Similar Documents at Hatch |
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARML24005A1142024-01-0505 January 2024 Recommendation for 2023-301 Cr/Sim 3 (Emergency Depress the Reactor Using Main Steam Line Drains) NL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 A000412, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Renewal Application2021-12-0202 December 2021 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Renewal Application NL-20-1295, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Non-Compliance Involving Radwaste Cask 3-60B2020-12-14014 December 2020 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Non-Compliance Involving Radwaste Cask 3-60B ML20303A1782020-09-29029 September 2020 Submittal of Revision 38 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-18-0863, CFR 50.55a Request for Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-05-04 Implementation of BWRVIP Documents in Lieu of Certain 8-N-1 and 8-N-2 Examinations2018-06-21021 June 2018 CFR 50.55a Request for Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-05-04 Implementation of BWRVIP Documents in Lieu of Certain 8-N-1 and 8-N-2 Examinations NL-18-0506, Failure to Observe the Certificate of Compliance Condition of the 8-120B Cask Pre-Shipment Leak Test2018-04-16016 April 2018 Failure to Observe the Certificate of Compliance Condition of the 8-120B Cask Pre-Shipment Leak Test NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-18-0282, Enclosure 1: NFPA 805 LAR Transition Report for Edwin I. Hatch2018-04-0404 April 2018 Enclosure 1: NFPA 805 LAR Transition Report for Edwin I. Hatch NL-17-1916, Pressure and Temperature Limits Report2017-11-27027 November 2017 Pressure and Temperature Limits Report ML18012A0582017-10-31031 October 2017 NEDO-33884, Revision 0, Gnf Fecrai ATF Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. NL-18-0026, NEDO-33884, Revision 0, Gnf Fecrai Atf Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.2017-10-31031 October 2017 NEDO-33884, Revision 0, Gnf Fecrai Atf Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. NL-18-0026, NEDO-33884, Revision 0, Gnf Fecrai ATF Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.2017-10-31031 October 2017 NEDO-33884, Revision 0, Gnf Fecrai ATF Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. NL-18-0026, NEDO-33883, Revision 0, Gnf Armor Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.2017-09-30030 September 2017 NEDO-33883, Revision 0, Gnf Armor Lead Test Assembly for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. NL-17-1255, Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Limited-Scope High Frequency Confirmation Evaluation2017-08-22022 August 2017 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Limited-Scope High Frequency Confirmation Evaluation NL-17-0955, Alternatives HNP-ISI-ALT-05-05 and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-062017-06-0505 June 2017 Alternatives HNP-ISI-ALT-05-05 and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-06 ML17069A2402017-04-13013 April 2017 Mitigating Strategies Assessment (CAC Nos. MF7932 and MF7933) - Redacted ML16356A0172016-12-16016 December 2016 Information Report for Lead Use Assemblies NL-16-2466, Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report Completion2016-12-15015 December 2016 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report Completion NL-16-1136, Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Limited-Scope Low Frequency Evaluation2016-08-10010 August 2016 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Limited-Scope Low Frequency Evaluation NL-16-0463, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model, Annual Report for 2015 and Significant Change/Error Report2016-04-0101 April 2016 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model, Annual Report for 2015 and Significant Change/Error Report NL-15-2010, E.I. Hatch - Submits 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Non-Conformance Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2015-11-0202 November 2015 E.I. Hatch - Submits 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Non-Conformance Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B NL-15-1461, Submittal of 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2015-08-21021 August 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B ML15097A4242015-04-27027 April 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f), Seismic Hazard Reevaluations Relating to Recommendation 2.1 of the NTTF Review ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis ML14335A1372015-03-25025 March 2015 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) NL-14-1989, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report - Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.12014-12-30030 December 2014 Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report - Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 NL-14-1876, Proposed Lnservice Inspection Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-HDPE-01, Version 2.0, Conceptual Design Information Package2014-11-24024 November 2014 Proposed Lnservice Inspection Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-HDPE-01, Version 2.0, Conceptual Design Information Package NL-14-1245, 10 CFR 26.719(c) Report: False Negative Results for a Blind Performance Test Sample2014-08-22022 August 2014 10 CFR 26.719(c) Report: False Negative Results for a Blind Performance Test Sample ML14223A7942014-07-31031 July 2014 Enclosure 2 - Non-Proprietary Gnf Report GNF-001N6296-R1-NP, Gnf Additional Information Regarding the Requested Changes to the Technical Specification SLMCPR, Hatch 2 Cycle 24 ML14155A4052014-06-30030 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (TAC MF0234-35) ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 ML14155A3612014-06-0606 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0343, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0326, Units 1 and 2, Recommendation 2.1 Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report, Requested by NRC Letter Dated March 12, 20122014-03-0606 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Recommendation 2.1 Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report, Requested by NRC Letter Dated March 12, 2012 ML13364A2022014-02-27027 February 2014 Interim Staff Evaluation Related to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 (Mitigation Strategies) ML14045A1472014-02-12012 February 2014 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, TAC Nos.: MF0712 and MF0713 NL-13-1898, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2013-08-30030 August 2013 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B ML13193A3662013-08-0707 August 2013 Request for Concurrence on the Effects of the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 on the Federally-Listed Endangered Species Altamaha Spinymussel NL-13-0172, Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to 3/12/2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2013-02-27027 February 2013 Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to 3/12/2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) NL-13-0214, Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events..2013-02-27027 February 2013 Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events.. ML13115A4732013-01-31031 January 2013 GNF-0000-0079-7396NP, Rev. 6, Technical Basis Supporting GNF-Ziron Lead Test Assembly Introduction Into the Hatch Nuclear Plant, March 2008 NL-13-0402, GNF-0000-0079-7396NP, Rev. 6, Technical Basis Supporting GNF-Ziron Lead Test Assembly Introduction Into the Hatch Nuclear Plant, March 20082013-01-31031 January 2013 GNF-0000-0079-7396NP, Rev. 6, Technical Basis Supporting GNF-Ziron Lead Test Assembly Introduction Into the Hatch Nuclear Plant, March 2008 ML12355A6332012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11 ML12355A6312012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 11 ML12355A0592012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 11 ML12355A0562012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 11 ML12355A0552012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 11 ML12355A0542012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 11 2024-01-05
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARML24005A1142024-01-0505 January 2024 Recommendation for 2023-301 Cr/Sim 3 (Emergency Depress the Reactor Using Main Steam Line Drains) NL-18-0863, CFR 50.55a Request for Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-05-04 Implementation of BWRVIP Documents in Lieu of Certain 8-N-1 and 8-N-2 Examinations2018-06-21021 June 2018 CFR 50.55a Request for Alternative HNP-ISI-ALT-05-04 Implementation of BWRVIP Documents in Lieu of Certain 8-N-1 and 8-N-2 Examinations NL-18-0506, Failure to Observe the Certificate of Compliance Condition of the 8-120B Cask Pre-Shipment Leak Test2018-04-16016 April 2018 Failure to Observe the Certificate of Compliance Condition of the 8-120B Cask Pre-Shipment Leak Test NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-0955, Alternatives HNP-ISI-ALT-05-05 and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-062017-06-0505 June 2017 Alternatives HNP-ISI-ALT-05-05 and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-06 ML17069A2402017-04-13013 April 2017 Mitigating Strategies Assessment (CAC Nos. MF7932 and MF7933) - Redacted ML16356A0172016-12-16016 December 2016 Information Report for Lead Use Assemblies NL-16-0463, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model, Annual Report for 2015 and Significant Change/Error Report2016-04-0101 April 2016 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model, Annual Report for 2015 and Significant Change/Error Report NL-15-1461, Submittal of 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2015-08-21021 August 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B ML15097A4242015-04-27027 April 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f), Seismic Hazard Reevaluations Relating to Recommendation 2.1 of the NTTF Review ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis ML14335A1372015-03-25025 March 2015 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) NL-14-1989, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report - Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.12014-12-30030 December 2014 Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report - Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 NL-14-1245, 10 CFR 26.719(c) Report: False Negative Results for a Blind Performance Test Sample2014-08-22022 August 2014 10 CFR 26.719(c) Report: False Negative Results for a Blind Performance Test Sample ML14155A4052014-06-30030 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (TAC MF0234-35) ML14155A3612014-06-0606 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0326, Units 1 and 2, Recommendation 2.1 Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report, Requested by NRC Letter Dated March 12, 20122014-03-0606 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Recommendation 2.1 Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report, Requested by NRC Letter Dated March 12, 2012 NL-13-1898, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2013-08-30030 August 2013 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B ML13193A3662013-08-0707 August 2013 Request for Concurrence on the Effects of the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 on the Federally-Listed Endangered Species Altamaha Spinymussel NL-13-0172, Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to 3/12/2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2013-02-27027 February 2013 Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to 3/12/2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) NL-13-0214, Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events..2013-02-27027 February 2013 Southern Nuclear Operating Company'S Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events.. ML12355A0502012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 11 NL-12-2268, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 1 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 1 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 9 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 9 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 11 ML12355A0512012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 1 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 1 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 11 NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 11 ML12355A6332012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11 ML12356A4102012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 9 of 11 ML12356A4092012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 11 ML12356A4082012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 11 ML12355A6662012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 11 NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 112012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 11 ML12355A6622012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 11 ML12355A6372012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 1 of 11 ML12355A6352012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 11 ML12355A6342012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 11 ML12355A0522012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 11 ML12355A6312012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 11 ML12355A0592012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 11 ML12355A0582012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 11 2024-01-05
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheetn of 6 Status: YM N[-] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-CO06C Equip. ClassW 12 Equipment Description DG 2C AIR COMPRESSOR Location:
Bldg. DIESEL FloorEl. 130. Room, Area DIESEL GEN ROOM 2C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing.
Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an itemof equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring sucIh verification)?
Y-I NM.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration Consistent.with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the itemis one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NO UEF N/Ar-YN NEI UI N/AEl Y[ NEI UE N/AEl YE NE- UE- NIAZ YN NO UEF I Enter the equipment classname from Appendix B:. Classes of Equipment.
Page 167 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status:. Y1 NEI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-C006C Equip. Class Equipment Description DG 2C AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YED NE] UI-] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur- N/AE'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?The flex conduit attached to the equipment as shown in photograph 3 is in contact with the sharp edge of a supporting angle. This condition is not considered adverse in a seismic event, due to the relative small duration of vibration.
Long term fretting on the conduit may occur during operation when high frequency vibrations are constantly present.CR 515119 was created to address this condition.
10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NO UE N/AE YN NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be. added as necessary)
There is a missing screw in the equipment housing as shown in picture 4. CR 515119 was created to address this issue.Walkby for this equipment is addressed in 2R43-SOO1 C.Date: 09/10/2012 09/10/2012 Page 168 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U[-]Equipment ID No. 2R43-CO6C
-Equip. Class, 12 Equipment Description DO 2C AIR COMPRESSOR Photographs 1: Equipment MPL # (2R43-CO06C)
Page 169 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 2: Equipment Elevation (2R43-C006C)
Page 170 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 3: Flex Conduit Bearing on Angle (2R43-CO06C)
Page 171 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 4: Housing Screw Missing (2R43-C006C)
Page 172 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: Y NI-] UI]Seismic Wal kdown: Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID)No. 2R43-COO5A Equip.Equipment Description DG 2A AIR COMPRESSOI Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area 2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown:
of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the-end of this checkiIst for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage:
configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YLI NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent; broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NEI U[- N/AL]YN Nil U[] N/A[]Y! NEI Ut- N/A--YEI Nil UE- N/AZ YN NEI UEi Enter the equipment class name. from Appendix B: Classesof Equipment.
Page 173 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown.
Checklist (SWO)Equipment ID No. 2R43-COO5A
-Equip.Equipment:Description DG 2A AIR COMPRESSOJ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Fluorescent light bulbs may fall and hit the equipment.However, this credible scenario will not result in significant damage to the compressor since it is rugged and the light bulb is very light 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to .avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI ULI N/AEl YZ NEI UEI- N/A[J YZý NEI UE3 N/AF YN NEI UI-Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages. may be added as necessary)
Area walk by is included with the package of generator 2A, 2R43-SOO1A.
Page 174 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-COO5A Equip. Class, 12 Equipment Description DG 2A AIR COMPRESSOR NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN Nn] Ul-]Photographs Page 175 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 176 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 6 Status: YE] NZ Un[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-CO05C Equip. Class' 12 Equipment Description DG 2C AIR COMPRESSOR Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GEN ROOM 2C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is providedat the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YEi NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?A potential seismic condition was observed.
Grout is missing from under the southeast anchor of the component pad (see photograph 3).CR 515115 was written to address this condition.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistentwith plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
See response to question 4.YO NEI UIE N/AE YO NEI U[-- N/AE YE NO UE- N/AE-YEi NEI UEi N/A9 YEI NI UEi IEnter the equipment class name from.Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 177 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[I -NO U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-C005C Equip. Class, 12 Equipment Description DG 2C AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects 7. Are, soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YN NUI UEI N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NIl U[] N/Al]and masonry block Walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?The flex conduit attached to the equipment as shown in photograph 3 is in contact with the sharp edge of a supporting angle. This condition is not considered adverse in a seismic event, due to the relative small duration of vibration.
Long term fretting on the conduit may occur duning operation when high frequency vibrations are constantly present.CR 515118 was created to address this condition.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN N[I U]- N/AEl YNl NCI UI-Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEl UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added. as necessary)
Walkby for this equipment is addressed in 2R43-SOO IC.Date: 09/10/20012 09/10/2012 Page 178 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-COO5C
-Equip. Class, 12 Equipment Description DG 2C AIR COMPRESSOR NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YE] NM U[]Photographs 1: Equipment MPL # (2R43-CO05C)
Page 179 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet A of 6 2: Equipment Elevation (2R43-CO05C)
Page 180 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 3: Missing Grout Condition (2R43-CO05C)
Page 181 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 4: Flex Conduit on Sharp Angle (2R43-CO05C)
Page 182 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN N1] ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C71-S001A Equip. Classi Equipment Description RPS MG Set A Motor Generator Location:
Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 13_0 Room, Area C124 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end, of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configurationverification required (i.e., isthe item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment is anchored to the building structure with vibration isolators.
- 3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage freel of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is, one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free, of potentially:
adverse seismic conditions?
Y0 NO- Ut] N/AL YZ NE] U-] N/AU YZ NIl U-] N/AU YE] NEI UI] N/AZ YN NE]I U Enter the equipment class name from Appendix .B: Classes of.Equipment.
Page 183 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C71-SOOIA Equip. Class,.Equipment Description RI'S MG Set A, Motor Generator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The seismic capacity of the Concrete Block Walls C130-47E, C-139-54A, C130-51B, and C130-52A surrounding the component has been verified via drawing H-40383, Rev. 2 and Hatch Unit 2, UFSAR Table 318-20.There is afluorescent light fixture without a cover located over the component.
The light is tied to the ceiling; so during a seismic event, only the bulb could fall. The motor generator is very rugged and is judged to have sufficient strength as to make a possible impact between the motor generator and the bulb will be insignificant.
Therefore, it is judged to be seismically adequate by the SWE's.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Motion of the vibration isolators during a-seismic eent is considered small. Therefore, the flexibility of the attached lines is judged acceptable by:the SWE's.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentjfree of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO- U-1 N/AC YE NC] UC] N/AC]YO NEI UC" N/AEI YN NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions 11 .Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UC]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
None Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/06/2012 09/06/2012 Page 184 of 394 0 0 It W.0 U)0-I 0-o Co G)Co CD 0 0 CD CD 0-I z C/)Q Ch C.)0-0 (D CD.0, uQ-I CD~r1.0 CD z 0-4 cj~0.0 to Ci2-4 F-9Oh Z: 0l j-4 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2- Equipment Elevation (2C71-SOO1A)
Page 186 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 -Light Fixture Above Motor Generator (2C71 -S00 A)Page 187 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ NR] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlID No. 2C71-SOO1B Equip. Class, 13 Equipment Description, RPS MG Set B Motor Gen Location:
Bldg. CONTROL FloorEEL 130 Room, Area TE-T12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used.to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the: item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such. verification)?
YL- NI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that ismore than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note:. This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage.
configuration verification is required..).
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NEI ULý N/AUl YZ NEI UI- N/AU-YZ NEl U-- N/AU1 Yi NU UUl N/AZ Y9 NUIU Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 188 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEI[ U[-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Equipment ID No. 2C71-SOt1B Equip. Class, Equipment Description RPS MG Set B Motor Gen Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impactby nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The seismic capacity of the Concrete Block Walls C130-47E, C130-50B, C130-51A and C130-54A surrounding the Motor Generator were verified using Drawing H-40383 Rev. 2 and Hatch Unit 2 UFSAR Table 3.8-20. There is afluorescent-light fixture without a cover located over the component.
The light is tied to the ceiling, so during a seismic event, only the bulb could fall. The motor generator is very rugged and is judged to have sufficient strength as to make a possible impact between the motor generator and the bulb insignificant.
Therefore, it is judged to be seismically adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9 NEIl UFI N/AF3 YN NEl UEI- N/AE]YN NI] Ur3 N/AL]YI NE O]l-Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could. YZ N] U--adversely affect the -safety functions of the equipment?
There are a number of drilled holes in the casing of the motor, particularly at anchorage locations.
These holes appear to have been drilled to alter the balance of the motor and are clearly unrelated to component anchorage.
Their presence does not indicate missing anchors or screws. Therefore, there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.
Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
See Component 1C7I-SOO0B for the Area Walk-by Checklist.
Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/17/2012.
09/17/2012 Page 189 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y[ NnI- U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C71-S001B Equip. Class' 13 Equipment Description RPS MG Set B Motor Gen Photogtraphs Figure 1 -Equipment ID No (2C71-SOOIB)
Page 190 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (2C71 -SOO I B)Page 191 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 3 -Flourescent Light over Equipment (2C71 -SOO I B)Page 192 of 394 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 4 -Drilled Holes in Motor Casing (2C71-SOO1B)
Page 193 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YM NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R42-SOO1A Equip.Equipment Description 125/250V Station Battery 2 A Location:
Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 112 Room, Area Unit 2 Station Battery Room 2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the-results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
.2. Is the anchorage free of bent,. broken, missing or loose hardware?There, are several locations where the original anchor bolts have been replaced with a different anchor bolt type, including one location where a second hole was drilled in the frame. This replacement is addressed in the SEWS package, andso is acceptable.
The empty hole is for an abandoned anchor bolt, and the -existing anchors are consistent with the plant documentation, so there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.
- 3. Is: the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
There is some acid residue on the bolts from the batteries, but the paint has prevented any significant corrosion of the bolts. Since the corrosion is only on the surface, there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
SEWS Package 2R42-SOOIA (dated 2-14-94)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NO YN NEl UO N/A[--YZ NEI U[-" N/A-YZ NEI UE- N/A-YN NO ULI N/AZ YN NEI UO rEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classesof Equipment Page 194 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y1M N-] U[]Seismic Walkdown Chec~klilst (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R42-SOOIA
-Equip. Class'Equipment Descriptioni 125/250 V Station Battery 2A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UL] N/AU YN NOl UEI N/AU YN NE] UE] N/AO-Y[ NEI UUI Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked.for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NEI UOU adversely affect the safetyffunctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
None Evaluatedby:
JohnMcFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/25/2012 09/25/2012 Page 195 of 394
.......~O m t.l .. .. .. >,,, ..-0 (,,) ¢-)o,~X ;r ,-- 0< 0 000-0 -CD m 00 Lo&f"... 1 / --" z 0 tn_CD Z 7 CD a, ;z C4 71 0 El ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (2R42-SOO IA)Page 197 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Figure 3 -Abandoned Anchor Hole (2R42-SOO 1 A)Page 198 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Figure 4 -Mild Acid Residue on Bolts (2R42-S001 A)Page 199 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Figure 5 -Mild Oxidation on Botts (2R42-S001 A)Page 200 of 394