ML20056G368
| ML20056G368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 08/26/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056G362 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-336-93-13, NUDOCS 9309030048 | |
| Download: ML20056G368 (2) | |
Text
,
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Docket No.
50-336 Waterford, Connecticut License No. DPR-65 Millstone Unit 2 During an NRC inspection conducted on June 14-25, 1993, one violation of NRC requirements was identi6ed. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Pan 2, Appendix C, (1993), the violation is stated below:
Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI of Tule 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires, in part, that "a test program shall be established to assure that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service and is identified and performed in accordance with written test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents. Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satis 6ed."
Northeast Utilities Quality Assuranc^ Program Topical Report, Section 11.2.4 states, in part, that " documented test results are evaluated against the predetermined acceptance criteria and the acceptance status of the test is documented."
Contrary to the above, as of June 14, 1993, dynamic tests for seventeen safety-related motor-operated valves (MOVs) were performed in accordance with test procedures that did not incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits for determining operability prior to returning the tested MOV hack to service. Additionally, the December 1992 test results for sixteen of these MOVs were not evaluated and documented adequately at the time of this inspection. As a result, the operability determinations for these sixteen valves remained undocumented.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company is hereby required to sabmit a written statement of explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATrN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region 1, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice of Violation within 30 days of the receipt date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation. This reply shouh, be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and
}
W W MM G
F Appendix A 2
(4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
x a
t
- - - -