IR 05000280/1989035

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-280/89-35 & 50-281/89-35 on 891204-06.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Configuration Mgt Program
ML18153C065
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/28/1989
From: Jape F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18153C064 List:
References
50-280-89-35, 50-281-89-35, NUDOCS 9001190061
Download: ML18153C065 (6)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:

50-280/89-35 and 50-281/89-35 Licensee:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Glen Allen. VA 23060 Docket Nos.:

50-280 and 50-281 License Nos.: OPR-32 and OPR-37 Facility Name:

Surry 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted:

December 4-6.1989 Inspector:

~C:?1,*{ /r ~

F. Jape. Team Leader Team Members:

W. Poertner C. Smith Approved by:

-/;/ C{1/l h_,,

Sc0pe:

F. Jape. Section Chief Quality Performance Section Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY I ?./ 2 - ~/ J>J Date Signed I ?- 1*1 y I <F7 Date Signed

This special. annour.ced inspection was a review of thP licensee 1s Configuration Management Progra Results:

Ir. the areas inspected. violations or deviations were not identifie The licensee I s Configuration Management Program is broad in scope with numerous activities intended to verify and document the licensing commitments for Surry and North Anna Nuclear Power Stations in addition to generating design basis information for both facilities. Significant resources have been allocated to this projec Completion of the System Design Basis Documents is presently on schedul Integration of the completed System Design ~asis Documents within the overall plant work processes will result in a Configuration Management Program that ensurPs (1) establishment of a base-line where plant design documents are consistent with well defined design bases and (2) design output documents are representative of actual plant configuratio Significant improvements in the preparation. review. approval. and installation of plant modifications are the results expected from implementation of this progra '?(i(l 105 o*~:;0002:=::o PDC

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees F. K. Moore, V. P. Nuclear Engineering Services

  • D. L. Benson, Project Manager Configuration Management
  • R. W. Calder, Manager Nuclear Engineering W. L. Thompson. Manager Electrical Enoineering
  • R. M. Berryman, Manager Nuclear,Analysis and Fuels
  • R. F. Saunders, Manaaer Nuclear Licensina and Proorams L. N. Harti, Manager.ISi/NOE

.

.

  • J. P. Maciejewski~ Manager Nuclear Quality Assurance
  • W. T. McBride, Supervisor Electrical Engineerinq
  • P. T. Knutsen, Supervisor Nuclear Engineering Programs
  • G. S. Salomone, Staff Specialist
  • G. P. Zagursky, *consultant Other 1 icensee employees contacted during this inspection included engineers, and administrative personnel. Configuration Control Progra The inspectors reviewed the scope and status of the licensee's configuration management progra The objective of the proqram is to establish th~ design basis of the facility, validate the design basis, verify the physical confiouration, ensure availability of accurate desian information and to ensure that processes control the documented ronfiauration. The confiauration management prooran ~s broken into the follo~ing program elements: document asses~ment, design basis documentation, design information assessment, surveillance ~nd performance*reviews, integration~ physical verification, process analysis, systems integration, and vendor.information and documer,t control The individual proqram elements are discussed belo Document Assessmen This program identifies, collects, reviews, organizes and indexes various document types to facilitate efficient production of design basis document The licensee has identified eighteen categories of documents that are required to be obtained to support the configuration management progra The licensee estir,1fltes that 80 percent of the information required will be contained in the targeted categories. Additionally, the licensee is obtaining copies of records from the NRC Public Document Room to ensure consistency between NRC records and Virginia Power Company records concerning licensina commitment The inspectors were informed that assessment of licensinq commitwrnts is the critical path for completion of the System Desion Basis Document This program is approximately 40 percent complete n~d is scheduled for completion by June 30, 199 *

2 Design Basis Documentatio This program generates the System Design Basis Documents (SDBD).

Presently nine SDBD's for Surry and nine SDBD's for North Anna have been completed by Stone & Webster and are under review by the licensee. These 18 SDBD's are scheduled for issuance in the first quarter of 199 The following systems were included in the 1989 SDBD program:

Auxiliary Feedwater Service Water Instrument Air Emerqency Power Diesel Generators Emergency DC Power Containment Spray Recirculation Spray Safety Injection SDBD's for the following systems are scheduled t6 be completed in 1990:

Component Cooling Feedwater Condensate Main Steam Gaseous Waste Nuclear Stea~ Supply Systems Reactor Coolant Residual Heat Removal Charging Reactor Protection lhe licensee is also preparing a r1ant Design Basis Document for both Surry c.nd North Ar*n The Plant Design Basis Document \\'Jill include oener~l desiq11 basis information applicable to all systems, structures and component This effort is scheduled for completion by Auqvst 31, 1990.

.,.., Design Information Assessmen This program reviews and assesses the critical calculations associated with each syste ThP. licensee has defined critical calculations as calculations that d~fine or support key system design parameters, calculations which demonstrate the plant or system desiqn basis or calculations which translate safety related functional requirements into key system design parameters. This review wil 1 be performec following completion of each SDB The review of the critical calculations for the SDBD's completed in 1989 is scheduled for completion by March 31~ 1990.

~.

3 Surveillance and Performance Review This program identifies all pre-operational, special and surveillance tests performed on the system. determines the scope and validity of each test, establishes which system functions have and have not been demonstrated and recommends any new testing or improvements to existing test method The surveillance and performance reviews associated with the SDBD's completed in 1989 are scheduled for completion by March 31, 199 Integratio This proqram reviews operations and maintenance procedures to ensure they are consistent with the design basis. The licensee is presently developi integration review guidelines and is scheduled to have them completed and provided to the system engineers by December 31, 198 The integration reviews are scheduled for completion by March 31, J990 for the SDBD's completed in 198 Physical Verificatio This program includes walkdowns of the systems to confirm they are functionally built in accordance with the design basis, collection of manufacturer nameplate data and entry into the equipment data system, a~d review and upgrade of the station vendor technical manual The system walkdowns are presently scheduled to continue through the first quarter of 199 Process Analysi This program reviews the operations, maintenance and engineering processes to identify improvements to establish or enhance configuration manaqemen Completion and inteoration of all process reviews is scheduled for complPtion by September 30~ 199 Systems Integratio This program develops or upgrades information systems to-support the configuration management objectives. The licensee is presently developing an equipment data system to receive the data generated by the physical verification progra This system is scheduled'to be implemented by May 15, 199 The licensee is also developing a bill of materi~ls syste Development of this system is scheduled for completion by June 30, 199 i. Vendor Informatio This proaram uparades vendor information for both Surrv and North Anna site The licensee is-presen~ly scheduled to develop auidelines for the vendor urqrade program by December 31, 1985. Assembly-ard validation of the vendor information packages is scheduled to continue in parallel with the physical verificatiGn progra *

~.

4 Document Control This program assesses and improves the records management and document control activities to incorporate the principles and practices of effective configuration managemen The licensee has presently completed an initial records management and control assessment and established a document control and records management steering committe The licensee has also retained NUS corporation to develop and assist in the implementation of an improvement pla.

Instrument Setpoint Progra Activities involving the instrument setpoint implementation/change process is not part of the SDBD projec These activities are being administered under a separate project in response to issues identified by the NRC in previous inspection Licensee management discus~ed these ongoing activities and explained the procedural controls that will ensure configuration management of setpoint dat The process will involve a computerized system with appropriate security checks to ensure the integrity of the setpoint data bas A setpoint initiation/change form is the vehicle u-sed for initiation of setpoint changes resulting from preparation of a design change package/engineering work reques The preparation, review, approval and implementation of setpoint changes are procedurally controlle Entry of setpoint data information into the data base will be controlled by a new procedure yet to be develope The scope of the setpoint activities include calibration of instrument loops; review of setpoint calculations for (1) safety related instruments, (2) important to safety instruments and (3) balance of plant instrument This activity is scheduled for completion in December 199.

Quality Assurance's Role in Configuration Managemen The corporate quality assurance organization has prepared a position paper, that describes the scope of their involvement in the configuration management projec Their role will be one of assessing the goals, objectives, and accomplishments of the program for adequacy and consistency with similar industry effort The quality assurance organization will provide independent monitoring, verification, and audit activities in the following areas:

Development of implementing procedure Review of selected design basis document Monitoring, tracking, and closeout of unresolved issue Monitoring of physical verification walkdown Evaluating the process analysis and systems integratio Monitoring of document managemen Monitoring of the vendor information acquisition and evaluatio Monitoring of the procedure revision proces Auditing overall project complianc *

5 Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on December 6, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph Altho~gh review~d during this inspection, proprietary information is not contained in this report.