ML20059G540

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-266/93-17 & 50-301/93-17.Corrective Actions:Nrc Inspector Observed Visitors Not Continuously Escorted,While within Protected Area.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2))

ML20059G540
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	01/18/1994
From:	Link B WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NRC-94-003, NRC-94-3, VPNPD-94-006, VPNPD-94-6, NUDOCS 9401240215
Download: ML20059G540 (2)

Text

.*

Wisconsin l (([(hC[ffC' SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

.l POWER COMPANY I

231 W Mcngon PO Bon 2046. Mho@ee WI 53201 2046 (M4J 2212345 i VPNPD 94-006 -)

l NRC 94-003 January 18, 1994 Document Control Desk .

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '

Mail Station F1-137 ,

Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen: ,

DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION INSPECTION REPORT 50-266/93017(DRSS) AND 50-301/93017(DRSS) '

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2 In a letter from Ms. C. D. Pederson, dated December 17, 1993, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission forwarded to Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WE) , licensee for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, the results of a physical security inspection performed by Mr. T. J. Madeda. The inspection was conducted from November 15  ;

through 18, 1993, The inspection reports, 50-266/93017(DRSS) and 50-301/ 93 017 (DRSS) , included a Notice of Violation (NOV).

The NOV describes a violation of Section 3.F of Amendments 37 and 42 of Facility Operating Licenses No._DPR-24 and No. DPR-27.

Section 3.F requires WE to maintain in effect and fully implement all provisions of the NRC approved Physical Security and Contingency Plans, including amendments and changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p).

Section 3.1 of the approved PBNP Security Plan requires that individuals who have not been authorized unescorted access, shall be continuously escorted, i.e. observed, while within the protected area. This NOV states, " Contrary to the above, on November 17, 1993, an NRC inspector observed two visitors who were not continuously escorted, i.e. observed, while_within the protected area".

i We have reviewed this NOV and, pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, have prepared a written response of explanation  ;

concerning the identified violation. Our written response is

• included as an attachment to this letter.

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION -

gC '

9401240215 940118 [ j' s I PDR ADOCK 05000266 i i NsubsWmofMinwsinDm Copvatkw '

i SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Document Control Desk January 18, 1994 Page 2 i

The subje:t matter of the attachment to this letter is safeguards  ;

information and is considered to be exempt from disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21(c) (2) . Consequently, it is requested that the attachment to this letter not be placed in the Public Document Room and be withheld from other public '

. disclosure. Once' separated from the attachment this letter does not contain safeguards information.

If you have any questions or require additional information regarding our response, please contact us.

Sincerely, 9

Bob ink Vice esident Nuclear Power  ;

cc: NRC Regional Administrator, Region III NRC Resident Inspector 3

Enclosure h

k i

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION t

- - - # ,