ML100210969

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request-LAR-04-02911(Alternative Source Term)
ML100210969
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/2010
From: Archie J B
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LAR-04-02911, RC-10-0002
Download: ML100210969 (5)


Text

Jeffrey B. Archie Vice President, Nuclear Operations 803.345.4214 January 14, 2010 A SCANA COMPANY RC-10-0002 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir / Madam:

Subject:

VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50/395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST -LAR-04-02911 (ALTERNATIVE SOURCE TERM)

Reference:

1. NRC Letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML092960067) to Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie dated October 26, 2009, "Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 -Request for Additional Information (TAC NO. ME0663)" 2. SCE&G Letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML090720887) (LAR-04-0291
1) from Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie to USNRC Document Control Desk dated February 17, 2009, "License Amendment and Related Technical Specification Changes to Implement Full-Scope Alternative Source Term in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.67" 3. SCE&G Letter (RC-09-0159) from Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie to USNRC Document Control Desk dated December 23, 2009, "Response to Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request -LAR-04-02911 (Alternative Source Term)" South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) hereby submits a supplemental response to the Request for Additional Information (RAI) items identified in the referenced NRC letter (Reference 1). These RAIs resulted from NRC review of LAR-04-02911 (Reference 2)requested by SCE&G. This supplemental response demonstrates acceptable doses for each of the postulated accidents considered in the VCSNS LAR, as previously stated in Reference 3.Attachment I provides the updated dose results. These results supersede the values discussed in the individual accident sections in Attachment 2 to Reference 2 and the summarized values in Attachment 1 to Reference
2. The enclosed CD provides the supporting PAVAN calculations.

Should you have questions, please call Bruce Thompson at (803) 931-5042.A40oi Virgil C. Summer Station -Post Office Box 88

  • Jenkinsville, SC. 29065 -T (803) 345-5209 Document Control Desk CR-04-02911 RC-10-0002 Page 2 of 2 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on Jeffrey B. Ar Vice President, Nuclk Ochie ear Operations JHW/JBA/gr Attachments I & 1 CD c: (without Attachments unless noted)K. B. Marsh S. A. Byrne N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton R. J. White W. M. Cherry T. P. O'Kelley (w/ Attachments)

P. Ledbetter L. A. Reyes (w/ Attachments)

R. E. Martin (w/ Attachments)

NRC Resident Inspector K. M. Sutton NSRC (w/ Attachments)

RTS (CR-04-0291 1)File (813.20)PRSF (RC-10-0002) (w/ Attachments)

Document Control Desk Attachment 1 RC- 10-0002 Page 1 of 3 The Question 6 response in Attachment 1 to Reference 1 (all references for this attachment are listed below on page 2) stated that new Exclusion Area Boundary (EAB) and Low Population Zone (LPZ) doses would be provided to the NRC for each of the postulated accidents considered in the VCSNS February 17, 2009 License Amendment Request (LAR) (Reference 2). These offsite doses would be based on the latest validated three-year meteorological data set described in the responses to RAI questions 1 and 6 in Attachment 1 to Reference

1. The results and relevant discussion are provided below.The latest three-year validated meteorological data set as described in the responses to RAI questions 1 and 6 in Attachment 1 to Reference 1 was used to generate offsite ground-level X/Q'S for potential short term accidental releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere.

Values were determined in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.145 for the 0.5% maximum sector Y/Q and the 5% direction independent value using the PAVAN computer code. The following table is a comparison of the EAB and LPZ X/Q's between the VCSNS February 17, 2009 LAR, the NUREG-0717 SER, and the X/Q's calculated with the latest three-year validated meteorological data set in Reference

3. The Reference 3 results establish the new Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) EAB and LPZ ground-level X/Q'S.Offsite, Ground-Level, EAB and LPZ X&c Comparison Time Period VCSNS LAR NUREG-0717 Reference 3 EAB EAB EAB 0 -2 hours 4.08E-04 3.3E-04 1.24E-04 LPZ LPZ LPZ 0 -2 hours 1.01E-04 N/A 5.06E-05 0 -8 hours 2.37E-05 4.1E-05 2.42E-05 8 -24 hours 2.44E-06 2.6E-05 1.68E-05 1 -4 days 1.11E-06 1.OE-05 7.55E-06 4 -30 days 6.28E-07 2.6E-06 2.40E-06 As shown in the table above, the Reference 3 EAB X/Q decreases compared to the VCSNS LAR.However, all but the LPZ 0 -2 hour X/Q'S increase with the Reference 3 results. The Reference 3 LPZ 0 -2 hour X/Q decreases compared to the VCSNS LAR. This X/Q is only used in the Fuel Handling Accident (FHA). A copy of the PAVAN calculation (Reference
3) is provided in the enclosed CD.The radiological dose calculations in Attachment 10 to Reference 2 were revised to incorporate the new offsite ground-level X/Q's in Reference
3. These VCSNS calculations are listed as References 4 through 9.

Document Control Desk Attachment I RC- 10-0002 Page 2 of 3 Accordingly, the table in Attachment 1 to Reference 2 "Summary of Design Basis Accident Radiological Consequences for AST Calculated Dose Versus RG 1.183 Dose Criteria" is updated below for the new offsite doses. These results also supersede those individual analyses described in detail in Attachment 2 to Reference

2. The previously submitted Control Room (CR) doses remain unchanged, as described in the response to Question 1 in Reference 1.Based upon the results of these analyses, it has been demonstrated that the dose consequences are within NRC regulatory limits for alternative source term (i.e., 10 CFR 50.67 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 19).

References:

1. SCE&G Letter (RC-09-0159) from Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie to NRC Document Control Desk dated December 23, 2009, "Response to Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request -LAR-04-02911 (Alternative Source Term)." 2. SCE&G Letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML090720887) (LAR-04-0291
1) from Mr.Jeffrey B. Archie to NRC Document Control Desk dated February 17, 2009, "License Amendment and Related Technical Specification Changes to Implement Full-Scope Alternative Source Term in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.67." 3. VCSNS Calculation DC00040- 111, "Short Term Accident X/Qs", Revision 0.4. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-097, "Loss of Coolant Accident -AST", Revision 1.5. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-098, "Steam Generator Tube Rupture -AST", Revision 1.6. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-099, "Main Steam Line Break -AST", Revision 1.7. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-100, "Reactor Coolant Pump Locked Rotor -AST", Revision 1.8. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-101, "Rod Ejection -AST", Revision 1.9. VCSNS Calculation DC00040-102, "Fuel Handling Accidents

-AST", Revision 1.

Document Control Desk Attachment 1 RC- 10-0002 Page 3 of 3 Summary of Design Basis Accident Radiological Consequences for AST Calculated Dose Versus RG 1.183 Dose Criteria AST Calculated Dose RG 1.183 Dose Criteria (Rem TEDE) (Rem TEDE)Loss of Coolant CR Operator Dose 1.01 5 Accident EAB Dose 1.48 25 (LOCA) LPZ Dose 0.83 25 Case 1: Concurrent Iodine Spike CR Operator Dose 0.37 5.0 Main Steam EAB Dose 0.24 2.5 Line Break (MSLB) LPZ Dose 0.20 2.5 Case 2: Pre-existing Iodine Spike CR Operator Dose 1.15 .5.0 EAB Dose 0.60 .25 FLPZ Dose 0.54 .25 Case 1: FHA Inside Containment CR Operator Dose 0.76 5.0 EAB Dose 1.30 6.3 Fuent LPZ Dose 0.53 6.3 (FAc)ide Case 2: FHA Inside Fuel Handline Building CR Operator Dose 0.41 5.0 EAB Dose 1.30 6.3 LPZ Dose 0.53 6.3 Case 1: Concurrent Iodine Spike CR Operator Dose 0.37 5.0 CnrlRdEAB Dose 1.31I 6.3 Steam Generator LPZ Dose 0.46 2.5 Tube Rupture PDoe052.(SGTR) Case 2: Pre-existing Iodine Spike CR Operator Dose 1.18 5.0 EAB Dose 0.63 25 LPZ Dose 0.13 25 Locked Rotor CR Operator Dose 2.43 5.0 Accident EAB Dose J 0.67 2.5 (LRA) LPZ Dose 0.66 2.5 Case 1: Containment Release Path CR Operator Dose 1.71 5.0 Control Rod LPZ Dose 1.31 6.3 Ejection Accident PDoe146.(CREA) Case 2: Steam Generator Release Path CR Operator Dose 2.38 5.0 EAB Dose 0.77 6.3 LPZ Dose 0.68 6.37_7::