IR 05000320/1981004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE ins Rept 50-320/81-04 on 810323-27.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Development of Preoperational & Startup Test Insp Program for Preoperational Portion of Decontamination Startup & Test Program
ML19350E097
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/1981
From: Caphton D, Nichols H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19350E095 List:
References
50-320-81-04, 50-320-81-4, NUDOCS 8106160660
Download: ML19350E097 (8)


Text

-

-

--

_

. _ _ _.

_

_

.

.

'

.

.

,

,

/\\

IO '~ k U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMI U?)

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORC

. Tf*<h. $

,C s

Region I

Y Report No. 50-320/81-04 o

f$.

s' hN f 'es

@f

Docket No. 50-320 t.

Category

$$.\\

L ense No. DPR-73 Priority

--

,

_,

-

'o %

-,

Licensee:

Metropolitan Edison Company g'g

_

P.O. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Facility Name:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 Inspection at:

Middletown, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:

March 23-27, 1981 M Ie N-M f/

Inspectors:

'

date signed H.H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector

.

cate signed date signed

.-

//

04 / /n Approved bv:

'~

L /

date signed

D.L. Caphton, Chief, Test Program Section, EIB, DETI Insoection Summary:

Inspection on March 23-27,1981 (Recort No. 50-320/81-04)

Routine, unannounced inspection by a region-based inspector Areas Insoected:

to develop a preoperational and startup test inspection program for the preoperational portion of the decontamination startup and test program at TMI Unit 2; to develop a preoperational and startup test inspection program i

for the submerged demineralizer system, and to determine the adequacy of l

'

the decontamination startup and test program for the submerged demineralizer The inspection involved 47.0 inspector-hours on site by one NRC system.

.

region-based inspector.

l No items of noncompliance were identified.

l Results :

,

I

i

' Region I Form 12

.

(Rev. April 77)

81061606(p0

_

.-

..

.__

-..

.-

.

. -..-

- -

_ _

-

- -

_ _ _. _

_ _

_

_ _ _.

__

._

-

.

.

OETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Metrooolitan Edison Comoany gg,

  • E.

Allen, GPU NQA Engineer

  • J.

Devine Jr, GPU Recovery Engineering M.

Herlihy, Startup and Test Manager, TMI Unit 2

  • G.

Hovey, GPU Director, TMI Unit 2

  • L.

King, GPU Manager Operations Unit 2

  • L.

Lehman Jr., GPU TMI Unit 2, Licensing

"J.

Marsden, GPU QASE, Quality Assurance

  • T.

Osterhoudt, GPU Recovery Engineering

  • G.

Skillman, GPU Recovery Engineering

  • J.

Wright, GPU QC Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • L.

Barrett, Acting Deputy Director, TMI PO R.

Bellamy, Chief, Operations TMI PO

  • R.

Cente, Senior Resident Inspector, TMI Unit 2

  • A.

Fasano, Chief, TMI PO

  • L.

Gage, Specialist, Operations TMI PO

  • T.

Martin, Chief, R1 Engineering Inspection Branch

  • T.

Poindexter, System Eng11eer, Operations TMI PO

  • A.

Sassani Jr., Reactor Inapector, R1

  • W.

Saunders, Reactor Inspector, R1

  • G.

Walton, Reactor Inspector, R1

  • J.

Wiebe, Systems Engineer, Operations TMI PO

  • denotes those present at exit interview 2.

Decontamination Startup and Test program i

Scope The thrust of this inspection by a Region 1 inspector was to develop a Preoperational and Startup Test Inspection Program for the preuserational portion of the Decontamination Startup and Test Program at TMI Unit 2.

i

!

Because this is a Recovery and Decontamination Program for TMI Unit 2, the following are considered as minimum for an adequate startup and i

j test program:

l-l

--

Overall p.eoperational test program review requirements; Preoperational test pr1 gram implementation;

--

.

- -,

.._

_,-

- - - - _ _.. _ _, -. _ _

_,

.

.

.. -

. - -

.

. _ _....

.. - -

-

.

.

.

.

,

.

.

,

.r

Preoperational test procedure reviews;

--

Preoperational test procedure verifications;

--

Preoperational test witnessing;

--

Preoperational test results evaluations;

--

Testing of Pipe support and restraint systems;

--

Construction /Startup testing of new or modified systems; and,

--

Containment leak rate tests for existing or possible new structures.

-

References Regulatory Guide 1.68, Revision 2, August 1978, Initial Test

--

Programs for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants.

TMI Umtt 2 Administrative Procedure AP 1047, Revision 0, December

--

10, 1980, Startup and Test Manual.

-

.

Discussions The inspector met with the Startup and Test Manager, TMI Unit 2 to discuss the licensee's decontamination startup and test program.

Discussions centered on test program requirements and implementation; test procedure reviews and verifications; test witnessing and test results evaluations; and, testing of new or modified systems.

_

The inspector reviewed the startup and test manual, various procedures, a typical test scheduling and sequencing chart, system diagrams and a sampling of turnover packages from construction to startup testing.

Findings l

As a result of the discussions with the Startup and Test Manager and l

his group; a review of the referenced documents: and inspection of a l

system in the construction phase (Submerged Cemi.ieralizer System), no discrepancies were noted.

The inspector concluded that based upon the selected sample taken, the Itcensee's Decontami. nation Startup and Test Program for TMI Unit 2 appears acceptable.

The inspector had no further questions at this time. These areas of the startup anc test program will be followed up on subsequent inspections.

N O

. _ - _.

,

.. _,

__

_,.

_ _ _ _ _.... _ _. _ _,

.. _., _. -,,,,. _... _... _,

-

. - -.,

.

-

-

,-

. J

- -. -.

.

-

--

.

_ _ -.

-

.

.

3.

Submerged Demineralizer System (SDS)

Scooe A major part of this inspection was to develop a Preoperational and Startup Test Inspection Program for the Submerged Demineralizer System (SDS).

It was also necessary to determine.the adequacy of the Decontamination Startup and Test Program for the Submerged Demineralizer System.

References TMI-2, Submerged Demineralizer System (SDS)-System Description,

--

Revision 1, October 3, 1980.

TMI-2, Technical Evaluation Raport (TER), "SDS", April 10, 1980.

--

TMI-2, TER Apperdix 1, "SDS", May 23, 1980.

--

TMI-2, Safety Evaluation Report, "SDS", February 6,1981.

--

TMi-2, AP 1047, Revision 0, Startup and Test Manual, December 10, 1980.

--

TMI-2, AP 1043, Revision C, Work Authorization Procedure, January

--

15, 1981.

-

TMI-2, TMI-11-R-1804, SDS Construction Turnover Status List,

--

February 19, 1981.

TMI-2, SDS-PF, Revision 1, SDS Process Flow Functional Test,

--

--

March 19, 1981.

TMI-2, SDS-LCS, Revision 1, SDS' Leakage Containmen* ;ystem Fun-

--

ctional Test, March 20, 1981.

TMI-2, SDP, Revision 0, SDS Feed Pump Functional Test, March 4,1981.

--

TMI-2, flS-07, Revision 0, SDS Filtration System Flush, February

--

20, 1981.

TMI-2, SDS-17, Revision 0, SDS Ion Exchanger System Flush,

--

March 20, 1981.

TMI-2, SDS Construction to Startup and Test Logic, March 23, 1981.

--

TMI-2, SDS Test Sequence Document, March 23, 1981.

--

iMI-2, SDS Graphic Display Composite Diagram..

--

TMI-2, Draft Copy, SDS Monitor Tank System Functional Test.

--

TMI-2, Draft Copy, SDS Dewatering System Functional Test.

--

.

TMI-2, SK 171-2, Revision 0, SDS Instrumentation, July 10, 1980.

--

.-.

.

. -. - -.

.

-_ -.. -

-

-..

- -.

. - -

___

_

_

_

_

_

_ _

.

_

.

.

.

.

.

~

l TMI-2, 5.6, SOS System Plan View and Floor Plan.

--

Plan and Elevation Diagram (P&ED), 5270-L-5030, Revision 0, SOS-

--

RCS Cleanup Marnfold, June 6,1980.

P&ED, 5270-L-5029, Revision 1, SOS-Dewatering ht tion, July 3,

--

1980.

P&ED, 5270-L-5028, Revision 1, SOS-Off' gas System, July 9,1980.

--

P&ED, 5270-L-5023, Revision 1, SOS-Beta Monitoring Manifold, July

--

3, 1980.

P&ED, 5270-L-5013, Revision 1, SOS-Feed Pump Discharge Piping,

--

June 6, 1980.

P&ED, 5270-L-5006, Revision 2, 57S-Feed Manifold, July 3, 1980.

--

P&ED, 5270-L-5001, Revision 1, SOS-Filter Manifold, March 17,

--

1980.

P,ing and Instrument Diagram (P&IO), 5270-A-5013, Revision 2, l

--

SOS-RCS Cleanup Manifold, June 5,1980.

P&IO, 5270-A-5009, Revision 3, SOS-Seta Monitoring Manifold, June

-

--

12, 1980.

P&ID, 5270-A-5007, Revision 1, SOS-Ion Exchange Equipment, June

--

6, 1980.

__

P&ID, 5270-A-5006, Revision 4, SOS-Intermediate Sampling System,

--

June 12, 1980.

P&ID, 5270-A-5005, Revision 2, S03-Ion Exchange Flow Sheet, June

--

12, 1980.

P&IO, 5270-A-5004, Revision 6, SOS-Offgas and Liquid Separation

--

System, June 12, 1980.

P&ID, 5270-A-5002. Revision 4, SOS-Contaminated Feed Water System,

--

June 12, 1980.

P&IO, 5270-A-5001, Revision 5, SOS-Supply Manifold Submerged Ion

--

Exchangers, June 30, 1980.

P&ID, 2-M74-PW01, Revision 1, SOS-Processed Water ftorage and Re-

--

cycle System, December 2, 1980.

P&ID, 2-M74-505-01, Revision 2, SOS-Feed and Monitor Tank, January

--

20, 1981.

-

USNRC RG 1.68, Revision 2, Initial Test Programs for Water Cooled

--

Nuclear Power Plants, August 1970.

.

.

y-gf

, -. -,-- -, -.

g.-

_ _ _

. - _

s

,.-ym,-,--+,_9--w--

9-__

s

,

y

.

._

__ _

.__ _

_

..

.

.

ANSI N18.7, Admin Controls and QA for the Operational Phase of

--

Nuclear Plants, 1976.

,

Discussions The inspector met with the Startup and Test Manager TMI Unit 2 and discussed the Submerged Demineralizer System and the SDS Construction and Startup Test Program.

Included in the discussions were the areas of the preoperational portion of the startup test program, including requirements and implementation; procedures for flushes, hydros, testing and operation; system and/or component turnovers, test scheduling, test sequencing and test witnessing; the Submerged Demineralizer System walkdowns; and, the inspectors review of the reference documents.

The inspector also discussed with the licensee's representative, procedure reviews and verifications, test witnessing and test results evaluations which would be done on a sampling basis by NRC IE inspectors.

Findings As a result of discussions witn the licensee's reprt;entatives, re-views of referenced documents and several tours of the SDS system and the refueling area, the inspector determined the following:

a.

Requirements and implementation of the preoperational and startup test program fm the SDS system have been addressed for the following areas:

test program and test organization, test program administration and document control, changes and modifications, maintenance and surveillanct, equipment protection and cleanliness, test and measurement equipment, and training and

--

qualifications.

b.

Procedures exist for flushes, hydros, preoperational, startup and functional tests for components and evolutions of SDS system testing. They address the following:

.

Management review and approval;

--

Format;

--

'

Cbjectives;

--

Prerequisites;

--

--

Er.vironmental conditions; Acceptance criteria;

--

.

--

References; Conditionsi

--

,

--

Objectives have been met;

.....

s,

.

Performance verification;

--

Recording conduct of test;

--

Restoration of system after test;

--

Identification of personnel conducting and evaluating test

--

and test data; and, Independent verification of critical steps or parameters.

--

c.

Turnovers, test scheduling and test sequencing from construction tu startup and test, to operations have been addressed through admiristrative procedures, flow paths for construction, startup

'

and test logic diagrams;' test sequence documents and SDS and

. _

related system. diagrams.

d.

Several visual inspections were made of the Submerged Demineral-irer System through walkdowns of ne system and refueling area.

Visual inspection and observations were made of system arrange-ment, components, piping, hanger supoorts, electrical cabling, instrumentation, system integration and interrelated system connections. Attention was also given to lighting and radiation monitoring of the area, as well as equipment protection and cleanliness.

,

No items of noncomoliance were identified.

The inspector concluded that the licensee has an acceptable test procram for the preoperational

portion of the SDS Construction and Startup Test Program at TMI Unit

~

2.

4.

NRC IE Insoector Observations Resulting from inspector reviews, discussions and visual inspections, the following items were identified for additional evaluation and resolution:

I a.

Adequacy of piping support in some areas around the valve man-l ifolds on the refueling floor, b.

Adequacy of the number of area radiation monitors (fixed and/or portable) in the refueling area.

c.

Adequacy of communications between the SOS operating areas on the refueling floor and the Unit 2 Control Room.

d.

Adequacy of emergency lighting for the refueling area.

Adequacy of procedures for handling a total loss of station power e.

(during functional oper: tion of the SDS).

.

-_

.

+--

v-t r--r-aw-t

  • ---- --

--+r.-

mw..,

e-g

-,

,. _..

.. -.

...

-

.

f.

Adequacy of Procedures for handling emergencies and abnormal occurrences such as:

(1)

fire (2) high radiation alarm (3) contamination of an individual (4)

an individual falling off of the platform into the fuel pool (5)

fainting or unconscious individual (6)

First aid for personnel (cut, bruise,etc.)

(7) quick removal of a person from refueling floor if necessary g.

Adequacy of high radiation sweeps af entire area when system is put into operation and periodically thereafter.

h.

Adequacy of overpressure protection in the SDS system as well as the interrelated adjacent systems.

1.

Neec for a central control point or control station for the SOS operation.

.

J.

Need for a designated person to be in charge at all times during functional operation of the SDS system.

k.

Need for restrictions or strict control of movement of the overhead

._

crane over the refueling pools during processing.

1.

Need for recording operations and evolutions in a log on the refueling floor during process'ng.

m.

Need for flow charts and/or diagrams on the refueling floor during operation. Need for installation, of valve position indicators at ecch reach rod penetration at aach of the valve manifolds on the refueling floor, so that valve position can be readily ascertained.

These items were brought to the attention of bcth the licensee and NRR personnel at the exit meeting. The inspector recognized the fact that many of these items are beyond the scope of the preoperational &

startup test phase and may be add" ssed in operating and emergency pracedures.

5.

Ex't Interview An exit meeting was conducted on March 26, 1981, with the licensee's senicr site representatives (denoted in paragraph 1).

The findinas were identified and the inspection program was discussed.

.

..,. -