IR 05000280/1989004
| ML18153B660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1989 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18153B659 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-89-04, 50-280-89-4, 50-281-89-04, 50-281-89-4, NUDOCS 8903310063 | |
| Download: ML18153B660 (12) | |
Text
- r Report Nos.:
50-280/89-04 and 50-281/89-04 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Glen Allen, VA 23060 Docket Nos.:
50-280 and 50-281 Facility Name:
Surry 1 and 2 License Nos.: DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection Conducted:~ _Febr~ary 13~17, 1989
.
~ ~, ~:,,
-/
/_
InspectorQ/~~;-/t(~??t..--
c-~r J. R. Harris
1
-- 6-,
g;*
I Approved b~~~->(f:/a;-32-y;( 6::.--Z-L--
T. E. Conlon, Chief Plant Systems Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of fire protection/prevention and followup on previous identified inspection item Results In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified. During this inspection, the licensee was very cooperative in providing the inspector with applicable procedures, records, and walkdown inspection of fire protection equipment and responses to previously i dent ifi ed i tern No weaknesses were identified during this inspectio ~R ADOCK G
890314 05000280 PNU
- Persons Contacted Licensee Employees C. Core, Loss Prevention REPORT DETAILS
- L. F.arinholt, Loss Prevention
- E. Grecheck, Assistant Station Manager
- G. Miller, Licensing Coordinator
- R. Morgan, Quality Assurance
- W. Robbins, Corporate Loss Prevention Other 1 i censee emp 1 oyees contacted during this inspection inc 1 uded engineers, operators, security force members, technicians, and administrative personne NRC Resident Inspector
- W. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview Fire Protection/Administrative Control Procedures The inspector reviewed the following fire prevention/administrative procedures:
Procedure N FPP April 5, 1988 SUADM ADM - 20, April 26, 1988 SUADM ADM - 30, April 22, 1986 Title Fire Protection Program Special Processes Involving Ignition Sources Fire Protection Guidelines Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the N,RC guidelines of the document entitled, Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Functional Responsibilities, Administfative Controls, and Quality Assurance dated June 197 Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following fire protection system procedures:
Procedure N PT 2 PT-24.lA Title Fire Protection Water Pump, Revision April 8, 1988 - Monthly Fire Protection, Testable Valves, Revision October 16, 1988 - Annually
- Procedure N PT-2 T-24.2A PT-24.28 PT-24.4E PT-24.4F PT-24.4H 1-PT-24.47 PT-24.18
PT-24.19 PT-24.20 PT-24.23 PT-24.24 PT-24.11 PT-24.11A 1 PT-24.118 PT-24.30 PT-24.29
Title High Pressure CO 2 Emergency Service, Revision April 3, 1988 - Semiannually High Pressure CO 2 Emergency, Revision March 31, 1988 - Semiannually High Pressure CO 2 System (Fuel Oi 1 Pump House) Revision.March 31, 1988 - Semiannually Fire Protection Extinguishers, Revision November 13, 1987 - Monthly Fire Protection Systems Extinguishers and Hose Station, Revision May 5, 1987 - Monthly Fire Protection Hose House and Hydrants, Revision November 11, 1988 - Monthly Transformer Fire Protection Trip Test, Revision January 3, 1987 - Refueling The Smoke Detection Power Supply Test, Revision July 14, 1988 - Monthly Flow Test of Fire Flammable Liquid Storage, Revision February 18, 1988 - Monthly Flow Test of Fire Protection System, Revision February 3, 1988 - Every Three Years Fi re Doors, Fi re Water Tank Levels and CO 2 Level Weekly, Revision November 11, 1988 - Weekly Fire Doors Daily, Revision January 30, 1989 -
Daily Fi re Barriers, Revision September 16, 1986 -
Every 18 months Fire Doors, Revision April 19, 1988 - Monthly Fire Retardant Coating and Cable Tray Fire Stop, Revision May 3, 1988 - Refueling Robert and Shaw Fire Detection System, Revision January 3, 198 - Semiannually Fire Protection Gas Turbine 251 Fixed Dry Chemical, Revision March 22, 1988 -Semiannually
Procedure N (cont'd)
PT-24.40 PT-24.41 1 P2-47a l-PT-47b PT-47-A l-PJ-47a PT-47H l-PT-24.44 l-PT-24.45 l-PT-24.46 l-PT-24.47 PT-24.33
Title Fire Protection LEOF Halon System, Revision July 14, 1988*- Monthly Self Contained Breathing Apparatus Cylinder Inspection Revision July 14, 1988 - Monthly Emergency DC Lighting Self Canta in Battery Test, Revision May 1, 1987 - Monthly Emergency Lighting 8 Hour Battery Discharge Test, Revision September 11, 1987 - Refueling Emergency DC Lighting Self Contain Battery Test, Revision May 1, 1987 ~ Semiannually Emergency Lighting Self Cqn~ain Battery Test, Revision May 1, 1987 - Month 1!lY
'
' '
Emergency DC Lighting Se lf1 Contained Battery Test (Emergency Service Wat~r Pump House),
Revision May 1, 1987 - Mon~hv
.
Emergency Switchgear Room Ha~on Test, Revision November 29, 1988 - Annually*
Emergency Switchgear Room Halon Test, Revision September 23, 1986 - Monthly Emergency Switchgear Room Halon, Revision January 30, 1989 - Semiannually Transformer Fir~ Protection Trip Test, Revision March 24, 1988 - Annually Fire Protection Valve Position, Revision January 28, 1988 - Monthly The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement the surveillance requirements of the plants fire protection Technical Specification In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practice.s, NRC fire protection guidelines and the guidelines of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
fire code Based on this review, it appears that the procedures are satisfactory.
- Fire Protection Surveillance Inspections and Tests The inspector reviewed the following survei 11 ance i nspecti ans and test records for the dates indicated:
PT 2 PT-2 PT-24.2D PT-24.4E PT-24.23 P-PT-2 PT-24.31 1-PT-24.16 PT-24.llA 1-PT-24.44 Fire Protection Water Pump Test, weekly chec Reviewed tests performed July 1 through December 22, 1988
.
High Pressure CO2 Emergency Service Water Pump House test semiannuall Reviewed test performed September 19, 1988 High Pressure CO 2 System Emergency Service Water Pump House, performed every six month Reviewed tests performed September 19, 1988 and April 15, 1988 Fire Protection Extinguisher Inspection performed monthl Reviewed inspections performed January 18 through December 1988 Fire Door Assure weekly that fire doors are in closed positio Reviewed weekly inspect i ans performed January 1988 through December 28, 1988 Periodic test of fire protection water pumps weekl Reviewed weekly inspections performed January 1988 through December 22, 1988 Fire Protection Fire Hose Station Inspection and Flow Test performed during refuelin Reviewed inspection performed July 6, 1988 Fire Protection Containment Inspections; Performed monthly after the Unit had t?een at cold shutdown for more than seven day Reviewed inspections performed April 22, 1988 through December 29, 1988 Fire Doors Monthly* Inspectio Reviewed inspections performed January 16, 1988 through December 14, 1988 Emergency Switchgear Room Halon Check performed annuall Reviewed test performed May 9, 1988
- l-PT-24.45 PT-24.30 PT-24.4A l-PT-47A 2-PT-47A PT-47-lF PT-47J PT-47E PT-47A PT-24.19
Emergency Switchgear Room Halon Surveillance performed monthl tests performed January 18, 1988 December 21, 1988 Chec Reviewed through Periodic Syste Reviewed April 27, Test of Robert Shaw Fire Detection Test performed semiannuall tests performed March 4, 1988 1988 and July 10, 1988 Fire Protection Extinguishers performed monthl Reviewed tests performed January 1, 1988 through December 1, 1988 Emergency DC Lighting Self Contained Battery Test, performed monthl Reviewed monthly tests performed January 23, 1988 through December 23, 1988 Emergency DC Lighting Self Contained Battery test performed monthl Reviewed monthly tests performed January 21, 1988 through December 19~ 1988 Emergency DC Lighting Self Contained Battery Test, Emergency Service Water Pump House performed monthl Reviewed tests performed January 24, * 1988 through December 24, 1988 Emergency DC Lighting Self Contained Battery Tes Emergency Diesel Generator Roo Performed monthl Reviewed tests performed January 22, 1988 through January 21, 1989 Emergency DC Self Contained Battery test Auxiliary Buildin Performed monthl Reviewed tests performed January 29, 1988 through December 24, 1988 Emergency DC Lighting Self Contained Battery Tes Performed semi annuall Reviewed tests performed January 30, 1988, July 1988 and January 198 Fire Protection Flammable Liquid Storage Inspection performed monthly, Reviewed inspections performed April 15, 1988 through December 1988.
The surveillance test data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance test inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the requirements of the plants fire protection technical specification Fire Protection Audit The most recent audit reports of the fire protection program were reviewed, these audits were:
Annual Audit S-88-26, December 19-20, 1988 Nuclear Mutual Limitied Loss Prevention Inspection of Surry Power Station, April 6-8, 1988
Nuclear Mutua 1 Limited Loss Prevention Inspection Surry Power Station, October 11-13, 1988 These audits identified several fire protection piogram discrepancies and recommended several program improvement The 1 icensee has either implemented the corrective actions associated with th~se audit findings or a scheduled date for completion of the corrective actions has been establishe The licer:isee appears to be taking the appropriate corre~tive actions on these audit f~nding Fi re Brigade (1)
Organization The total station fire brigade is composed of approximately 57 personnel from the operations and security staf The on duty shift fire brigade leader is normally one of the operator The inspector reviewed the on duty shift for February 1989 and verified that sufficient qualified fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet the provisions of the plants technical specificatio In addition, the inspector verified that r>
sufficient personne 1 were assigned to each s.hi ft to meet the minimum operating and fire brigade staff requirements of the technical specification Therefore, it appears based on the review of the duty ro*sters associated with the above dates, that there was sufficient manpower on duty to meet both operational and fire brigade requirements of the plants Technical Specification (2) Training The inspector reviewed the training and drill records for 15 brigade ~eaders and 20 brigade members for 1988 and 198 The records revi ew*ed i nd1 cated :that each of these 1 eaders and members had received an annual medical review, attended the
<_,_.**_... _.*
(3)
required training and participated in the required number of dri 11 The inspector a 1 so verified that a fire brigade dri 11 had been conducted every 92 days for each shift for 198 The brigade training records which were inspected were found satisfactor Fire Brigade Firefighting Strategies The inspector reviewed plant and fire fighting strategies for the Auxiliary and Containment Buildin Firefighting strategies reviewed were strategy numbers 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 112, 122, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 134, 144, 145, 146, 149, 150, 151, 153, 155, 158 and 16 The firefighting strategies were revised April 5, 198 Based on this review, the inspector determined that the firefighting strategies adequately addressed the fire hazards in the area, the type of fire extinguishants to be utilized, the direction of attack, systems in the room/area to be managed in order to reduce fire damage, heat sensitive equipment in the room area and specific fire brigade duties with regard to smoke control and salvag (4)
Fire Brig~de Drill During this 1nspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced fire brigade dril The drill scenario was a fire in the Unit two cable tray roo The scenario was that cable was smoldering in the penetration area behind the Unit 2 reactor trip breaker roo Ten fire brigade members responded to the pending fir The brigade assembled outside the Unit 2 cable spreading room in full protective firefighting turnout clothing and self contained breathing apparatu An initial siz~-up of the fire condition was made by the brigade leade Two ABC extinguishers and a 1\\ inch fire attack hose were used to extinguish the fir The fire was placed under control in 30 minute In addition, the fire brigade initiated fire victim search and rescue, smoke control and communication The fire brigade utilized proper manual firefighting methods and reacted to the fire drill scenario in an effective and efficient manne Plant Tour Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment (1) The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equipment lockers at the fire brigade equipment response location located in the truck bay of the turbine building.
.... :. ~--~
A total of four lockers were inspected which contained eight sets of turnout gear (coats, boats, helmets etc.) eight sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 24 spare air cylinders just outside the control room in the turbine buildin Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment appeared to be properly maintained and stored in a ready conditio (2)
Outside Fire Protection Walkdown The inspector verified that the two fire pumps were inservice with all essential valves properly aligne The diesel fuel tank for the diesel driven fire pump was approximately ninety percent full of fuel which met the requirements of the Technica Specification In addition, the. low pressure CO 2 tank was verified to be 95 percent full as required by Technical Specification The following sectional control valves in the outside fire protection water supply system were inspected and verified to be properly aligned and locked in position:
Valve Number 1-FP-46 1-FP-47 1-FP-48 1-FP-49 1-FP-53 1-FP-40 1-FP-23 1-FP-81 1-FP-85 1-FP-91 1-FP-101 Valve Number 1-FP-35 1-FP-54 1-FP-56 1-FP-56A 1-FP-41 1-FP-42 1-FP-26 1-FP-79 1-FP-86 1-FP-92 1-FP-93 Hose houses 6, 7, 8, 9 and 15 were inspected to verify that the proper equipment was installe This inspection verified that the proper amount of equipment was properly stored in the hose cabinet A tour of the exterior of the plant indicated that sufficient clearance was provided between permanent safety related buildings and structures and temporary buildings, trailers and other transient combustible material The general housekeeping of the area adjacent to the permanent plant structures was satisfactory.
~.. ;. ~ :"
')
(3)
Permanent Plant Fire Protection Features A plant tour was made by the inspecto During the plant tour the following safe shutdown related plant areas and their related fire protection features were inspected:
Fire Area Description
Emergency Diesel Generator Room 1
Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2
Emergency Diesel Generator Room 3
Unit 1 Safeguards
Unit 2 Safeguards The fire/smoke detection systems, manual firefighting equipment (i.e., portable extinguishers, hose stations, etc, etc.) and the fire area boundary walls, floors, and ceiling associated with the above pl ant areas were inspected and verified to be in service or functiona The CO 2 (Halon) system installed in the three diesel generator rooms were inspected and found to be in servic Bas~d on this inspect~on, it appears that the iire protection features associated with the above plant areas are satisfactorily maintaine The plant tour also verified the licensee's implementation of the fire prevention administrative procedure The control of combustibles, and flammable materials, liquids and gases, and the genera 1 housekeeping were found to be good in the areas inspecte (4)
Appendix R Fire Protection Features
. ",. < ~--
The inspector visually inspected the fire rated raceway for breaks required for compliance with Appendix R,Section III. in the following areas:
Turbine Building Walkdown 40'-60" Ele Unit 1 Emergency Switchgear and Relay Room Unit 2 Emergency Switchgear and Relay Room Auxiliary Building Level 13 and 45 Unit 2 Cable Vault and Tunnel Based on the i.nspectors observation qf the above raceway fire breaks it appears that the fire breaks are being properly maintained in a satisfactory condition.
,
The total flooding CO2 systems, protecting the Unit 2* cable vaults and tunnels and the total flooding Halon Systems protecting the Units 1 and 2 emergency switchgear and relay rooms were inspected and found to be in servic The following eight hour emergency lighting units were inspected:
Unit N ELT84B 1ELT74 1ELT15 ELT118 lELT 2ELT 90 Location Unit 1 Emergency Seitchgear Room Unit 1 Cable Vault Unit 1 Cable Vault Unit 1 Cable Vault Auxiliary Building Auxiliary Building These units were in service, the lamps were properly aligned and appeared to be properly maintaine The inspector verified that the equipment required for operator act i ans described in the p 1 ant fire contingency actions procedures was stored in its 1 designated,~cation in the service
- buildin In addition, the inspector verified that the equipment needed to facilitate replacement of the RHR and CCW pumps, if they were damaged in a fire, was being maintained in the site warehous The equipment is described in procedure EEMP-C-CC-153, Emergency Installation of Temporary Component Cooling Water Pump Motor The equipment was found to be maintained and readily available in a designated area of the warehous.
Action on Previous Inspection Finding (Closed) Violation (280,281/88-07-0l), Use of Fire Protection Equipment for Non Fire Protection Activitie Corrective actions included inspection and restocking of hose house Distribution of memorandums by superin-tendent of operation prohibiting the use of fire protection equipment, and new co 1 ored coded hoses were procured for use by maintenance and operations personne During this inspection, the inspector visually inspected the hose houses and verified that the equipment was being properly maintaine (Closed) IFI 85-37-01, Firefighting Preplans Lack Brigade Guidance in Smoke Control, Fire Damage Control and Fire Suppression Water Runnoff Contro The inspector reviewed the revised firefighting preplans and verified these preplans contained the required informatio (Closed) Unresolved Item 87-07-02 and 88-07-02, Correct Deficiencies in Fire Contingency Action (FCA) Procedures and Conduct a Detailed Review of a 11 Fi re Contingency Action Procedure The inspector reviewed the revised FCA procedures and verified that proper corrective actions had been implemente (Closed) Unresolved Item 87-07-03 and 88-07-03, Provide Practical Shift Crew Training on Fire Contingency Action (FCA) Procedure During this inspection the inspector reviewed the shift crew training for all operators and verified.that all operators had received proper trainin.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on February 17, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection result The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to of reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.