3, HPCI Pump ISI Pump Operability, Revision 7 dated.3/81 -
.. - - -- - -- ___.- - _ - .- -.. .- -
' < d i !
4 i ' HNP-0-3303-4, HPCI Pump. Motor Bearing Temperature Measurements, Revision 7
dated 3/81 l HNP-0-3303-5, HPCI Pump Rated Flow (Reactor Pressure equals 150 PSIG) . Revisior 7 dated 3/81 I HNP-0-3405-1, RCIC Pump (DP1), Revision 10 dated 4/81 ~ HNP-0-3405-2, RCIC Turbine Data, Revision 10 dated 4/81 HNP-0-3405-3, RCIC Pump ISI Pump Operability, Revision 10 dated 4/81
HNP-0-3405-4, RCIC Pump Bearing Temperature Measurements, Revision 10 dated
4/81 HNP-0-3405-5, RCIC Pump Rated Flow (Reactor Pressure equals 150 PSIG), , Revision 10 dated 4/81 , UNIT 2 , ! HNP-0-3303-1, HPCI Pump (DP1 & 2), Revision 7 dated 3/81 , HNP-0-3303-2, HPCI Turbine Data, Revision 7 dated 3/81 ' HNP-0-3303-3, HPCI Pump ISI Pump Operability, Revision 7 dated 3/81 HNP-0-3303-4, HPCI Pump Motor Bearing Temperature Measurements, Revision 7
. dated 3/81 HNP-0-3303-5, HPCI Pump Operability (DP2)(At 165 + 15, -15 PSIG Reactor Pressure), Revision 7 dated 3/81 HNP-0-3405-1, RCIC Pump (DPI & 2), Revision 10 dated 4/81 HNP-0-3405-2. RCIC Turbine Data, Revision 10 dated 4/81 , HNP-0-3405-3, RCIC Pump ISI Pump Operability, Revision 10 dated 4/81 HNP-0-3405-4, RCIC Pump Motor Bearing Temperature Measurements, Revision 10 dated 4/81
HNP-0-3405-5, RCIC Pump Operability (DP2)(at 150+15,-0 PSIG Reactor Pressure), Revision 10 dated 4/81 HNP-0-3405-6, RCIC Pump Manual Suction Transfer, Revision 10 dated 4/81 HNP-0-3006, MSIV Closure Instrumentation FT&C, Revision 4 dated 6/81 , ! (Valves 2B21-F028A-D and Valves 2B21-F022A-D) j HNP-2-1050, Surveillance Checks, Radiation Protection Main Steam Line I Radiation, Revision 16 dated 2/81 HNP-2-3559, Liquid Effluent Radwaste Monitor Instrumentation FT, Revision , 3 dated 5/81 l Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
i 7.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Items ' a.
(Closed) Open Item (321,366/80-28-17): Plant housekeeping - need to document current practices.
The inspector reviewed HNP-556, Plant Housekeeping, Revision 6 dated 6/81, and verified that the typograph-i ical error making the wording of "were" and "where" on data sheet 1 ) had been corrected by Revision 5 dated 3/81.
This procedure appears
to provide adequate controls for general plant housekeeping, i i I , ) ..r~,w m,-r w,,m> - v.m.
,.--.rw.
v-7--.. . -y-y.w--- --w----,m _ - -, - -,+.-y,-- , n--~,,,---gw,,---,--<,,-,3-v.,-r.,,,,t.,.--. ~-r- ,g-,.., y --,-e, ,,,g-w-,-%.- - -, y y
- .. . -. - . -.-._ - . - -
. . . .
b.
(Closed) Open Item (321,366/80-28-20): Method for tracking offsite QA items.
Procedure QA-05-13 has been changed to provide a method for tracking offsite QA items. The inspector reviewed the QA Audit Finding
List and verified that this procedure has been implemented.
c.
(Closed) Open Item (321,366/80-28-23): Shelf-life program.
The inspector reviewed HNP-841, Material Shelf Life, Revision 0 dated 11/80.
This procedure describes and details the controls to be
implemented for the shelf life program.
The inspector talked to cognizant warehouse personnel and determined that thc shelf life ' i program, although limited in scope at the present time, is being implemented. This program will expand in scope as manufacturers detail shelf life requirements for materials that are brought on site.
d.
(Closed) Open Item (321,366/80-38-25): Change of rnord storage system.
The inspector reviewed the document control area.
All historical records were contained in cabinets or boxes. Records that were not in a file system were being processed. All quality records ' have been removed from the block house. The block house is scheduled , to be torn down in approximately two weeks.
e.
(0 pen) Open Item (321,366/80-28-27): Temperature control of remote warehouse.
The inspector reviewed this area and found that heaters .] with individual temperature controls and additional ventilation fans ' have been installed and appear to be controlling the warehouse tempera-
ture in the limits required. The survey of the materials that could j have been adversely affected by storage below 40 degrees F and appro-priate justification for use in a safety-related system has not been , completed at this time. This item will remain open pending completion of this survey and justification for material used in a safety related system.
f.
(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/80-28-32): Housekeeping /
cleanliness program.
The inspector toured the Unit 2 HPCI and LPCI i pump room (South end), the Unit 1 and 2 Control room, the Diesel l Generator Building, the Auxiliary Boiler Building, the Reactor Building ' and the 480 Volt Shutdown Board Room, in the presence of two licensee personnel. During this tour it was pointed out that housekeeping was not being adequately maintained in the HPCI and LPCI pump rooms. A list of unacceptable conditions was furnished to the licensee.
For those conditions identified, no items of safety significance were , noted, therefore, no violation is issued.
g.
(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item (321,366/80-28-34): Review of vendor performance. The inspector noted that the licensee no longer performs in-house audits and is now t ilizing Southern Company Services for the
audit and evaluation of the majority of quality item suppliers. As i i i < l i l
,... _, _. , _.... _.. _ -.,, _,.. _,,..,.. - _. -. _ _,..,. _,__,,..___,_.__.,._..,..,___.__m._ ,., ..,_,_m.
- _. - ~
. . . .
such, the vendor evaluation program is still in a process of implemen-tation. Procedures are in a revision status, integrating the Southern Company Services audit and evaluation system into the licensee's program. This area will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
h.
(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item (321,366/80-28-35): Use of non-qualified vendor.
The inspector selected ten purchase orders and identified two which had suppliers not listed on the licensee's qualified suppliers list (PR GP22-1569, IPSC0; PR GP22-732, Owens of Georgia).
The suppliers on both orders had been changed by the Purchasing Department.
Subsequent investigation revealed that both suppliers were satisfactory, one being on the Vogtle Project suppliers list and the other an agent for a supplier on the qualified suppliers list. As both were actually qualified, no violation is identified.
This item remains open, pending the licensee's implementation of the
current supplier evaluation program, to include clearly defining the method for handling supplier's agents, the use of other qualified sup-plier lists and the relationship of the Purchasing Department with respect to change of suppliers.
1.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321,366/80-28-37): HPCI and RCIC operational failures. The inspector discussed the HPCI system and RCIC
system failures with a licensee representative.
The three areas addressed and the current status for resolution are: I (1) The problem with high steam line delta p is corrected when three '
second time delay relay instrumentation is installed.
They are i currently on Unit 1 HPCI and Unit 2 RCIC system and will be j installed to Unit 1 RCIC and Unit 2 HPCI in July 1981.
! (2) Peak turbine overspeed is no longer a problem with automatic quick starts. This maintains turbine speed within acceptable limits.
' (3) Plans for replacing oversized check valves to reduce high steam exhaust back pressure are being made and should be installed in approximately one year.
Further analysis is being conducted through monthly quick starts and increased surveillances.
j.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321,366/80-28-38): Implementation of the laboratory quality assurance orogram.
The inspector reviewed various analytical data for the analysis performed by the chemistry department to determine conformance to the requirements of HNP-7651, Analytical Quality Control for Chemical Analysis, Revision 2 dated 2/81 and HNP-7652, Quality Control Chemistry Sample Program, Revision 0 dated 9/79.
The records available for review-indicated that the program is not completely implemented in that insufficient data has been obtained to develop required curves. Records provided by the _
_.
_ _ _ _ _ ____ . . . .
1 ' chemistry department and reviewed by the inspector showed that several curves developed did not correspond to data that was obtained for that instrument.
A schedule to perform various analyses was specified but the date the schedule was promulgated was not specified and the schedule did not accurately reflect acceptance limits shown on the various data sheets. This item is upgraded to an open item (321,366/ 81-17-01). The licensee provided a target date of October 1, 1981 for the establishment of a laboratory quality assurance program.
k.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321,366/81-06-01): Control of drawings. The inspector reviewed the controls established relative to plant drawings.
Ten drawings were reviewed at five locations.
The following represents a listing of the drawings and locations that were reviewed: DRAWING LOCATIONS H-16331
- Document Control Center H-16061
- Control Room H-26019
- Mechanical Shop H-26014
- Engineering Department H-16329
- 0perations Department H-16330 H-26016 H-26015 H-26001 H-26021
"These locations applicable for all drawings All locations contained the latest revisions for the drawing.
_ . _ _ _ - _ }}