IR 05000024/2013404

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 0500024-13-404 & 05000286-13-404, for 12/12/2013, Indian Point
ML14024A460
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point, 05000024  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/24/2014
From: Anthony Dimitriadis
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Ventosa J
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Dimitriadis A
References
FOIA/PA-2016-0148 IR-13-404
Download: ML14024A460 (20)


Text

UNITED STATES anuary 24, 2014

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER: NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000247/2013404 AND 05000286/2013404

Dear Mr. Ventosa:

On December 12, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security inspection at your Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC), Units 2 and 3. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on December 12, 2013, with Mr. Walpole, Manager, Regulatory Affairs and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Three NRC identified findings and one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Baseline Security Significance Determination Process) were identified during this inspection. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the area.

All of these findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest any NCV in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Indian Point Energy Center.

Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, the transmittal document is decontrolled. Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Human Performance and one cross-cutting aspect was assigned in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution.

Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned in the area of Human Performance because the licensee failed to provide training of personnel and sufficient qualified personnel, to maintain work hours within working hours guidelines H.2(b) and did not ensure supervisory and management oversight of work activities such that nuclear security was supported H.4(c). One cross-cutting aspect was assigned in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee failed to implement a corrective action program with a low threshold for identifying issues completely, accurately, and in a timely manner commensurate with their security significance [P.1 (a)]. If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at the Indian Point Energy Center, Units 2 and 3.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d) (1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information -

Withhold from Public Disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1)

and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b) (1) (ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 cc w/o encl; w/o OUO-SRI: Distribution via ListServ cc w/encl; w/OUO-SRI:

D. Gagnon, Site Security Manager J. Hauer, Commissioner, NY State Div. of Homeland Security and Emergency Services A. Peterson, State Liaison Office Designee, NY State Energy Research and Development Authority Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Human Performance and one cross-cutting aspect was assigned in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution.

Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned in the area of Human Performance because the licensee failed to provide training of personnel and sufficient qualified personnel, to maintain work hours within working hours guidelines H.2(b) and did not ensure supervisory and management oversight of work activities such that nuclear security was supported H.4(c). One cross-cutting aspect was assigned in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee failed to implement a corrective action program with a low threshold for identifying issues completely, accurately, and in a timely manner commensurate with their security significance [P.1 (a)]. If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at the Indian Point Energy Center, Units 2 and 3.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d) (1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information -

Withhold from Public Disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1)

and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b) (1) (ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 Non-Public Designation Category: MD 3.4 Non-Public A.3 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\Plant Support Branch 1\Security\2013 IR Final\IPEC\IPEC 2013404-Rev3 Pub WO OUO-SRI.docx ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML14024A460 (Cover letter) ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML14024A325 (Cover letter w/encl)

Cover Letter: Non-Sensitive Publicly Available SUNSI Review Sensitive Non-Publicly Available Cover Letter w/Enclosure: Non-Sensitive Publicly Available SUNSI Review Sensitive Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRS RI/DRP RI/DRS NAME JCherubini/JC JBream/JB ABurritt/AB ADimitriadis/AD WSchmidt/WS DATE 1/24/14 1/24/14 1/23/14 1/24/13 1/23/14 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i Distribution (via E-mail)

W. Dean, RA D. Lew, DRA M. Scott, DRP E. Benner, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Trapp, DRS A. Burritt, DRP T. Setzer, DRP L. McKown, DRP J. Petch, DRP S. Stewart, DRP, SRI Ami Patel, DRP, RI T. Lamb, DRP, RI (Actg)

D. Hochmuth, DRP, AA B. Rini, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resources Distribution w/encl; w/OUO-SRI: (via E-Mail)

J. Cherubini, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS R. Albert, NSIR S. Coker, NSIR C. Johnson, NSIR B. Desai, DRS, RII R. Skokowski, DRS, RIII M. Haire, DRS, RIV