ML20128M194

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 960506-10.Violation Noted; Licensee Failed to Control SGI as Required on 951105
ML20128M194
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/09/1996
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128M120 List:
References
05-423-96-06, 5-423-96-6, 50-245-96-06, 50-245-96-6, 50-336-96-06, 50-336-96-6, NUDOCS 9610160020
Download: ML20128M194 (2)


Text

.- - _ - . . - _ _ - - .- _- - . - . . . _ - - - - . - . - _- - - . . _ - - _ .

1 i

l NOTICE OF VIOLATION

)

l Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Docket Nos.: 50-245 Millstone Nuclear Power Station 50-336

, 50-423 l

l License Nos.: DPR-21 DPR-65 l NPF-49 During an NRC inspection conducted from May 6-10,1996, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," (60 FR 34381; June 30,1995), the violation is listed below:

Part 73.21(d)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires, in part, that, while in use, matter containing Safeguards Information shall be under the control of an authorized individual, and, while unattended, Safeguards Information shall be stored in a locked security storage container.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to control Safeguards Information (SGI) as required on November 5,1995, when audit reports containing SGI were left unattended in a copy room, and again on December 15,1995, when a work package containing SGI wis turned over to an employee who was not cleared for SGl.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement Ill).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Northeast Utilities is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adcauately  :

addresses the required response.  !

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a .

Demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, l suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act,42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

9610160020 961009 PDR ADOCK 05000245 G PDR i

- - . - - _ _ _. - - . - . - . - . - . . - - . - . - . . . - - - _ . . . - . - ~ . . . - . - - . - - . . _

b 2

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards )
information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it j .necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information
that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public. '

i e

4

! Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, this 9th day of October 1996.

l e

l i

i i

?

b j

3

)

i a

. - .