IR 05000311/1979016
| ML18078B239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/1979 |
| From: | Caphton D, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078B238 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-79-16, NUDOCS 7904270091 | |
| Download: ML18078B239 (6) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Report No. 50-31*1/79-16 Docket.N......;;..;;;......;;.~---
Region I License N CPPR-53 Priority------
- Category ___
B_l __ _
Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
Hancocks Bridge, New J.ersey fl_
Inspection conductecil ~
F;:*ry 27 -28, 1979 Inspectors:
~
~VJJkt:fu bz" H. H: Nii' holas, Rejctor Inspector
Approved by:
Inspection Summary:
on, Chief, Nuclear Support No. 1, RO & NS Branch date signed date signed date signed dh-L/77 date signed Inspection on February 27-28, 1979 (Report* No. 50-311/79-.16)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional based inspector of the overall preoperational test program including:
test procedure review and verification; test results review and evaluation;
- startup test program startup -procedures; and, plant. tour of contai.n-ment, equipment protection, and cleanlines The inspection involved 13_ inspector-hours on site by one NRC regional based inspecto Results:
No items of noncompliance were identifie Region I Form 1 (Rev. April 77)
'**...II
DETAILS Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer - QA Mr.. J. Ciccone, Construction Startup Engineer Mr.. J. Cox, Construction Startup Engineer Mr. J. Destefano, Site QA Engineer Mr. H. Fistel,. Site QA Engineer
- Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
"*Mr. E. Meyer, Site QA Head United Engineers and Constructors, In Mr. M. Juister-,. Test Engineer The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel during
. the inspection including management, clerical, quality assurance, testing, and construction personnel.
- denotes those present at the exit intervie Preoperational Test Program Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for techni ca 1 and administrative adequacy:
SUP 16.4 Revision 0, Approved February 16, 197 Resin Removal Syste SUP 16.6 Revision 0, Approval February 21, 197 Gaseous Waste Processin The procedures were reviewed for the following:
Man_agement approva 1,
Appropriate committee review, Procedure format, Test objectives,
Prerequisites, Environmental conditions, Acceptance criteria, References,.
Initial conditions, Test: objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to nonnal after test, Evaluation of test data, and, Quality control verification.
Findi.ngs:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above that pro-cedures were consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance, and licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate
. testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commhments:
SUP 16.4 Revision O, Approved February 16, 197 Resin Removal Syste SUP 16.6 Revision 0, Approved February 21, 197 Gaseous Waste Processing.
'-..Ii
The inspector verified that the licensee had a proced~re written, reviewed, and approve Management approval was in accordance wit~ established licensee procedures and test objectives were consi~tent with test title Findings:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these proce-liures, and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Preoperational Test Results Evaluation
- The-following procedures were reviewed to ascertain whether uniform criteria was being applied for evaluating complete preoperational tests to assure technical.and administrative adequacy:
SUP* 10.2 Revision 0, Approved February* 6, 197 Boric Acid-System.
SUP lT.O Revision O, Approved February 6, 197 Com-*
ponent Cooling System -- Col SUP 37.Revision 0,. Approved January 16, 197 Seal Oil Syste SUP 50.5 Revtsion 0, Approved January 9,, 197 Samplin Syste SUP 50.98 Revision 0, Approved February 6, 197 Condenser Steam Dump System - Ho SUP 50.11 Revision 0, Approved January 30, 197 Chemical and Volume Control System - Ho The inspector reviewed the test results, and made verifications of the licensee evaluations.of test results, by the following methods:
Review of all test changes, Review of all test deficiencies,
3 *.
Review of all test. excepti ans, Review of* test summary and evaluation, Review* of 11as-run 11 copy of* test procedures, Review of QA inspection records, and, Verifying thatthe test results have been approved *
. Eindings:
Th~: inspector made note of each procedure change, exception, and deficiency, and cross-referenced these items to the licensee's outstanding items lis No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Startup Test Program The 0 followin~ draft copies of Startup Procedures have been trans-mitted thrO:ugh the* Resident Reactor Inspector for NRC review:
SUP 6 Ihitial Cbre Loadin SUP 8T.3. Turbine Overspeed Trip Tes SUP 81. 1 Incore Excore Detector Calibratio SUP 81.12 Alignment of Process Temperature Instrumentatio SUP 81.12 Statepoint Data Collectio SUP 81..12 Intermediate and Power Range Channel High Vo lt_age Sett i_ng Verificatio A detailed review of approved procedures will be made in subse-quent inspection The inspector had no further questions at this tim *:*
- 6 Pl ant Tour*
The inspector toured. the* containment observing work in progress focl uding:
cleaning, painting, equipment protection,. storage and cleanliness. Tha inspector expressed his concern to the licensee's representative, regarding the apparent excess debtts observed in the pressurizer area,' where insulation work was being performe Additional., inspection fol lowup on. this item will be. provided *.
.
._
.*
-
~
The* irispection-inducfed~:obse'rvations:* of.the reactor.vessel head,.
head-bolts*~~ and upper and lower 1]..rJ.1~r11~s~ for proper storage,
-
protection, and.cleanliness *
. No items of noncompliance were identifie.
Exit Interview At the-conclusion of the site* inspection of February 28, 1979, an-exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's seni'or site representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1). The findings of this inspection were discussed durinQ the exit meeting.