IR 05000302/1977026
| ML19308D500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/1978 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Jenkins G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19308D491 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-77-26, NUDOCS 8002280814 | |
| Download: ML19308D500 (5) | |
Text
.
.
<
~
8 #80
[g6
,
'
0s,'c UNITED STATES N
'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
\\,
-
-
-;'i
,,,(
REclONil
/
r 230 PEACHTREE STREET. N.W. SUITE 1217
o,
[
ATt.ANTA, cEoRGIA 30303
%,
- -
,r
-
....*
.
Report No.: 50-302/77-15
'
Docket No.: 50-302 Licensee: Florida Power Corperation P. O. Box 14042 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Facility Name:
Crystal River, Unit 3 Inspection at: Crystal River Site, Crystal River, Florida Florida Power Corporation Headquarters, Petersburg, Fla.
Florida Power Corporation Environmental and Fuel Oil Laboratory, St. Petersburg, Florida Inspection conducted: December 19-22, 1977 s
s Inspector:
A. L. Cun ingham Reviewed by: T h
'
G. R. Jenkins, Acting Section Chief Date Environmental and Special Projects Section Fuel Facilities and Materials Safety Branch i
,
Inspection Summarv_
,
'
.
Inspection on December 19-22, 1977 (Report No. 50-302/77-15)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of nonradiological environmental protection including management and administrative con-trols; chemical and thermal monitoring; environmental surveillance;
)
i special surveillance studies; followup on licensee event reports.
The inspection involved 32 inspector-hours on site by one NRC inspector.
{
Results:
Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncom-j pliance were identified in four areas; two apparent items of noncom-pliance were identified in one area (deficiency:
review and audit -
Details I, paragraph 4.b) (deficiency: procedures - Details I, para-graph 4.c).
8002280
.
.
N
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-302/77-15 I-l
-
/
DETAILS I Prepared by:
,/,
[/
M x 4 -'s A. L. Cunningham, Yn gvnmettfal Scientist ' Date Environmental and Sprecial Projects Section Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch Dates of Inspecti n*
cem er 19-22, 1977 Reviewed by:
'
[
.
G. R. M ihs, Acting Chief
'
Date Envirohnfental and Special Projects Section Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch 1.
Persons Contacted
- G. P. Beatty, Nuclear Plant Manager
- J. R. Wright, Chemical / Radiation Engineer
- W. P. Stewart, Director Power Production
- C. D. Perkins, Health Physics Supervisor
- R. E. Fuller, Plant Engineer
- J. Cooper, Compliance Auditor Q. B. Dubois, Manager, Nuclear Support Services B. P. Hunt, Environmental Chemist R. M. Bright, Nuclear Support Engineer J. Kurtz, Assistant Meteorologist J. F. Studt, Environmental Scientist
- Denotes those present at exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings, There were no previous nonradiological environmental inspection findings.
-
3.
Unresolved Items
)
No unresolved items were disclosed during this inspection.
4.
Administrative Controls t
Section 5.0 of Appendix B Technical Specifications charges the a.
licensee with responsibility for establishment, execution and review of programs to administer the Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS).
The section further requires detailed written operating procedures and the establishment of organiza-j tional and administrative procedures that will provide for h
J
~
_.
..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _.-_
-___
~
.
,
]
.
%
~'
,
'N)-
RII Rpt. No. 50-302/77-15 I-2
'
.
i management review and independent audit functions to assure implementation of the ETS. The inspector reviewed organizational responsibility for implementation of environmental monitoring, surveillance, and special studies programs defined in Appendix B Technical Specifications. Review of FPC Corporate Environmental i
Department functions and detailed df.scussions with licensee representatives disclosed that program responsibilities appeared consistent with those requirements defined in the ETS.
b.
Appendix B Technical Specification 5.3 requires the licensee to conduct an annual audic which includes the following:
(1)
implementation of environmental monitoring and surveillance programs imposed by the Environmental Specifications; (2)
conformance to procedures and Environmental Technical Speci-fication requirements; (3) contractor operations. The inspector reviewed the licensee's Audit Report No. QP-139. The audit was conducted on September 23, 1977.
Inspection disclosed that the auditors failed to audit implementacion of monitoring and surveillance, conformance of such programs to procedures and technical specification requirements, and contractor activities involved in monitoring and special study requirements.
The inspector discusced these findings with licensee represent-
~
atives.
The inspector informed licensee representatives that failure to inplement audit requirements imposed by the subject specification constituted an item of noncompliance. A licensee representative stated that audit requirements would be reviewed
{
and that corrective actions would be determined.
The inspector reviewed detail written procedures for non-
'.
c.
radiological monitoring and surveillance requirements defined
!
in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of Appendix B Specifications. Assessment of compliance with procedural requirements defined in Appendix 3 disclosed the following findings:
(1) the licensee provided no procedure for Specification 2.1.1 (maximum condenser AT);
(2) failure to review and approve procedures for Specifica-tions 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3 and 3.1.5 (benthos, marsh grass, intake screens impingement, general ecological survey, and waste water treatment system respectively). The latter surveillances and those in Section 4.0 were conducted by licensee contractors and consultants. The inspector discussed
these findings with licensee representatives and informed them that failure to implement procedural requirements constituted an item of noncompliance. A licensee representative stated that these findings would be reviewed and appropriate correc-tive actions would be implemented.
!
l l
l
.
__ _ _ _,. _ _ _, _. _ ~ _
...
..,
_, _ _ _ -
....
.
,
.
_
_
-
.
.
s.
'
,
!
t
'
.
'RII Rpt. No. 50-302/77-15 I-3
_
,
5.
Chemical Industrial Waste Water Treatment System Appendix B Technical Specification 3.1.5 requires monthly monitoring of the two wastewater ponds and adjacent test wells 1, 4 and 5 for i
i Tu and selected chemical parameters (viz., nutrients dissolved solids and trace metals).
Review and audit of monthly analytical
.'
data disclosed that the subject requirement was implemented as defined. The inspector also reviewed and audited analytical and analytical quality control proced".es veilized in implementing the subject requirement. There were no suestions regarding this item.
6.
Environmental Surveillance
i Implementation of Appendix B Technical Specifications 3.1.1 through 3.1.4 during the period December 1976 through November 19, 1977, was audited by the inspector. Operational nonrad surveillance studies included benthos, marsh grass (biomass. productivity, respiration), intake screens impingement, and general ecological survey, respectively.
Inspection disclosed that all studies were implemented as required including surveillance frequency, data
-
reduction and analysis, and reporting. There were no questions regarding this matter.
7.
Special Surveillance Research The inspector audited implementation of special surveillance studies defined in Appendix B Technical Specifications 4.1 through 4.3 for the period December 1976 through November 1977.
The studies included i
thermal plume determinations during Unit 3 operation, intake velocity
]
determinations, and erosion in the discharge system respectively.
Inspection disclosed that the subject specifications were implemented
'
as required. There were no questions regarding this item.
8.
Thermal Discharge and AT Monitoring The inspector audited implementation of continous monitoring of thermal discharge and condenser AT (ETS-2.1.1, 2.1.2) for the
period December 1976 through November 1977.
Inspection included audit of daily temperature summaries, and discussions with cognizant licensee representatives.
Inspection disclosed that the subject specifications were implemented as required.
O
.
t
'
-
-
,
..
y
,.
.., -
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,,,. _,. _, -,. ____-
,-.e
.,,, _. -
..
..-,,-,.,,,,-..,p4
-
_
_
_._
.
.
<*eiw A.
,_ -
s (
RII Rpt. No. 50-302/77-I5 I-4
.
9.
Followup of Licensee Event Reports The inspector reviewed and discussed with licensee representatives
'
all nonrad events reported to NRC during the period February 1977 through December 22, 1977. The reportable events included the following:
(1) fish impingement - ETS-3.1; (2) thermal discharge -
ETS 2.1.2; (3) thermal plume verification studies. Inspection disclosed that in all cases, appropriate corrective actions were implemented, and efforts to preclude recurrences were taken. These events have been closed out.
There were no furtherquestions regarding these items.
'
10.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in para-graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 22, 3377.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and discussed l
the items of noncompliance listed herein.
.
.-
.
.
_ -..
.
_
-.
.
-
_
-
...., -.,.
-.
-....,.. -..