IR 05000250/1987030

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-250/87-30,50-251/87-30,50-335/87-13 & 50-389/87-12 on 870629-0701.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Actions on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters & Insp Findings
ML17342A780
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie, Turkey Point, 05000000
Issue date: 07/14/1987
From: Belisle G, Mellen L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML17342A779 List:
References
50-250-87-30, 50-251-87-30, 50-335-87-13, 50-389-87-12, NUDOCS 8707240130
Download: ML17342A780 (10)


Text

~pg REgII (4 Aqua0 Cy

v

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.

ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:

50-250/87-30, 50-251/87-30, 50-335/87-13 and 50-389/87-12 Licensee:

Florida Power and. Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.:

50-250, 50-251 50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.:

DPR-31 and. DPR-41 DPR-67 and NPF-16 Facility Names:

Turkey Point 3 and

St.

Lucie 1 and

Inspection Conducted:

June 29, 1987 at 'Turkey Point June 30 - July 1, 1987 at St.

Lucie Inspector:

L. S.

ellen Approved by:

G. A.

elisle, hief equality Assurance Program Section Division of Reactor Safety 7 /

D te Signed D te'Signed SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of licensee actions on previously identified enforcement matters and licensee actions on previously identified inspection findings.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

8707240130 870714 PDR ADOCK 05000250

PDR

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • J. Arias, Regulatory Compliance, Supervisor

"S. Franzore, Technical Licensing

"D. Grandge, Operations Superintendent

  • R. Hart, Licensing Engineer
  • P. Higgins, Technical Licensing
  • C. Wethy, Site Vice-President

"*G. Boissy, Plant Manager

~~C. Pell, Technical Staff Supervisor

"*M. Rhoades, Corrective Action Report Coordinator

    • N. Roos, Quality Control
    • D. Sipos, Services Manager Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspectors

"J. MacDonald, Resident Inspector, Turkey Point

"K. VanDyne, Resident Inspector, Turkey Point

"Attended Turkey Point exit interview.

"*Attended St.

Lucie exit interview.

2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 29, 1987, with Turkey Point personnel and on July 1, 1987, with St.

Lucie personnel.

No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)

a

~

(Closed) Violation 335/84-12-01 and 389/84-14-01:

Failure To Include Gages In The Calibration Program.

The licensee's response dated July 2, 1984, was considered acceptable by Region II.

The inspector reviewed the following procedures:

Instrument and Control (IKC) Procedure 2-1400064F, Installed Plant Instrumentation Calibration (Flow), Revision

18C Procedure 2-1'400064L, Installed Plant Instrumentation Calibration (Level), Revision

IKC Procedure 2-1400064P, Installed Plant Instrumentation Calibration (Pressure),

Revision

IKC Procedure 2-1400064T, Installed Plant Instrumentation Calibration (Temperature),

Revision

IKC Procedure 2-1400153, Reactor Protection System Engineering Safeguards System Loop Instrument Calibration The procedures contained the calibration requirements for the charging pump suction gage, which was the subject of the violation.

Additionally, the inspector verified that selected gages in the containment spray system, the auxiliary feedwater system, the diesel generator transfer pump system, and the safety injection system were in the calibration program.

The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full extent of the violation, taken action to correct current conditions, and developed corrective actions needed to preclude recurrence of similar problems.

Corrective actions stated in the licensee response have been implemented.

b.

(Closed) Violation 335/84-12-02 and 389/84-14-02:

Failure To Audit To Necessary Depth.

The licensee's response dated July 2, 1984, was considered acceptable by Region II.

c

~

The inspector reviewed the results of Audit gSL-OPS-84-329 conducted from September 11, 1984, through October 23, 1984, in the measuring and test equipment (MKTE) area.

The audit was indepth and identified five unsatisfactory findings.

The inspector verified that selected corrective actions for these findings were adequate.

The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full extent of the violation, taken action to correct current conditions, and developed corrective actions needed to preclude recurrence of similar problems.

Corrective actions stated in the licensee response have been implemented.

(Closed)

Unresolved Item 335,389/85-19-02:

Technical Manual Control.

The inspector reviewed Administrative Procedure 0005724, Operating Experience Feedback, Revision 9, which provides'or the collection and disposition of technical information.

It also provides for implementing the Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee Vendor Equipment Technical Information Program.

Additionally, the inspector interviewed document control and guality Control personnel on the control of vendor manuals -including manual updating and distributio The program in place appears adequate; however, the engineering time to evaluate changes could be improved.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection 5.

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings (92701)

a.

(Closed)

Inspector Followup Item 389/82-45-01, Failure To Accomplish Welding In Accordance With Approved Field Change Request Drawings And To Provide Non-unique Weld Travellers For The Subject Weld.

b.

The inspector reviewed Plant Construction Procedure CPL:ASP-6, Welding Control, Revision 5, and General Maintenance Procedure M-0400, Revision 9.

The inspector interviewed site supervisors in the plant and backfit welding groups.

In backfit welding, all welds must have either a unique or non-unique weld traveler.

In plant, welding, all welds must have either a unique weld traveler or be s'pecifically exempted by the site'elding supervisor.

The procedures are clear and appear to adequately address the issues in this inspector followup item.

(Closed)

Inspector Followup Items 335/84-09-06 and 389/84-12-06:

Level "A" Storeroom Temperature And Humidity Monitoring Program.

The inspector reviewed a licensee's inter-office correspondence dated April 4, 1986, which listed actions to be taken to ensure level

"A" storage was within required limits for temperature and humidity.

The inspector verified that temperature and humidity are checked daily, there is a continuously reading chart recorder for both, the records

"are properly maintained, and the instruments were properly calibrated.

(Closed)

Inspector Followup Item 335/84-09-04 and 389/84-12-04:

Develop And Implement A Program To Control The Use Of Safety-Related Shaft Keys Throughout The Plant (Storeroom and Maintenance)

d.

The inspector reviewed General Maintenance Procedure M-0920, Control of Safety-Related Shaft Keys, Revision 0, which was written to ensure that selection of technically adequate shaft key material and quality level is maintained and documented.

This procedure appears to adequately address the inspectors concerns.

(Closed), Inspector Followup Item 335/84-09-05 and 389/84-12-05:

Develop And Implement A Program To Control The Use Of Commercial Grade Aerosols.

The inspector reviewed Administrative Procedure 0010503, Revision 1,

which delineates the program for control of all hazardous chemicals on site including aerosol s.

This procedure appears to adequately addresses the control and use of commercial grade aerosol (Closed)

Inspector Followup Item 250/84-33-03 and 251/84-34-03:

Review Of Q-List After Issuance.

The inspector reviewed Quality Instruction (QI) 2.3, Classification of Structures, Systems and Components, Revision 2, which provides for the classification of structures, systems, and components and Admini,strative Procedure O-ADM-701, Plant Work Order Preparation, dated February 10, 1987..

QI 2.3 appears to have adequately addressed additions to the Q List and preparation of the Q List.

Procedure 0-ADM-701 appears to have adequately addressed the use of the Q-List in preparation of Plant Work Orders.

Additionally, the inspector reviewed the current the Turkey Point Q-List and examined selected entries.

In the areas, inspected, the Q-List program appears adequate.